mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:10:25 +08:00
829 lines
34 KiB
Plaintext
829 lines
34 KiB
Plaintext
# $OpenLDAP$
|
|
# Copyright 1999-2007 The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved.
|
|
# COPYING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, see COPYRIGHT.
|
|
|
|
H1: Replication
|
|
|
|
Replicated directories are a fundamental requirement for delivering a
|
|
resilient enterprise deployment.
|
|
|
|
{{PRD:OpenLDAP}} has various configuration options for creating a replicated
|
|
directory. The following sections will discuss these.
|
|
|
|
H2: Replication Strategies
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Push Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
H5: Replacing Slurpd
|
|
|
|
{{Slurpd}} replication has been deprecated in favor of Syncrepl replication and
|
|
has been completely removed from OpenLDAP 2.4.
|
|
|
|
{{Why was it replaced?}}
|
|
|
|
The {{slurpd}} daemon was the original replication mechanism inherited from
|
|
UMich's LDAP and operates in push mode: the master pushes changes to the
|
|
slaves. It has been replaced for many reasons, in brief:
|
|
|
|
* It is not reliable
|
|
* It is extremely sensitive to the ordering of records in the replog
|
|
* It can easily go out of sync, at which point manual intervention is
|
|
required to resync the slave database with the master directory
|
|
* It isn't very tolerant of unavailable servers. If a slave goes down
|
|
for a long time, the replog may grow to a size that's too large for
|
|
slurpd to process
|
|
|
|
{{What was it replaced with?}}
|
|
|
|
Syncrepl
|
|
|
|
{{Why is Syncrepl better?}}
|
|
|
|
* Syncrepl is self-synchronizing; you can start with a database in any
|
|
state from totally empty to fully synced and it will automatically do
|
|
the right thing to achieve and maintain synchronization
|
|
* Syncrepl can operate in either direction
|
|
* Data updates can be minimal or maximal
|
|
|
|
{{How do I implement a pushed based replication system using Syncrepl?}}
|
|
|
|
The easiest way is to point an LDAP backend ({{SECT: Backends}} and {{slapd-ldap(8)}})
|
|
to your slave directory and setup Syncrepl to point to your Master database.
|
|
|
|
REFERENCE test045/048 for better explanation of above.
|
|
|
|
If you imagine Syncrepl pulling down changes from the Master server, and then
|
|
pushing those changes out to your slave servers via {{slapd-ldap(8)}}. This is
|
|
called proxy mode (elaborate/confirm?).
|
|
|
|
DIAGRAM HERE
|
|
|
|
BETTER EXAMPLE here from test045/048 for different push/multiproxy examples.
|
|
|
|
Here's an example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
> include ./schema/core.schema
|
|
> include ./schema/cosine.schema
|
|
> include ./schema/inetorgperson.schema
|
|
> include ./schema/openldap.schema
|
|
> include ./schema/nis.schema
|
|
>
|
|
> pidfile /home/ghenry/openldap/ldap/tests/testrun/slapd.3.pid
|
|
> argsfile /home/ghenry/openldap/ldap/tests/testrun/slapd.3.args
|
|
>
|
|
> modulepath ../servers/slapd/back-bdb/
|
|
> moduleload back_bdb.la
|
|
> modulepath ../servers/slapd/back-monitor/
|
|
> moduleload back_monitor.la
|
|
> modulepath ../servers/slapd/overlays/
|
|
> moduleload syncprov.la
|
|
> modulepath ../servers/slapd/back-ldap/
|
|
> moduleload back_ldap.la
|
|
>
|
|
> # We don't need any access to this DSA
|
|
> restrict all
|
|
>
|
|
> #######################################################################
|
|
> # consumer proxy database definitions
|
|
> #######################################################################
|
|
>
|
|
> database ldap
|
|
> suffix "dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> rootdn "cn=Whoever"
|
|
> uri ldap://localhost:9012/
|
|
>
|
|
> lastmod on
|
|
>
|
|
> # HACK: use the RootDN of the monitor database as UpdateDN so ACLs apply
|
|
> # without the need to write the UpdateDN before starting replication
|
|
> acl-bind bindmethod=simple
|
|
> binddn="cn=Monitor"
|
|
> credentials=monitor
|
|
>
|
|
> # HACK: use the RootDN of the monitor database as UpdateDN so ACLs apply
|
|
> # without the need to write the UpdateDN before starting replication
|
|
> syncrepl rid=1
|
|
> provider=ldap://localhost:9011/
|
|
> binddn="cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=secret
|
|
> searchbase="dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> filter="(objectClass=*)"
|
|
> attrs="*,structuralObjectClass,entryUUID,entryCSN,creatorsName,createTimestamp,modifiersName,modifyTimestamp"
|
|
> schemachecking=off
|
|
> scope=sub
|
|
> type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="5 5 300 5"
|
|
>
|
|
> overlay syncprov
|
|
>
|
|
> database monitor
|
|
|
|
DETAILED EXPLANATION OF ABOVE LIKE IN OTHER SECTIONS (line numbers?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOTHER DIAGRAM HERE
|
|
|
|
As you can see, you can let your imagination go wild using Syncrepl and
|
|
{{slapd-ldap(8)}} tailoring your replication to fit your specific network
|
|
topology.
