mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:10:25 +08:00
732 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
732 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Network Working Group Mark Smith, Editor
|
||
Request for Comments: DRAFT Netscape Communications Corp.
|
||
Obsoletes: RFC 2255 Tim Howes
|
||
Expires: 28 August 2003 Opsware, Inc.
|
||
|
||
28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator
|
||
<draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-03.txt>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. Status of this Memo
|
||
|
||
This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions
|
||
of Section 10 of RFC2026.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
|
||
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
|
||
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
|
||
Drafts.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
|
||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
||
|
||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
|
||
|
||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
|
||
|
||
Discussion of this document should take place on the LDAP (v3)
|
||
Revision (ldapbis) Working Group mailing list <ietf-
|
||
ldapbis@openldap.org>.
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
2. Abstract
|
||
|
||
This document describes a format for an LDAP Uniform Resource Locator
|
||
(URL). An LDAP URL describes an LDAP search operation that is used
|
||
to retrieve information from an LDAP directory, or, in the context of
|
||
an LDAPv3 referral or reference, an LDAP URL describes a service
|
||
where an LDAP operation may be progressed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 1]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
3. Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
1. Status of this Memo............................................1
|
||
2. Abstract.......................................................1
|
||
3. Table of Contents..............................................2
|
||
4. Introduction...................................................2
|
||
5. URL Definition.................................................2
|
||
6. Defaults for Fields of the LDAP URL............................5
|
||
7. Examples.......................................................5
|
||
8. Security Considerations........................................7
|
||
9. Acknowledgements...............................................8
|
||
10. Normative References...........................................9
|
||
11. Informative References.........................................9
|
||
12. Authors' Address...............................................9
|
||
13. Full Copyright Statement.......................................10
|
||
14. Appendix A: Changes Since RFC 2255.............................10
|
||
14.1. Technical Changes...........................................10
|
||
14.2. Editorial Changes...........................................11
|
||
15. Appendix B: Changes Since Previous Document Revision...........13
|
||
15.1. Technical Changes...........................................13
|
||
15.2. Editorial Changes...........................................13
|
||
|
||
4. Introduction
|
||
|
||
LDAP is the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, defined in
|
||
[Protocol]. This document specifies the LDAP URL format for version
|
||
3 of LDAP and clarifies how LDAP URLs are resolved. This document
|
||
also defines an extension mechanism for LDAP URLs, so that future
|
||
documents can extend their functionality, for example, to provide
|
||
access to new LDAPv3 extensions as they are defined. Note: not all
|
||
of the parameters of the LDAP search operation described in
|
||
[Protocol] can be expressed using the format defined in this
|
||
document.
|
||
|
||
This document is an integral part of the LDAP Technical Specification
|
||
[Roadmap].
|
||
|
||
This document replaces RFC 2255. See Appendix A for a list of changes
|
||
relative to RFC 2255.
|
||
|
||
The key words "MUST", "MAY", and "SHOULD" used in this document are
|
||
to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
|
||
|
||
5. URL Definition
|
||
|
||
An LDAP URL begins with the protocol prefix "ldap" and is defined by
|
||
the following grammar, following the ABNF notation defined in
|
||
[RFC2234].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 2]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
ldapurl = scheme COLON SLASH SLASH [hostport] [SLASH dn
|
||
[QUESTION [attributes] [QUESTION [scope]
|
||
[QUESTION [filter] [QUESTION extensions]]]]]
|
||
scheme = "ldap"
|
||
hostport = <hostport from Section 3.2.2 of [RFC2396]>
|
||
; as updated by [RFC2732] to allow IPv6 literal addresses
|
||
dn = <distinguishedName from Section 3 of [LDAPDN]>
|
||
attributes = attrdesc *(COMMA attrdesc)
|
||
attrdesc = <AttributeDescription from Section 4.1.4 of [Protocol]>
|
||
/ ASTERIX
|
||
scope = "base" / "one" / "sub"
|
||
filter = <filter from Section 4 of [Filters]>
|
||
extensions = extension *(COMMA extension)
|
||
extension = [EXCLAMATION] extype [EQUALS exvalue]
|
||
extype = oid / oiddescr
|
||
exvalue = <LDAPString from section 4.1.2 of [Protocol]>
|
||
oid = <LDAPOID from section 4.1.2 of [Protocol]>
|
||
oiddescr = <name from section 3.3 of [LDAPIANA]>
|
||
|
||
EXCLAMATION = %x21 ; exclamation mark ("!")
