mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:10:25 +08:00
2692 lines
101 KiB
Plaintext
2692 lines
101 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT S. Legg, Editor
|
||
draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-07.txt Adacel Technologies
|
||
Intended Category: Standards Track K. Dally
|
||
Obsoletes: RFC 2252, RFC 2256 The MITRE Corp.
|
||
27 October 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
Status of this Memo
|
||
|
||
|
||
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
|
||
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
|
||
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
|
||
other groups may also distribute working documents as
|
||
Internet-Drafts.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
|
||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
|
||
|
||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
|
||
|
||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
|
||
|
||
This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
|
||
revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as a Standard Track document.
|
||
Distribution of this document is unlimited. Technical discussion of
|
||
this document should take place on the IETF LDAP Revision Working
|
||
Group (LDAPbis) mailing list <ietf-ldapbis@openldap.org>. Please
|
||
send editorial comments directly to the editor
|
||
<steven.legg@adacel.com.au>.
|
||
|
||
This Internet-Draft expires on 27 April 2004.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Abstract
|
||
|
||
Each attribute stored in a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
||
(LDAP) directory, and whose values may be transfered in the LDAP
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 1]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
protocol, has a defined syntax which constrains the structure and
|
||
format of its values. The comparison semantics for values of a
|
||
syntax are not part of the syntax definition but are instead provided
|
||
through separately defined matching rules. Matching rules specify an
|
||
argument, an assertion value, which also has a defined syntax. This
|
||
document defines a base set of syntaxes and matching rules for use in
|
||
defining attributes for LDAP directories.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 2]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||
2. Conventions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||
3. Syntaxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||
3.1. General Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||
3.2. Common Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||
3.3. Syntax Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||
3.3.1. Attribute Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||
3.3.2. Bit String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||
3.3.3. Boolean. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
|
||
3.3.4. Country String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
|
||
3.3.5. Delivery Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
|
||
3.3.6. Directory String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
|
||
3.3.7. DIT Content Rule Description . . . . . . . . . . 10
|
||
3.3.8. DIT Structure Rule Description . . . . . . . . . 11
|
||
3.3.9. DN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
|
||
3.3.10. Enhanced Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
|
||
3.3.11. Facsimile Telephone Number . . . . . . . . . . . 13
|
||
3.3.12. Fax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
|
||
3.3.13. Generalized Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
|
||
3.3.14. Guide. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
|
||
3.3.15. IA5 String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
|
||
3.3.16. Integer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
|
||
3.3.17. JPEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
|
||
3.3.18. LDAP Syntax Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
|
||
3.3.19. Matching Rule Description. . . . . . . . . . . . 17
|
||
3.3.20. Matching Rule Use Description. . . . . . . . . . 17
|
||
3.3.21. Name and Optional UID. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
|
||
3.3.22. Name Form Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
|
||
3.3.23. Numeric String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
3.3.24. Object Class Description . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
3.3.25. Octet String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
3.3.26. OID. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
|
||
3.3.27. Other Mailbox. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
|
||
3.3.28. Postal Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
|
||
3.3.29. Printable String . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
|
||
3.3.30. Substring Assertion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
|
||
3.3.31. Telephone Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
|
||
3.3.32. Teletex Terminal Identifier. . . . . . . . . . . 24
|
||
3.3.33. Telex Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
|
||
3.3.34. UTC Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
|
||
4. Matching Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
|
||
4.1. General Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
|
||
4.2. Matching Rule Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
|
||
4.2.1. bitStringMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
|
||
4.2.2. caseExactIA5Match. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
|
||
4.2.3. caseIgnoreIA5Match . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 3]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
4.2.4. caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch . . . . . . . . . . 29
|
||
4.2.5. caseIgnoreListMatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
|
||
4.2.6. caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch. . . . . . . . . . 30
|
||
4.2.7. caseIgnoreMatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
|
||
4.2.8. caseIgnoreOrderingMatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
|
||
4.2.9. caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch. . . . . . . . . . . . 32
|
||
4.2.10. distinguishedNameMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
|
||
4.2.11. generalizedTimeMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
|
||
4.2.12. generalizedTimeOrderingMatch . . . . . . . . . . 33
|
||
4.2.13. integerFirstComponentMatch . . . . . . . . . . . 34
|
||
4.2.14. integerMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
|
||
4.2.15. numericStringMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
|
||
4.2.16. numericStringSubstringsMatch . . . . . . . . . . 35
|
||
4.2.17. objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch. . . . . . . 36
|
||
4.2.18. objectIdentifierMatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
|
||
4.2.19. octetStringMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
|
||
4.2.20. telephoneNumberMatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
|
||
4.2.21. telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch . . . . . . . . . 38
|
||
4.2.22. uniqueMemberMatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
|
||
5. Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
|
||
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
|
||
7. IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
|
||
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
|
||
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
|
||
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
|
||
9. Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
|
||
10. Intellectual Property Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
|
||
Appendix A. Summary of Syntax Object Identifiers . . . . . . . . . 44
|
||
Appendix B. Changes from RFC 2252 & RFC 2256 . . . . . . . . . . . 45
|
||
Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
|
||
|
||
1. Introduction
|
||
|
||
Each attribute stored in a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
||
(LDAP) directory [ROADMAP], and whose values may be transfered in the
|
||
LDAP protocol [PROT], has a defined syntax (i.e., data type) which
|
||
constrains the structure and format of its values. The comparison
|
||
semantics for values of a syntax are not part of the syntax
|
||
definition but are instead provided through separately defined
|
||
matching rules. Matching rules specify an argument, an assertion
|
||
value, which also has a defined syntax. This document defines a base
|
||
set of syntaxes and matching rules for use in defining attributes for
|
||
LDAP directories.
|
||
|
||
Readers are advised to familiarize themselves with the Directory
|
||
Information Models [MODELS] before reading the rest of this document.
|
||
Section 3 provides definitions for the base set of LDAP syntaxes.
|
||
Section 4 provides definitions for the base set of matching rules for
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 4]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
LDAP.
|
||
|
||
This document is a integral part of the LDAP technical specification
|
||
[ROADMAP] which obsoletes the previously defined LDAP technical
|
||
specification [RFC3377] in its entirety.
|
||
|
||
Sections 4, 5 and 7 of RFC 2252 [RFC2252] are obsoleted by [MODELS].
|
||
The remainder of RFC 2252 is obsoleted by this document. Sections 6
|
||
and 8 of RFC 2256 [RFC2256] are obsoleted by this document. The
|
||
remainder of RFC 2256 is obsoleted by [SCHEMA] and [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
A number of schema elements which were included in the previous
|
||
revision of the LDAP technical specification are not included in this
|
||
revision of LDAP. Public Key Infrastructure schema elements are now
|
||
specified in [LDAP-PKI]. Unless reintroduced in future technical
|
||
specifications, the remainder are to be considered Historic.
|
||
|
||
The changes from RFC 2252 and RFC 2256 are described in Appendix B of
|
||
this document.
|
||
|
||
2. Conventions
|
||
|
||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
|
||
[KEYWORD].
|
||
|
||
Syntax definitions are written according to the <SyntaxDescription>
|
||
ABNF [ABNF] rule specified in [MODELS], and matching rule definitions
|
||
are written according to the <MatchingRuleDescription> ABNF rule
|
||
specified in [MODELS], except that the syntax and matching rule
|
||
definitions provided in this document are line-wrapped for
|
||
readability. When such definitions are transfered as attribute
|
||
values in the LDAP protocol (e.g., as values of the ldapSyntaxes and
|
||
matchingRules attributes [MODELS] respectively) then those values
|
||
would not contain line breaks.
|
||
|
||
3. Syntaxes
|
||
|
||
Syntax definitions constrain the structure of attribute values stored
|
||
in an LDAP directory, and determine the representation of attribute
|
||
and assertion values transfered in the LDAP protocol.
|
||
|
||
Syntaxes that are required for directory operation, or that are in
|
||
common use, are specified in this section. Servers SHOULD recognize
|
||
all the syntaxes listed in this document, but are not required to
|
||
otherwise support them, and MAY recognise or support other syntaxes.
|
||
However, the definition of additional arbitrary syntaxes is
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 5]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
discouraged since it will hinder interoperability. Client and server
|
||
implementations typically do not have the ability to dynamically
|
||
recognize new syntaxes.
|
||
|
||
3.1. General Considerations
|
||
|
||
The description of each syntax specifies how attribute or assertion
|
||
values conforming to the syntax are to be represented when transfered
|
||
in the LDAP protocol [PROT]. This representation is referred to as
|
||
the LDAP-specific encoding to distinguish it from other methods of
|
||
encoding attribute values (e.g., the Basic Encoding Rules (BER)
|
||
encoding [BER] used by X.500 [X.500] directories).