|
|
|
|
H3: Pull Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
H4: syncrepl replication
|
|
|
|
|
|
H4: delta-syncrepl replication
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2: Replication Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: syncrepl replication
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: delta-syncrepl replication
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: N-Way Multi-Master replication
|
|
|
|
Multi-Master replication is a replication technique using Syncrepl to replicate
|
|
data to multiple Master Directory servers.
|
|
|
|
* Advantages of Multi-Master replication:
|
|
|
|
- If any master fails, other masters will continue to accept updates
|
|
- Avoids a single point of failure
|
|
- Masters can be located in several physical sites i.e. distributed across the
|
|
network/globe.
|
|
- Good for Automatic failover/High Availability
|
|
|
|
* Disadvantages of Multi-Master replication:
|
|
|
|
- It has {{B:NOTHING}} to do with load balancing
|
|
- {{URL:http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1240.html}}
|
|
- If connectivity with a master is lost because of a network partition, then
|
|
"automatic failover" can just compound the problem
|
|
- Typically, a particular machine cannot distinguish between losing contact
|
|
with a peer because that peer crashed, or because the network link has failed
|
|
- If a network is partitioned and multiple clients start writing to each of the
|
|
"masters" then reconciliation will be a pain; it may be best to simply deny
|
|
writes to the clients that are partitioned from the single master
|
|
- Masters {{B:must}} propagate writes to {{B:all}} the other servers, which
|
|
means the network traffic and write load is constant and spreads across all
|
|
of the servers
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is discussed in full in the {{SECT:N-Way Multi-Master}} section below
|
|
|
|
H3: MirrorMode replication
|
|
|
|
MirrorMode is a hybrid configuration that provides all of the consistency
|
|
guarantees of single-master replication, while also providing the high
|
|
availability of multi-master. In MirrorMode two masters are set up to
|
|
replicate from each other (as a multi-master configuration) but an
|
|
external frontend is employed to direct all writes to only one of
|
|
the two servers. The second master will only be used for writes if
|
|
the first master crashes, at which point the frontend will switch to
|
|
directing all writes to the second master. When a crashed master is
|
|
repaired and restarted it will automatically catch up to any changes
|
|
on the running master and resync.
|
|
|
|
This is discussed in full in the {{SECT:MirrorMode}} section below
|
|
|
|
H2: LDAP Sync Replication
|
|
|
|
The {{TERM:LDAP Sync}} Replication engine, {{TERM:syncrepl}} for
|
|
short, is a consumer-side replication engine that enables the
|
|
consumer {{TERM:LDAP}} server to maintain a shadow copy of a
|
|
{{TERM:DIT}} fragment. A syncrepl engine resides at the consumer-side
|
|
as one of the {{slapd}}(8) threads. It creates and maintains a
|
|
consumer replica by connecting to the replication provider to perform
|
|
the initial DIT content load followed either by periodic content
|
|
polling or by timely updates upon content changes.
|
|
|
|
Syncrepl uses the LDAP Content Synchronization (or LDAP Sync for
|
|
short) protocol as the replica synchronization protocol. It provides
|
|
a stateful replication which supports both pull-based and push-based
|
|
synchronization and does not mandate the use of a history store.
|
|
|
|
Syncrepl keeps track of the status of the replication content by
|
|
maintaining and exchanging synchronization cookies. Because the
|
|
syncrepl consumer and provider maintain their content status, the
|
|
consumer can poll the provider content to perform incremental
|
|
synchronization by asking for the entries required to make the
|
|
consumer replica up-to-date with the provider content. Syncrepl
|
|
also enables convenient management of replicas by maintaining replica
|
|
status. The consumer replica can be constructed from a consumer-side
|
|
or a provider-side backup at any synchronization status. Syncrepl
|
|
can automatically resynchronize the consumer replica up-to-date
|
|
with the current provider content.
|
|
|
|
Syncrepl supports both pull-based and push-based synchronization.
