Last week I proposed to increase the version number to 1.0.

So far nobody complained...
This commit is contained in:
Ulf Möller 1999-04-26 20:56:18 +00:00
parent b736d909ee
commit 540e6c172e

15
STATUS
View File

@ -1,28 +1,31 @@
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
______________ $Date: 1999/04/23 22:20:21 $
______________ $Date: 1999/04/26 20:56:18 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.3: Under development...
o OpenSSL 1.0: Under development...
Proposed freeze date: Mon May 8th, 1999
Proposed release date: Mon May 17th, 1999
o OpenSSL 0.9.2b: Released on March 22th, 1999
o OpenSSL 0.9.1c: Released on December 23th, 1998
[ Proposed new numbering scheme: <major>.<minor>[<patchlevel>]
0.9.1c is 0913
1.0 is 010000
1.0 a is 100001
1.8 z is 01081a ]
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS
o Compilation warnings: ctype-related int vs. char
o Compilation error: "unsigned long*" and "int*" under AIX
o BSD/OS: assembler functions must not have leading underscores
o exptest and rsa_oaep_test fail with irix64-*
o exptest and rsa_oaep_test fail with irix64-*
(Don Badrak <dbadrak@geo.census.gov>: "Re: Problems to compile openssl
on IRIX 6.2", openssl-users)
o BN_add test fails on Caldera OpenLinux 1.3
(Marc Christensen <Marc.Christensen@m.cc.utah.edu>
"Compiles but fails big number test?", openssl-users)
o make test fails on AIX
(jvant@bsumail.idbsu.edu on openssl-users)
AVAILABLE PATCHES