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a given attribute syntax always
|
||
produces octet-aligned values. To the greatest extent possible,
|
||
encoding rules for LDAP syntaxes should produce character strings
|
||
that can be displayed with little or no translation by clients
|
||
implementing LDAP. However, clients MUST NOT assume that the
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding of a value of an unrecognized syntax is a
|
||
human-readable character string. There are a few cases (e.g., the
|
||
JPEG syntax) when it is not reasonable to produce a human-readable
|
||
representation.
|
||
|
||
Each LDAP syntax is uniquely identified with an object identifier
|
||
[ASN.1] represented in the dotted-decimal format (short descriptive
|
||
names are not defined for syntaxes). These object identifiers are
|
||
not intended to be displayed to users. The object identifiers for
|
||
the syntaxes defined in this document are summarized in Appendix A.
|
||
|
||
A suggested minimum upper bound on the number of characters in an
|
||
attribute value with a string-based syntax, or the number of octets
|
||
in a value for all other syntaxes, MAY be indicated by appending the
|
||
bound inside of curly braces following the syntax's OBJECT IDENTIFIER
|
||
in an attribute type definition (see the <noidlen> rule in [MODELS]).
|
||
Such a bound is not considered part of the syntax identifier.
|
||
|
||
For example, "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{64}" in an attribute
|
||
definition suggests that the directory server will allow a value of
|
||
the attribute to be up to 64 characters long, although it may allow
|
||
longer character strings. Note that a single character of the
|
||
Directory String syntax can be encoded in more than one octet since
|
||
UTF-8 [UTF8] is a variable-length encoding. Therefore a 64 character
|
||
string may be more than 64 octets in length.
|
||
|
||
3.2. Common Definitions
|
||
|
||
The following ABNF rules are used in a number of the syntax
|
||
definitions in Section 3.3.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 6]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
PrintableCharacter = ALPHA / DIGIT / SQUOTE / LPAREN / RPAREN /
|
||
PLUS / COMMA / HYPHEN / DOT / EQUALS /
|
||
SLASH / COLON / QUESTION / SPACE
|
||
PrintableString = 1*PrintableCharacter
|
||
IA5String = *(%x00-7F)
|
||
HEX-DIGIT = DIGIT / "A" / "B" / "C" / "D" / "E" / "F"
|
||
; N.B. allows upper and lower case
|
||
SLASH = %x2F ; forward slash ("/")
|
||
COLON = %x3A ; colon (":")
|
||
QUESTION = %x3F ; question mark ("?")
|
||
|
||
The <OCTET>, <ALPHA>, <DIGIT>, <SQUOTE>, <LPAREN>, <RPAREN>, <PLUS>,
|
||
<COMMA>, <HYPHEN>, <DOT>, <EQUALS> and <SPACE> rules are defined in
|
||
[MODELS].
|
||
|
||
3.3. Syntax Definitions
|
||
|
||
3.3.1. Attribute Type Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the Attribute Type Description syntax is the definition of
|
||
an attribute type. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this
|
||
syntax is defined by the <AttributeTypeDescription> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
For example, the following definition of the createTimestamp
|
||
attribute type from [MODELS] is also a value of the Attribute Type
|
||
Description syntax (note: line breaks have been added for readability
|
||
- they are not part of the value when transfered in protocol).
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.18.1 NAME 'createTimestamp'
|
||
EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch
|
||
ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24
|
||
SINGLE-VALUE NO-USER-MODIFICATION
|
||
USAGE directoryOperation )
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Attribute Type Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.3 DESC 'Attribute Type Description' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the AttributeTypeDescription ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.2. Bit String
|
||
|
||
A value of the Bit String syntax is a sequence of binary digits. The
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by the
|
||
following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
BitString = SQUOTE *binary-digit SQUOTE "B"
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 7]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
binary-digit = "0" / "1"
|
||
|
||
The <SQUOTE> rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
'0101111101'B
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Bit String syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6 DESC 'Bit String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the BIT STRING ASN.1 type from [ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.3. Boolean
|
||
|
||
A value of the Boolean syntax is one of the Boolean values, true or
|
||
false. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is
|
||
defined by the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
Boolean = "TRUE" / "FALSE"
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Boolean syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 DESC 'Boolean' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the BOOLEAN ASN.1 type from [ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.4. Country String
|
||
|
||
A value of the Country String syntax is one of the two-character
|
||
codes from ISO 3166 [ISO3166] for representing a country. The
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by the
|
||
following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
CountryString = 2(PrintableCharacter)
|
||
|
||
The <PrintableCharacter> rule is defined in Section 3.2.
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
US
|
||
AU
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Country String syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.11 DESC 'Country String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the following ASN.1 type from [X.520]:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 8]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
PrintableString (SIZE (2)) -- ISO 3166 codes only
|
||
|
||
3.3.5. Delivery Method
|
||
|
||
A value of the Delivery Method syntax is a sequence of items that
|
||
indicate, in preference order, the service(s) by which an entity is
|
||
willing and/or capable of receiving messages. The LDAP-specific
|
||
encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
DeliveryMethod = pdm *( WSP DOLLAR WSP pdm )
|
||
|
||
pdm = "any" / "mhs" / "physical" / "telex" / "teletex" /
|
||
"g3fax" / "g4fax" / "ia5" / "videotex" / "telephone"
|
||
|
||
The <WSP> and <DOLLAR> rules are defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
telephone $ videotex
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Delivery Method syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.14 DESC 'Delivery Method' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the following ASN.1 type from [X.520]:
|
||
|
||
SEQUENCE OF INTEGER {
|
||
any-delivery-method (0),
|
||
mhs-delivery (1),
|
||
physical-delivery (2),
|
||
telex-delivery (3),
|
||
teletex-delivery (4),
|
||
g3-facsimile-delivery (5),
|
||
g4-facsimile-delivery (6),
|
||
ia5-terminal-delivery (7),
|
||
videotex-delivery (8),
|
||
telephone-delivery (9) }
|
||
|
||
3.3.6. Directory String
|
||
|
||
A value of the Directory String syntax is a string of one or more
|
||
arbitrary characters from the Universal Character Set (UCS) [UCS]. A
|
||
zero length character string is not permitted. The LDAP-specific
|
||
encoding of a value of this syntax is the UTF-8 encoding [UTF8] of
|
||
the character string. Such encodings conform to the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
DirectoryString = 1*UTF8
|
||
|
||
The <UTF8> rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 9]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
This is a value of Directory String containing #!%#@.
|
||
|
||
Servers and clients MUST be prepared to receive arbitrary UCS code
|
||
points, including code points outside the range of printable ASCII
|
||
and code points not presently assigned to any character.
|
||
|
||
Attribute type definitions using the Directory String syntax should
|
||
not restrict the format of Directory String values, e.g., by
|
||
requiring that the character string conforms to specific patterns
|
||
described by ABNF. A new syntax should be defined in such cases.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Directory String syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 DESC 'Directory String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the DirectoryString parameterized ASN.1
|
||
type from [X.520].
|
||
|
||
The DirectoryString ASN.1 type allows a choice between the
|
||
TeletexString, PrintableString or UniversalString ASN.1 types from
|
||
[ASN.1]. However, note that the chosen alternative is not indicated
|
||
in the LDAP-specific encoding of a Directory String value.
|
||
|
||
Implementations which convert Directory String values from the
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding to the BER encoding used by X.500 must choose
|
||
an alternative that permits the particular characters in the string,
|
||
and must convert the characters from the UTF-8 encoding into the
|
||
character encoding of the chosen alternative.
|
||
|
||
When converting Directory String values from the BER encoding to the
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding the characters must be converted from the
|
||
character encoding of the chosen alternative into the UTF-8 encoding.
|
||
|
||
3.3.7. DIT Content Rule Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the DIT Content Rule Description syntax is the definition
|
||
of a DIT (Directory Information Tree) content rule. The
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by the
|
||
<DITContentRuleDescription> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
( 2.5.6.4 DESC 'content rule for organization'
|
||
NOT ( x121Address $ telexNumber ) )
|
||
|
||
Note: a line break has been added for readability - it is not part of
|
||
the value.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 10]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the DIT Content Rule Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.16
|
||
DESC 'DIT Content Rule Description' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the DITContentRuleDescription ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.8. DIT Structure Rule Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the DIT Structure Rule Description syntax is the
|
||
definition of a DIT structure rule. The LDAP-specific encoding of a
|
||
value of this syntax is defined by the <DITStructureRuleDescription>
|
||
rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
( 2 DESC 'organization structure rule' FORM 2.5.15.3 )
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the DIT Structure Rule Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.17
|
||
DESC 'DIT Structure Rule Description' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the DITStructureRuleDescription ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.9. DN
|
||
|
||
A value of the DN syntax is the (purported) distinguished name (DN)
|
||
of an entry [MODELS]. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this
|
||
syntax is defined by the <distinguishedName> rule in [LDAPDN].
|
||
|
||
Examples (from [LDAPDN]):
|
||
UID=jsmith,DC=example,DC=net
|
||
OU=Sales+CN=J. Smith,DC=example,DC=net
|
||
CN=John Smith\, III,DC=example,DC=net
|
||
CN=Before\0dAfter,DC=example,DC=net
|
||
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.0=#04024869,DC=example,DC=com
|
||
CN=Lu\C4\8Di\C4\87
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the DN syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 DESC 'DN' )
|
||
|
||
The DN syntax corresponds to the DistinguishedName ASN.1 type from
|
||
[X.501]. Note that a BER encoded distinguished name (as used by
|
||
X.500) re-encoded into the LDAP-specific encoding is not necessarily
|
||
reversible to the original BER encoding since the chosen string type
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 11]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
in any DirectoryString components of the distinguished name is not
|
||
indicated in the LDAP-specific encoding of the distinguished name
|
||
(see Section 3.3.6).
|
||
|
||
3.3.10. Enhanced Guide
|
||
|
||
A value of the Enhanced Guide syntax suggests criteria, which consist
|
||
of combinations of attribute types and filter operators, to be used
|
||
in constructing filters to search for entries of particular object
|
||
classes. The Enhanced Guide syntax improves upon the Guide syntax by
|
||
allowing the recommended depth of the search to be specified.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
EnhancedGuide = object-class SHARP WSP criteria WSP
|
||
SHARP WSP subset
|
||
object-class = WSP oid WSP
|
||
subset = "baseobject" / "oneLevel" / "wholeSubtree"
|
||
|
||
criteria = and-term *( BAR and-term )
|
||
and-term = term *( AMPERSAND term )
|
||
term = EXCLAIM term /
|
||
attributetype DOLLAR match-type /
|
||
LPAREN criteria RPAREN /
|
||
true /
|
||
false
|
||
match-type = "EQ" / "SUBSTR" / "GE" / "LE" / "APPROX"
|
||
true = "?true"
|
||
false = "?false"
|
||
BAR = %x7C ; vertical bar ("|")
|
||
AMPERSAND = %x26 ; ampersand ("&")
|
||
EXCLAIM = %x21 ; exclamation mark ("!")