|
|
In its basic refreshOnly synchronization mode, the provider uses
|
|
pull-based synchronization where the consumer servers need not be
|
|
tracked and no history information is maintained. The information
|
|
required for the provider to process periodic polling requests is
|
|
contained in the synchronization cookie of the request itself. To
|
|
optimize the pull-based synchronization, syncrepl utilizes the
|
|
present phase of the LDAP Sync protocol as well as its delete phase,
|
|
instead of falling back on frequent full reloads. To further optimize
|
|
the pull-based synchronization, the provider can maintain a per-scope
|
|
session log as a history store. In its refreshAndPersist mode of
|
|
synchronization, the provider uses a push-based synchronization.
|
|
The provider keeps track of the consumer servers that have requested
|
|
a persistent search and sends them necessary updates as the provider
|
|
replication content gets modified.
|
|
|
|
With syncrepl, a consumer server can create a replica without
|
|
changing the provider's configurations and without restarting the
|
|
provider server, if the consumer server has appropriate access
|
|
privileges for the DIT fragment to be replicated. The consumer
|
|
server can stop the replication also without the need for provider-side
|
|
changes and restart.
|
|
|
|
Syncrepl supports both partial and sparse replications. The shadow
|
|
DIT fragment is defined by a general search criteria consisting of
|
|
base, scope, filter, and attribute list. The replica content is
|
|
also subject to the access privileges of the bind identity of the
|
|
syncrepl replication connection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: The LDAP Content Synchronization Protocol
|
|
|
|
The LDAP Sync protocol allows a client to maintain a synchronized
|
|
copy of a DIT fragment. The LDAP Sync operation is defined as a set
|
|
of controls and other protocol elements which extend the LDAP search
|
|
operation. This section introduces the LDAP Content Sync protocol
|
|
only briefly. For more information, refer to {{REF:RFC4533}}.
|
|
|
|
The LDAP Sync protocol supports both polling and listening for
|
|
changes by defining two respective synchronization operations:
|
|
{{refreshOnly}} and {{refreshAndPersist}}. Polling is implemented
|
|
by the {{refreshOnly}} operation. The client copy is synchronized
|
|
to the server copy at the time of polling. The server finishes the
|
|
search operation by returning {{SearchResultDone}} at the end of
|
|
the search operation as in the normal search. The listening is
|
|
implemented by the {{refreshAndPersist}} operation. Instead of
|
|
finishing the search after returning all entries currently matching
|
|
the search criteria, the synchronization search remains persistent
|
|
in the server. Subsequent updates to the synchronization content
|
|
in the server cause additional entry updates to be sent to the
|
|
client.
|
|
|
|
The {{refreshOnly}} operation and the refresh stage of the
|
|
{{refreshAndPersist}} operation can be performed with a present
|
|
phase or a delete phase.
|
|
|
|
In the present phase, the server sends the client the entries updated
|
|
within the search scope since the last synchronization. The server
|
|
sends all requested attributes, be it changed or not, of the updated
|
|
entries. For each unchanged entry which remains in the scope, the
|
|
server sends a present message consisting only of the name of the
|
|
entry and the synchronization control representing state present.
|
|
The present message does not contain any attributes of the entry.
|
|
After the client receives all update and present entries, it can
|
|
reliably determine the new client copy by adding the entries added
|
|
to the server, by replacing the entries modified at the server, and
|
|
by deleting entries in the client copy which have not been updated
|
|
nor specified as being present at the server.
|
|
|
|
The transmission of the updated entries in the delete phase is the
|
|
same as in the present phase. The server sends all the requested
|
|
attributes of the entries updated within the search scope since the
|
|
last synchronization to the client. In the delete phase, however,
|
|
the server sends a delete message for each entry deleted from the
|
|
search scope, instead of sending present messages. The delete
|
|
message consists only of the name of the entry and the synchronization
|
|
control representing state delete. The new client copy can be
|
|
determined by adding, modifying, and removing entries according to
|
|
the synchronization control attached to the {{SearchResultEntry}}
|
|
message.
|
|
|
|
In the case that the LDAP Sync server maintains a history store and
|
|
can determine which entries are scoped out of the client copy since
|
|
the last synchronization time, the server can use the delete phase.
|
|
If the server does not maintain any history store, cannot determine
|
|
the scoped-out entries from the history store, or the history store
|
|
does not cover the outdated synchronization state of the client,
|
|
the server should use the present phase. The use of the present
|
|
phase is much more efficient than a full content reload in terms
|
|
of the synchronization traffic. To reduce the synchronization
|
|
traffic further, the LDAP Sync protocol also provides several
|
|
optimizations such as the transmission of the normalized {{EX:entryUUID}}s
|
|
and the transmission of multiple {{EX:entryUUIDs}} in a single
|
|
{{syncIdSet}} message.