|
||
ASTERIX = %x2A ; asterix ("*")
|
||
COLON = %x3A ; colon (":")
|
||
QUESTION = %x3F ; question mark ("?")
|
||
SLASH = %x5C; forward slash ("/")
|
||
|
||
|
||
The "ldap" prefix indicates an entry or entries residing in the LDAP
|
||
server running on the given hostname at the given portnumber. Note
|
||
that the hostport may contain literal IPv6 addresses as specified in
|
||
[RFC2732].
|
||
|
||
The dn is an LDAP Distinguished Name using the string format
|
||
described in [LDAPDN]. It identifies the base object of the LDAP
|
||
search or the target of a non-search operation.
|
||
|
||
The attributes construct is used to indicate which attributes should
|
||
be returned from the entry or entries. Individual attrdesc names are
|
||
as defined for AttributeDescription in [Protocol].
|
||
|
||
The scope construct is used to specify the scope of the search to
|
||
perform in the given LDAP server. The allowable scopes are "base"
|
||
for a base object search, "one" for a one-level search, or "sub" for
|
||
a subtree search.
|
||
|
||
The filter is used to specify the search filter to apply to entries
|
||
within the specified scope during the search. It has the format
|
||
specified in [Filters].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 3]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
The extensions construct provides the LDAP URL with an extensibility
|
||
mechanism, allowing the capabilities of the URL to be extended in the
|
||
future. Extensions are a simple comma-separated list of type=value
|
||
pairs, where the =value portion MAY be omitted for options not
|
||
requiring it. Each type=value pair is a separate extension. These
|
||
LDAP URL extensions are not necessarily related to any of the LDAPv3
|
||
extension mechanisms. Extensions may be supported or unsupported by
|
||
the client resolving the URL. An extension prefixed with a '!'
|
||
character (ASCII 33) is critical. An extension not prefixed with a
|
||
'!' character is non-critical.
|
||
|
||
If an extension is supported by the client, the client MUST obey the
|
||
extension if the extension is critical. The client SHOULD obey
|
||
supported extensions that are non-critical.
|
||
|
||
If an extension is unsupported by the client, the client MUST NOT
|
||
process the URL if the extension is critical. If an unsupported
|
||
extension is non-critical, the client MUST ignore the extension.
|
||
|
||
If a critical extension cannot be processed successfully by the
|
||
client, the client MUST NOT process the URL. If a non-critical
|
||
extension cannot be processed successfully by the client, the client
|
||
SHOULD ignore the extension.
|
||
|
||
The extension type (extype) MAY be specified using the oid form
|
||
(e.g., 1.2.3.4) or the oiddesc form (e.g., myLDAPURLExtension). Use
|
||
of the oiddesc form SHOULD be restricted to registered object
|
||
identifier descriptive names. See [LDAPIANA] for registration
|
||
details and usage guidelines for descriptive names.
|
||
|
||
No LDAP URL extensions are defined in this document. Other documents
|
||
or a future version of this document MAY define one or more
|
||
extensions.
|
||
|
||
A generated LDAP URL MUST consist only of the restricted set of
|
||
characters included in the uric production that is defined in section
|
||
2 of [RFC2396]. Implementations SHOULD accept other valid UTF-8
|
||
strings as input. An octet MUST be escaped using the % method
|
||
described in section 2.4 of [RFC2396] in any of these situations:
|
||
|
||
The octet is not in the reserved set defined in section 2.2 of
|
||
[RFC2396] or in the unreserved set defined in section 2.3 of
|
||
[RFC2396].
|
||
|
||
It is the single Reserved character '?' and occurs inside a dn,
|
||
filter, or other element of an LDAP URL.
|
||
|
||
It is a comma character ',' that occurs inside an extension value.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 4]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
6. Defaults for Fields of the LDAP URL
|
||
|
||
Some fields of the LDAP URL are optional, as described above. In the
|
||
absence of any other specification, the following general defaults
|
||
SHOULD be used when a field is absent. Note: other documents MAY
|
||
specify different defaulting rules; for example, section 4.1.11 of
|
||
[Protocol] specifies a different rule for determining the correct DN
|
||
to use when it is absent in an LDAP URL that is returned as a
|
||
referral.