|
||
|
||
The <SHARP>, <WSP>, <oid>, <LPAREN>, <RPAREN>, <attributetype> and
|
||
<DOLLAR> rules are defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Enhanced Guide syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.21 DESC 'Enhanced Guide' )
|
||
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
person#(sn$EQ)#oneLevel
|
||
|
||
The Enhanced Guide syntax corresponds to the EnhancedGuide ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.520]. The EnhancedGuide type references the Criteria ASN.1
|
||
type, also from [X.520]. The <true> rule above represents an empty
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 12]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
"and" expression in a value of the Criteria type. The <false> rule
|
||
above represents an empty "or" expression in a value of the Criteria
|
||
type.
|
||
|
||
3.3.11. Facsimile Telephone Number
|
||
|
||
A value of the Facsimile Telephone Number syntax is a subscriber
|
||
number of a facsimile device on the public switched telephone
|
||
network. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is
|
||
defined by the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
fax-number = telephone-number *( DOLLAR fax-parameter )
|
||
telephone-number = PrintableString
|
||
fax-parameter = "twoDimensional" /
|
||
"fineResolution" /
|
||
"unlimitedLength" /
|
||
"b4Length" /
|
||
"a3Width" /
|
||
"b4Width" /
|
||
"uncompressed"
|
||
|
||
The <telephone-number> is a string of printable characters that
|
||
complies with the internationally agreed format for representing
|
||
international telephone numbers [E.123]. The <PrintableString> rule
|
||
is defined in Section 3.2. The <DOLLAR> rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Facsimile Telephone Number syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.22 DESC 'Facsimile Telephone Number')
|
||
|
||
The Facsimile Telephone Number syntax corresponds to the
|
||
FacsimileTelephoneNumber ASN.1 type from [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.12. Fax
|
||
|
||
A value of the Fax syntax is an image which is produced using the
|
||
Group 3 facsimile process [FAX] to duplicate an object, such as a
|
||
memo. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is the
|
||
string of octets for a Group 3 Fax image as defined in [FAX].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Fax syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.23 DESC 'Fax' )
|
||
|
||
The ASN.1 type corresponding to the Fax syntax is defined as follows,
|
||
assuming EXPLICIT TAGS:
|
||
|
||
Fax ::= CHOICE {
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 13]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
g3-facsimile [3] G3FacsimileBodyPart
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
The G3FacsimileBodyPart ASN.1 type is defined in [X.420].
|
||
|
||
3.3.13. Generalized Time
|
||
|
||
A value of the Generalized Time syntax is a character string
|
||
representing a date and time. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value
|
||
of this syntax is a restriction of the format defined in [ISO8601],
|
||
and is described by the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
century = 2(%x30-39) ; "00" to "99"
|
||
year = 2(%x30-39) ; "00" to "99"
|
||
month = ( %x30 %x31-39 ) ; "01" (January) to "09"
|
||
/ ( %x31 %x30-32 ) ; "10" to "12"
|
||
day = ( %x30 %x31-39 ) ; "01" to "09"
|
||
/ ( %x31-32 %x30-39 ) ; "10" to "29"
|
||
/ ( %x33 %x30-31 ) ; "30" to "31"
|
||
hour = ( %x30-31 %x30-39 ) / ( %x32 %x30-33 ) ; "00" to "23"
|
||
minute = %x30-35 %x30-39 ; "00" to "59"
|
||
second = ( %x30-35 %x30-39 ) ; "00" to "59"
|
||
/ ( %x36 %x30 ) ; "60" (a leap second)
|
||
|
||
GeneralizedTime = century year month day hour
|
||
[ minute [ second ] ] [ fraction ]
|
||
g-time-zone
|
||
fraction = ( DOT / COMMA ) 1*(%x30-39)
|
||
g-time-zone = %x5A ; "Z"
|
||
/ g-differential
|
||
g-differential = ( MINUS / PLUS ) hour [ minute ]
|
||
MINUS = %x2D ; minus sign ("-")
|
||
|
||
The <DOT>, <COMMA> and <PLUS> rules are defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The time value represents coordinated universal time (equivalent to
|
||
Greenwich Mean Time) if the "Z" form of <g-time-zone> is used,
|
||
otherwise the value represents a local time in the time zone
|
||
indicated by <g-differential>. In the latter case, coordinated
|
||
universal time can be calculated by subtracting the differential from
|
||
the local time. The "Z" form of <g-time-zone> SHOULD be used in
|
||
preference to <g-differential>.
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
199412161032Z
|
||
199412160532-0500
|
||
|
||
Both example values represent the same coordinated universal time:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 14]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
10:32 AM, December 16, 1994.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Generalized Time syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 DESC 'Generalized Time' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the GeneralizedTime ASN.1 type from
|
||
[ASN.1], with the constraint that local time without a differential
|
||
SHALL NOT be used.
|
||
|
||
3.3.14. Guide
|
||
|
||
A value of the Guide syntax suggests criteria, which consist of
|
||
combinations of attribute types and filter operators, to be used in
|
||
constructing filters to search for entries of particular object
|
||
classes. The Guide syntax is obsolete and should not be used for
|
||
defining new attribute types.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
Guide = [ object-class SHARP ] criteria
|
||
|
||
The <object-class> and <criteria> rules are defined in Section
|
||
3.3.10. The <SHARP> rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Guide syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.25 DESC 'Guide' )
|
||
|
||
The Guide syntax corresponds to the Guide ASN.1 type from [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.15. IA5 String
|
||
|
||
A value of the IA5 String syntax is a string of zero, one or more
|
||
characters from International Alphabet 5 (IA5) [T.50], the
|
||
international version of the ASCII character set. The LDAP-specific
|
||
encoding of a value of this syntax is the unconverted string of
|
||
characters, which conforms to the <IA5String> rule in Section 3.2.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the IA5 String syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 DESC 'IA5 String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the IA5String ASN.1 type from [ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.16. Integer
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 15]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
A value of the Integer syntax is a whole number of unlimited
|
||
magnitude. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is
|
||
the optionally signed decimal digit character string representation
|
||
of the number (so, for example, the number 1321 is represented by the
|
||
character string "1321"). The encoding is defined by the following
|
||
ABNF:
|
||
|
||
Integer = ( HYPHEN LDIGIT *DIGIT ) / number
|
||
|
||
The <HYPHEN>, <LDIGIT>, <DIGIT> and <number> rules are defined in
|
||
[MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Integer syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 DESC 'INTEGER' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the INTEGER ASN.1 type from [ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.17. JPEG
|
||
|
||
A value of the JPEG syntax is an image in the JPEG File Interchange
|
||
Format (JFIF), as described in [JPEG]. The LDAP-specific encoding of
|
||
a value of this syntax is the sequence of octets of the JFIF encoding
|
||
of the image.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the JPEG syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.28 DESC 'JPEG' )
|
||
|
||
The JPEG syntax corresponds to the following ASN.1 type:
|
||
|
||
JPEG ::= OCTET STRING (CONSTRAINED BY
|
||
{ -- contents octets are an image in the --
|
||
-- JPEG File Interchange Format -- })
|
||
|
||
3.3.18. LDAP Syntax Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the LDAP Syntax Description syntax is the description of
|
||
an LDAP syntax. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax
|
||
is defined by the <SyntaxDescription> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the LDAP Syntax Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.54 DESC 'LDAP Syntax Description' )
|
||
|
||
The above LDAP definition for the LDAP Syntax Description syntax is
|
||
itself a legal value of the LDAP Syntax Description syntax.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 16]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
The ASN.1 type corresponding to the LDAP Syntax Description syntax is
|
||
defined as follows, assuming EXPLICIT TAGS:
|
||
|
||
LDAPSyntaxDescription ::= SEQUENCE {
|
||
identifier OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
|
||
description DirectoryString { ub-schema } OPTIONAL }
|
||
|
||
The DirectoryString parameterized ASN.1 type is defined in [X.520].
|
||
|
||
The value of ub-schema (an integer) is implementation defined. A
|
||
non-normative definition appears in [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.19. Matching Rule Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the Matching Rule Description syntax is the definition of
|
||
a matching rule. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this
|
||
syntax is defined by the <MatchingRuleDescription> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
( 2.5.13.2 NAME 'caseIgnoreMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
|
||
|
||
Note: a line break has been added for readability - it is not part of
|
||
the syntax.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Matching Rule Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.30 DESC 'Matching Rule Description' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the MatchingRuleDescription ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.20. Matching Rule Use Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the Matching Rule Use Description syntax indicates the
|
||
attribute types to which a matching rule may be applied in an
|
||
extensibleMatch search filter [PROT]. The LDAP-specific encoding of
|
||
a value of this syntax is defined by the <MatchingRuleUseDescription>
|
||
rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
( 2.5.13.16 APPLIES ( givenName $ surname ) )
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Matching Rule Use Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.31
|
||
DESC 'Matching Rule Use Description' )
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 17]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the MatchingRuleUseDescription ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.21. Name and Optional UID
|
||
|
||
A value of the Name and Optional UID syntax is the distinguished name
|
||
[MODELS] of an entity optionally accompanied by a unique identifier
|
||
that serves to differentiate the entity from others with an identical
|
||
distinguished name.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
NameAndOptionalUID = distinguishedName [ SHARP BitString ]
|
||
|
||
The <BitString> rule is defined in Section 3.3.2. The
|
||
<distinguishedName> rule is defined in [LDAPDN]. The <SHARP> rule is
|
||
defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Note that although the '#' character may occur in the string
|
||
representation of a distinguished name, no additional escaping of
|
||
this character is performed when a <distinguishedName> is encoded in
|
||
a <NameAndOptionalUID>.
