2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
=pod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 NAME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provider-keymgmt - The KEYMGMT library E<lt>-E<gt> provider functions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:21:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <openssl/core_dispatch.h>
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* None of these are actual functions, but are displayed like this for
|
|
|
|
* the function signatures for functions that are offered as function
|
|
|
|
* pointers in OSSL_DISPATCH arrays.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key object (keydata) creation and destruction */
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
void *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new(void *provctx);
|
|
|
|
void OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_free(void *keydata);
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 04:21:18 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Generation, a more complex constructor */
|
2021-03-02 07:05:15 +08:00
|
|
|
void *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_init(void *provctx, int selection,
|
|
|
|
const OSSL_PARAM params[]);
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_template(void *genctx, void *template);
|
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_params(void *genctx, const OSSL_PARAM params[]);
|
2021-02-27 01:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
const OSSL_PARAM *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_settable_params(void *genctx,
|
|
|
|
void *provctx);
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
void *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen(void *genctx, OSSL_CALLBACK *cb, void *cbarg);
|
|
|
|
void OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_cleanup(void *genctx);
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 04:21:18 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key loading by object reference, also a constructor */
|
|
|
|
void *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_load(const void *reference, size_t *reference_sz);
|
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key object information */
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_get_params(void *keydata, OSSL_PARAM params[]);
|
2020-08-05 11:24:04 +08:00
|
|
|
const OSSL_PARAM *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gettable_params(void *provctx);
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params(void *keydata, const OSSL_PARAM params[]);
|
2020-08-05 11:24:04 +08:00
|
|
|
const OSSL_PARAM *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_settable_params(void *provctx);
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key object content checks */
|
2020-10-21 06:02:04 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_has(const void *keydata, int selection);
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_match(const void *keydata1, const void *keydata2,
|
|
|
|
int selection);
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Discovery of supported operations */
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
const char *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_query_operation_name(int operation_id);
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key object import and export functions */
|
2022-05-28 18:59:34 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import(void *keydata, int selection, const OSSL_PARAM params[]);
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
const OSSL_PARAM *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import_types(int selection);
|
2022-05-28 18:59:34 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export(void *keydata, int selection,
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_CALLBACK *param_cb, void *cbarg);
|
|
|
|
const OSSL_PARAM *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export_types(int selection);
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 01:35:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key object duplication, a constructor */
|
2021-04-09 00:25:26 +08:00
|
|
|
void *OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_dup(const void *keydata_from, int selection);
|
2021-04-08 01:35:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Key object validation */
|
2021-02-09 23:50:05 +08:00
|
|
|
int OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_validate(const void *keydata, int selection, int checktype);
|
2020-01-29 18:32:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KEYMGMT operation doesn't have much public visibility in OpenSSL
|
|
|
|
libraries, it's rather an internal operation that's designed to work
|
|
|
|
in tandem with operations that use private/public key pairs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the KEYMGMT operation shares knowledge with the operations it
|
|
|
|
works with in tandem, they must belong to the same provider.
|
|
|
|
The OpenSSL libraries will ensure that they do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary responsibility of the KEYMGMT operation is to hold the
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
provider side key data for the OpenSSL library EVP_PKEY structure.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All "functions" mentioned here are passed as function pointers between
|
|
|
|
F<libcrypto> and the provider in B<OSSL_DISPATCH> arrays via
|
|
|
|
B<OSSL_ALGORITHM> arrays that are returned by the provider's
|
|
|
|
provider_query_operation() function
|
|
|
|
(see L<provider-base(7)/Provider Functions>).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All these "functions" have a corresponding function type definition
|
2021-03-31 19:22:25 +08:00
|
|
|
named B<OSSL_FUNC_{name}_fn>, and a helper function to retrieve the
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
function pointer from a B<OSSL_DISPATCH> element named
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
B<OSSL_FUNC_{name}>.
|
|
|
|
For example, the "function" OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new() has these:
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
typedef void *(OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new_fn)(void *provctx);
|
|
|
|
static ossl_inline OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new_fn
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new(const OSSL_DISPATCH *opf);
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B<OSSL_DISPATCH> arrays are indexed by numbers that are provided as
|
2020-06-21 07:21:19 +08:00
|
|
|
macros in L<openssl-core_dispatch.h(7)>, as follows:
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_NEW
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_free OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_FREE
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_init OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GEN_INIT
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_template OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GEN_SET_TEMPLATE
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_params OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GEN_SET_PARAMS
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_settable_params OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GEN_SETTABLE_PARAMS
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GEN
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_cleanup OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GEN_CLEANUP
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 04:21:18 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_load OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_LOAD
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_get_params OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GET_PARAMS
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gettable_params OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_GETTABLE_PARAMS
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_SET_PARAMS
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_settable_params OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_SETTABLE_PARAMS
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_query_operation_name OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_QUERY_OPERATION_NAME
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_has OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_HAS
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_validate OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_VALIDATE
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_match OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_MATCH
|
2020-01-29 18:32:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_IMPORT
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import_types OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_IMPORT_TYPES
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_EXPORT
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export_types OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_EXPORT_TYPES
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 01:35:13 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_dup OSSL_FUNC_KEYMGMT_DUP
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=head2 Key Objects
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
A key object is a collection of data for an asymmetric key, and is
|
|
|
|
represented as I<keydata> in this manual.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
The exact contents of a key object are defined by the provider, and it
|
|
|
|
is assumed that different operations in one and the same provider use
|
|
|
|
the exact same structure to represent this collection of data, so that
|
|
|
|
for example, a key object that has been created using the KEYMGMT
|
|
|
|
interface that we document here can be passed as is to other provider
|
|
|
|
operations, such as OP_signature_sign_init() (see
|
|
|
|
L<provider-signature(7)>).