|
|
|
|
At the end of the {{refreshOnly}} synchronization, the server sends
|
|
a synchronization cookie to the client as a state indicator of the
|
|
client copy after the synchronization is completed. The client
|
|
will present the received cookie when it requests the next incremental
|
|
synchronization to the server.
|
|
|
|
When {{refreshAndPersist}} synchronization is used, the server sends
|
|
a synchronization cookie at the end of the refresh stage by sending
|
|
a Sync Info message with TRUE refreshDone. It also sends a
|
|
synchronization cookie by attaching it to {{SearchResultEntry}}
|
|
generated in the persist stage of the synchronization search. During
|
|
the persist stage, the server can also send a Sync Info message
|
|
containing the synchronization cookie at any time the server wants
|
|
to update the client-side state indicator. The server also updates
|
|
a synchronization indicator of the client at the end of the persist
|
|
stage.
|
|
|
|
In the LDAP Sync protocol, entries are uniquely identified by the
|
|
{{EX:entryUUID}} attribute value. It can function as a reliable
|
|
identifier of the entry. The DN of the entry, on the other hand,
|
|
can be changed over time and hence cannot be considered as the
|
|
reliable identifier. The {{EX:entryUUID}} is attached to each
|
|
{{SearchResultEntry}} or {{SearchResultReference}} as a part of the
|
|
synchronization control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Syncrepl Details
|
|
|
|
The syncrepl engine utilizes both the {{refreshOnly}} and the
|
|
{{refreshAndPersist}} operations of the LDAP Sync protocol. If a
|
|
syncrepl specification is included in a database definition,
|
|
{{slapd}}(8) launches a syncrepl engine as a {{slapd}}(8) thread
|
|
and schedules its execution. If the {{refreshOnly}} operation is
|
|
specified, the syncrepl engine will be rescheduled at the interval
|
|
time after a synchronization operation is completed. If the
|
|
{{refreshAndPersist}} operation is specified, the engine will remain
|
|
active and process the persistent synchronization messages from the
|
|
provider.
|
|
|
|
The syncrepl engine utilizes both the present phase and the delete
|
|
phase of the refresh synchronization. It is possible to configure
|
|
a per-scope session log in the provider server which stores the
|
|
{{EX:entryUUID}}s of a finite number of entries deleted from a
|
|
replication content. Multiple replicas of single provider content
|
|
share the same per-scope session log. The syncrepl engine uses the
|
|
delete phase if the session log is present and the state of the
|
|
consumer server is recent enough that no session log entries are
|
|
truncated after the last synchronization of the client. The syncrepl
|
|
engine uses the present phase if no session log is configured for
|
|
the replication content or if the consumer replica is too outdated
|
|
to be covered by the session log. The current design of the session
|
|
log store is memory based, so the information contained in the
|
|
session log is not persistent over multiple provider invocations.
|
|
It is not currently supported to access the session log store by
|
|
using LDAP operations. It is also not currently supported to impose
|
|
access control to the session log.
|
|
|
|
As a further optimization, even in the case the synchronization
|
|
search is not associated with any session log, no entries will be
|
|
transmitted to the consumer server when there has been no update
|
|
in the replication context.
|
|
|
|
The syncrepl engine, which is a consumer-side replication engine,
|
|
can work with any backends. The LDAP Sync provider can be configured
|
|
as an overlay on any backend, but works best with the {{back-bdb}}
|
|
or {{back-hdb}} backend.
|
|
|
|
The LDAP Sync provider maintains a {{EX:contextCSN}} for each
|
|
database as the current synchronization state indicator of the
|
|
provider content. It is the largest {{EX:entryCSN}} in the provider
|
|
context such that no transactions for an entry having smaller
|
|
{{EX:entryCSN}} value remains outstanding. The {{EX:contextCSN}}
|
|
could not just be set to the largest issued {{EX:entryCSN}} because
|
|
{{EX:entryCSN}} is obtained before a transaction starts and
|
|
transactions are not committed in the issue order.
|
|
|
|
The provider stores the {{EX:contextCSN}} of a context in the
|
|
{{EX:contextCSN}} attribute of the context suffix entry. The attribute
|
|
is not written to the database after every update operation though;
|
|
instead it is maintained primarily in memory. At database start
|
|
time the provider reads the last saved {{EX:contextCSN}} into memory
|
|
and uses the in-memory copy exclusively thereafter. By default,
|
|
changes to the {{EX:contextCSN}} as a result of database updates
|
|
will not be written to the database until the server is cleanly
|
|
shut down. A checkpoint facility exists to cause the contextCSN to
|
|
be written out more frequently if desired.
