openldap/doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf
2007-08-26 10:21:01 +00:00

207 lines
8.6 KiB
Plaintext

# $OpenLDAP$
# Copyright 2007 The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved.
# COPYING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, see COPYRIGHT.
H1: Changes Since Previous Release
The following sections attempt to summarize the new features and changes in OpenLDAP
software since the 2.3.x release and the OpenLDAP Admin Guide.
H2: New Guide Sections
In order to make the Admin Guide more thorough and cover the majority of questions
asked on the OpenLDAP mailing lists and scenarios discussed there, we have added the following new sections:
* {{SECT:When should I use LDAP?}}
* {{SECT:When should I not use LDAP?}}
* {{SECT:LDAP vs RDBMS}}
* {{SECT:Backends}}
* {{SECT:Overlays}}
* {{SECT:Replication}}
* {{SECT:Maintenance}}
* {{SECT:Monitoring}}
* {{SECT:Tuning}}
* {{SECT:Troubleshooting}}
* {{SECT:Changes Since Previous Release}}
* {{SECT:Configuration File Examples}}
* {{SECT:Glossary}}
Also, the table of contents is now 3 levels deep to ease navigation.
H2: New Features and Enhancements in 2.4
H3: Better {{B:cn=config}} functionality
There is a new slapd-config(5) manpage for the {{B:cn=config}} backend. The
original design called for auto-renaming of config entries when you insert or
delete entries with ordered names, but that was not implemented in 2.3. It is
now in 2.4. This means, e.g., if you have
> olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config
> olcSuffix: dc=example,dc=com
and you want to add a new subordinate, now you can ldapadd:
> olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config
> olcSuffix: dc=foo,dc=example,dc=com
This will insert a new BDB database in slot 1 and bump all following databases
down one, so the original BDB database will now be named:
> olcDatabase={2}bdb,cn=config
> olcSuffix: dc=example,dc=com
H3: Better {{B:cn=schema}} functionality
In 2.3 you were only able to add new schema elements, not delete or modify
existing elements. In 2.4 you can modify schema at will. (Except for the
hardcoded system schema, of course.)
H3: More sophisticated Syncrepl configurations
The original implementation of Syncrepl in OpenLDAP 2.2 was intended to support
multiple consumers within the same database, but that feature never worked and
was removed from OpenLDAP 2.3; you could only configure a single consumer in
any database.
In 2.4 you can configure multiple consumers in a single database. The configuration
possibilities here are quite complex and numerous. You can configure consumers
over arbitrary subtrees of a database (disjoint or overlapping). Any portion
of the database may in turn be provided to other consumers using the Syncprov
overlay. The Syncprov overlay works with any number of consumers over a single
database or over arbitrarily many glued databases.
H3: N-Way Multimaster Replication
As a consequence of the work to support multiple consumer contexts, the syncrepl
system now supports full N-Way multimaster replication with entry-level conflict
resolution. There are some important constraints, of course: In order to maintain
consistent results across all servers, you must maintain tightly synchronized
clocks across all participating servers (e.g., you must use NTP on all servers).
The entryCSNs used for replication now record timestamps with microsecond resolution,
instead of just seconds. The delta-syncrepl code has not been updated to support
multimaster usage yet, that will come later in the 2.4 cycle.
H3: Replicating {{slapd}} Configuration (syncrepl and {{B:cn=config}})
Syncrepl was explicitly disabled on cn=config in 2.3. It is now fully supported
in 2.4; you can use syncrepl to replicate an entire server configuration from
one server to arbitrarily many other servers. It's possible to clone an entire
running slapd using just a small (less than 10 lines) seed configuration, or
you can just replicate the schema subtrees, etc. Tests 049 and 050 in the test
suite provide working examples of these capabilities.
H3: Push-Mode Replication
In 2.3 you could configure syncrepl as a full push-mode replicator by using it
in conjunction with a back-ldap pointed at the target server. But because the
back-ldap database needs to have a suffix corresponding to the target's suffix,
you could only configure one instance per slapd.
