EVP_CipherUpdate is supposed to return 1 for success or 0 for error.
However for GCM ciphers it was sometimes returning -1 for error.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12288)
Other ciphers return the length of the Payload for TLS as a result of an
EVP_DecryptUpdate() operation - but ChaCha20-Poly1305 did not. We change
it so that it does.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12288)
The previous commits separated out the TLS CBC padding code in libssl.
Now we can use that code to directly support TLS CBC padding and MAC
removal in provided ciphers.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12288)
The new naming scheme consistently usese the `OSSL_FUNC_` prefix for all
functions which are dispatched between the core and providers.
This change includes in particular all up- and downcalls, i.e., the
dispatched functions passed from core to provider and vice versa.
- OSSL_core_ -> OSSL_FUNC_core_
- OSSL_provider_ -> OSSL_FUNC_core_
For operations and their function dispatch tables, the following convention
is used:
Type | Name (evp_generic_fetch(3)) |
---------------------|-----------------------------------|
operation | OSSL_OP_FOO |
function id | OSSL_FUNC_FOO_FUNCTION_NAME |
function "name" | OSSL_FUNC_foo_function_name |
function typedef | OSSL_FUNC_foo_function_name_fn |
function ptr getter | OSSL_FUNC_foo_function_name |
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12222)
When we're fetching an IV, there's no need to enforce that the
provided buffer is exactly the same size as the IV we want to
write into it. This might happen, for example, when
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_iv_noconst() passes sizeof(ctx->iv) (that is,
EVP_MAX_IV_LENGTH) for an AES-GCM cipher that uses a shorter IV.
AES-OCB and CCM were also affected.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12039)
OSSL_CIPHER_PARAM_IV can be accessed both as an octet string and as
an octet pointer (for routines like EVP_CIPHER_CTX_iv() that are
in a nebulous undocumented-and-might-go-away-eventually state),
the latter for when there is need to modify the actual value in
the provider.
Make sure that we consistently try to set it as both the string and pointer
forms (not just octet string) and only fail if neither version succeeds. The
generic cipher get_ctx_params routine was already doing so, but the
AES-variant-, GCM-, and CCM-specific ones were not.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12039)
Fixes#11459
It was incorrectly using 8 bytes instead of 16 as the default.
This was verified by expanding the macros used in e_cast.c.
The issue occurs if EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length() is not called.
evp_test.c hides this issue as it always calls EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length() before
using EVP_CipherInit_ex(...., key, ..).
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11707)
The legacy provider contains assembler references. Most code is automagically pulled in from the libcrypto - but the platform specific assembler functions will not be visible in the symbol table. Copying BNASM and DESASM into liblegacy seems to be a better solution than exposing platform specific function in libcrypto.num.
Added a missing call in the des_cbc code for sparc.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11697)
This macro is used to determine if certain pieces of code should
become part of the FIPS module or not. The old name was confusing.
Fixes#11538
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11539)
The cipher_tdes_common causes build failure as being duplicated
in libcrypto static builds.
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11544)
DES implementations were missing the dup/copy ctx routines
required by CMAC implementation. A regression test is added.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11498)
DES, idea, seed, rc2, rc4, rc5, cast and blowfish have been moved out of the default provider.
Code shared between desx and tdes has been moved into a seperate file (cipher_tdes_common.c).
3 test recipes failed due to using app/openssl calls that used legacy ciphers.
These calls have been updated to supply both the default and legacy providers.
Fixed openssl app '-provider' memory leak
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11419)
In function 'ccm_tls_cipher',
inlined from 'ccm_cipher_internal' at providers/common/ciphers/cipher_ccm.c:359:16,
inlined from 'ccm_stream_final' at providers/common/ciphers/cipher_ccm.c:265:9:
providers/common/ciphers/cipher_ccm.c:317:5: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Werror=nonnull]
317 | memcpy(ctx->iv + EVP_CCM_TLS_FIXED_IV_LEN, in, EVP_CCM_TLS_EXPLICIT_IV_LEN);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/internal/cryptlib.h:14,
from providers/common/include/prov/ciphercommon.h:14,
from providers/common/ciphers/cipher_ccm.c:12:
providers/common/ciphers/cipher_ccm.c: In function 'ccm_stream_final':
/home/ed/gnu/arm-linux-gnueabihf-linux64/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys-include/string.h:44:14: note: in a call to function 'memcpy' declared here
44 | extern void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest,
| ^~~~~~
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10344)
Avoid function calls we don't need to do.
In 1.1.1 we have:
aes-128-cbc 572267.80k 681197.08k 715430.74k 720508.59k 722359.64k 723004.07k
Current master:
aes-128-cbc 460663.70k 631125.66k 701283.58k 719794.52k 724732.59k 726668.63k
new:
aes-128-cbc 582057.64k 684288.62k 715721.90k 724856.15k 717578.24k 727176.53k
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11102)
Compile failures were occuring on systems that weren't AESNI capable
because the detection wasn't quite right in a couple of files.
This fixes a run-checker build failure for the 386 compile option.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11022)
Minor fixes to resolve compilation errors with the no-multiblock
Configure option.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11004)
Use of the low level DES functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10858)
Libssl uses the null cipher in certain situations. It should be
converted to a provided cipher.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10865)
These were initially added as internal functions only. However they will
also need to be used by libssl as well. Therefore it make sense to move
them into the public API.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10864)
Use of the low level IDEA functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10819)
Use of the low level MD5 functions has been informally discouraged for a long
time. We now formally deprecate them.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10791)
Use of the low level RC5 functions has been informally discouraged for a long
time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10834)
Use of the low level RC4 functions has been informally discouraged for a long
time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10834)
Use of the low level RC2 functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10834)
Use of the low level SEED functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10833)
providers/implementations/ciphers/ciphercommon_gcm_hw.c had an AES
specific GCM update function, while
providers/implementations/ciphers/cipher_aria_gcm_hw.c had the more
general implementation.
