This change adds optional support for
- Armv8.3-A Pointer Authentication (PAuth) and
- Armv8.5-A Branch Target Identification (BTI)
features to the perl scripts.
Both features can be enabled with additional compiler flags.
Unless any of these are enabled explicitly there is no code change at
all.
The extensions are briefly described below. Please read the appropriate
chapters of the Arm Architecture Reference Manual for the complete
specification.
Scope
-----
This change only affects generated assembly code.
Armv8.3-A Pointer Authentication
--------------------------------
Pointer Authentication extension supports the authentication of the
contents of registers before they are used for indirect branching
or load.
PAuth provides a probabilistic method to detect corruption of register
values. PAuth signing instructions generate a Pointer Authentication
Code (PAC) based on the value of a register, a seed and a key.
The generated PAC is inserted into the original value in the register.
A PAuth authentication instruction recomputes the PAC, and if it matches
the PAC in the register, restores its original value. In case of a
mismatch, an architecturally unmapped address is generated instead.
With PAuth, mitigation against ROP (Return-oriented Programming) attacks
can be implemented. This is achieved by signing the contents of the
link-register (LR) before it is pushed to stack. Once LR is popped,
it is authenticated. This way a stack corruption which overwrites the
LR on the stack is detectable.
The PAuth extension adds several new instructions, some of which are not
recognized by older hardware. To support a single codebase for both pre
Armv8.3-A targets and newer ones, only NOP-space instructions are added
by this patch. These instructions are treated as NOPs on hardware
which does not support Armv8.3-A. Furthermore, this patch only considers
cases where LR is saved to the stack and then restored before branching
to its content. There are cases in the code where LR is pushed to stack
but it is not used later. We do not address these cases as they are not
affected by PAuth.
There are two keys available to sign an instruction address: A and B.
PACIASP and PACIBSP only differ in the used keys: A and B, respectively.
The keys are typically managed by the operating system.
To enable generating code for PAuth compile with
-mbranch-protection=<mode>:
- standard or pac-ret: add PACIASP and AUTIASP, also enables BTI
(read below)
- pac-ret+b-key: add PACIBSP and AUTIBSP
Armv8.5-A Branch Target Identification
--------------------------------------
Branch Target Identification features some new instructions which
protect the execution of instructions on guarded pages which are not
intended branch targets.
If Armv8.5-A is supported by the hardware, execution of an instruction
changes the value of PSTATE.BTYPE field. If an indirect branch
lands on a guarded page the target instruction must be one of the
BTI <jc> flavors, or in case of a direct call or jump it can be any
other instruction. If the target instruction is not compatible with the
value of PSTATE.BTYPE a Branch Target Exception is generated.
In short, indirect jumps are compatible with BTI <j> and <jc> while
indirect calls are compatible with BTI <c> and <jc>. Please refer to the
specification for the details.
Armv8.3-A PACIASP and PACIBSP are implicit branch target
identification instructions which are equivalent with BTI c or BTI jc
depending on system register configuration.
BTI is used to mitigate JOP (Jump-oriented Programming) attacks by
limiting the set of instructions which can be jumped to.
BTI requires active linker support to mark the pages with BTI-enabled
code as guarded. For ELF64 files BTI compatibility is recorded in the
.note.gnu.property section. For a shared object or static binary it is
required that all linked units support BTI. This means that even a
single assembly file without the required note section turns-off BTI
for the whole binary or shared object.
The new BTI instructions are treated as NOPs on hardware which does
not support Armv8.5-A or on pages which are not guarded.
To insert this new and optional instruction compile with
-mbranch-protection=standard (also enables PAuth) or +bti.
When targeting a guarded page from a non-guarded page, weaker
compatibility restrictions apply to maintain compatibility between
legacy and new code. For detailed rules please refer to the Arm ARM.
Compiler support
----------------
Compiler support requires understanding '-mbranch-protection=<mode>'
and emitting the appropriate feature macros (__ARM_FEATURE_BTI_DEFAULT
and __ARM_FEATURE_PAC_DEFAULT). The current state is the following:
-------------------------------------------------------
| Compiler | -mbranch-protection | Feature macros |
+----------+---------------------+--------------------+
| clang | 9.0.0 | 11.0.0 |
+----------+---------------------+--------------------+
| gcc | 9 | expected in 10.1+ |
-------------------------------------------------------
Available Platforms
------------------
Arm Fast Model and QEMU support both extensions.
