The semantics of such concurrent call is not defined.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24275)
This patch merged the `add` and `xor` part of chacha_sub_round, which are
same in RISC-V Vector only and Zvkb implementation. There is no change to
the generated ASM code except for the indent.
Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24069)
Since we can do group operations on vector registers in RISC-V, some vector
registers will be used without being explicitly referenced. Thus, comments
on vector register allocation should be added to improve the code
readability and maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24069)
Although we have a Zvkb version of Chacha20, the Zvkb from the RISC-V
Vector Cryptography Bit-manipulation extension was ratified in late 2023
and does not come to the RVA23 Profile. Many CPUs in 2024 currently do not
support Zvkb but may have Vector and Bit-manipulation, which are already in
the RVA22 Profile. This commit provides a vector-only implementation that
replaced the vror with vsll+vsrl+vor and can provide enough speed for
Chacha20 for new CPUs this year.
Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24069)
These are newly introduced memory leaks and UAF in evp_test.c
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24339)
It is not used anywhere else than in tests.
Fixes#22965
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23269)
While clang 15 config target by '--target', not cannot support
'-mabi=ilp32', so add the linux-arm64ilp32-clang target.
Signed-off-by: Huiyue Xu <xuhuiyue@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22666)
Don't attempt to memcpy a NULL pointer if the length is 0.
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24309)
This function is only useful for EAP-FAST, but was previously undocumented.
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24309)
Setting the server sig algs sets up the certificate "s3->tmp.valid_flags".
These are needed when calling ssl3_choose_cipher() which can happen
immediately after calling the session_secret_cb
Fixes#24213
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24309)
Ensure that if a session_secret_cb is being used that a connection can
be successfully made
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24309)
Add checks for the return value of CRYPTO_THREAD_lock_new() in order to avoid Null pointer dereference.
Fixes: 5f8b812931 ("Add locking to atomic operations in rw/rcu tests")
Fixes: d0e1a0ae70 ("RCU lock implementation")
Fixes: 71a04cfca0 ("Implement new multi-threading API")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@purdue.edu>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24313)
That caused several memory leaks in case of error.
Also when the CMS object that is created by CMS_EncryptedData_encrypt
is not used in the normal way, but instead just deleted
by CMS_ContentInfo_free some memory was lost.
Fixes#21985
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22031)
Input value is parsed into chunks, which are separately
stored in the buffer stack. When chunk size is set,
"Count" and "Copy" parameters are skipped.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21727)
When cipher does not support variable fragmentation,
the test is skipped.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21727)
For tests in `evp_test`, which support processing in batches.
When not set or set to 0, data are processed with default
sizes (as before).
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21727)
We're getting some odd errors in the lhash test on hppa. Analysis shows
that the crash is happening randomly in various places, but always
occurs during an indexed load of register r11 or r23. Root cause hasn't
been completely determined, but given that:
1) hppa is an unadopted platform
2) asan/ubsan/threadsan shows no issues with the affected code elsewhere
3) The hppa build does not have threading enabled
4) reducing the optimization level to 01 quashes the problem
The belief is that this is either a bug in gcc optimization, or an issue
in the qemu emulator we use to test.
Since this is causing CI failures, I'm proposing that we just lower the
optimization level of the build to -01 to avoid the problem, and address
it more throughly should an actual platform user encounter an error
Fixes#24272
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24318)
Otherwise following operations would bail out in bn_check_top().
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24265)
And create a new BN_generate_dsa_nonce() that corrects the BIGNUM top.
We do this to avoid leaking fixed top numbers via the public API.
Also add a slight optimization in ossl_bn_gen_dsa_nonce_fixed_top()
and make it LE/BE agnostic.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24265)
Co-authored-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24265)
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23768)
Introduce the capability to retrieve and update Certificate Revocation Lists
(CRLs) in the CMP client, as specified in section 4.3.4 of RFC 9483.
To request a CRL update, the CMP client can send a genm message with the
option -infotype crlStatusList. The server will respond with a genp message
containing the updated CRL, using the -infoType id-it-crls. The client can
then save the CRL in a specified file using the -crlout parameter.
Co-authored-by: Rajeev Ranjan <ranjan.rajeev@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23768)
Early data is time sensitive. We have an approx 8 second allowance between
writing the early data and reading it. If we exceed that time tests will
fail. This can sometimes (rarely) occur in normal CI operation. We can try
and detect this and just ignore the result of such test failures if the test
has taken too long. We assume anything over 7 seconds is too long.
This is a partial fix for #22605
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23966)
We have functions for adding/subtracting time. We should use them.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23966)
we extract several values (uint16_t and uint64_t from the fuzzer buff
passed in, but they weren't aligned on 2 and 8 byte boundaries. Adjust
the fuzzer to memcpy data to the target variables to avoid unalignment
issues
Fixes#24272
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24276)
This fixes an incorrect error message.
Fixes#24224
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24290)
Previously the documentation for `SSL_CIPHER_description` said:
> If buf is provided, it must be at least 128 bytes, otherwise a buffer
> will be allocated using OPENSSL_malloc().
In reality, `OPENSSL_malloc` is only invoked if the provided `buf`
argument is `NULL`. If the `buf` arg is not `NULL`, but smaller than
128 bytes, the function returns `NULL` without attempting to allocate
a new buffer for the description.
This commit adjusts the documentation to better describe the implemented
behaviour.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23921)
Some CI jobs produce a significant amount artifacts and it takes a lot
of time to upload them into GitHub artifacts storage. It will be much
faster to upload only one archive with artifacts.
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24264)
