Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24630)
(cherry picked from commit d38d264228)
Generally we can get away with just using CRYPTO_atomic_load to do
stores by reversing the source and target variables, but doing so
creates a problem for the thread sanitizer as CRYPTO_atomic_load hard
codes an __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE constraint, which confuses tsan into thinking
that loads and stores aren't properly ordered, leading to RAW/WAR
hazzards getting reported. Instead create a CRYPTO_atomic_store api
that is identical to the load variant, save for the fact that the value
is a unit64_t rather than a pointer that gets stored using an
__ATOMIC_RELEASE constraint, satisfying tsan.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23671)
Currently, rcu has a global bit of data, the CRYPTO_THREAD_LOCAL object
to store per thread data. This works in some cases, but fails in FIPS,
becuase it contains its own copy of the global key.
So
1) Make the rcu_thr_key a per-context variable, and force
ossl_rcu_lock_new to be context aware
2) Store a pointer to the context in the lock object
3) Use the context to get the global thread key on read/write lock
4) Use ossl_thread_start_init to properly register a cleanup on thread
exit
5) Fix up missed calls to OSSL_thread_stop() in our tests
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24162)
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Release: yes
(cherry picked from commit 0ce7d1f355)
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24034)
Introduce an RCU lock implementation as an alternative locking mechanism
to openssl. The api is documented in the ossl_rcu.pod
file
Read side implementaiton is comparable to that of RWLOCKS:
ossl_rcu_read_lock(lock);
<
critical section in which data can be accessed via
ossl_derefrence
>
ossl_rcu_read_unlock(lock);
Write side implementation is:
ossl_rcu_write_lock(lock);
<
critical section in which data can be updated via
ossl_assign_pointer
and stale data can optionally be scheduled for removal
via ossl_rcu_call
>
ossl_rcu_write_unlock(lock);
...
ossl_synchronize_rcu(lock);
ossl_rcu_call fixup
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22729)
Some functions that lock things are void, so we just return early.
Also make ossl_namemap_empty return 0 on error. Updated the docs, and added
some code to ossl_namemap_stored() to handle the failure, and updated the
tests to allow for failure.
Fixes: #14230
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14238)
We add an implementation for CRYPTO_atomic_or() and CRYPTO_atomic_load()
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13733)
When the new OpenSSL CSPRNG was introduced in version 1.1.1,
it was announced in the release notes that it would be fork-safe,
which the old CSPRNG hadn't been.
The fork-safety was implemented using a fork count, which was
incremented by a pthread_atfork handler. Initially, this handler
was enabled by default. Unfortunately, the default behaviour
had to be changed for other reasons in commit b5319bdbd0, so
the new OpenSSL CSPRNG failed to keep its promise.
This commit restores the fork-safety using a different approach.
It replaces the fork count by a fork id, which coincides with
the process id on UNIX-like operating systems and is zero on other
operating systems. It is used to detect when an automatic reseed
after a fork is necessary.
To prevent a future regression, it also adds a test to verify that
the child reseeds after fork.
CVE-2019-1549
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9832)
CRYPTO_atomic_read was added with intention to read statistics counters,
but readings are effectively indistinguishable from regular load (even
in non-lock-free case). This is because you can get out-dated value in
both cases. CRYPTO_atomic_write was added for symmetry and was never used.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6883)
