this needs a sanitized 64 bit time_t build to be detected (or possibly
valgrind, trapv or similar)
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22976)
Don't check the Max Fragment Length if the it hasn't been negotiated. We
were checking it anyway, and using the default value
(SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH). This works in most cases but KTLS can cause the
record length to actually exceed this in some cases.
Fixes#23169
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23182)
Check that we can write and read back long app data records when using
KTLS.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23182)
Also document that it is ok to use this for control flow decisions.
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23304)
The function in question is SSL_get_peer_certificate()
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23315)
ubsan on clang17 has started warning about the following undefined
behavior:
crypto/lhash/lhash.c:299:12: runtime error: call to function err_string_data_hash through pointer to incorrect function type 'unsigned long (*)(const void *)'
[...]/crypto/err/err.c:184: note: err_string_data_hash defined here
#0 0x7fa569e3a434 in getrn [...]/crypto/lhash/lhash.c:299:12
#1 0x7fa569e39a46 in OPENSSL_LH_insert [...]/crypto/lhash/lhash.c:119:10
#2 0x7fa569d866ee in err_load_strings [...]/crypto/err/err.c:280:15
[...]
The issue occurs because, the generic hash functions (OPENSSL_LH_*) will
occasionaly call back to the type specific registered functions for hash
generation/comparison/free/etc, using functions of the (example)
prototype:
[return value] <hash|cmp|free> (void *, [void *], ...)
While the functions implementing hash|cmp|free|etc are defined as
[return value] <fnname> (TYPE *, [TYPE *], ...)
The compiler, not knowing the type signature of the function pointed to
by the implementation, performs no type conversion on the function
arguments
While the C language specification allows for pointers to data of one
type to be converted to pointers of another type, it does not
allow for pointers to functions with one signature to be called
while pointing to functions of another signature. Compilers often allow
this behavior, but strictly speaking it results in undefined behavior
As such, ubsan warns us about this issue
This is an potential fix for the issue, implemented using, in effect,
thunking macros. For each hash type, an additional set of wrapper
funtions is created (currently for compare and hash, but more will be
added for free/doall/etc). The corresponding thunking macros for each
type cases the actuall corresponding callback to a function pointer of
the proper type, and then calls that with the parameters appropriately
cast, avoiding the ubsan warning
This approach is adventageous as it maintains a level of type safety,
but comes at the cost of having to implement several additional
functions per hash table type.
Related to #22896
Reviewed-by: Sasa Nedvedicky <sashan@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23192)
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19948)
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19948)
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19948)
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19948)
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19948)
The regression was introduced in PR #22817.
In that pull request, the input length check was moved forward,
but the related ori instruction was missing, and it will cause
input of any length down to the much slower scalar implementation.
Fixes#23300
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23301)
GNU/Hurd does not have IP_PKTINFO yet, thus SUPPORT_LOCAL_ADDR is undef,
data->local_addr_enabled never set to 1, and thus the M_METHOD_RECVMSG
method would end up raising BIO_R_LOCAL_ADDR_NOT_AVAILABLE immediately.
Fixes#22872
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23293)
During creation of the EVP_PKEY_CTX we were trying to discover what legacy
alg it corresponds to every time which was slow. Instead we move this into
the construction of the EVP_KEYMGMT.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23265)
X509_STORE_get0_objects returns a pointer to the X509_STORE's storage,
but this function is a bit deceptive. It is practically unusable in a
multi-threaded program. See, for example, RUSTSEC-2023-0072, a security
vulnerability caused by this OpenSSL API.
One might think that, if no other threads are mutating the X509_STORE,
it is safe to read the resulting list. However, the documention does not
mention that other logically-const operations on the X509_STORE, notably
certifcate verifications when a hash_dir is installed, will, under a
lock, write to the X509_STORE. The X509_STORE also internally re-sorts
the list on the first query.
If the caller knows to call X509_STORE_lock and X509_STORE_unlock, it
can work around this. But this is not obvious, and the documentation
does not discuss how X509_STORE_lock is very rarely safe to use. E.g.
one cannot call any APIs like X509_STORE_add_cert or
X509_STORE_CTX_get1_issuer while holding the lock because those
functions internally expect to take the lock. (X509_STORE_lock is
another such API which is not safe to export as public API.)
Rather than leave all this to the caller to figure out, the API should
have returned a shallow copy of the list, refcounting the values. Then
it could be internally locked and the caller can freely inspect the
result without synchronization with the X509_STORE.
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23224)
Since new_line is assigned with 0 in the very begging of the function check added at line no. 106 will never become true. Hence removing.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23284)
Fixes CVE-2023-6237
If a large and incorrect RSA public key is checked with
EVP_PKEY_public_check() the computation could take very long time
due to no limit being applied to the RSA public key size and
unnecessarily high number of Miller-Rabin algorithm rounds
used for non-primality check of the modulus.
Now the keys larger than 16384 bits (OPENSSL_RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS)
will fail the check with RSA_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE error reason.
Also the number of Miller-Rabin rounds was set to 5.
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23243)
If the value of a->length is large (>= 2^12), then an integer overflow will
occur for the signed type, which according to the C standard is UB.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23274)
This changeset adds the counterpart to the '-subj' option to allow overriding
the Issuer. For consistency, the `-subj` option is aliased to `-set_subject`.
The issuer can be specified as following apps/openssl x509 -new -set_issuer
'/CN=example-nro-ta' -subj '/CN=2a7dd1d787d793e4c8af56e197d4eed92af6ba13' ...
This is useful in constructing specific test-cases or rechaining PKI trees
Joint work with George Michaelson (@geeohgeegeeoh)
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23257)
Current PowerPC-related defines omit Darwin ppc64 case.
Use __POWERPC__ in place of __ppc__ + __ppc64__
Fixes#23220
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23245)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23253)
OpenSSL's encoding of SM2 keys used the SM2 OID for the algorithm OID
where an AlgorithmIdentifier is encoded (for encoding into the structures
PrivateKeyInfo and SubjectPublicKeyInfo).
Such keys should be encoded as ECC keys.
Fixes#22184
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22529)
When parsing the stable section of a config such as this:
openssl_conf = openssl_init
[openssl_init]
stbl_section = mstbl
[mstbl]
id-tc26 = min
Can lead to a SIGSEGV, as the parsing code doesnt recognize min as a
proper section name without a trailing colon to associate it with a
value. As a result the stack of configuration values has an entry with
a null value in it, which leads to the SIGSEGV in do_tcreate when we
attempt to pass NULL to strtoul.
Fix it by skipping any entry in the config name/value list that has a
null value, prior to passing it to stroul
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22988)
Add test case for re-using a cipher context with the same key, iv and
cipher. It detects, if the hardware-specific cipher context is reset
correctly, like reported in issue #23175.
This test has encrypt and decrypt iterations for cfb128 and
ofb128. All iteations use the same key, iv and plaintext.
Signed-off-by: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23201)
Use the number of processed bytes information (num) from the generic
cipher context for the partial block handling in cfb and ofb also in
s390x-legacy code. For more details see 4df92c1a14 ("Fix partial block
encryption in cfb and ofb for s390x").
Signed-off-by: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23201)
Use the number of processed bytes information (num) from the generic
cipher context for the partial block handling in cfb and ofb, instead
of keep this information in the s390x-specific part of the cipher
context. The information in the generic context is reset properly,
even if the context is re-initialized without resetting the key or iv.
Fixes: #23175
Signed-off-by: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23201)
Match behavior of all other x86_64 asm.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23219)
