A spurious printf was added to evp_test.c - probably for debugging
purposes. This actually causes runtime errors in some cases because the
name being printed can be NULL.
Fixes#19814
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19820)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18809)
This PR is based off the contributions in PR #9223 by Jemmy1228.
It has been modified and reworked to:
(1) Work with providers
(2) Support ECDSA and DSA
(3) Add a KDF HMAC_DRBG implementation that shares code with the RAND HMAC_DRBG.
A nonce_type is passed around inside the Signing API's, in order to support any
future deterministic algorithms.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18809)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19201)
Also fix a number of regressions when run against the 3.0.0 FIPS provider
that result from bug fixes.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19201)
Increase the signature's length, that is passed to EVP_DigestSign(). The
implementation should set this parameter back to the actual length, that
has been written.
This (oneshot_digestsign_test_run()) fails for the ed25519/ ed448
implementation of s390 prio the fix. The change in digestsign_test_run()
follows the same pattern and is for collecting bonus points.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18928)
Fixes#16721
This uses AES-ECB to create a counter mode AES-CTR32 (32bit counter, I could
not get AES-CTR to work as-is), and GHASH to implement POLYVAL. Optimally,
there would be separate polyval assembly implementation(s), but the only one
I could find (and it was SSE2 x86_64 code) was not Apache 2.0 licensed.
This implementation lives only in the default provider; there is no legacy
implementation.
The code offered in #16721 is not used; that implementation sits on top of
OpenSSL, this one is embedded inside OpenSSL.
Full test vectors from RFC8452 are included, except the 0 length plaintext;
that is not supported; and I'm not sure it's worthwhile to do so.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18693)
Fixes test error in #18714
This only happens currently during minimal builds.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18737)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_strdup(),
it should be better to check the return value and
return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18592)
EVP_PKEY_derive() should be able to cope with a too big buffer for fixed
size outputs. However, we don't test that.
This change modifies the PKEYKDF tests to ask EVP_PKEY_derive() what the
desired output buffer size is, and as long as the returned value isn't
absurd (indicating that anything goes), the output buffer is made to be
twice as big as what is expected.
Tests #18517
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18533)
(cherry picked from commit a0587aaeff)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18368)
Since the memory allocation may fail, the 'mac_name' and 'controls'
could be NULL.
And the 'mac_name' will be printed in mac_test_run_mac() without check.
Also the result of 'params_n +
sk_OPENSSL_STRING_num(expected->controls)' in
mac_test_run_mac() will be 'params_n - 1' if allocation fails , which
does not make sense.
Therefore, it should be better to check them in order to guarantee the
complete success of initiation.
If fails, we also need to free the 'mdat' to avoid the memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17628)
Including e_os.h with a path from a header file doesn't work well on
certain exotic platform. It simply fails to build.
Since we don't seem to be able to stop ourselves, the better move is
to move e_os.h to an include directory that's part of the inclusion
path given to the compiler.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17641)
The OPENSSL_zalloc() could return NULL pointer if fails.
Add the check for it does make sense, like how digest_test_init() deals
with.
CLA: trivial
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17571)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16918)
This test did not really execute, since usually
the OPENSSL_malloc(0) will fail and prevent the
execution of the KDF.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16444)
If we have an unsupported key type we may get a decode error and
therefore we should detect that.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15504)
For functions that exist in 1.1.1 provide a simple aliases via #define.
Fixes#15236
Functions with OSSL_DECODER_, OSSL_ENCODER_, OSSL_STORE_LOADER_,
EVP_KEYEXCH_, EVP_KEM_, EVP_ASYM_CIPHER_, EVP_SIGNATURE_,
EVP_KEYMGMT_, EVP_RAND_, EVP_MAC_, EVP_KDF_, EVP_PKEY_,
EVP_MD_, and EVP_CIPHER_ prefixes are renamed.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15405)
Change:
EVP_RAND_gettable_ctx_params -> EVP_RAND_CTX_gettable_params
EVP_RAND_settable_ctx_params -> EVP_RAND_CTX_settable_params
Which brings them in line with the other similar functions for other algorithm
types.
Fixes#14880
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14893)
Fixes#14808
Validation checks were moved into EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() which broke
an external negative test. Originally the old code was semi working by checking the peers public key was in the range of other parties p. It was not actually ever
checking that the domain parameters were consistent between the 2
parties. It now checks the parameters match as well as validating the
peers public key.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14823)
Fixes#14401
Note that this moves the public key check out of DH compute_key() since
key validation does not belong inside this primitive..
The check has been moved to the EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() function so that
it generally applies to all exchange operations.. Use EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer_ex()
to disable this behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14717)
A trivial PR to remove some commonly repeated words. It looks like this is
not the first PR to do this.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14420)