In 2.4 you can define a database to be "hidden", which means that its suffix is
ignored when checking for name collisions, and the database will never be used
to answer requests received by the frontend. Using this "hidden" database feature
allows you to configure multiple databases with the same suffix, allowing you to
set up multiple back-ldap instances for pushing replication of a single database
to multiple targets. There may be other uses for hidden databases as well (e.g.,
using a syncrepl consumer to maintain a *local* mirror of a database on a separate filesystem).
H3: More extensive TLS configuration control
In 2.3, the TLS configuration in slapd was only used by the slapd listeners. For
outbound connections used by e.g. back-ldap or syncrepl their TLS parameters came
from the system's ldap.conf file.
In 2.4 all of these sessions inherit their settings from the main slapd configuration,
but settings can be individually overridden on a per-config-item basis. This is
particularly helpful if you use certificate-based authentication and need to use a
different client certificate for different destinations.
H3: Performance enhancements
Too many to list. Some notable changes - ldapadd used to be a couple of orders
of magnitude slower than "slapadd -q". It's now at worst only about half the
speed of slapadd -q. Some comparisons of all the 2.x OpenLDAP releases are available
at {{URL:http://www.openldap.org/pub/hyc/scale2007.pdf}}
That compared 2.0.27, 2.1.30, 2.2.30, 2.3.33, and HEAD). Toward the latter end
of the "Cached Search Performance" chart it gets hard to see the difference
because the run times are so small, but the new code is about 25% faster than 2.3,
which was about 20% faster than 2.2, which was about 100% faster than 2.1, which
was about 100% faster than 2.0, in that particular search scenario. That test
basically searched a 1.3GB DB of 380836 entries (all in the slapd entry cache)
in under 1 second. i.e., on a 2.4GHz CPU with DDR400 ECC/Registered RAM we can
search over 500 thousand entries per second. The search was on an unindexed
attribute using a filter that would not match any entry, forcing slapd to examine
every entry in the DB, testing the filter for a match.
Essentially the slapd entry cache in back-bdb/back-hdb is so efficient the search
processing time is almost invisible; the runtime is limited only by the memory
bandwidth of the machine. (The search data rate corresponds to about 3.5GB/sec;
the memory bandwidth on the machine is only about 4GB/sec due to ECC and register latency.)
H3: New overlays
* slapo-dds (Dynamic Directory Services, RFC 2589)
* slapo-memberof (reverse group membership maintenance)
H3: New features in existing Overlays
* slapo-pcache
- Inspection/Maintenance
-- the cache database can be directly accessed via
LDAP by adding a specific control to each LDAP request; a specific
extended operation allows to consistently remove cached entries and entire
cached queries
- Hot Restart
-- cached queries are saved on disk at shutdown, and reloaded if
not expired yet at subsequent restart
* slapo-rwm can safely interoperate with other overlays
* Dyngroup/Dynlist merge, plus security enhancements
H3: New features in slapd
* monitoring of back-{b,h}db: cache fill-in, non-indexed searches,
* session tracking control (draft-wahl-ldap-session)
* subtree delete in back-sql (draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete)
H3: New features in libldap
* ldap_sync client API (LDAP Content Sync Operation, RFC 4533)
H3: New clients, tools and tool enhancements
* ldapexop for arbitrary extended operations
* Complete support of controls in request/response for all clients
* LDAP Client tools now honor SRV records
H3: New build options
* Support for building against GnuTLS
H2: Obsolete Features Removed From 2.4
These features were strongly deprecated in 2.3 and removed in 2.4.
H3: Slurpd
Please read the {{SECT:Replication}} section as to why this is no longer in
OpenLDAP
H3: back-ldbm
back-ldbm was both slow and unreliable. Its byzantine indexing code was
prone to spontaneous corruption, as were the underlying database libraries
that were commonly used (e.g. GDBM or NDBM). back-bdb and back-hdb are
superior in every aspect, with simplified indexing to avoid index corruption,
fine-grained locking for greater concurrency, hierarchical caching for
greater performance, streamlined on-disk format for greater efficiency
and portability, and full transaction support for greater reliability.