Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Caswell
572f290c9c Fix a failure in bio_dgram_test on the NonStop platform
The size of the datagram header is significantly larger that we might
expect on NonStop (probably driven by sizeof(BIO_ADDR)). We adjust the
size of the default buffer to take into account the header size and the
mtu.

Fixes #22013

Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22058)
2023-09-13 11:53:13 +01:00
Matt Caswell
da1c088f59 Copyright year updates
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Release: yes
2023-09-07 09:59:15 +01:00
Hugo Landau
8d7f034622 Minor fixes
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21715)
2023-09-01 10:45:36 +01:00
Hugo Landau
c20b78d599 BIO_s_dgram_pair: Correct implementation of BIO_CTRL_DGRAM_GET_LOCAL_ADDR_ENABLE
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21715)
2023-09-01 10:45:34 +01:00
Tomas Mraz
b56b034e9a Correct the fixed size handling for dgram_pair and dgram_mem
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21866)
2023-08-30 11:43:34 +01:00
Matt Caswell
533390e46f Ensure calling BIO_recvmmsg() with a dgram pair reports errors
When calling BIO-recvmmsg() and using a dgram pair we were failing to
raise an error in the case that a problem occurs. This means that the
reason behind a failure cannot be detected and all problems are treated
as fatal even if they may not be.

Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20030)
2023-02-22 05:34:05 +00:00
Matt Caswell
3f968ecf47 Don't raise an error on retryable read in a BIO_s_dgram_pair()
This results in spurious errors appearing on the queue in normal
operation, e.g. calling SSL_tick() with a QUIC connection will succeed,
but an error will end up on the queue anyway.

Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20030)
2023-02-22 05:33:24 +00:00
Tomas Mraz
3a857b9532 Implement BIO_s_dgram_mem() reusing the BIO_s_dgram_pair() code
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20012)
2023-01-27 16:11:38 +01:00
Richard Levitte
e077455e9e Stop raising ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE in most places
Since OPENSSL_malloc() and friends report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE, and
at least handle the file name and line number they are called from,
there's no need to report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE where they are called
directly, or when SSLfatal() and RLAYERfatal() is used, the reason
`ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` is changed to `ERR_R_CRYPTO_LIB`.

There were a number of places where `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` was reported
even though it was a function from a different sub-system that was
called.  Those places are changed to report ERR_R_{lib}_LIB, where
{lib} is the name of that sub-system.
Some of them are tricky to get right, as we have a lot of functions
that belong in the ASN1 sub-system, and all the `sk_` calls or from
the CRYPTO sub-system.

Some extra adaptation was necessary where there were custom OPENSSL_malloc()
wrappers, and some bugs are fixed alongside these changes.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19301)
2022-10-05 14:02:03 +02:00
Tomas Mraz
9643ddb13a dgram_pair_read_inner(): Do not move buf pointer if it is NULL
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19284)
2022-09-27 17:50:35 +02:00
Tomas Mraz
31fbf119f3 A static const variable is implicitly zero initialized
Older clang versions complain about the explicit initializer
because the first member of the struct is a struct.
But it is not necessary to explicitly initialize it anyway.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19284)
2022-09-27 17:39:01 +02:00
Hugo Landau
b88ce46ee8 BIO_s_dgram_pair
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18442)
2022-09-23 11:59:13 +10:00