|
|
|
|
Note that at startup time, if the provider is unable to read a
|
|
{{EX:contextCSN}} from the suffix entry, it will scan the entire
|
|
database to determine the value, and this scan may take quite a
|
|
long time on a large database. When a {{EX:contextCSN}} value is
|
|
read, the database will still be scanned for any {{EX:entryCSN}}
|
|
values greater than it, to make sure the {{EX:contextCSN}} value
|
|
truly reflects the greatest committed {{EX:entryCSN}} in the database.
|
|
On databases which support inequality indexing, setting an eq index
|
|
on the {{EX:entryCSN}} attribute and configuring {{contextCSN}}
|
|
checkpoints will greatly speed up this scanning step.
|
|
|
|
If no {{EX:contextCSN}} can be determined by reading and scanning
|
|
the database, a new value will be generated. Also, if scanning the
|
|
database yielded a greater {{EX:entryCSN}} than was previously
|
|
recorded in the suffix entry's {{EX:contextCSN}} attribute, a
|
|
checkpoint will be immediately written with the new value.
|
|
|
|
The consumer also stores its replica state, which is the provider's
|
|
{{EX:contextCSN}} received as a synchronization cookie, in the
|
|
{{EX:contextCSN}} attribute of the suffix entry. The replica state
|
|
maintained by a consumer server is used as the synchronization state
|
|
indicator when it performs subsequent incremental synchronization
|
|
with the provider server. It is also used as a provider-side
|
|
synchronization state indicator when it functions as a secondary
|
|
provider server in a cascading replication configuration. Since
|
|
the consumer and provider state information are maintained in the
|
|
same location within their respective databases, any consumer can
|
|
be promoted to a provider (and vice versa) without any special
|
|
actions.
|
|
|
|
Because a general search filter can be used in the syncrepl
|
|
specification, some entries in the context may be omitted from the
|
|
synchronization content. The syncrepl engine creates a glue entry
|
|
to fill in the holes in the replica context if any part of the
|
|
replica content is subordinate to the holes. The glue entries will
|
|
not be returned in the search result unless {{ManageDsaIT}} control
|
|
is provided.
|
|
|
|
Also as a consequence of the search filter used in the syncrepl
|
|
specification, it is possible for a modification to remove an entry
|
|
from the replication scope even though the entry has not been deleted
|
|
on the provider. Logically the entry must be deleted on the consumer
|
|
but in {{refreshOnly}} mode the provider cannot detect and propagate
|
|
this change without the use of the session log.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Configuring Syncrepl
|
|
|
|
Because syncrepl is a consumer-side replication engine, the syncrepl
|
|
specification is defined in {{slapd.conf}}(5) of the consumer
|
|
server, not in the provider server's configuration file. The initial
|
|
loading of the replica content can be performed either by starting
|
|
the syncrepl engine with no synchronization cookie or by populating
|
|
the consumer replica by adding an {{TERM:LDIF}} file dumped as a
|
|
backup at the provider.
|
|
|
|
When loading from a backup, it is not required to perform the initial
|
|
loading from the up-to-date backup of the provider content. The
|
|
syncrepl engine will automatically synchronize the initial consumer
|
|
replica to the current provider content. As a result, it is not
|
|
required to stop the provider server in order to avoid the replica
|
|
inconsistency caused by the updates to the provider content during
|
|
the content backup and loading process.
|
|
|
|
When replicating a large scale directory, especially in a bandwidth
|
|
constrained environment, it is advised to load the consumer replica
|
|
from a backup instead of performing a full initial load using
|
|
syncrepl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H4: Set up the provider slapd
|
|
|
|
The provider is implemented as an overlay, so the overlay itself
|
|
must first be configured in {{slapd.conf}}(5) before it can be
|
|
used. The provider has only two configuration directives, for setting
|
|
checkpoints on the {{EX:contextCSN}} and for configuring the session
|
|
log. Because the LDAP Sync search is subject to access control,
|
|
proper access control privileges should be set up for the replicated
|
|
content.
|
|
|
|
The {{EX:contextCSN}} checkpoint is configured by the
|
|
|
|
> syncprov-checkpoint <ops> <minutes>
|
|
|
|
directive. Checkpoints are only tested after successful write
|
|
operations. If {{<ops>}} operations or more than {{<minutes>}}
|
|
time has passed since the last checkpoint, a new checkpoint is
|
|
performed.
|
|
|
|
The session log is configured by the
|
|
|
|
> syncprov-sessionlog <size>
|
|
|
|
directive, where {{<size>}} is the maximum number of session log
|
|
entries the session log can record. When a session log is configured,
|
|
it is automatically used for all LDAP Sync searches within the
|
|
database.