|
||
|
||
hostport
|
||
The default LDAP port is TCP port 389. If no hostport is given,
|
||
the client must have some apriori knowledge of an appropriate LDAP
|
||
server to contact.
|
||
|
||
dn
|
||
If no dn is given, the default is the zero-length DN, "".
|
||
|
||
attributes
|
||
If the attributes part is omitted, all user attributes of the
|
||
entry or entries should be requested (e.g., by setting the
|
||
attributes field AttributeDescriptionList in the LDAP search
|
||
request to a NULL list, or (in LDAPv3) by requesting the special
|
||
attribute name "*").
|
||
|
||
scope
|
||
If scope is omitted, a scope of "base" is assumed.
|
||
|
||
filter
|
||
If filter is omitted, a filter of "(objectClass=*)" is assumed.
|
||
|
||
extensions
|
||
If extensions is omitted, no extensions are assumed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
7. Examples
|
||
|
||
The following are some example LDAP URLs using the format defined
|
||
above. The first example is an LDAP URL referring to the University
|
||
of Michigan entry, available from an LDAP server of the client's
|
||
choosing:
|
||
|
||
ldap:///o=University%20of%20Michigan,c=US
|
||
|
||
The next example is an LDAP URL referring to the University of
|
||
Michigan entry in a particular ldap server:
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap1.example.net/o=University%20of%20Michigan,c=US
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 5]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Both of these URLs correspond to a base object search of the
|
||
"o=University of Michigan,c=US" entry using a filter of
|
||
"(objectclass=*)", requesting all attributes.
|
||
|
||
The next example is an LDAP URL referring to only the postalAddress
|
||
attribute of the University of Michigan entry:
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap1.example.net/o=University%20of%20Michigan,
|
||
c=US?postalAddress
|
||
|
||
The corresponding LDAP search operation is the same as in the
|
||
previous example, except that only the postalAddress attribute is
|
||
requested.
|
||
|
||
The next example is an LDAP URL referring to the set of entries found
|
||
by querying the given LDAP server on port 6666 and doing a subtree
|
||
search of the University of Michigan for any entry with a common name
|
||
of "Babs Jensen", retrieving all attributes:
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap1.example.net:6666/o=University%20of%20Michigan,
|
||
c=US??sub?(cn=Babs%20Jensen)
|
||
|
||
The next example is an LDAP URL referring to all children of the c=GB
|
||
entry:
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap1.example.com/c=GB?objectClass?one
|
||
|
||
The objectClass attribute is requested to be returned along with the
|
||
entries, and the default filter of "(objectclass=*)" is used.
|
||
|
||
The next example is an LDAP URL to retrieve the mail attribute for
|
||
the LDAP entry named "o=Question?,c=US" is given below, illustrating
|
||
the use of the escaping mechanism on the reserved character '?'.
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap2.example.com/o=Question%3f,c=US?mail
|
||
|
||
The next example illustrates the interaction between the LDAP string
|
||
representation of filters quoting mechanism and URL quoting
|
||
mechanisms.
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap3.example.com/o=Babsco,c=US???(int=%5c00%5c00%5c00%5c04)
|
||
|
||
The filter in this example uses the LDAP escaping mechanism of \ to
|
||
encode three zero or null bytes in the value. In LDAP, the filter
|
||
would be written as (int=\00\00\00\04). Because the \ character must
|
||
be escaped in a URL, the \'s are escaped as %5c in the URL encoding.
|
||
|
||
The next example illustrates the interaction between the LDAP string
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 6]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
representation of DNs quoting mechanism and URL quoting mechanisms.
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap.example.com/o=An%20Example%5c2c%20Inc.,c=US
|
||
|
||
The DN encoded in the above URL is:
|
||
|
||
o=An Example\2c Inc.,c=US
|
||
|
||
That is, the left-most RDN value is:
|
||
|
||
An Example, Inc.
|
||
|
||
The following three URLs that are equivalent, assuming that the
|
||
defaulting rules specified in section 4 of this document are used:
|
||
|
||
ldap://ldap.example.net
|
||
ldap://ldap.example.net/
|
||
ldap://ldap.example.net/?
|
||
|
||
These three URLs all point to the root DSE on the ldap.example.net
|
||
server.
|
||
|
||
The final two examples show use of a hypothetical, experimental bind
|
||
name extension (the value associated with the extension is an LDAP DN).
|
||
|
||
ldap:///??sub??e-bindname=cn=Manager%2cdc=example%2cdc=com
|
||
ldap:///??sub??!e-bindname=cn=Manager%2cdc=example%2cdc=com
|
||
|
||
The two URLs are the same, except that the second one marks the e-
|
||
bindname extension as critical. Notice the use of the % encoding
|
||
method to encode the commas within the distinguished name value in
|
||
the e-bindname extension.