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.0=#04024869,O=Test,C=GB#'0101'B
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Name and Optional UID syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.34 DESC 'Name And Optional UID' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the NameAndOptionalUID ASN.1 type from
|
||
[X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.22. Name Form Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the Name Form Description syntax is the definition of a
|
||
name form, which regulates how entries may be named. The
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by the
|
||
<NameFormDescription> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
( 2.5.15.3 NAME 'orgNameForm' OC organization MUST o )
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Name Form Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.35 DESC 'Name Form Description' )
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 18]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the NameFormDescription ASN.1 type from
|
||
[X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.23. Numeric String
|
||
|
||
A value of the Numeric String syntax is a sequence of one or more
|
||
numerals and spaces. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this
|
||
syntax is the unconverted string of characters, which conforms to the
|
||
following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
NumericString = 1*(DIGIT / SPACE)
|
||
|
||
The <DIGIT> and <SPACE> rules are defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
15 079 672 281
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Numeric String syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36 DESC 'Numeric String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the NumericString ASN.1 type from [ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.24. Object Class Description
|
||
|
||
A value of the Object Class Description syntax is the definition of
|
||
an object class. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this
|
||
syntax is defined by the <ObjectClassDescription> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
( 2.5.6.2 NAME 'country' SUP top STRUCTURAL MUST c
|
||
MAY ( searchGuide $ description ) )
|
||
|
||
Note: a line break has been added for readability - it is not part of
|
||
the syntax.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Object Class Description syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.37 DESC 'Object Class Description' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the ObjectClassDescription ASN.1 type from
|
||
[X.501].
|
||
|
||
3.3.25. Octet String
|
||
|
||
A value of the Octet String syntax is a sequence of zero, one or more
|
||
arbitrary octets. The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this
|
||
syntax is the unconverted sequence of octets, which conforms to the
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 19]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
OctetString = *OCTET
|
||
|
||
The <OCTET> rule is defined in [MODELS]. Values of this syntax are
|
||
not generally human-readable.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Octet String syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40 DESC 'Octet String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the OCTET STRING ASN.1 type from [ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.26. OID
|
||
|
||
A value of the OID syntax is an object identifier; a sequence of two
|
||
or more non-negative integers that uniquely identify some object or
|
||
item of specification. Many of the object identifiers used in LDAP
|
||
also have IANA registered names [RFC3383].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the <oid> rule in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
1.2.3.4
|
||
cn
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the OID syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38 DESC 'OID' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the OBJECT IDENTIFIER ASN.1 type from
|
||
[ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.27. Other Mailbox
|
||
|
||
A value of the Other Mailbox syntax identifies an electronic mailbox,
|
||
in a particular named mail system. The LDAP-specific encoding of a
|
||
value of this syntax is defined by the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
OtherMailbox = mailbox-type DOLLAR mailbox
|
||
mailbox-type = PrintableString
|
||
mailbox = IA5String
|
||
|
||
The <mailbox-type> rule represents the type of mail system in which
|
||
the mailbox resides, for example "MCIMail", and <mailbox> is the
|
||
actual mailbox in the mail system described by <mailbox-type>. The
|
||
<PrintableString> and <IA5String> rules are defined in Section 3.2.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 20]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
The <DOLLAR> rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Other Mailbox syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.39 DESC 'Other Mailbox' )
|
||
|
||
The ASN.1 type corresponding to the Other Mailbox syntax is defined
|
||
as follows, assuming EXPLICIT TAGS:
|
||
|
||
OtherMailbox ::= SEQUENCE {
|
||
mailboxType PrintableString,
|
||
mailbox IA5String
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
3.3.28. Postal Address
|
||
|
||
A value of the Postal Address syntax is a sequence of strings of one
|
||
or more arbitrary UCS characters, which form an address in a physical
|
||
mail system.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
PostalAddress = line *( DOLLAR line )
|
||
line = 1*line-char
|
||
line-char = %x00-23
|
||
/ (%x5C "24") ; escaped "$"
|
||
/ %x25-5B
|
||
/ (%x5C "5C") ; escaped "\"
|
||
/ %x5D-7F
|
||
/ UTFMB
|
||
|
||
Each character string (i.e., <line>) of a postal address value is
|
||
encoded as a UTF-8 [UTF8] string except that "\" and "$" characters,
|
||
if they occur in the string, are escaped by a "\" character followed
|
||
by the two hexadecimal digit code for the character. The <HEX-DIGIT>
|
||
rule is defined in Section 3.2. The <DOLLAR> and <UTFMB> rules are
|
||
defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Many servers limit the postal address to no more than six lines of no
|
||
more than thirty characters each.
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
1234 Main St.$Anytown, CA 12345$USA
|
||
\241,000,000 Sweepstakes$PO Box 1000000$Anytown, CA 12345$USA
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Postal Address syntax is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 21]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41 DESC 'Postal Address' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the PostalAddress ASN.1 type from [X.520],
|
||
i.e.,
|
||
|
||
PostalAddress ::= SEQUENCE SIZE(1..ub-postal-line) OF
|
||
DirectoryString { ub-postal-string }
|
||
|
||
The values of ub-postal-line and ub-postal-string (both integers) are
|
||
implementation defined. Non-normative definitions appear in [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.29. Printable String
|
||
|
||
A value of the Printable String syntax is a string of one or more
|
||
latin alphabetic, numeric, and selected punctuation characters as
|
||
specified by the <PrintableCharacter> rule in Section 3.2.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is the
|
||
unconverted string of characters, which conforms to the
|
||
<PrintableString> rule in Section 3.2.
|
||
|
||
Example:
|
||
This is a PrintableString.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the PrintableString syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.44 DESC 'Printable String' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the PrintableString ASN.1 type from
|
||
[ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
3.3.30. Substring Assertion
|
||
|
||
A value of the Substring Assertion syntax is a sequence of zero, one
|
||
or more character substrings used as an argument for substring
|
||
extensible matching of character string attribute values, i.e., as
|
||
the matchValue of a MatchingRuleAssertion [PROT]. Each substring is
|
||
a string of one or more arbitrary characters from the Universal
|
||
Character Set (UCS) [UCS]. A zero length substring is not permitted.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
SubstringAssertion = [ initial ] any [ final ]
|
||
|
||
initial = substring
|
||
any = ASTERISK *(substring ASTERISK)
|
||
final = substring
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 22]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
ASTERISK = %x2A ; asterisk ("*")
|
||
|
||
substring = 1*substring-character
|
||
substring-character = %x00-29
|
||
/ (%x5C "2A") ; escaped "*"
|
||
/ %x2B-5B
|
||
/ (%x5C "5C") ; escaped "\"
|
||
/ %x5D-7F
|
||
/ UTFMB
|
||
|
||
Each <substring> of a Substring Assertion value is encoded as a UTF-8
|
||
[UTF8] string, except that "\" and "*" characters, if they occur in
|
||
the substring, are escaped by a "\" character followed by the two
|
||
hexadecimal digit code for the character.
|
||
|
||
The Substring Assertion syntax is used only as the syntax of
|
||
assertion values in the extensible match. It is not used as an
|
||
attribute syntax, or in the SubstringFilter [PROT].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Substring Assertion syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 DESC 'Substring Assertion' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the SubstringAssertion ASN.1 type from
|
||
[X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.31. Telephone Number
|
||
|
||
A value of the Telephone Number syntax is a string of printable
|
||
characters that complies with the internationally agreed format for
|
||
representing international telephone numbers [E.123].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is the
|
||
unconverted string of characters, which conforms to the
|
||
<PrintableString> rule in Section 3.2.
|
||
|
||
Example: +1 512 315 0280
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Telephone Number syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 DESC 'Telephone Number' )
|
||
|
||
The Telephone Number syntax corresponds to the following ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.520]:
|
||
|
||
PrintableString (SIZE(1..ub-telephone-number))
|
||
|
||
The value of ub-telephone-number (an integer) is implementation
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 23]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
defined. A non-normative definition appears in [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.32. Teletex Terminal Identifier
|
||
|
||
A value of this syntax specifies the identifier and (optionally)
|
||
parameters of a teletex terminal.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
teletex-id = ttx-term *(DOLLAR ttx-param)
|
||
ttx-term = PrintableString ; terminal identifier
|
||
ttx-param = ttx-key COLON ttx-value ; parameter
|
||
ttx-key = "graphic" / "control" / "misc" / "page" / "private"
|
||
ttx-value = *ttx-value-char
|
||
|
||
ttx-value-char = %x00-23
|
||
/ (%x5C "24") ; escaped "$"
|
||
/ %x25-5B
|
||
/ (%x5C "5C") ; escaped "\"
|
||
/ %x5D-FF
|
||
|
||
The <PrintableString> and <COLON> rules are defined in Section 3.2.
|
||
The <DOLLAR> rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Teletex Terminal Identifier syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.51
|
||
DESC 'Teletex Terminal Identifier' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the TeletexTerminalIdentifier ASN.1 type
|
||
from [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.33. Telex Number
|
||
|
||
A value of the Telex Number syntax specifies the telex number,
|
||
country code and answerback code of a telex terminal.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP-specific encoding of a value of this syntax is defined by
|
||
the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
telex-number = actual-number DOLLAR country-code
|
||
DOLLAR answerback
|
||
actual-number = PrintableString
|
||
country-code = PrintableString
|
||
answerback = PrintableString
|
||
|
||
The <PrintableString> rule is defined in Section 3.2. The <DOLLAR>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 24]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
rule is defined in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the Telex Number syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.52 DESC 'Telex Number' )
|
||
|
||
This syntax corresponds to the TelexNumber ASN.1 type from [X.520].