|
|
|
|
Note that using the session log requires searching on the {{entryUUID}}
|
|
attribute. Setting an eq index on this attribute will greatly benefit
|
|
the performance of the session log on the provider.
|
|
|
|
A more complete example of the {{slapd.conf}}(5) content is thus:
|
|
|
|
> database bdb
|
|
> suffix dc=Example,dc=com
|
|
> rootdn dc=Example,dc=com
|
|
> directory /var/ldap/db
|
|
> index objectclass,entryCSN,entryUUID eq
|
|
>
|
|
> overlay syncprov
|
|
> syncprov-checkpoint 100 10
|
|
> syncprov-sessionlog 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
H4: Set up the consumer slapd
|
|
|
|
The syncrepl replication is specified in the database section of
|
|
{{slapd.conf}}(5) for the replica context. The syncrepl engine
|
|
is backend independent and the directive can be defined with any
|
|
database type.
|
|
|
|
> database hdb
|
|
> suffix dc=Example,dc=com
|
|
> rootdn dc=Example,dc=com
|
|
> directory /var/ldap/db
|
|
> index objectclass,entryCSN,entryUUID eq
|
|
>
|
|
> syncrepl rid=123
|
|
> provider=ldap://provider.example.com:389
|
|
> type=refreshOnly
|
|
> interval=01:00:00:00
|
|
> searchbase="dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> filter="(objectClass=organizationalPerson)"
|
|
> scope=sub
|
|
> attrs="cn,sn,ou,telephoneNumber,title,l"
|
|
> schemachecking=off
|
|
> bindmethod=simple
|
|
> binddn="cn=syncuser,dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> credentials=secret
|
|
|
|
In this example, the consumer will connect to the provider {{slapd}}(8)
|
|
at port 389 of {{FILE:ldap://provider.example.com}} to perform a
|
|
polling ({{refreshOnly}}) mode of synchronization once a day. It
|
|
will bind as {{EX:cn=syncuser,dc=example,dc=com}} using simple
|
|
authentication with password "secret". Note that the access control
|
|
privilege of {{EX:cn=syncuser,dc=example,dc=com}} should be set
|
|
appropriately in the provider to retrieve the desired replication
|
|
content. Also the search limits must be high enough on the provider
|
|
to allow the syncuser to retrieve a complete copy of the requested
|
|
content. The consumer uses the rootdn to write to its database so
|
|
it always has full permissions to write all content.
|
|
|
|
The synchronization search in the above example will search for the
|
|
entries whose objectClass is organizationalPerson in the entire
|
|
subtree rooted at {{EX:dc=example,dc=com}}. The requested attributes
|
|
are {{EX:cn}}, {{EX:sn}}, {{EX:ou}}, {{EX:telephoneNumber}},
|
|
{{EX:title}}, and {{EX:l}}. The schema checking is turned off, so
|
|
that the consumer {{slapd}}(8) will not enforce entry schema
|
|
checking when it process updates from the provider {{slapd}}(8).
|
|
|
|
For more detailed information on the syncrepl directive, see the
|
|
{{SECT:syncrepl}} section of {{SECT:The slapd Configuration File}}
|
|
chapter of this admin guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H4: Start the provider and the consumer slapd
|
|
|
|
The provider {{slapd}}(8) is not required to be restarted.
|
|
{{contextCSN}} is automatically generated as needed: it might be
|
|
originally contained in the {{TERM:LDIF}} file, generated by
|
|
{{slapadd}} (8), generated upon changes in the context, or generated
|
|
when the first LDAP Sync search arrives at the provider. If an
|
|
LDIF file is being loaded which did not previously contain the
|
|
{{contextCSN}}, the {{-w}} option should be used with {{slapadd}}
|
|
(8) to cause it to be generated. This will allow the server to
|
|
startup a little quicker the first time it runs.
|
|
|
|
When starting a consumer {{slapd}}(8), it is possible to provide
|
|
a synchronization cookie as the {{-c cookie}} command line option
|
|
in order to start the synchronization from a specific state. The
|
|
cookie is a comma separated list of name=value pairs. Currently
|
|
supported syncrepl cookie fields are {{csn=<csn>}} and {{rid=<rid>}}.