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. Security Considerations
|
||
|
||
General URL security considerations discussed in [RFC2396] are
|
||
relevant for LDAP URLs.
|
||
|
||
The use of security mechanisms when processing LDAP URLs requires
|
||
particular care, since clients may encounter many different servers
|
||
via URLs, and since URLs are likely to be processed automatically,
|
||
without user intervention. A client SHOULD have a user-configurable
|
||
policy about which servers to connect to using which security
|
||
mechanisms, and SHOULD NOT make connections that are inconsistent
|
||
with this policy. If a client chooses to reuse an existing
|
||
connection when resolving one or more LDAP URL, it MUST ensure that
|
||
the connection is compatible with the URL and that no security
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 7]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
policies are violated.
|
||
|
||
Sending authentication information, no matter the mechanism, may
|
||
violate a user's privacy requirements. In the absence of specific
|
||
policy permitting authentication information to be sent to a server,
|
||
a client should use an anonymous connection. (Note that clients
|
||
conforming to previous LDAP URL specifications, where all connections
|
||
are anonymous and unprotected, are consistent with this
|
||
specification; they simply have the default security policy.) Simply
|
||
opening a connection to another server may violate some users'
|
||
privacy requirements, so clients should provide the user with a way
|
||
to control URL processing.
|
||
|
||
Some authentication methods, in particular reusable passwords sent to
|
||
the server, may reveal easily-abused information to the remote server
|
||
or to eavesdroppers in transit, and should not be used in URL
|
||
processing unless explicitly permitted by policy. Confirmation by
|
||
the human user of the use of authentication information is
|
||
appropriate in many circumstances. Use of strong authentication
|
||
methods that do not reveal sensitive information is much preferred.
|
||
If the URL represents a referral for an update operation, strong
|
||
authentication methods SHOULD be used. Please refer to the Security
|
||
Considerations section of [AuthMeth] for more information.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP URL format allows the specification of an arbitrary LDAP
|
||
search operation to be performed when evaluating the LDAP URL.
|
||
Following an LDAP URL may cause unexpected results, for example, the
|
||
retrieval of large amounts of data, the initiation of a long-lived
|
||
search, etc. The security implications of resolving an LDAP URL are
|
||
the same as those of resolving an LDAP search query.
|
||
|
||
9. Acknowledgements
|
||
|
||
The LDAP URL format was originally defined at the University of
|
||
Michigan. This material is based upon work supported by the National
|
||
Science Foundation under Grant No. NCR-9416667. The support of both
|
||
the University of Michigan and the National Science Foundation is
|
||
gratefully acknowledged.
|
||
|
||
This document is an update to RFC 2255 by Tim Howes and Mark Smith.
|
||
Changes included in this revised specification are based upon
|
||
discussions among the authors, discussions within the LDAP (v3)
|
||
Revision Working Group (ldapbis), and discussions within other IETF
|
||
Working Groups. The contributions of individuals in these working
|
||
groups is gratefully acknowledged. Several people in particular have
|
||
made valuable comments on this document; RL "Bob" Morgan, Mark Wahl,
|
||
Kurt Zeilenga, Jim Sermersheim, and Hallvard Furuseth deserve special
|
||
thanks for their contributions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 8]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
10. Normative References
|
||
|
||
[LDAPDN] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: String Representation of
|
||
Distinguished Names", draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-xx.txt, a work in
|
||
progress.
|
||
|
||
[LDAPIANA] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP", draft-ietf-
|
||
ldapbis-iana-xx.txt, a work in progress.
|
||
|
||
[Filters] Smith, M. and Howes, T., "LDAP: String Representation of
|
||
Search Filters", draft-ietf-ldapbis-filter-xx.txt, a work in
|
||
progress. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for use in RFCs to
|
||
Indicate Requirement Levels," RFC 2119, BCP 14, March 1997.