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/simulation-models/fast-modelshttps://www.qemu.org/
Implementation Notes
--------------------
This change adds BTI landing pads even to assembly functions which are
likely to be directly called only. In these cases, landing pads might
be superfluous depending on what code the linker generates.
Code size and performance impact for these cases would be negligible.
Interaction with C code
-----------------------
Pointer Authentication is a per-frame protection while Branch Target
Identification can be turned on and off only for all code pages of a
whole shared object or static binary. Because of these properties if
C/C++ code is compiled without any of the above features but assembly
files support any of them unconditionally there is no incompatibility
between the two.
Useful Links
------------
To fully understand the details of both PAuth and BTI it is advised to
read the related chapters of the Arm Architecture Reference Manual
(Arm ARM):
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0487/latest/
Additional materials:
"Providing protection for complex software"
https://developer.arm.com/architectures/learn-the-architecture/providing-protection-for-complex-software
Arm Compiler Reference Guide Version 6.14: -mbranch-protection
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101754/0614/armclang-Reference/armclang-Command-line-Options/-mbranch-protection?lang=en
Arm C Language Extensions (ACLE)
https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/latest
Addional Notes
--------------
This patch is a copy of the work done by Tamas Petz in boringssl. It
contains the changes from the following commits:
aarch64: support BTI and pointer authentication in assembly
Change-Id: I4335f92e2ccc8e209c7d68a0a79f1acdf3aeb791
URL: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42084
aarch64: Improve conditional compilation
Change-Id: I14902a64e5f403c2b6a117bc9f5fb1a4f4611ebf
URL: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/43524
aarch64: Fix name of gnu property note section
Change-Id: I6c432d1c852129e9c273f6469a8b60e3983671ec
URL: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44024
Change-Id: I2d95ebc5e4aeb5610d3b226f9754ee80cf74a9af
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16674)
AIX reported warnings of the form:
1506-207 (W) Integer constant 0x8080808080808080u out of range.
This truncation causes all startup self tests related to AES to fail.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15842)
This adds optional constant time support for AES
when building openssl for no-asm.
Enable with: ./config no-asm -DOPENSSL_AES_CONST_TIME
Disable with: ./config no-asm -DOPENSSL_NO_AES_CONST_TIME
This is by default enabled.
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10828)
Commit c7978e506b ("Fix missing $CPUIDDEF in
libdefault.a") revealed another problem in the build system on s390. The
build of the provider libraries includes the AES system without the proper
defines. This causes a build error on s390 now since the CPUIDDEF is present
but the prototypes for various AES functions implemented in assembler are
missing due to missing preprocessor defines. Fix this by adding the missing
defines to all provider libraries.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15244)
We recently noticed AES algorithms(like aes-xxx-ctr, aes-xxx-gcm,.etc)
have significant performance regression on x86_64 platform, and it is
because of the missing AES_ASM macro. This PR is to fix it by applying
$AESDEF to libdefault.a.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15225)
libimplementations.a was a nice idea, but had a few flaws:
1. The idea to have common code in libimplementations.a and FIPS
sensitive helper functions in libfips.a / libnonfips.a didn't
catch on, and we saw full implementation ending up in them instead
and not appearing in libimplementations.a at all.
2. Because more or less ALL algorithm implementations were included
in libimplementations.a (the idea being that the appropriate
objects from it would be selected automatically by the linker when
building the shared libraries), it's very hard to find only the
implementation source that should go into the FIPS module, with
the result that the FIPS checksum mechanism include source files
that it shouldn't
To mitigate, we drop libimplementations.a, but retain the idea of
collecting implementations in static libraries. With that, we not
have:
libfips.a
Includes all implementations that should become part of the FIPS
provider.
liblegacy.a
Includes all implementations that should become part of the legacy
provider.
libdefault.a
Includes all implementations that should become part of the
default and base providers.
With this, libnonfips.a becomes irrelevant and is dropped.
libcommon.a is retained to include common provider code that can be
used uniformly by all providers.
Fixes#15157
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15171)
ARM Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A72 cores running in 32-bit mode are affected
by silicon errata #1742098 [0] and #1655431 [1], respectively, where the
second instruction of a AES instruction pair may execute twice if an
interrupt is taken right after the first instruction consumes an input
register of which a single 32-bit lane has been updated the last time it
was modified.