This moves them around to have the more general implementation in the
common source, and place the AES specialiation where it belongs.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10783)
Applications should instead use the higher level EVP APIs, e.g.
EVP_Encrypt*() and EVP_Decrypt*().
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10742)
Applications should instead use the higher level EVP APIs, e.g.
EVP_Encrypt*() and EVP_Decrypt*().
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10741)
Applications should instead use the higher level EVP APIs, e.g.
EVP_Encrypt*() and EVP_Decrypt*().
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10740)
A few provider implementations need this to build correctly with a
'no-deprecated' configuration.
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10766)
Use of the low level AES functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10580)
Also Add ability for providers to dynamically exclude cipher algorithms.
Cipher algorithms are only returned from providers if their capable() method is either NULL,
or the method returns 1.
This is mainly required for ciphers that only have hardware implementations.
If there is no hardware support, then the algorithm needs to be not available.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10146)
The AES_GCM specialisation was defined in the common cipher header
providers/implementations/include/prov/ciphercommon_gcm.h, when it
should in fact be in a local providers/implementations/ciphers/
header.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10606)
The AES_CCM specialisation was defined in the common cipher header
providers/implementations/include/prov/ciphercommon_ccm.h, when it
should in fact be in a local providers/implementations/ciphers/
header.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10606)
Aes-ecb mode can be optimized by inverleaving cipher operation on
several blocks and loop unrolling. Interleaving needs one ideal
unrolling factor, here we adopt the same factor with aes-cbc,
which is described as below:
If blocks number > 5, select 5 blocks as one iteration,every
loop, decrease the blocks number by 5.
If 3 < left blocks < 5 select 3 blocks as one iteration, every
loop, decrease the block number by 3.
If left blocks < 3, treat them as tail blocks.
Detailed implementation will have a little adjustment for squeezing
code space.
With this way, for small size such as 16 bytes, the performance is
similar as before, but for big size such as 16k bytes, the performance
improves a lot, even reaches to 100%, for some arches such as A57,
the improvement even exceeds 100%. The following table will list the
encryption performance data on aarch64, take a72 and a57 as examples.
Performance value takes the unit of cycles per byte, takes the format
as comparision of values. List them as below:
A72:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-ecb@16 17.26538237 16.82663866 2.61%
evp-aes-128-ecb@64 5.50528499 5.222637557 5.41%
evp-aes-128-ecb@256 2.632700213 1.908442892 37.95%
evp-aes-128-ecb@1024 1.876102047 1.078018868 74.03%
evp-aes-128-ecb@8192 1.6550392 0.853982929 93.80%
evp-aes-128-ecb@16384 1.636871283 0.847623957 93.11%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16 17.73104961 17.09692468 3.71%
evp-aes-192-ecb@64 5.78984398 5.418545192 6.85%
evp-aes-192-ecb@256 2.872005308 2.081815274 37.96%
evp-aes-192-ecb@1024 2.083226672 1.25095642 66.53%
evp-aes-192-ecb@8192 1.831992057 0.995916251 83.95%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16384 1.821590009 0.993820525 83.29%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16 18.0606306 17.96963317 0.51%
evp-aes-256-ecb@64 6.19651997 5.762465812 7.53%
evp-aes-256-ecb@256 3.176991394 2.24642538 41.42%
evp-aes-256-ecb@1024 2.385991919 1.396018192 70.91%
evp-aes-256-ecb@8192 2.147862636 1.142222597 88.04%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16384 2.131361787 1.135944617 87.63%
A57:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-ecb@16 18.61045121 18.36456218 1.34%
evp-aes-128-ecb@64 6.438628994 5.467959461 17.75%
evp-aes-128-ecb@256 2.957452881 1.97238604 49.94%
evp-aes-128-ecb@1024 2.117096219 1.099665054 92.52%
evp-aes-128-ecb@8192 1.868385973 0.837440804 123.11%
evp-aes-128-ecb@16384 1.853078526 0.822420027 125.32%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16 19.07021756 18.50018552 3.08%
evp-aes-192-ecb@64 6.672351486 5.696088921 17.14%
evp-aes-192-ecb@256 3.260427769 2.131449916 52.97%
evp-aes-192-ecb@1024 2.410522832 1.250529718 92.76%
evp-aes-192-ecb@8192 2.17921605 0.973225504 123.92%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16384 2.162250997 0.95919871 125.42%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16 19.3008384 19.12743654 0.91%
evp-aes-256-ecb@64 6.992950658 5.92149541 18.09%
evp-aes-256-ecb@256 3.576361743 2.287619504 56.34%
evp-aes-256-ecb@1024 2.726671027 1.381267599 97.40%
evp-aes-256-ecb@8192 2.493583657 1.110959913 124.45%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16384 2.473916816 1.099967073 124.91%
Change-Id: Iccd23d972e0d52d22dc093f4c208f69c9d5a0ca7
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10518)
The idea to have all these things in providers/common was viable as
long as the implementations was spread around their main providers.
This is, however, no longer the case, so we move the common blocks
closer to the source that use them.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10564)