|
||
|
||
[Protocol] Sermersheim, J. (editor), "LDAP: The Protocol", draft-
|
||
ietf-ldapbis-protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress.
|
||
|
||
[RFC2234] Crocker, D., Overell, P., "Augmented BNF for Syntax
|
||
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997.
|
||
|
||
[RFC2279] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646",
|
||
RFC 2279, January 1998.
|
||
|
||
[RFC2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and Masinter, L., "Uniform
|
||
Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998.
|
||
|
||
[RFC2732] Hinden, R., Carpenter, B., Masinter, L., "Format for
|
||
Literal IPv6 Addresses in URL's", RFC 2732, December 1999.
|
||
|
||
[AuthMeth] Harrison, R. (editor), "LDAP: Authentication Methods",
|
||
draft-ietf-ldapbis-authmeth-xx.txt, a work in progress. a work in
|
||
progress.
|
||
|
||
[Roadmap] K. Zeilenga (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification Road
|
||
Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in progress.
|
||
|
||
11. Informative References
|
||
|
||
None.
|
||
|
||
12. Authors' Address
|
||
|
||
Mark Smith, Editor
|
||
Netscape Communications Corp.
|
||
360 W. Caribbean Drive
|
||
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
|
||
USA
|
||
+1 650 937-3477
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 9]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
mcs@netscape.com
|
||
|
||
Tim Howes
|
||
Opsware, Inc.
|
||
599 N. Mathilda Ave.
|
||
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
|
||
USA
|
||
+1 408 744-7509
|
||
howes@opsware.com
|
||
|
||
13. Full Copyright Statement
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
|
||
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
|
||
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
|
||
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
|
||
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
|
||
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
|
||
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
|
||
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
|
||
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
|
||
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
|
||
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
|
||
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
|
||
English.
|
||
|
||
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
|
||
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
|
||
|
||
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
|
||
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
|
||
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
|
||
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
|
||
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
|
||
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
||
|
||
|
||
14. Appendix A: Changes Since RFC 2255
|
||
|
||
14.1. Technical Changes
|
||
|
||
The following technical changes were made to the contents of the "URL
|
||
Definition" section:
|
||
|
||
Revised all of the ABNF to use common productions from [Models].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 10]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Added note and references to [RFC2732] to allow literal IPv6
|
||
addresses inside the hostport portion of the URL.
|
||
|
||
Added missing ASTERIX as an alternative for the attrdesc part of the
|
||
URL. It is believed that existing implementations of RFC 2255
|
||
already support this.
|
||
|
||
Added angle brackets around free-form prose in the "dn", "hostport",
|
||
"attrdesc", "filter", and "exvalue" rules.
|
||
|
||
Changed the ABNF for ldapurl to group the dn component with the
|
||
preceding slash.
|
||
|
||
Changed the extype rule to be an LDAPOID from [Protocol] or an OID
|
||
description from [LDAPIANA].
|
||
|
||
Changed the text about extension types so it references [LDAPIANA].
|
||
Reordered rules to more closely follow the order the elements appear
|
||
in the URL.
|
||
|
||
"Bindname Extension": removed due to lack of known implementations.
|
||
|
||
|
||
14.2. Editorial Changes
|
||
|
||
Changed document title to include "LDAP:" prefix.
|
||
|
||
IESG Note: removed note about lack of satisfactory mandatory
|
||
authentication mechanisms.
|
||
|
||
"Status of this Memo" section: updated boilerplate to match current
|
||
I-D guidelines.
|
||
|
||
"Abstract" section: separated from introductory material.
|
||
|
||
"Table of Contents" section: added.
|
||
|
||
"Introduction" section: new section; separated from the Abstract.
|
||
Changed the text indicate that RFC 2255 is replaced by this document
|
||
(instead of RFC 1959). Added text to indicate that LDAP URLs are
|
||
used for references and referrals. Fixed typo (replaced the nonsense
|
||
phrase "to perform to retrieve" with "used to retrieve"). Added a
|
||
note to let the reader know that not all of the parameters of the
|
||
LDAP search operation described in [Protocol] can be expressed using
|
||
this format.
|
||
|
||
"URL Definition" section: removed second copy of ldapurl grammar and
|
||
following two paragraphs (editorial error in RFC 2255). Fixed line
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 11]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
break within '!' sequence. Reworded last paragraph to clarify which
|
||
characters must be URL escaped. Added text to indicate that LDAP
|
||
URLs are used for references and referrals. Added text that refers
|
||
to the ABNF from RFC 2234.
