openldap/doc/rfc/rfc1558.txt
1998-08-09 00:43:13 +00:00

171 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

Network Working Group T. Howes
Request for Comments: 1558 University of Michigan
Category: Informational December 1993
A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [1] defines a
network representation of a search filter transmitted to an LDAP
server. Some applications may find it useful to have a common way of
representing these search filters in a human-readable form. This
document defines a human-readable string format for representing LDAP
search filters.
1. LDAP Search Filter Definition
An LDAP search filter is defined in [1] as follows:
Filter ::= CHOICE {
and [0] SET OF Filter,
or [1] SET OF Filter,
not [2] Filter,
equalityMatch [3] AttributeValueAssertion,
substrings [4] SubstringFilter,
greaterOrEqual [5] AttributeValueAssertion,
lessOrEqual [6] AttributeValueAssertion,
present [7] AttributeType,
approxMatch [8] AttributeValueAssertion
}
SubstringFilter ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeType,
SEQUENCE OF CHOICE {
initial [0] LDAPString,
any [1] LDAPString,
final [2] LDAPString
}
}
Howes [Page 1]
RFC 1558 Representation of LDAP Filters December 1993
AttributeValueAssertion ::= SEQUENCE
attributeType AttributeType,
attributeValue AttributeValue
}
AttributeType ::= LDAPString
AttributeValue ::= OCTET STRING
LDAPString ::= OCTET STRING
where the LDAPString above is limited to the IA5 character set. The
AttributeType is a string representation of the attribute object
identifier in dotted OID format (e.g., "2.5.4.10"), or the shorter
string name of the attribute (e.g., "organizationName", or "o"). The
AttributeValue OCTET STRING has the form defined in [2]. The Filter
is encoded for transmission over a network using the Basic Encoding
Rules defined in [3], with simplifications described in [1].
2. String Search Filter Definition
The string representation of an LDAP search filter is defined by the
following BNF. It uses a prefix format.
<filter> ::= '(' <filtercomp> ')'
<filtercomp> ::= <and> | <or> | <not> | <item>
<and> ::= '&' <filterlist>
<or> ::= '|' <filterlist>
<not> ::= '!' <filter>
<filterlist> ::= <filter> | <filter> <filterlist>
<item> ::= <simple> | <present> | <substring>
<simple> ::= <attr> <filtertype> <value>
<filtertype> ::= <equal> | <approx> | <greater> | <less>
<equal> ::= '='
<approx> ::= '~='
<greater> ::= '>='
<less> ::= '<='
<present> ::= <attr> '=*'
<substring> ::= <attr> '=' <initial> <any> <final>
<initial> ::= NULL | <value>
<any> ::= '*' <starval>
<starval> ::= NULL | <value> '*' <starval>
<final> ::= NULL | <value>
<attr> is a string representing an AttributeType, and has the format
defined in [1]. <value> is a string representing an AttributeValue,
or part of one, and has the form defined in [2]. If a <value> must
contain one of the characters '*' or '(' or ')', these characters
Howes [Page 2]
RFC 1558 Representation of LDAP Filters December 1993
should be escaped by preceding them with the backslash '\' character.
3. Examples
This section gives a few examples of search filters written using
this notation.
(cn=Babs Jensen)
(!(cn=Tim Howes))
(&(objectClass=Person)(|(sn=Jensen)(cn=Babs J*)))
(o=univ*of*mich*)
4. Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
5. References
[1] Yeong, W., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol", RFC 1487, Performance Systems International,
University of Michigan, ISODE Consortium, July 1993.
[2] Howes, T., Kille, S., Yeong, W., and C. Robbins, "The String
Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes", RFC 1488,
University of Michigan, ISODE Consortium, Performance Systems
International, NeXor Ltd., July 1993.
[3] "Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Syntax
Notation One (ASN.1)", CCITT Recommendation X.209, 1988.
6. Author's Address
Tim Howes
University of Michigan
ITD Research Systems
535 W William St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943
USA
Phone: +1 313 747-4454
EMail: tim@umich.edu
Howes [Page 3]