|
|
{{<csn>}} represents the current synchronization state of the
|
|
consumer replica. {{<rid>}} identifies a consumer replica locally
|
|
within the consumer server. It is used to relate the cookie to the
|
|
syncrepl definition in {{slapd.conf}}(5) which has the matching
|
|
replica identifier. The {{<rid>}} must have no more than 3 decimal
|
|
digits. The command line cookie overrides the synchronization
|
|
cookie stored in the consumer replica database.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2: N-Way Multi-Master
|
|
|
|
For the following example we will be using 3 Master nodes. Keeping in line with
|
|
{{B:test050-syncrepl-multimaster}} of the OpenLDAP test suite, we will be configuring
|
|
{{slapd(8)}} via {{B:cn=config}}
|
|
|
|
This sets up the config database:
|
|
|
|
> dn: cn=config
|
|
> objectClass: olcGlobal
|
|
> cn: config
|
|
> olcServerID: 1
|
|
>
|
|
> dn: olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config
|
|
> objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig
|
|
> olcDatabase: {0}config
|
|
> olcRootPW: secret
|
|
|
|
second and third servers will have a different olcServerID obviously:
|
|
|
|
> dn: cn=config
|
|
> objectClass: olcGlobal
|
|
> cn: config
|
|
> olcServerID: 2
|
|
>
|
|
> dn: olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config
|
|
> objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig
|
|
> olcDatabase: {0}config
|
|
> olcRootPW: secret
|
|
|
|
This sets up syncrepl as a provider (since these are all masters):
|
|
|
|
> dn: cn=module,cn=config
|
|
> objectClass: olcModuleList
|
|
> cn: module
|
|
> olcModulePath: /usr/local/libexec/openldap
|
|
> olcModuleLoad: syncprov.la
|
|
|
|
Now we setup the first Master Node (replace $URI1, $URI2 and $URI3 etc. with your actual ldap urls):
|
|
|
|
> dn: cn=config
|
|
> changetype: modify
|
|
> replace: olcServerID
|
|
> olcServerID: 1 $URI1
|
|
> olcServerID: 2 $URI2
|
|
> olcServerID: 3 $URI3
|
|
>
|
|
> dn: olcOverlay=syncprov,olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config
|
|
> changetype: add
|
|
> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig
|
|
> objectClass: olcSyncProvConfig
|
|
> olcOverlay: syncprov
|
|
>
|
|
> dn: olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config
|
|
> changetype: modify
|
|
> add: olcSyncRepl
|
|
> olcSyncRepl: rid=001 provider=$URI1 binddn="cn=config" bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=secret searchbase="cn=config" type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="5 5 300 5" timeout=1
|
|
> olcSyncRepl: rid=002 provider=$URI2 binddn="cn=config" bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=secret searchbase="cn=config" type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="5 5 300 5" timeout=1
|
|
> olcSyncRepl: rid=003 provider=$URI3 binddn="cn=config" bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=secret searchbase="cn=config" type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="5 5 300 5" timeout=1
|
|
> -
|
|
> add: olcMirrorMode
|
|
> olcMirrorMode: TRUE
|
|
|
|
Now start up the Master and a consumer/s, also add the above LDIF to the first consumer, second consumer etc. It will then replicate {{B:cn=config}}. You now have N-Way Multimaster on the config database.
|
|
|
|
We still have to replicate the actual data, not just the config, so add to the master (all active and configured consumers/masters will pull down this config, as they are all syncing). Also, replace all {{${}}} variables with whatever is applicable to your setup:
|
|
|
|
> dn: olcDatabase={1}$BACKEND,cn=config
|
|
> objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig
|
|
> objectClass: olc${BACKEND}Config
|
|
> olcDatabase: {1}$BACKEND
|
|
> olcSuffix: $BASEDN
|
|
> olcDbDirectory: ./db
|
|
> olcRootDN: $MANAGERDN
|
|
> olcRootPW: $PASSWD
|
|
> olcSyncRepl: rid=004 provider=$URI1 binddn="$MANAGERDN" bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=$PASSWD searchbase="$BASEDN" type=refreshOnly
|
|
> interval=00:00:00:10 retry="5 5 300 5" timeout=1
|
|
> olcSyncRepl: rid=005 provider=$URI2 binddn="$MANAGERDN" bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=$PASSWD searchbase="$BASEDN" type=refreshOnly
|
|
> interval=00:00:00:10 retry="5 5 300 5" timeout=1
|
|
> olcSyncRepl: rid=006 provider=$URI3 binddn="$MANAGERDN" bindmethod=simple
|
|
> credentials=$PASSWD searchbase="$BASEDN" type=refreshOnly
|
|
> interval=00:00:00:10 retry="5 5 300 5" timeout=1
|
|
> olcMirrorMode: TRUE
|
|
>
|
|
> dn: olcOverlay=syncprov,olcDatabase={1}${BACKEND},cn=config
|
|
> changetype: add
|
|
> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig
|
|
> objectClass: olcSyncProvConfig
|
|
> olcOverlay: syncprov
|
|
|
|
Note: You must have all your server set to the same time via {{http://www.ntp.org/}}
|
|
|
|
H2: MirrorMode
|
|
|
|
H3: Arguments for MirrorMode
|
|
|
|
* Provides a high-availability (HA) solution for directory writes (replicas handle reads)
|
|
* As long as one Master is operational, writes can safely be accepted
|
|
* Master nodes replicate from each other, so they are always up to date and
|
|
can be ready to take over (hot standby)
|
|
* Syncrepl also allows the master nodes to re-synchronize after any downtime
|
|
* Delta-Syncrepl can be used
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Arguments against MirrorMode
|
|
|
|
* MirrorMode is not what is termed as a Multi-Master solution. This is because
|
|
writes have to go to one of the mirror nodes at a time
|
|
* MirrorMode can be termed as Active-Active Hot-Standby, therefor an external
|
|
server (slapd in proxy mode) or device (hardware load balancer) to manage which
|
|
master is currently active
|
|
* While syncrepl can recover from a completely empty database, slapadd is much
|
|
faster
|
|
* Does not provide faster or more scalable write performance (neither could
|
|
any Multi-Master solution)
|
|
* Backups are managed slightly differently
|
|
- If backing up the Berkeley database itself and periodically backing up the
|
|
transaction log files, then the same member of the mirror pair needs to be
|
|
used to collect logfiles until the next database backup is taken
|
|
- To ensure that both databases are consistent, each database might have to be
|
|
put in read-only mode while performing a slapcat.