This is not such a rare occurrence as it may seem: in counter mode, only
the least significant 32-bit word is incremented in the absence of a
carry, which makes our counter mode implementation susceptible to these
errata.
So let's shuffle the counter assignments around a bit so that the most
recent updates when the AES instruction pair executes are 128-bit wide.
[0] ARM-EPM-049219 v23 Cortex-A57 MPCore Software Developers Errata Notice
[1] ARM-EPM-012079 v11.0 Cortex-A72 MPCore Software Developers Errata Notice
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13504)
Aes-xts mode can be optimized by interleaving cipher operation on
several blocks and loop unrolling. Interleaving needs one ideal
unrolling factor, here we adopt the same factor with aes-cbc,
which is described as below:
If blocks number > 5, select 5 blocks as one iteration,every
loop, decrease the blocks number by 5.
If left blocks < 5, treat them as tail blocks.
Detailed implementation has a little adjustment for squeezing
code space.
With this way, for small size such as 16 bytes, the performance is
similar as before, but for big size such as 16k bytes, the performance
improves a lot, even reaches to 2x uplift, for some arches such as A57,
the improvement even reaches more than 2x uplift. We collect many
performance datas on different micro-archs such as thunderx2,
ampere-emag, a72, a75, a57, a53 and N1, all of which reach 0.5-2x uplift.
The following table lists the encryption performance data on aarch64,
take a72, a75, a57, a53 and N1 as examples. Performance value takes the
unit of cycles per byte, takes the format as comparision of values.
List them as below:
A72:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-xts@16 8.899913518 5.949087263 49.60%
evp-aes-128-xts@64 4.525512668 3.389141845 33.53%
evp-aes-128-xts@256 3.502906908 1.633573479 114.43%
evp-aes-128-xts@1024 3.174210419 1.155952639 174.60%
evp-aes-128-xts@8192 3.053019303 1.028134888 196.95%
evp-aes-128-xts@16384 3.025292462 1.02021169 196.54%
evp-aes-256-xts@16 9.971105023 6.754233758 47.63%
evp-aes-256-xts@64 4.931479093 3.786527393 30.24%
evp-aes-256-xts@256 3.746788153 1.943975947 92.74%
evp-aes-256-xts@1024 3.401743802 1.477394648 130.25%
evp-aes-256-xts@8192 3.278769327 1.32950421 146.62%
evp-aes-256-xts@16384 3.27093296 1.325276257 146.81%
A75:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-xts@16 8.397965173 5.126839098 63.80%
evp-aes-128-xts@64 4.176860631 2.59817764 60.76%
evp-aes-128-xts@256 3.069126585 1.284561028 138.92%
evp-aes-128-xts@1024 2.805962699 0.932754655 200.83%
evp-aes-128-xts@8192 2.725820131 0.829820397 228.48%
evp-aes-128-xts@16384 2.71521905 0.823251591 229.82%
evp-aes-256-xts@16 11.24790935 7.383914448 52.33%
evp-aes-256-xts@64 5.294128847 3.048641998 73.66%
evp-aes-256-xts@256 3.861649617 1.570359905 145.91%
evp-aes-256-xts@1024 3.537646797 1.200493533 194.68%
evp-aes-256-xts@8192 3.435353012 1.085345319 216.52%
evp-aes-256-xts@16384 3.437952563 1.097963822 213.12%
A57:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-xts@16 10.57455446 7.165438012 47.58%
evp-aes-128-xts@64 5.418185447 3.721241202 45.60%
evp-aes-128-xts@256 3.855184592 1.747145379 120.66%
evp-aes-128-xts@1024 3.477199757 1.253049735 177.50%
evp-aes-128-xts@8192 3.36768104 1.091943159 208.41%
evp-aes-128-xts@16384 3.360373443 1.088942789 208.59%
evp-aes-256-xts@16 12.54559459 8.745489036 43.45%
evp-aes-256-xts@64 6.542808937 4.326387568 51.23%
evp-aes-256-xts@256 4.62668822 2.119908754 118.25%
evp-aes-256-xts@1024 4.161716505 1.557335554 167.23%
evp-aes-256-xts@8192 4.032462227 1.377749511 192.68%
evp-aes-256-xts@16384 4.023293877 1.371558933 193.34%
A53:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-xts@16 18.07842135 13.96980808 29.40%
evp-aes-128-xts@64 7.933818397 6.07159276 30.70%
evp-aes-128-xts@256 5.264604704 2.611155744 101.60%
evp-aes-128-xts@1024 4.606660117 1.722713454 167.40%
evp-aes-128-xts@8192 4.405160115 1.454379201 202.90%
evp-aes-128-xts@16384 4.401592028 1.442279392 205.20%