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
With some of the KEYMGMT functions, it's possible to select a specific
|
|
|
|
subset of data to handle, governed by the bits in a I<selection>
|
|
|
|
indicator. The bits are:
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=over 4
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_PRIVATE_KEY>
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Indicating that the private key data in a key object should be
|
|
|
|
considered.
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_PUBLIC_KEY>
|
2020-01-29 18:32:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Indicating that the public key data in a key object should be
|
|
|
|
considered.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_DOMAIN_PARAMETERS>
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Indicating that the domain parameters in a key object should be
|
|
|
|
considered.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_OTHER_PARAMETERS>
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Indicating that other parameters in a key object should be
|
|
|
|
considered.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Other parameters are key parameters that don't fit any other
|
|
|
|
classification. In other words, this particular selector bit works as
|
|
|
|
a last resort bit bucket selector.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=back
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Some selector bits have also been combined for easier use:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_ALL_PARAMETERS>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicating that all key object parameters should be considered,
|
|
|
|
regardless of their more granular classification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=for comment This should used by EVP functions such as
|
2021-04-23 08:53:03 +08:00
|
|
|
EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters() and EVP_PKEY_parameters_eq()
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a combination of B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_DOMAIN_PARAMETERS> and
|
|
|
|
B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_OTHER_PARAMETERS>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=for comment If more parameter categories are added, they should be
|
|
|
|
mentioned here too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_KEYPAIR>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicating that both the whole key pair in a key object should be
|
|
|
|
considered, i.e. the combination of public and private key.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
This is a combination of B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_PRIVATE_KEY> and
|
|
|
|
B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_PUBLIC_KEY>.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=item B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_ALL>
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Indicating that everything in a key object should be considered.
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
=back
|
2020-01-29 18:32:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
The exact interpretation of those bits or how they combine is left to
|
|
|
|
each function where you can specify a selector.
|
2020-01-29 18:32:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-29 19:45:55 +08:00
|
|
|
It's left to the provider implementation to decide what is reasonable
|
|
|
|
to do with regards to received selector bits and how to do it.
|
|
|
|
Among others, an implementation of OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_match() might opt
|
|
|
|
to not compare the private half if it has compared the public half,
|
|
|
|
since a match of one half implies a match of the other half.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Constructing and Destructing Functions
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new() should create a provider side key object. The
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
provider context I<provctx> is passed and may be incorporated in the
|
|
|
|
key object, but that is not mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_free() should free the passed I<keydata>.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_init(), OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_template(),
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_params(), OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_settable_params(),
|
2020-07-09 04:21:18 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen() and OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_cleanup() work together as a
|
|
|
|
more elaborate context based key object constructor.
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_init() should create the key object generation context
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
and initialize it with I<selections>, which will determine what kind
|
2021-03-03 09:26:51 +08:00
|
|
|
of contents the key object to be generated should get.
|
|
|
|
The I<params>, if not NULL, should be set on the context in a manner similar to
|
|
|
|
using OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params().
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_template() should add I<template> to the context
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
I<genctx>. The I<template> is assumed to be a key object constructed
|
|
|
|
with the same KEYMGMT, and from which content that the implementation
|
|
|
|
chooses can be used as a template for the key object to be generated.
|
|
|
|
Typically, the generation of a DSA or DH key would get the domain
|
|
|
|
parameters from this I<template>.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_params() should set additional parameters from
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
I<params> in the key object generation context I<genctx>.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_settable_params() should return a constant array of
|
2021-09-21 08:59:56 +08:00
|
|
|
descriptor B<OSSL_PARAM>, for parameters that OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_set_params()
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
can handle.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen() should perform the key object generation itself, and
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
return the result. The callback I<cb> should be called at regular
|
|
|
|
intervals with indications on how the key object generation
|
|
|
|
progresses.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_cleanup() should clean up and free the key object
|
2019-10-26 19:00:56 +08:00
|
|
|
generation context I<genctx>
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 04:21:18 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_load() creates a provider side key object based on a
|
|
|
|
I<reference> object with a size of I<reference_sz> bytes, that only the
|
|
|
|
provider knows how to interpret, but that may come from other operations.