|
||
|
||
3.3.34. UTC Time
|
||
|
||
A value of the UTC Time syntax is a character string representing a
|
||
date and time to a precision of one minute or one second. The year
|
||
is given as a two-digit number. The LDAP-specific encoding of a
|
||
value of this syntax follows the format defined in [ASN.1] for the
|
||
UTCTime type and is described by the following ABNF:
|
||
|
||
UTCTime = year month day hour minute [ second ]
|
||
[ u-time-zone ]
|
||
u-time-zone = %x5A ; "Z"
|
||
/ u-differential
|
||
u-differential = ( MINUS / PLUS ) hour minute
|
||
|
||
The <year>, <month>, <day>, <hour>, <minute>, <second> and <MINUS>
|
||
rules are defined in Section 3.3.13. The <PLUS> rule is defined in
|
||
[MODELS].
|
||
|
||
The time value represents coordinated universal time if the "Z" form
|
||
of <u-time-zone> is used, otherwise the value represents a local
|
||
time. In the latter case, if <u-differential> is provided then
|
||
coordinated universal time can be calculated by subtracting the
|
||
differential from the local time. The <u-time-zone> SHOULD be
|
||
present in time values and the "Z" form of <u-time-zone> SHOULD be
|
||
used in preference to <u-differential>.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the UTC Time syntax is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.53 DESC 'UTC Time' )
|
||
|
||
Note: This syntax is deprecated in favor of the Generalized Time
|
||
syntax.
|
||
|
||
The UTC Time syntax corresponds to the UTCTime ASN.1 type from
|
||
[ASN.1].
|
||
|
||
4. Matching Rules
|
||
|
||
Matching rules are used by directory implementations to compare
|
||
attribute values against assertion values when performing Search and
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 25]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Compare operations [PROT]. They are also used when comparing a
|
||
purported distinguished name [MODELS] with the name of an entry.
|
||
When modifying entries, matching rules are used to identify values to
|
||
be deleted and to prevent an attribute from containing two equal
|
||
values.
|
||
|
||
Matching rules that are required for directory operation, or that are
|
||
in common use, are specified in this section.
|
||
|
||
4.1. General Considerations
|
||
|
||
A matching rule is applied to attribute values through an
|
||
AttributeValueAssertion or MatchingRuleAssertion [PROT]. The
|
||
conditions under which an AttributeValueAssertion or
|
||
MatchingRuleAssertion evaluates to Undefined are specified in [PROT].
|
||
If an assertion is not Undefined then the result of the assertion is
|
||
the result of applying the selected matching rule. A matching rule
|
||
evaluates to TRUE, and in some cases Undefined, as specified in the
|
||
description of the matching rule, otherwise it evaluates to FALSE.
|
||
|
||
Each assertion contains an assertion value. The definition of each
|
||
matching rule specifies the syntax for the assertion value. The
|
||
syntax of the assertion value is typically, but not necessarily, the
|
||
same as the syntax of the attribute values to which the matching rule
|
||
may be applied. Note that the AssertionValue in a SubstringFilter
|
||
[PROT] MUST conform to the assertion syntax of the equality matching
|
||
rule for the attribute type rather than the assertion syntax of the
|
||
substrings matching rule for the attribute type. The entire
|
||
SubstringFilter is converted into an assertion value of the
|
||
substrings matching rule prior to applying the rule.
|
||
|
||
The definition of each matching rule indicates the attribute syntaxes
|
||
to which the rule may be applied, by specifying conditions the
|
||
corresponding ASN.1 type of a candidate attribute syntax must
|
||
satisfy. These conditions are also satisfied if the corresponding
|
||
ASN.1 type is a tagged or constrained derivative of the ASN.1 type
|
||
explicitly mentioned in the rule description (i.e., ASN.1 tags and
|
||
constraints are ignored in checking applicability), or an alternative
|
||
reference notation for the explicitly mentioned type. Each rule
|
||
description lists as examples of applicable attribute syntaxes, the
|
||
complete list of the syntaxes defined in this document to which the
|
||
matching rule applies. A matching rule may be applicable to
|
||
additional syntaxes defined in other documents if those syntaxes
|
||
satisfy the conditions on the corresponding ASN.1 type.
|
||
|
||
The description of each matching rule indicates whether the rule is
|
||
suitable for use as the equality matching rule (EQUALITY), ordering
|
||
matching rule (ORDERING) or substrings matching rule (SUBSTR) in an
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 26]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
attribute type definition [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
Each matching rule is uniquely identified with an object identifier.
|
||
The definition of a matching rule should not be subsequently changed.
|
||
If a change is desirable then a new matching rule with a different
|
||
object identifier should be defined instead.
|
||
|
||
Servers SHOULD implement all the matching rules in Section 4.2.
|
||
Servers MAY implement additional matching rules.
|
||
|
||
Servers which implement the extensibleMatch filter SHOULD allow the
|
||
matching rules listed in Section 4.2 to be used in the
|
||
extensibleMatch filter and SHOULD allow matching rules to be used
|
||
with all attribute types known to the server, where the assertion
|
||
syntax of the matching rule is the same as the value syntax of the
|
||
attribute.
|
||
|
||
Servers MUST publish in the matchingRules attribute, the definitions
|
||
of matching rules referenced by values of the attributeTypes and
|
||
matchingRuleUse attributes in the same subschema entry. Other
|
||
unreferenced matching rules MAY be published in the matchingRules
|
||
attribute.
|
||
|
||
If the server supports the extensibleMatch filter, then the server
|
||
MAY use the matchingRuleUse attribute to indicate the applicability
|
||
(in an extensibleMatch filter) of selected matching rules to
|
||
nominated attribute types.
|
||
|
||
4.2. Matching Rule Definitions
|
||
|
||
When evaluating the numericStringMatch, numericStringSubstringsMatch,
|
||
caseExactIA5Match, caseIgnoreIA5Match, caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch,
|
||
caseIgnoreListMatch, caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch, caseIgnoreMatch,
|
||
caseIgnoreOrderingMatch, caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch,
|
||
telephoneNumberMatch and telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch matching
|
||
rules the assertion value and attribute value are prepared according
|
||
to the string preparation algorithms [PREP] for LDAP before being
|
||
compared. The Transcode, Normalize, Prohibit and Check bidi steps
|
||
are the same for each of the matching rules. However, the Map and
|
||
Insignificant Character Removal steps depends on the specific rule,
|
||
as detailed in the description of these matching rules in the
|
||
sections that follow.
|
||
|
||
4.2.1. bitStringMatch
|
||
|
||
The bitStringMatch rule compares an assertion value of the Bit String
|
||
syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g., the Bit String
|
||
syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is BIT STRING.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 27]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
If the corresponding ASN.1 type of the attribute syntax does not have
|
||
a named bit list (which is the case for the Bit String syntax) then
|
||
the rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value has the
|
||
same number of bits as the assertion value and the bits match on a
|
||
bitwise basis.
|
||
|
||
If the corresponding ASN.1 type does have a named bit list then
|
||
bitStringMatch operates as above except that trailing zero bits in
|
||
the attribute and assertion values are treated as absent.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the bitStringMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.16 NAME 'bitStringMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6 )
|
||
|
||
The bitStringMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.2. caseExactIA5Match
|
||
|
||
The caseExactIA5Match rule compares an assertion value of the IA5
|
||
String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the IA5 String
|
||
syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is IA5String.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string and the prepared assertion value character
|
||
string have the same number of characters and corresponding
|
||
characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are not case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
Insignificant Space Removal is applied in the Insignificant Character
|
||
Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseExactIA5Match rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.1 NAME 'caseExactIA5Match'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
|
||
|
||
The caseExactIA5Match rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.3. caseIgnoreIA5Match
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreIA5Match rule compares an assertion value of the IA5
|
||
String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the IA5 String
|
||
syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is IA5String.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string and the prepared assertion value character
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 28]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
string have the same number of characters and corresponding
|
||
characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
Insignificant Space Removal is applied in the Insignificant Character
|
||
Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseIgnoreIA5Match rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.2 NAME 'caseIgnoreIA5Match'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreIA5Match rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.4. caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch rule compares an assertion value of
|
||
the Substring Assertion syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g
|
||
the IA5 String syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is IA5String.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared substrings of
|
||
the assertion value match disjoint portions of the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string in the order of the substrings in the
|
||
assertion value, and an <initial> substring, if present, matches the
|
||
beginning of the prepared attribute value character string, and a
|
||
<final> substring, if present, matches the end of the prepared
|
||
attribute value character string. A prepared substring matches a
|
||
portion of the prepared attribute value character string if
|
||
corresponding characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value substrings for
|
||
comparison, characters are case folded in the Map preparation step,
|
||
and only Insignificant Space Removal is applied in the Insignificant
|
||
Character Removal step.
|
||
|
||
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.3 NAME 'caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch rule is a substrings matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.5. caseIgnoreListMatch
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreListMatch rule compares an assertion value that is a
|
||
sequence of strings to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g., the
|
||
Postal Address syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is a SEQUENCE
|
||
OF the DirectoryString ASN.1 type.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 29]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value and the
|
||
assertion value have the same number of strings and corresponding
|
||
strings (by position) match according to the caseIgnoreMatch matching
|
||
rule.
|
||
|
||
In [X.520] the assertion syntax for this matching rule is defined to
|
||
be:
|
||
|
||
SEQUENCE OF DirectoryString {ub-match}
|
||
|
||
i.e., different from the corresponding type for the Postal Address
|
||
syntax. The choice of the Postal Address syntax for the assertion
|
||
syntax of the caseIgnoreListMatch in LDAP should not be seen as
|
||
limiting the matching rule to only apply to attributes with the
|
||
Postal Address syntax.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseIgnoreListMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.11 NAME 'caseIgnoreListMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreListMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.6. caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch rule compares an assertion value of
|
||
the Substring Assertion syntax to an attribute value of a syntax
|
||
(e.g., the Postal Address syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is a
|
||
SEQUENCE OF the DirectoryString ASN.1 type.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the assertion value
|
||
matches, per the caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch rule, the character string
|
||
formed by concatenating the strings of the attribute value, except
|
||
that none of the <initial>, <any>, or <final> substrings of the
|
||
assertion value are considered to match a substring of the
|
||
concatenated string which spans more than one of the original strings
|
||
of the attribute value.
|
||
|
||
Note that, in terms of the LDAP-specific encoding of the Postal
|
||
Address syntax, the concatenated string omits the <DOLLAR> line
|
||
separator and the escaping of "\" and "$" characters.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.12 NAME 'caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch rule is a substrings matching rule.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 30]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
4.2.7. caseIgnoreMatch
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreMatch rule compares an assertion value of the Directory
|
||
String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g., the Directory
|
||
String, Printable String, Country String or Telephone Number syntax)
|
||
whose corresponding ASN.1 type is DirectoryString or one of the
|
||
alternative string types of DirectoryString, e.g., PrintableString
|
||
(the other alternatives do not correspond to any syntax defined in
|
||
this document).