evp-aes-256-xts@16 20.07084054 16.00803726 25.40%
evp-aes-256-xts@64 9.192647294 6.883876732 33.50%
evp-aes-256-xts@256 6.336143161 3.108140452 103.90%
evp-aes-256-xts@1024 5.62502952 2.097960651 168.10%
evp-aes-256-xts@8192 5.412085608 1.807294191 199.50%
evp-aes-256-xts@16384 5.403062591 1.790135764 201.80%
N1:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-xts@16 6.48147613 4.209415473 53.98%
evp-aes-128-xts@64 2.847744115 1.950757468 45.98%
evp-aes-128-xts@256 2.085711968 1.061903238 96.41%
evp-aes-128-xts@1024 1.842014669 0.798486302 130.69%
evp-aes-128-xts@8192 1.760449052 0.713853939 146.61%
evp-aes-128-xts@16384 1.760763546 0.707702009 148.80%
evp-aes-256-xts@16 7.264142817 5.265970454 37.94%
evp-aes-256-xts@64 3.251356212 2.41176323 34.81%
evp-aes-256-xts@256 2.380488469 1.342095742 77.37%
evp-aes-256-xts@1024 2.08853022 1.041718215 100.49%
evp-aes-256-xts@8192 2.027432668 0.944571334 114.64%
evp-aes-256-xts@16384 2.00740782 0.941991415 113.10%
Add more XTS test cases to cover the cipher stealing mode and cases of different
number of blocks.
CustomizedGitHooks: yes
Change-Id: I93ee31b2575e1413764e27b599af62994deb4c96
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11399)
For example, FreeBSD prepends "FreeBSD" to version string, e.g.,
FreeBSD clang version 11.0.0 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2-0-g414f32a9e86)
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
This prevented us from properly detecting AVX support, etc.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12725)
Don't wrap conditionally-compiled files in global ifndef tests.
Instead, test if the feature is disabled and, if so, do not
compile it.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11263)
Since pointer in x32 is 4 bytes, add x86_64-support.pl to define
pointer_size and pointer_register based on flavour to support
stuctures like:
struct { void *ptr; int blocks; }
This fixes 90-test_sslapi.t on x32. Verified with
$ ./Configure shared linux-x86_64
$ make
$ make test
and
$ ./Configure shared linux-x32
$ make
$ make test
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10988)
In https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10883, I'd meant to exclude
the perlasm drivers since they aren't opening pipes and do not
particularly need it, but I only noticed x86_64-xlate.pl, so
arm-xlate.pl and ppc-xlate.pl got the change.
That seems to have been fine, so be consistent and also apply the change
to x86_64-xlate.pl. Checking for errors is generally a good idea.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10930)
FIXES#10692#10638
a bug for aarch64 bigendian with instructions 'st1' and 'ld1' on AES-GCM mode.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10751)
To support Intel CET, all indirect branch targets must start with
endbranch. Here is a patch to add endbranch to function entries
in x86_64 assembly codes which are indirect branch targets as
discovered by running openssl testsuite on Intel CET machine and
visual inspection.
Verified with
$ CC="gcc -Wl,-z,cet-report=error" ./Configure shared linux-x86_64 -fcf-protection
$ make
$ make test
and
$ CC="gcc -mx32 -Wl,-z,cet-report=error" ./Configure shared linux-x32 -fcf-protection
$ make
$ make test # <<< passed with https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10988
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10982)
If one of the perlasm xlate drivers crashes, OpenSSL's build will
currently swallow the error and silently truncate the output to however
far the driver got. This will hopefully fail to build, but better to
check such things.
Handle this by checking for errors when closing STDOUT (which is a pipe
to the xlate driver).
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10883)
Use of the low level AES functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.
Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10580)
Also Add ability for providers to dynamically exclude cipher algorithms.
