Excess bytes, when one block is longer than the other, are not explicitly
highlighted.
The NULL / zero length block output has been cleaned up.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3515)
Fix the small arena test to just check for the symptom of the infinite
loop (i.e. initialized set on failure), rather than the actual infinite
loop. This avoids some valgrind errors.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3512)
Switch to TAP::Harness inadvertently masked test failures.
Test::Harness::runtests was terminating with non-zero exit code in case
of failure[s], while TAP::Harness apparently holds caller responsible
for doing so.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Remove assertion when mmap() fails.
Only run the 1<<31 limit test on Linux
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3455)
Import test data from sha1test.c, sha256t.c and sha512t.c which is
from RFC6234 section 8.5
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3451)
Allow multiple "Input" lines to call the update function multiple times.
Add "Ncopy" keyword to copy the input buffer. So for example:
Input = "a"
Ncopy = 1024
Will create a buffer consisting of 1024 "a" characters.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3451)
An alert message is 2 bytes long. In theory it is permissible in SSLv3 -
TLSv1.2 to fragment such alerts across multiple records (some of which
could be empty). In practice it make no sense to send an empty alert
record, or to fragment one. TLSv1.3 prohibts this altogether and other
libraries (BoringSSL, NSS) do not support this at all. Supporting it adds
significant complexity to the record layer, and its removal is unlikely
to cause inter-operability issues.
The DTLS code for this never worked anyway and it is not supported at a
protocol level for DTLS. Similarly fragmented DTLS handshake records only
work at a protocol level where at least the handshake message header
exists within the record. DTLS code existed for trying to handle fragmented
handshake records smaller than this size. This code didn't work either so
has also been removed.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3476)
Allow multiple file arguments.
Split bntests.txt into separate files.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3471)
Issue 1:
sh.bittable_size is a size_t but i is and int, which can result in
freelist == -1 if sh.bittable_size exceeds an int.
This seems to result in an OPENSSL_assert due to invalid allocation
size, so maybe that is "ok."
Worse, if sh.bittable_size is exactly 1<<31, then this becomes an
infinite loop (because 1<<31 is a negative int, so it can be shifted
right forever and sticks at -1).
Issue 2:
CRYPTO_secure_malloc_init() sets secure_mem_initialized=1 even when
sh_init() returns 0.
If sh_init() fails, we end up with secure_mem_initialized=1 but
sh.minsize=0. If you then call secure_malloc(), which then calls,
sh_malloc(), this then enters an infite loop since 0 << anything will
never be larger than size.
Issue 3:
That same sh_malloc loop will loop forever for a size greater
than size_t/2 because i will proceed (assuming sh.minsize=16):
i=16, 32, 64, ..., size_t/8, size_t/4, size_t/2, 0, 0, 0, 0, ....
This sequence will never be larger than "size".
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3449)
In some cases, testutil outputs subtests like this:
1..6 # Subtest: progname
The standard set by Test::More (because there really is no actual
standard yet) gives this display:
# Subtest: progname
1..6
Until the standard is actually agreed upon, let's do it like
Test::More.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3446)
- Mostly missing fall thru comments
- And uninitialized value used in sslapitest.c
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3440)
Add file/line# to test error message.
Also remove expected/got fields since TEST structure prints them.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3324)
Also, allow multiple files on commandline (for future splitup of
evptests.txt)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3324)
TAP:Harness came along in perl 5.10.1, and since we claim to support
perl 5.10.0 in configuration and testing, we can only load it
conditionally.
The main reason to use TAP::Harness rather than Test::Harness is its
capability to merge stdout and stderr output from the test recipes,
which Test::Harness can't. The merge gives much more comprehensible
output when testing verbosely.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3424)
This includes support for:
- comparisions between pairs of BIGNUMs
- comparisions between BIGNUMs and zero
- equality comparison between BIGNUMs and one
- equality comparisons between BIGNUMs and constants
- parity checks for BIGNUMs
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3405)
Verify that we fail if we receive an HRR but no change will result in
ClientHello2.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3414)
Test that sending a non NULL compression method fails in TLSv1.3 as well
as other similar tests.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3410)
Get some trivial test coverage that this flag does what it claims to.
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1700)