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string and the prepared assertion value character
|
||
string have the same number of characters and corresponding
|
||
characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
Insignificant Space Removal is applied in the Insignificant Character
|
||
Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseIgnoreMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.2 NAME 'caseIgnoreMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.8. caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreOrderingMatch rule compares an assertion value of the
|
||
Directory String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g., the
|
||
Directory String, Printable String, Country String or Telephone
|
||
Number syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is DirectoryString or
|
||
one of its alternative string types.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if, and only if, in the code point
|
||
collation order, the prepared attribute value character string
|
||
appears earlier than the prepared assertion value character string,
|
||
i.e., the attribute value is "less than" the assertion value.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
Insignificant Space Removal is applied in the Insignificant Character
|
||
Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseIgnoreOrderingMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.3 NAME 'caseIgnoreOrderingMatch'
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 31]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreOrderingMatch rule is an ordering matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.9. caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch rule compares an assertion value of the
|
||
Substring Assertion syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g.,
|
||
the Directory String, Printable String, Country String or Telephone
|
||
Number syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is DirectoryString or
|
||
one of its alternative string types.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared substrings of
|
||
the assertion value match disjoint portions of the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string in the order of the substrings in the
|
||
assertion value, and an <initial> substring, if present, matches the
|
||
beginning of the prepared attribute value character string, and a
|
||
<final> substring, if present, matches the end of the prepared
|
||
attribute value character string. A prepared substring matches a
|
||
portion of the prepared attribute value character string if
|
||
corresponding characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value substrings for
|
||
comparison, characters are case folded in the Map preparation step,
|
||
and only Insignificant Space Removal is applied in the Insignificant
|
||
Character Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.4 NAME 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 )
|
||
|
||
The caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch rule is a substrings matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.10. distinguishedNameMatch
|
||
|
||
The distinguishedNameMatch rule compares an assertion value of the DN
|
||
syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g., the DN syntax) whose
|
||
corresponding ASN.1 type is DistinguishedName.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value and the
|
||
assertion value have the same number of relative distinguished names
|
||
and corresponding relative distinguished names (by position) are the
|
||
same. A relative distinguished name (RDN) of the assertion value is
|
||
the same as an RDN of the attribute value if and only if they have
|
||
the same number of attribute value assertions and each attribute
|
||
value assertion (AVA) of the first RDN is the same as the AVA of the
|
||
second RDN with the same attribute type. The order of the AVAs is
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 32]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
not significant. Also note that a particular attribute type may
|
||
appear in at most one AVA in an RDN. Two AVAs with the same
|
||
attribute type are the same if their values are equal according to
|
||
the equality matching rule of the attribute type. If one or more of
|
||
the AVA comparisons evaluate to Undefined and the remaining AVA
|
||
comparisons return TRUE then the distinguishedNameMatch rule
|
||
evaluates to Undefined.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the distinguishedNameMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.1 NAME 'distinguishedNameMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 )
|
||
|
||
The distinguishedNameMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.11. generalizedTimeMatch
|
||
|
||
The generalizedTimeMatch rule compares an assertion value of the
|
||
Generalized Time syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the
|
||
Generalized Time syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is
|
||
GeneralizedTime.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value
|
||
represents the same universal coordinated time as the assertion
|
||
value. If a time is specified with the minutes or seconds absent
|
||
then the number of minutes or seconds (respectively) is assumed to be
|
||
zero.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the generalizedTimeMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.27 NAME 'generalizedTimeMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 )
|
||
|
||
The generalizedTimeMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.12. generalizedTimeOrderingMatch
|
||
|
||
The generalizedTimeOrderingMatch rule compares the time ordering of
|
||
an assertion value of the Generalized Time syntax to an attribute
|
||
value of a syntax (e.g the Generalized Time syntax) whose
|
||
corresponding ASN.1 type is GeneralizedTime.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value
|
||
represents a universal coordinated time which is earlier than the
|
||
universal coordinated time represented by the assertion value.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the generalizedTimeOrderingMatch rule is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 33]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.28 NAME 'generalizedTimeOrderingMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 )
|
||
|
||
The generalizedTimeOrderingMatch rule is an ordering matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.13. integerFirstComponentMatch
|
||
|
||
The integerFirstComponentMatch rule compares an assertion value of
|
||
the Integer syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the DIT
|
||
Structure Rule Description syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is
|
||
a SEQUENCE with a mandatory first component of the INTEGER ASN.1
|
||
type.
|
||
|
||
Note that the assertion syntax of this matching rule differs from the
|
||
attribute syntax of attributes for which this is the equality
|
||
matching rule.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the assertion value and the
|
||
first component of the attribute value are the same integer value.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the integerFirstComponentMatch matching rule
|
||
is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.29 NAME 'integerFirstComponentMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 )
|
||
|
||
The integerFirstComponentMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
When using integerFirstComponentMatch to compare two attribute values
|
||
(of an applicable syntax), an assertion value must first be derived
|
||
from one of the attribute values. An assertion value can be derived
|
||
from an attribute value by taking the first component of that
|
||
attribute value.
|
||
|
||
4.2.14. integerMatch
|
||
|
||
The integerMatch rule compares an assertion value of the Integer
|
||
syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the Integer syntax)
|
||
whose corresponding ASN.1 type is INTEGER.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value and the
|
||
assertion value are the same integer value.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the integerMatch matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.14 NAME 'integerMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 )
|
||
|
||
The integerMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 34]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
4.2.15. numericStringMatch
|
||
|
||
The numericStringMatch rule compares an assertion value of the
|
||
Numeric String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the
|
||
Numeric String syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is
|
||
NumericString.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string and the prepared assertion value character
|
||
string have the same number of characters and corresponding
|
||
characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are not case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
numericString Insignificant Character Removal is applied in the
|
||
Insignificant Character Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the numericStringMatch matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.8 NAME 'numericStringMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36 )
|
||
|
||
The numericStringMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.16. numericStringSubstringsMatch
|
||
|
||
The numericStringSubstringsMatch rule compares an assertion value of
|
||
the Substring Assertion syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g
|
||
the Numeric String syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is
|
||
NumericString.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared substrings of
|
||
the assertion value match disjoint portions of the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string in the order of the substrings in the
|
||
assertion value, and an <initial> substring, if present, matches the
|
||
beginning of the prepared attribute value character string, and a
|
||
<final> substring, if present, matches the end of the prepared
|
||
attribute value character string. A prepared substring matches a
|
||
portion of the prepared attribute value character string if
|
||
corresponding characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are not case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
numericString Insignificant Character Removal is applied in the
|
||
Insignificant Character Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the numericStringSubstringsMatch matching
|
||
rule is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 35]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.10 NAME 'numericStringSubstringsMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 )
|
||
|
||
The numericStringSubstringsMatch rule is a substrings matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.17. objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch
|
||
|
||
The objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch rule compares an assertion
|
||
value of the OID syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the
|
||
Attribute Type Description, DIT Content Rule Description, LDAP Syntax
|
||
Description, Matching Rule Description, Matching Rule Use
|
||
Description, Name Form Description or Object Class Description
|
||
syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is a SEQUENCE with a mandatory
|
||
first component of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER ASN.1 type.
|
||
|
||
Note that the assertion syntax of this matching rule differs from the
|
||
attribute syntax of attributes for which this is the equality
|
||
matching rule.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the assertion value matches
|
||
the first component of the attribute value using the rules of
|
||
objectIdentifierMatch.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch
|
||
matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.31 NAME 'objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38 )
|
||
|
||
The objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch rule is an equality matching
|
||
rule. When using objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch to compare two
|
||
attribute values (of an applicable syntax), an assertion value must
|
||
first be derived from one of the attribute values. An assertion
|
||
value can be derived from an attribute value by taking the first
|
||
component of that attribute value.
|
||
|
||
4.2.18. objectIdentifierMatch
|
||
|
||
The objectIdentifierMatch rule compares an assertion value of the OID
|
||
syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the OID syntax) whose
|
||
corresponding ASN.1 type is OBJECT IDENTIFIER.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the assertion value and the
|
||
attribute value represent the same object identifier, that is, the
|
||
same sequence of integers, whether represented explicitly in the
|
||
<numericoid> form of <oid> or implicitly in the <descr> form (see
|
||
[MODELS]).