Cipher algorithms are only returned from providers if their capable() method is either NULL,
or the method returns 1.
This is mainly required for ciphers that only have hardware implementations.
If there is no hardware support, then the algorithm needs to be not available.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10146)
We store a secondary frame pointer info for the debugger
in the red zone. This fixes a crash in the unwinder when
this function is interrupted.
Additionally the missing cfi function annotation is added
to aesni_cbc_sha256_enc_shaext.
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10674)
Aes-ecb mode can be optimized by inverleaving cipher operation on
several blocks and loop unrolling. Interleaving needs one ideal
unrolling factor, here we adopt the same factor with aes-cbc,
which is described as below:
If blocks number > 5, select 5 blocks as one iteration,every
loop, decrease the blocks number by 5.
If 3 < left blocks < 5 select 3 blocks as one iteration, every
loop, decrease the block number by 3.
If left blocks < 3, treat them as tail blocks.
Detailed implementation will have a little adjustment for squeezing
code space.
With this way, for small size such as 16 bytes, the performance is
similar as before, but for big size such as 16k bytes, the performance
improves a lot, even reaches to 100%, for some arches such as A57,
the improvement even exceeds 100%. The following table will list the
encryption performance data on aarch64, take a72 and a57 as examples.
Performance value takes the unit of cycles per byte, takes the format
as comparision of values. List them as below:
A72:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-ecb@16 17.26538237 16.82663866 2.61%
evp-aes-128-ecb@64 5.50528499 5.222637557 5.41%
evp-aes-128-ecb@256 2.632700213 1.908442892 37.95%
evp-aes-128-ecb@1024 1.876102047 1.078018868 74.03%
evp-aes-128-ecb@8192 1.6550392 0.853982929 93.80%
evp-aes-128-ecb@16384 1.636871283 0.847623957 93.11%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16 17.73104961 17.09692468 3.71%
evp-aes-192-ecb@64 5.78984398 5.418545192 6.85%
evp-aes-192-ecb@256 2.872005308 2.081815274 37.96%
evp-aes-192-ecb@1024 2.083226672 1.25095642 66.53%
evp-aes-192-ecb@8192 1.831992057 0.995916251 83.95%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16384 1.821590009 0.993820525 83.29%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16 18.0606306 17.96963317 0.51%
evp-aes-256-ecb@64 6.19651997 5.762465812 7.53%
evp-aes-256-ecb@256 3.176991394 2.24642538 41.42%
evp-aes-256-ecb@1024 2.385991919 1.396018192 70.91%
evp-aes-256-ecb@8192 2.147862636 1.142222597 88.04%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16384 2.131361787 1.135944617 87.63%
A57:
Before optimization After optimization Improve
evp-aes-128-ecb@16 18.61045121 18.36456218 1.34%
evp-aes-128-ecb@64 6.438628994 5.467959461 17.75%
evp-aes-128-ecb@256 2.957452881 1.97238604 49.94%
evp-aes-128-ecb@1024 2.117096219 1.099665054 92.52%
evp-aes-128-ecb@8192 1.868385973 0.837440804 123.11%
evp-aes-128-ecb@16384 1.853078526 0.822420027 125.32%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16 19.07021756 18.50018552 3.08%
evp-aes-192-ecb@64 6.672351486 5.696088921 17.14%
evp-aes-192-ecb@256 3.260427769 2.131449916 52.97%
evp-aes-192-ecb@1024 2.410522832 1.250529718 92.76%
evp-aes-192-ecb@8192 2.17921605 0.973225504 123.92%
evp-aes-192-ecb@16384 2.162250997 0.95919871 125.42%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16 19.3008384 19.12743654 0.91%
evp-aes-256-ecb@64 6.992950658 5.92149541 18.09%
evp-aes-256-ecb@256 3.576361743 2.287619504 56.34%
evp-aes-256-ecb@1024 2.726671027 1.381267599 97.40%
evp-aes-256-ecb@8192 2.493583657 1.110959913 124.45%
evp-aes-256-ecb@16384 2.473916816 1.099967073 124.91%
Change-Id: Iccd23d972e0d52d22dc093f4c208f69c9d5a0ca7
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10518)
Previous macros suggested that from 3.0, we're only allowed to
deprecate things at a major version. However, there's no policy
stating this, but there is for removal, saying that to remove
something, it must have been deprecated for 5 years, and that removal
can only happen at a major version.
