The Unix build was the last to retain the classic build scheme. The
new unified scheme has matured enough, even though some details may
need polishing.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
This takes us away from the idea that we know exactly how our static
libraries are going to get used. Instead, we make them available to
build shareable things with, be it other shared libraries or DSOs.
On the other hand, we also have greater control of when the shared
library cflags. They will never be used with object files meant got
binaries, such as apps/openssl or test/test*.
With unified, we take this a bit further and prepare for having to
deal with extra cflags specifically to be used with DSOs (dynamic
engines), libraries and binaries (applications).
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
All those flags existed because we had all the dependencies versioned
in the repository, and wanted to have it be consistent, no matter what
the local configuration was. Now that the dependencies are gone from
the versioned Makefile.ins, it makes much more sense to use the exact
same flags as when compiling the object files.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Now that we have the foundation for the "unified" build scheme in
place, we add build.info files. They have been generated from the
Makefiles in the same directories. Things that are platform specific
will appear in later commits.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
This was done by the following
find . -name '*.[ch]' | /tmp/pl
where /tmp/pl is the following three-line script:
print unless $. == 1 && m@/\* .*\.[ch] \*/@;
close ARGV if eof; # Close file to reset $.
And then some hand-editing of other files.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Remove lint, tags, dclean, tests.
This is prep for a new makedepend scheme.
This is temporary pending unified makefile, and might help it.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Create Makefile's from Makefile.in
Rename Makefile.org to Makefile.in
Rename Makefiles to Makefile.in
Address review feedback from Viktor and Richard
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
We had updates of certain header files in both Makefile.org and the
Makefile in the directory the header file lived in. This is error
prone and also sometimes generates slightly different results (usually
just a comment that differs) depending on which way the update was
done.
This removes the file update targets from the top level Makefile, adds
an update: target in all Makefiles and has it depend on the depend: or
local_depend: targets, whichever is appropriate, so we don't get a
double run through the whole file tree.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
With no more symlinks, there's no need for those variables, or the links
target. This also goes for all install: and uninstall: targets that do
nothing but copy $(EXHEADER) files, since that's now taken care of by the
top Makefile.
Also, removed METHTEST from test/Makefile. It looks like an old test that's
forgotten...
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Rather than making include/openssl/foo.h a symlink to
crypto/foo/foo.h, this change moves the file to include/openssl/foo.h
once and for all.
Likewise, move crypto/foo/footest.c to test/footest.c, instead of
symlinking it there.
Originally-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
This removes all code surrounded by '#ifdef undef'
One case is left: memmove() replaced by open-coded for loop,
in crypto/stack/stack.c That needs further review.
Also removed a couple of instances of /* dead code */ if I saw them
while doing the main removal.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
sure they are available in opensslconf.h, by giving them names starting
with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making
sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with
opensslconf.h.
I've checked fairly well that nothing breaks with this (apart from
external software that will adapt if they have used something like
NO_KRB5), but I can't guarantee it completely, so a review of this
change would be a good thing.