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 36]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
If an LDAP client supplies an assertion value in the <descr> form,
|
||
and the chosen descriptor is not recognized by the server, then the
|
||
objectIdentifierMatch rule evaluates to Undefined.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the objectIdentifierMatch matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.0 NAME 'objectIdentifierMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38 )
|
||
|
||
The objectIdentifierMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.19. octetStringMatch
|
||
|
||
The octetStringMatch rule compares an assertion value of the Octet
|
||
String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the Octet String
|
||
or JPEG syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is the OCTET STRING
|
||
ASN.1 type.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the attribute value and the
|
||
assertion value are the same length and corresponding octets (by
|
||
position) are the same.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the octetStringMatch matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.17 NAME 'octetStringMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40 )
|
||
|
||
The octetStringMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.20. telephoneNumberMatch
|
||
|
||
The telephoneNumberMatch rule compares an assertion value of the
|
||
Telephone Number syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the
|
||
Telephone Number syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is a
|
||
PrintableString representing a telephone number.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string and the prepared assertion value character
|
||
string have the same number of characters and corresponding
|
||
characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value for comparison,
|
||
characters are case folded in the Map preparation step, and only
|
||
telephoneNumber Insignificant Character Removal is applied in the
|
||
Insignificant Character Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the telephoneNumberMatch matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 37]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.20 NAME 'telephoneNumberMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 )
|
||
|
||
The telephoneNumberMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.21. telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch
|
||
|
||
The telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch rule compares an assertion value
|
||
of the Substring Assertion syntax to an attribute value of a syntax
|
||
(e.g the Telephone Number syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is a
|
||
PrintableString representing a telephone number.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the prepared substrings of
|
||
the assertion value match disjoint portions of the prepared attribute
|
||
value character string in the order of the substrings in the
|
||
assertion value, and an <initial> substring, if present, matches the
|
||
beginning of the prepared attribute value character string, and a
|
||
<final> substring, if present, matches the end of the prepared
|
||
attribute value character string. A prepared substring matches a
|
||
portion of the prepared attribute value character string if
|
||
corresponding characters have the same code point.
|
||
|
||
In preparing the attribute value and assertion value substrings for
|
||
comparison, characters are case folded in the Map preparation step,
|
||
and only telephoneNumber Insignificant Character Removal is applied
|
||
in the Insignificant Character Removal step.
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch matching
|
||
rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.21 NAME 'telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 )
|
||
|
||
The telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch rule is a substrings matching
|
||
rule.
|
||
|
||
4.2.22. uniqueMemberMatch
|
||
|
||
The uniqueMemberMatch rule compares an assertion value of the Name
|
||
And Optional UID syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g the
|
||
Name And Optional UID syntax) whose corresponding ASN.1 type is
|
||
NameAndOptionalUID.
|
||
|
||
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the <distinguishedName>
|
||
components of the assertion value and attribute value match according
|
||
to the distinguishedNameMatch rule and the <BitString> component is
|
||
absent from the attribute value or matches the <BitString> component
|
||
of the assertion value according to the bitStringMatch rule.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 38]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
The LDAP definition for the uniqueMemberMatch matching rule is:
|
||
|
||
( 2.5.13.23 NAME 'uniqueMemberMatch'
|
||
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.34 )
|
||
|
||
The uniqueMemberMatch rule is an equality matching rule.
|
||
|
||
5. Security Considerations
|
||
|
||
In general, the LDAP-specific encodings for syntaxes defined in this
|
||
document do not define canonical encodings. That is, a
|
||
transformation from an LDAP-specific encoding into some other
|
||
encoding (e.g., BER) and back into the LDAP-specific encoding will
|
||
not necessarily reproduce exactly the original octets of the
|
||
LDAP-specific encoding. Therefore an LDAP-specific encoding should
|
||
not be used where a canonical encoding is required.
|
||
|
||
Furthermore, the LDAP-specific encodings do not necessarily enable an
|
||
alternative encoding of values of the Directory String and DN
|
||
syntaxes to be reconstructed, e.g., a transformation from a
|
||
Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER) [BER] encoding to an LDAP-specific
|
||
encoding and back to a DER encoding may not reproduce the original
|
||
DER encoding. Therefore LDAP-specific encodings should not be used
|
||
where reversibility to DER is needed, e.g., for the verification of
|
||
digital signatures. Instead, DER or a DER-reversible encoding should
|
||
be used.
|
||
|
||
When interpreting security-sensitive fields, and in particular fields
|
||
used to grant or deny access, implementations MUST ensure that any
|
||
matching rule comparisons are done on the underlying abstract value,
|
||
regardless of the particular encoding used.
|
||
|
||
6. Acknowledgements
|
||
|
||
This document is an revision of RFC 2252 by M. Wahl, A. Coulbeck, T.
|
||
Howes, and S. Kille. RFC 2252 was a product of the IETF ASID Working
|
||
Group.
|
||
|
||
This document is based upon input of the IETF LDAPBIS working group.
|
||
The authors wish to thank J. Sermersheim and K. Zeilenga for their
|
||
significant contribution to this revision.
|
||
|
||
7. IANA Considerations
|
||
|
||
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is requested to update
|
||
the LDAP descriptors registry [BCP64] as indicated by the following
|
||
templates:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 39]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration Update
|
||
Descriptor (short name): see comment
|
||
Object Identifier: see comment
|
||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||
Steven Legg <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
|
||
Usage: see comment
|
||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||
Comments:
|
||
|
||
The following descriptors (short names) should be updated to refer
|
||
to RFC XXXX.
|
||
|
||
NAME Type OID
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
bitStringMatch M 2.5.13.16
|
||
caseExactIA5Match M 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.1
|
||
caseIgnoreIA5Match M 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.2
|
||
caseIgnoreListMatch M 2.5.13.11
|
||
caseIgnoreMatch M 2.5.13.2
|
||
caseIgnoreOrderingMatch M 2.5.13.3
|
||
caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch M 2.5.13.4
|
||
distinguishedNameMatch M 2.5.13.1
|
||
generalizedTimeMatch M 2.5.13.27
|
||
generalizedTimeOrderingMatch M 2.5.13.28
|
||
integerFirstComponentMatch M 2.5.13.29
|
||
integerMatch M 2.5.13.14
|
||
numericStringMatch M 2.5.13.8
|
||
numericStringSubstringsMatch M 2.5.13.10
|
||
objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch M 2.5.13.31
|
||
octetStringMatch M 2.5.13.17
|
||
telephoneNumberMatch M 2.5.13.20
|
||
telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch M 2.5.13.21
|
||
uniqueMemberMatch M 2.5.13.23
|
||
|
||
The descriptor for the object identifier 2.5.13.0 was incorrectly
|
||
registered as objectIdentifiersMatch (extraneous `s') in BCP 64.
|
||
It should be changed to the following with a reference to RFC
|
||
XXXX.
|
||
|
||
NAME Type OID
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
objectIdentifierMatch M 2.5.13.0
|
||
|
||
|
||
Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration
|
||
Descriptor (short name): caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
|
||
Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.3
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 40]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||
Steven Legg <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
|
||
Usage: other (M)
|
||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||
|
||
|
||
Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration
|
||
Descriptor (short name): caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch
|
||
Object Identifier: 2.5.13.12
|
||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||
Steven Legg <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
|
||
Usage: other (M)
|
||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||
|
||
8. References
|
||
|
||
8.1. Normative References
|
||
|
||
[KEYWORD] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
|
||
|
||
[ABNF] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
|
||
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997.
|
||
|
||
[UTF8] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
|
||
10646", draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-xx.txt, a work in
|
||
progress, June 2003.
|
||
|
||
[BCP64] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
|
||
Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access
|
||
Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 3383, September 2002.
|
||
|
||
[LDAPDN] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP: String Representation of
|
||
Distinguished Names", draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-xx.txt, a work
|
||
in progress, June 2003.
|
||
|
||
[PROT] Sermersheim, J., "LDAP: The Protocol", draft-ietf-ldapbis-
|
||
protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress, September 2003.
|
||
|
||
[E.123] Notation for national and international telephone numbers,
|
||
ITU-T Recommendation E.123, 1988.
|
||
|
||
[FAX] Standardization of Group 3 facsimile apparatus for
|
||
document transmission - Terminal Equipment and Protocols
|
||
for Telematic Services, ITU-T Recommendation T.4, 1993
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 41]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
[T.50] International Reference Alphabet (IRA) (Formerly
|
||
International Alphabet No. 5 or IA5) Information
|
||
Technology - 7-Bit Coded Character Set for Information
|
||
Interchange, ITU-T Recommendation T.50, 1992
|
||
|
||
[X.420] ITU-T Recommendation X.420 (1996) | ISO/IEC 10021-7:1997,
|
||
Information Technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS):
|
||
Interpersonal messaging system
|
||
|
||
[X.501] ITU-T Recommendation X.501 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-2:1994,
|
||
Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
|
||
The Directory: Models
|
||
|
||
[X.520] ITU-T Recommendation X.520 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-6:1994,
|
||
Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
|
||
The Directory: Selected attribute types
|
||
|
||
[ASN.1] ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (07/02) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002,
|
||
Information technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One
|
||
(ASN.1): Specification of basic notation
|
||
|
||
[ISO3166] ISO 3166, "Codes for the representation of names of
|
||
countries".
|
||
|
||
[UCS] Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) -
|
||
Architecture and Basic Multilingual Plane, ISO/IEC
|
||
10646-1: 1993 (with amendments).
|
||
|
||
[JPEG] JPEG File Interchange Format (Version 1.02). Eric
|
||
Hamilton, C-Cube Microsystems, Milpitas, CA, September 1,
|
||
1992.
|
||
|
||
[ROADMAP] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP: Technical Specification Road Map",
|
||
draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in progress,
|
||
June 2003.
|
||
|
||
[MODELS] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP: Directory Information Models", draft-
|
||
ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in progress, June 2003.
|
||
|
||
[PREP] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP: Internationalized String
|
||
Preparation", draft-ietf-ldapbis-strprep-xx.txt, a work in
|
||
progress, June 2003.