|
|
|
|
Outside the provider, this reference is simply an array of bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At least one of OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new(), OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen() and
|
2021-09-18 11:04:39 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_load() are mandatory, as well as OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_free() and
|
2021-09-21 08:59:56 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_has(). Additionally, if OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen() is present,
|
2021-09-18 11:04:39 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_init() and OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gen_cleanup() must be
|
|
|
|
present as well.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Key Object Information Functions
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_get_params() should extract information data associated
|
2020-04-15 01:06:12 +08:00
|
|
|
with the given I<keydata>, see L</Common Information Parameters>.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gettable_params() should return a constant array of
|
|
|
|
descriptor B<OSSL_PARAM>, for parameters that OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_get_params()
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
can handle.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
If OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gettable_params() is present, OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_get_params()
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
must also be present, and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params() should update information data associated
|
2020-04-15 01:06:12 +08:00
|
|
|
with the given I<keydata>, see L</Common Information Parameters>.
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_settable_params() should return a constant array of
|
|
|
|
descriptor B<OSSL_PARAM>, for parameters that OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params()
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
can handle.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
If OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_settable_params() is present, OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params()
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
must also be present, and vice versa.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Key Object Checking Functions
|
2019-12-18 20:20:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_query_operation_name() should return the name of the
|
2019-12-18 20:20:55 +08:00
|
|
|
supported algorithm for the operation I<operation_id>. This is
|
|
|
|
similar to provider_query_operation() (see L<provider-base(7)>),
|
|
|
|
but only works as an advisory. If this function is not present, or
|
|
|
|
returns NULL, the caller is free to assume that there's an algorithm
|
|
|
|
from the same provider, of the same name as the one used to fetch the
|
|
|
|
keymgmt and try to use that.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_has() should check whether the given I<keydata> contains the subsets
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
of data indicated by the I<selector>. A combination of several
|
|
|
|
selector bits must consider all those subsets, not just one. An
|
|
|
|
implementation is, however, free to consider an empty subset of data
|
2021-03-11 20:31:13 +08:00
|
|
|
to still be a valid subset. For algorithms where some selection is
|
|
|
|
not meaningful such as B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_DOMAIN_PARAMETERS> for
|
|
|
|
RSA keys the function should just return 1 as the selected subset
|
|
|
|
is not really missing in the key.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_validate() should check if the I<keydata> contains valid
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
data subsets indicated by I<selection>. Some combined selections of
|
|
|
|
data subsets may cause validation of the combined data.
|
|
|
|
For example, the combination of B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_PRIVATE_KEY> and
|
|
|
|
B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_PUBLIC_KEY> (or B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_KEYPAIR>
|
|
|
|
for short) is expected to check that the pairwise consistency of
|
2021-02-09 23:50:05 +08:00
|
|
|
I<keydata> is valid. The I<checktype> parameter controls what type of check is
|
|
|
|
performed on the subset of data. Two types of check are defined:
|
|
|
|
B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_VALIDATE_FULL_CHECK> and B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_VALIDATE_QUICK_CHECK>.
|
|
|
|
The interpretation of how much checking is performed in a full check versus a
|
|
|
|
quick check is key type specific. Some providers may have no distinction
|
2021-03-11 20:31:13 +08:00
|
|
|
between a full check and a quick check. For algorithms where some selection is
|
|
|
|
not meaningful such as B<OSSL_KEYMGMT_SELECT_DOMAIN_PARAMETERS> for
|
|
|
|
RSA keys the function should just return 1 as there is nothing to validate for
|
|
|
|
that selection.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_match() should check if the data subset indicated by
|
2020-02-05 19:53:14 +08:00
|
|
|
I<selection> in I<keydata1> and I<keydata2> match. It is assumed that
|
|
|
|
the caller has ensured that I<keydata1> and I<keydata2> are both owned
|
|
|
|
by the implementation of this function.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-09 01:02:44 +08:00
|
|
|
=head2 Key Object Import, Export and Duplication Functions
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import() should import data indicated by I<selection> into
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
I<keydata> with values taken from the B<OSSL_PARAM> array I<params>.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export() should extract values indicated by I<selection>
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
from I<keydata>, create an B<OSSL_PARAM> array with them and call
|
|
|
|
I<param_cb> with that array as well as the given I<cbarg>.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import_types() should return a constant array of descriptor
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
B<OSSL_PARAM> for data indicated by I<selection>, for parameters that
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import() can handle.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export_types() should return a constant array of descriptor
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
B<OSSL_PARAM> for data indicated by I<selection>, that the
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export() callback can expect to receive.
|
Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
The KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface currently makes a few
assumptions:
1. provider side domain parameters and key data isn't mutable. In
other words, as soon as a key has been created in any (loaded,
imported data, ...), it's set in stone.
