The parser expected an 'extern "C"' followed by a single declaration
to always end with a semicolon. Then came along something like this:
extern "C" DEPRECATEDIN_3_0(int ERR_load_KDF_strings(void))
This change adjusts the detector of 'extern "C"' to also take in
accound a declaration that ends with a parenthesis.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10368)
The resumption_label variable when CHARSET_EBCDIC was enabled, was misspelled.
Instead of evaluating to 'res binder' as expected, it evaluated to 'red binder'.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10396)
Make sure we don't try and load a DSA key in the tests if DSA has been
disabled.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10375)
Many Windows-based GOST TLS implementations are unable to extend the
list of supported SignatureAlgorithms because of lack of the necessary
callback in Windows. So for TLS 1.2 it makes sense to imply the support
of GOST algorithms in case when the GOST ciphersuites are present.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10377)
It contains only one function, which should only get added to non-FIPS
providers.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10389)
Now that KEYMGMT method pointers have moved away from the diverse
methods that are used with EVP_PKEY_CTX, we no longer need to pass
special argument to evp_generic_fetch() and evp_generic_do_all().
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10309)
The solaris config targets assumed that GNU cc used Sun ld at all
times. However, there are setups where GNU ld is used instead, so we
adapt the Solaris gcc config targets to use the mechanism introduced
with Configurations/shared_info.pl to try to detect what ld flavor is
being used and set the diverse ld flags accordingly.
Fixes#8547
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8548)
char (alignment 1) casted to union sctp_notification (alignment > 1).
Fixes: #9538
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10336)
The old version always sets the top 2 bits, so the most significate byte
of the primes was always >= 0xC0. We now use 256 bits to represent
1/sqrt(2) = 0x0.B504F333F9DE64845...
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
GH: #10246
'__builtin_strncpy' offset [275, 4095] from the object at
'direntry' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'd_name'
with type 'char[256]' at offset 19
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10343)
Now that we generate include/openssl/opensslv.h, there's no point
keeping some macross around, we can just set a simpler set to their
respective value and be done with it.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10218)
Also fix the test as min version > max version is allowed because
the API calls to set min and max versions are separate and there
can be legitimately a temporary situation when the condition is
true even with correctly working application.
The failure in this condition will be detected only during
a handshake attempt.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10337)
Remove "Valid options" label, since all commands have sections (and
[almost] always the first one is "General options").
Have "list --options" ignore section headers
Reformat ts's additional help
Add output section
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9953)
This test is a bit lame, but will either be completed as functionality
is added in the default provider, or the new functions may start
getting used in evp_test.c and this program will disappear.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10187)
This is the EVP operation that corresponds to creating direct RSA, DH
and DSA keys and set their numbers, to then assign them to an EVP_PKEY,
but done entirely using an algorithm agnostic EVP interface.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10187)
It's unclear if this dependency was because ASN1 functions that use
BIGNUM didn't exist before 1.1.0, or if it was a mistaken attempt at
deprecation. Since there exist ASN1 functions using BIGNUM now, it
seems pointless to keep that check, and unnecessarily including
<openssl/bn.h> should be harmless either way.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
This macro was never defined in existing releases, there's no reason
for us to create a macro that we immediately deprecate.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
Previous macros suggested that from 3.0, we're only allowed to
deprecate things at a major version. However, there's no policy
stating this, but there is for removal, saying that to remove
something, it must have been deprecated for 5 years, and that removal
can only happen at a major version.
Meanwhile, the semantic versioning rule is that deprecation should
trigger a MINOR version update, which is reflected in the macro names
as of this change.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
At some point in time, there was a 'no-deprecated' configuration
option, which had the effect of hiding all declarations of deprecated
stuff, i.e. make the public API look like they were all removed.
At some point in time, there was a '--api' configuration option, which
had the effect of having the public API look like it did in the version
given as value, on a best effort basis. In practice, this was used to
get different implementations of BN_zero(), depending on the desired
API compatibility level.