|
||
|
||
"Defaults for Fields of the LDAP URL" section: added; formed by
|
||
moving text about defaults out of the "URL Definition" section.
|
||
|
||
"URL Processing" section: clarified that connections MAY be reused
|
||
only if the open connection is compatible with the URL. Added text
|
||
to indicate that use of security services is encouraged and that they
|
||
SHOULD be used when updates are involved. Removed "dn" from
|
||
discussion of authentication methods. Added note that the client MAY
|
||
interrogate the server to determine the most appropriate method.
|
||
|
||
"Examples" section: Modified examples to use example.com and
|
||
example.net hostnames. Added missing '?' to the LDAP URL example
|
||
whose filter contains three null bytes. Removed space after one
|
||
comma within a DN. Revised the bindname example to use e-bindname.
|
||
Added an example that demonstrates the interaction between DN
|
||
escaping and URL escaping. Added some examples to show URL
|
||
equivalence with respect to the dn portion of the URL.
|
||
|
||
"Security Considerations" section: Added a note about connection
|
||
reuse. Added a note about using strong authentication methods for
|
||
updates. Added a reference to RFC 2829. Added note that simply
|
||
opening a connection may violate some users' privacy requirements.
|
||
|
||
"Acknowledgements" section: added statement about this being an
|
||
update to RFC 2255. Added Kurt Zeilenga, Jim Sermersheim, and
|
||
Hallvard Furuseth.
|
||
|
||
"Normative References" section: renamed from "References" per new RFC
|
||
guidelines. Changed from [1] style to [Protocol] style throughout the
|
||
document. Added references to RFCs 2234 and 2829. Updated RFC 1738
|
||
references to the appropriate sections within RFC 2396. Updated the
|
||
references to refer to LDAPBis WG documents. Removed the reference to
|
||
the LDAP Attribute Syntaxes document and added references to the LDAP
|
||
IANA and Roadmap documents.
|
||
|
||
"Informative References" section: added for clarity.
|
||
|
||
Header and "Authors' Address" sections: added "editor" next to Mark
|
||
Smith's name. Updated affiliation and contact information.
|
||
|
||
Copyright: updated the year.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 12]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator 28 February 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
15. Appendix B: Changes Since Previous Document Revision
|
||
|
||
This appendix lists all changes relative to the last published
|
||
revision, draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-02.txt. Note that when appropriate
|
||
these changes are also included in Appendix A, but are also included
|
||
here for the benefit of the people who have already reviewed draft-
|
||
ietf-ldapbis-url-02.txt. This section will be removed before this
|
||
document is published as an RFC.
|
||
|
||
|
||
15.1. Technical Changes
|
||
|
||
"URL Definition" section: revised all of the ABNF to use common
|
||
productions from [Models] and added note and references to [RFC2732]
|
||
to allow literal IPv6 addresses inside the hostport portion of the
|
||
URL.
|
||
|
||
|
||
15.2. Editorial Changes
|
||
|
||
"Status of this Memo" section: updated boilerplate to match current
|
||
I-D guidelines.
|
||
|
||
"URL Definition" section: replaced misleading phrase "MAY define
|
||
other extensions" with "MAY define one or more extensions" (this
|
||
document no longer defines any extensions). Rewrote the last
|
||
paragraph of this section to more clearly describe the escaping rules
|
||
and to reference [RFC2396] accurately.
|
||
|
||
"Examples" section: added an example that demonstrates the
|
||
interaction between DN escaping and URL escaping and clarified the
|
||
text that introduces the LDAP filter escaping interaction example.
|
||
|
||
"Acknowledgements" section: added Hallvard Furuseth.
|
||
|
||
"Normative References" section: added a reference to [RFC2732].
|
||
|
||
"Informative References" section: added for clarity.
|
||
|
||
Copyright: updated the year to 2003.
|
||
|
||
"Authors' Address" section: updated Tim's contact information.
|
||
|
||
Appendix A: added an older editorial change that was accidently
|
||
overlooked (Changed document title to include "LDAP:" prefix).
|
||
|
||
|
||
This Internet Draft expires on 28 August 2003.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Smith & Howes Intended Category: Standards Track [Page 13]
|
||
|