2. provider side domain parameters can be strictly separated from the
key data.
This does work for the most part, but there are places where that's a
bit too rigid for the functionality that the EVP_PKEY API delivers.
Key data needs to be mutable to allow the flexibility that functions
like EVP_PKEY_copy_parameters promise, as well as to provide the
combinations of data that an EVP_PKEY is generally assumed to be able
to hold:
- domain parameters only
- public key only
- public key + private key
- domain parameters + public key
- domain parameters + public key + private key
To remedy all this, we:
1. let go of the distinction between domain parameters and key
material proper in the libcrypto <-> provider interface.
As a consequence, functions that still need it gain a selection
argument, which is a set of bits that indicate what parts of the
key object are to be considered in a specific call. This allows
a reduction of very similar functions into one.
2. Rework the libcrypto <-> provider interface so provider side key
objects are created and destructed with a separate function, and
get their data filled and extracted in through import and export.
(future work will see other key object constructors and other
functions to fill them with data)
Fixes #10979
squash! Redesign the KEYMGMT libcrypto <-> provider interface - the basics
Remedy 1 needs a rewrite:
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11006)
2020-02-03 01:56:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-09 00:25:26 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_dup() should duplicate data subsets indicated by
|
|
|
|
I<selection> or the whole key data I<keydata_from> and create a new
|
|
|
|
provider side key object with the data.
|
2021-04-08 01:35:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-15 01:06:12 +08:00
|
|
|
=head2 Common Information Parameters
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See L<OSSL_PARAM(3)> for further details on the parameters structure.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-15 01:06:12 +08:00
|
|
|
Common information parameters currently recognised by all built-in
|
|
|
|
keymgmt algorithms are as follows:
|
2020-04-01 13:51:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-08 10:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item "bits" (B<OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_BITS>) <integer>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value should be the cryptographic length of the cryptosystem to
|
|
|
|
which the key belongs, in bits. The definition of cryptographic
|
|
|
|
length is specific to the key cryptosystem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item "max-size" (B<OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_MAX_SIZE>) <integer>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value should be the maximum size that a caller should allocate to
|
|
|
|
safely store a signature (called I<sig> in L<provider-signature(7)>),
|
|
|
|
the result of asymmmetric encryption / decryption (I<out> in
|
|
|
|
L<provider-asym_cipher(7)>, a derived secret (I<secret> in
|
|
|
|
L<provider-keyexch(7)>, and similar data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because an EVP_KEYMGMT method is always tightly bound to another method
|
|
|
|
(signature, asymmetric cipher, key exchange, ...) and must be of the
|
|
|
|
same provider, this number only needs to be synchronised with the
|
|
|
|
dimensions handled in the rest of the same provider.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item "security-bits" (B<OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_SECURITY_BITS>) <integer>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value should be the number of security bits of the given key.
|
|
|
|
Bits of security is defined in SP800-57.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
=head1 RETURN VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 01:35:13 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_new() and OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_dup() should return a valid
|
|
|
|
reference to the newly created provider side key object, or NULL on failure.
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import(), OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export(), OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_get_params() and
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_set_params() should return 1 for success or 0 on error.
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_validate() should return 1 on successful validation, or 0 on
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
failure.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_has() should return 1 if all the selected data subsets are contained
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
in the given I<keydata> or 0 otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_query_operation_name() should return a pointer to a string matching
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
the requested operation, or NULL if the same name used to fetch the keymgmt
|
|
|
|
applies.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-21 07:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_gettable_params() and OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_settable_params()
|
|
|
|
OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_import_types(), OSSL_FUNC_keymgmt_export_types()
|
2020-02-09 19:56:27 +08:00
|
|
|
should
|
|
|
|
always return a constant B<OSSL_PARAM> array.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
=head1 SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-15 01:06:12 +08:00
|
|
|
L<provider(7)>,
|
|
|
|
L<EVP_PKEY-X25519(7)>, L<EVP_PKEY-X448(7)>, L<EVP_PKEY-ED25519(7)>,
|
|
|
|
L<EVP_PKEY-ED448(7)>, L<EVP_PKEY-EC(7)>, L<EVP_PKEY-RSA(7)>,
|
|
|
|
L<EVP_PKEY-DSA(7)>, L<EVP_PKEY-DH(7)>
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 HISTORY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KEYMGMT interface was introduced in OpenSSL 3.0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-18 22:57:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Copyright 2019-2021 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
2019-07-22 16:46:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (the "License"). You may not use
|
|
|
|
this file except in compliance with the License. You can obtain a copy
|
|
|
|
in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
|
|
|
|
L<https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=cut
|