At some later point in time, '--api' was changed to mean the same as
'no-deprecated', but only for the deprecations up to and including the
desired API compatibility level. BN_zero() has been set to the
pre-1.0.0 implementation ever since, unless 'no-deprecation' has been
given.
This change turns these options back to their original meaning, but
with the slight twist that when combined, i.e. both '--api' and
'no-deprecated' is given, the declarations that are marked deprecated
up to an including the desired API compatibility level are hidden,
simulating that they have been removed.
If no desired API compatibility level has been given, then
configuration sets the current OpenSSL version by default.
Furthermore, the macro OPENSSL_API_LEVEL is now used exclusively to
check what API compatibility level is desired. For checking in code
if `no-deprecated` has been configured for the desired API
compatibility level, macros for each supported level is generated,
such as OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED_1_1_1, corresponding to the use of
DEPRECATEDIN_ macros, such as DEPRECATEDIN_1_1_1().
Just like before, to set an API compatibility level when building an
application, define OPENSSL_API_COMPAT with an appropriate value. If
it's desirable to hide deprecated functions up to and including that
level, additionally define OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED (the value is
ignored).
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
There were two paragraphs of useful information about SSL_dup, so
copy that to the right manpage.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10208)
Following on from the previous commit, we test that if an algorithm has
a provider supplied alias in the namemap then EVP_get_digestbyname() and
EVP_get_cipherbyname() can still find it.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10324)
Now that we have an EVP namemap containing all aliases that providers
know about for any given algorithm, it is possible that an application
attempts to look up a digest or a cipher via EVP_get_digestbyname() or
EVP_get_cipherbyname() with an algorithm name that is unknown to the
legacy method database. Therefore we extend those functions to
additionally check the aliases in the namemap when searching for a
method in the event that our initial lookup attempt fails.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10324)
When the source isn't in development any more (the version number
doesn't the tags 'dev' or 'alpha'), we renumber the unassigned symbols
to ensure that we have fixed numbers on all.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10348)
If a script wants to display how many symbols have assigned numbers
and how many don't, this gives them those numbers.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10348)
This should be used when it's time to assign constant numbers to the
unassigned symbols.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10348)
We preserve the number or '?' or '?+', but assign numbers internally
on the latter, to ensure we keep the order of the input.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10348)
Symbols that have appeared since 1.1.1 was released are considered
unassigned in the development branch. This is marked by having a
question mark as its ordinal number.
This introduces two new markers to be used instead of ordinal numbers:
? signifying it gets the previous symbol's number plus one
?+ signifying it gets the same number as the previous symbol
'?+' should remain rare, but is useful to create aliases when needed
(for example when two different symbols clash because they only differ
in character case, see include/openssl/symhacks.h)
The intention is that a development branch won't have set numbers for
new symbols, and that the final numbers will only get allocated when
making beta or final releases.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10348)
Because the algorithm to use is decided already when creating an
EVP_PKEY_CTX regardless of how it was created, it turns out that it's
unnecessary to provide the SIGNATURE method explicitly, and rather
always have it be fetched implicitly.
This means fewer changes for applications that want to use new
signature algorithms / implementations.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10303)
Because the algorithm to use is decided already when creating an
EVP_PKEY_CTX regardless of how it was created, it turns out that it's
unnecessary to provide the KEYEXCH method explicitly, and rather
always have it be fetched implicitly.
This means fewer changes for applications that want to use new key
exchange algorithms / implementations.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10305)
...in constant time.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10339)
x25519 has such a test vector obtained from wycheproof but wycheproof
does not have a corresponding x448 test vector.
So add a self-generated test vector for that case.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10339)
The s390x x448 implementation does not correctly reduce non-canonical
values i.e., u-coordinates >= p = 2^448 - 2^224 - 1.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10339)
- add instructions: clfi, stck, stckf, kdsa
- clfi and clgfi belong to extended-immediate (not long-displacement)
- some cleanup
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10346)