Meanwhile, the semantic versioning rule is that deprecation should
trigger a MINOR version update, which is reflected in the macro names
as of this change.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
Implementations are now spread across several libraries, so the assembler
related defines need to be applied to all affected libraries and modules.
AES_ASM define was missing from libimplementations.a which disabled AESNI
aarch64 changes were made by xkqian.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10180)
We put almost everything in these internal static libraries:
libcommon Block building code that can be used by all
our implementations, legacy and non-legacy
alike.
libimplementations All non-legacy algorithm implementations and
only them. All the code that ends up here is
agnostic to the definitions of FIPS_MODE.
liblegacy All legacy implementations.
libnonfips Support code for the algorithm implementations.
Built with FIPS_MODE undefined. Any code that
checks that FIPS_MODE isn't defined must end
up in this library.
libfips Support code for the algorithm implementations.
Built with FIPS_MODE defined. Any code that
checks that FIPS_MODE is defined must end up
in this library.
The FIPS provider module is built from providers/fips/*.c and linked
with libimplementations, libcommon and libfips.
The Legacy provider module is built from providers/legacy/*.c and
linked with liblegacy, libcommon and libcrypto.
If module building is disabled, the object files from liblegacy and
libcommon are added to libcrypto and the Legacy provider becomes a
built-in provider.
The Default provider module is built-in, so it ends up being linked
with libimplementations, libcommon and libnonfips. For libcrypto in
form of static library, the object files from those other libraries
are simply being added to libcrypto.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10088)
Make the include guards consistent by renaming them systematically according
to the naming conventions below
For the public header files (in the 'include/openssl' directory), the guard
names try to match the path specified in the include directives, with
all letters converted to upper case and '/' and '.' replaced by '_'. For the
private header files files, an extra 'OSSL_' is added as prefix.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9333)
Apart from public and internal header files, there is a third type called
local header files, which are located next to source files in the source
directory. Currently, they have different suffixes like
'*_lcl.h', '*_local.h', or '*_int.h'
This commit changes the different suffixes to '*_local.h' uniformly.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9333)
They now generally conform to the following argument sequence:
script.pl "$(PERLASM_SCHEME)" [ C preprocessor arguments ... ] \
$(PROCESSOR) <output file>
However, in the spirit of being able to use these scripts manually,
they also allow for no argument, or for only the flavour, or for only
the output file. This is done by only using the last argument as
output file if it's a file (it has an extension), and only using the
first argument as flavour if it isn't a file (it doesn't have an
extension).
While we're at it, we make all $xlate calls the same, i.e. the $output
argument is always quoted, and we always die on error when trying to
start $xlate.
There's a perl lesson in this, regarding operator priority...
This will always succeed, even when it fails:
open FOO, "something" || die "ERR: $!";
The reason is that '||' has higher priority than list operators (a
function is essentially a list operator and gobbles up everything
following it that isn't lower priority), and since a non-empty string
is always true, so that ends up being exactly the same as:
open FOO, "something";
This, however, will fail if "something" can't be opened:
open FOO, "something" or die "ERR: $!";
The reason is that 'or' has lower priority that list operators,
i.e. it's performed after the 'open' call.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9884)
Since the arguments are now generated in the build file templates,
they should be removed from the build.info files.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9884)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9288)
Two mistakes were made:
1. AES_ASM for x86 was misplaced
2. sse2 isn't applicable for x86_64 code
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9177)
These ciphers were already provider aware, and were available from the
default provider. We move them into the FIPS provider too.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9038)
The kernel self-tests picked up an issue with CTR mode. The issue was
detected with a test vector with an IV of
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFD: after 3 increments it should wrap
around to 0.
There are two paths that increment IVs: the bulk (8 at a time) path,
and the individual path which is used when there are fewer than 8 AES
blocks to process.
In the bulk path, the IV is incremented with vadduqm: "Vector Add
Unsigned Quadword Modulo", which does 128-bit addition.
In the individual path, however, the IV is incremented with vadduwm:
"Vector Add Unsigned Word Modulo", which instead does 4 32-bit
additions. Thus the IV would instead become
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF00000000, throwing off the result.
Use vadduqm.
This was probably a typo originally, what with q and w being
adjacent.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8942)