|
||
|
||
8.2. Informative References
|
||
|
||
[RFC2252] Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T. and S. Kille,
|
||
"Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute
|
||
Syntax Definitions", RFC 2252, December 1997.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 42]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
[RFC2256] Wahl, M., "A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use
|
||
with LDAPv3", RFC 2256, December 1997.
|
||
|
||
[RFC3377] Hodges, J. and R. Morgan, "Lightweight Directory Access
|
||
Protocol (v3): Technical Specification", RFC 3377,
|
||
September 2002.
|
||
|
||
[SCHEMA] Dally, K., "LDAP: Schema for User Applications", draft-
|
||
ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-xx.txt, a work in progress, June
|
||
2003.
|
||
|
||
[LDAP-PKI] Chadwick, D. W. and S. Legg, "LDAP Schema and Syntaxes for
|
||
PKIs", draft-ietf-pkix-ldap-pki-schema-xx.txt, a work in
|
||
progress, July 2002.
|
||
|
||
[X.500] ITU-T Recommendation X.500 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994,
|
||
Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
|
||
The Directory: Overview of concepts, models and services
|
||
|
||
[BER] ITU-T Recommendation X.690 (07/02) | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002,
|
||
Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
|
||
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical
|
||
Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
|
||
(DER)
|
||
|
||
9. Authors' Addresses
|
||
|
||
Steven Legg
|
||
Adacel Technologies Ltd.
|
||
250 Bay Street
|
||
Brighton, Victoria 3186
|
||
AUSTRALIA
|
||
|
||
Phone: +61 3 8530 7710
|
||
Fax: +61 3 8530 7888
|
||
Email: steven.legg@adacel.com.au
|
||
|
||
|
||
Kathy Dally
|
||
The MITRE Corp.
|
||
7515 Colshire Dr., ms-W650
|
||
McLean VA 22102
|
||
USA
|
||
|
||
Phone: +1 703 883 6058
|
||
Fax: +1 703 883 7142
|
||
Email: kdally@mitre.org
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 43]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
10. Intellectual Property Notice
|
||
|
||
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
||
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
|
||
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
|
||
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
|
||
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
|
||
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
|
||
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
|
||
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
|
||
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
|
||
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
|
||
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
|
||
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
|
||
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
|
||
|
||
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
||
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
||
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
|
||
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
|
||
Director.
|
||
|
||
Appendix A. Summary of Syntax Object Identifiers
|
||
|
||
The following list summarizes the object identifiers assigned to the
|
||
syntaxes defined in this document.
|
||
|
||
Syntax OBJECT IDENTIFIER
|
||
==============================================================
|
||
Attribute Type Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.3
|
||
Bit String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6
|
||
Boolean 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7
|
||
Country String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.11
|
||
Delivery Method 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.14
|
||
Directory String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
|
||
DIT Content Rule Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.16
|
||
DIT Structure Rule Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.17
|
||
DN 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12
|
||
Enhanced Guide 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.21
|
||
Facsimile Telephone Number 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.22
|
||
Fax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.23
|
||
Generalized Time 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24
|
||
Guide 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.25
|
||
IA5 String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26
|
||
Integer 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
|
||
JPEG 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.28
|
||
LDAP Syntax Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.54
|
||
Matching Rule Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.30
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 44]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Matching Rule Use Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.31
|
||
Name And Optional UID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.34
|
||
Name Form Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.35
|
||
Numeric String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36
|
||
Object Class Description 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.37
|
||
Octet String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40
|
||
OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38
|
||
Other Mailbox 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.39
|
||
Postal Address 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41
|
||
Printable String 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.44
|
||
Substring Assertion 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58
|
||
Telephone Number 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50
|
||
Teletex Terminal Identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.51
|
||
Telex Number 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.52
|
||
UTC Time 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.53
|
||
|
||
Appendix B. Changes from RFC 2252 & RFC 2256
|
||
|
||
This annex lists the significant differences between this
|
||
specification and RFC 2252 and Sections 6 and 8 of RFC 2256.
|
||
|
||
This annex is provided for informational purposes only. It is not a
|
||
normative part of this specification.
|
||
|
||
1. The IESG Note has been removed.
|
||
|
||
2. The major part of Sections 4, 5 and 7 has been moved to [MODELS]
|
||
and revised. Changes to the parts of these sections moved to
|
||
[MODELS] are detailed in [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
3. BNF descriptions of syntax formats have been replaced by ABNF
|
||
[ABNF] specifications.
|
||
|
||
4. The ambiguous statement in RFC 2252, Section 4.3 regarding the
|
||
use of a backslash quoting mechanism to escape separator symbols
|
||
has been removed. The escaping mechanism is now explicitly
|
||
represented in the ABNF for the syntaxes where this provision
|
||
applies.
|
||
|
||
5. The description of each of the LDAP syntaxes has been expanded so
|
||
that they are less dependent on knowledge of X.500 for
|
||
interpretation.
|
||
|
||
6. The relationship of LDAP syntaxes to corresponding ASN.1 type
|
||
definitions has been made explicit.
|
||
|
||
7. The set of characters allowed in a <PrintableString> (formerly
|
||
<printablestring>) has been corrected to align with the
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 45]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
PrintableString ASN.1 type in [ASN.1]. Specifically, the double
|
||
quote character has been removed and the single quote character
|
||
and equals sign have been added.
|
||
|
||
8. Values of the Directory String, Printable String and Telephone
|
||
Number syntaxes are now required to have at least one character.
|
||
|
||
9. The <DITContentRuleDescription>, <NameFormDescription> and
|
||
<DITStructureRuleDescription> rules have been moved to [MODELS].
|
||
|
||
10. The corresponding ASN.1 type for the Other Mailbox syntax has
|
||
been incorporated from RFC 1274.
|
||
|
||
11. A corresponding ASN.1 type for the LDAP Syntax Description syntax
|
||
has been invented.
|
||
|
||
12. The Binary syntax has been removed because it was not adequately
|
||
specified, implementations with different incompatible
|
||
interpretations exist, and it was confused with the ;binary
|
||
transfer encoding.
|
||
|
||
13. All discussion of transfer options, including the ";binary"
|
||
option, has been removed. All imperatives regarding binary
|
||
transfer of values have been removed.
|
||
|
||
14. The Delivery Method, Enhanced Guide, Guide, Octet String, Teletex
|
||
Terminal Identifier and Telex Number syntaxes from RFC 2256 have
|
||
been incorporated.
|
||
|
||
15. The <criteria> rule for the Enhanced Guide and Guide syntaxes has
|
||
been extended to accommodate empty "and" and "or" expressions.
|
||
|
||
16. An encoding for the <ttx-value> rule in the Teletex Terminal
|
||
Identifier syntax has been defined.
|
||
|
||
17. The PKI-related syntaxes (Certificate, Certificate List and
|
||
Certificate Pair from RFC 2252, and Supported Algorithm syntax
|
||
from RFC 2256) have been removed. They are to be reintroduced in
|
||
PKIX documents.
|
||
|
||
18. The MHS OR Address syntax has been removed since its
|
||
specification (in RFC 2156) is not at draft standard maturity.
|
||
|
||
19. The DL Submit Permission syntax has been removed as it depends on
|
||
the MHS OR Address syntax.
|
||
|
||
20. The Presentation Address syntax has been removed since its
|
||
specification (in RFC 1278) is not at draft standard maturity.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 46]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
21. The ACI Item, Access Point, Audio, Data Quality, DSA Quality, DSE
|
||
Type, LDAP Schema Description, Master And Shadow Access Points,
|
||
Modify Rights, Protocol Information, Subtree Specification,
|
||
Supplier Information, Supplier Or Consumer and Supplier And
|
||
Consumer syntaxes have been removed. These syntaxes are
|
||
referenced in RFC 2252, but not defined.
|
||
|
||
22. The LDAP Schema Definition syntax (defined in RFC 2927) and the
|
||
Mail Preference syntax have been removed on the grounds that they
|
||
are out of scope for a core specification.
|
||
|
||
23. The description of each of the matching rules has been expanded
|
||
so that they are less dependent on knowledge of X.500 for
|
||
interpretation.
|
||
|
||
24. The caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch matching rule from RFC 2798 has
|
||
been added.
|
||
|
||
25. The caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch, caseIgnoreOrderingMatch and
|
||
caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch matching rules have been added to the
|
||
list of matching rules for which the provisions for handling
|
||
leading, trailing and multiple adjoining whitespace characters
|
||
apply (now through string preparation). This is consistent with
|
||
the definitions of these matching rules in X.500. The
|
||
caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch rule has also been added to the
|
||
list.
|
||
|
||
26. The specification of the octetStringMatch matching rule from RFC
|
||
2256 has been added to this document.
|
||
|
||
27. The presentationAddressMatch matching rule has been removed as it
|
||
depends on an assertion syntax (Presentation Address) that is not
|
||
at draft standard maturity.
|
||
|
||
28. The protocolInformationMatch matching rule has been removed as it
|
||
depends on an undefined assertion syntax (Protocol Information).
|
||
|
||
29. The definitive reference for ASN.1 has been changed from X.208 to
|
||
X.680 since X.680 is the version of ASN.1 referred to by X.500.
|
||
|
||
30. The specification of the caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch matching
|
||
rule from RFC 2798 & X.520 has been added to this document.
|
||
|
||
31. String preparation algorithms have been applied to the character
|
||
string matching rules.
|
||
|
||
Full Copyright Statement
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 47]
|
||
|
||
INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules October 27, 2003
|
||
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
|
||
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
|
||
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
|
||
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
|
||
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
|
||
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
|
||
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
|
||
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
|
||
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
|
||
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
|
||
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
|
||
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
|
||
English.
|
||
|
||
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
|
||
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees.
|
||
|
||
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
|
||
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
|
||
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
|
||
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
|
||
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
|
||
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Legg & Dally Expires 27 April 2004 [Page 48]
|
||
|