|
|
- When using slapcat, the generated LDIF files can be rather large. This can
|
|
happen with a non-MirrorMode deployment also.
|
|
|
|
H3: MirrorMode Configuration
|
|
|
|
MirrorMode configuration is actually very easy. If you have ever setup a normal
|
|
slapd syncrepl provider, then the only change is the following two directives:
|
|
|
|
> mirrormode on
|
|
> serverID 1
|
|
|
|
Note: You need to make sure that the {{serverID}} of each mirror node pair is
|
|
different.
|
|
|
|
H4: Mirror Node Configuration
|
|
|
|
This is the same as the {{SECT:Set up the provider slapd}} section, reference
|
|
{{SECT:delta-syncrepl replication}} if using {{delta-syncrepl}}.
|
|
|
|
Here's a specific cut down example using {{SECT:LDAP Sync Replication}} in
|
|
{{refreshAndPersist}} mode ({{delta-syncrepl}} can be used also):
|
|
|
|
MirrorMode node 1:
|
|
|
|
> # syncrepl directives
|
|
> syncrepl rid=001
|
|
> provider=ldap://ldap-ridr1.example.com
|
|
> bindmethod=simple
|
|
> binddn="cn=mirrormode,dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> credentials=mirrormode
|
|
> searchbase="dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> schemachecking=on
|
|
> type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="60 +"
|
|
>
|
|
> syncrepl rid=002
|
|
> provider=ldap://ldap-rid2.example.com
|
|
> bindmethod=simple
|
|
> binddn="cn=mirrormode,dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> credentials=mirrormode
|
|
> searchbase="dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> schemachecking=on
|
|
> type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="60 +"
|
|
>
|
|
> mirrormode on
|
|
> serverID 1
|
|
|
|
MirrorMode node 2:
|
|
|
|
> # syncrepl directives
|
|
> syncrepl rid=001
|
|
> provider=ldap://ldap-ridr1.example.com
|
|
> bindmethod=simple
|
|
> binddn="cn=mirrormode,dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> credentials=mirrormode
|
|
> searchbase="dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> schemachecking=on
|
|
> type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="60 +"
|
|
>
|
|
> syncrepl rid=002
|
|
> provider=ldap://ldap-rid2.example.com
|
|
> bindmethod=simple
|
|
> binddn="cn=mirrormode,dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> credentials=mirrormode
|
|
> searchbase="dc=example,dc=com"
|
|
> schemachecking=on
|
|
> type=refreshAndPersist
|
|
> retry="60 +"
|
|
>
|
|
> mirrormode on
|
|
> serverID 2
|
|
|
|
It's simple really; each MirrorMode node is setup {{B:exactly}} the same, except
|
|
that the {{serverID}} is unique.
|
|
|
|
H4: Failover Configuration
|
|
|
|
There are generally 2 choices for this; 1. Hardware proxies/load-balancing or
|
|
dedicated proxy software, 2. using a Back-LDAP proxy as a syncrepl provider
|
|
|
|
A typical enterprise example might be:
|
|
|
|
!import "dual_dc.png"; align="center"; title="MirrorMode Enterprise Configuration"
|
|
FT[align="Center"] Figure X.Y: MirrorMode in a Dual Data Center Configuration
|
|
|
|
H4: Normal Consumer Configuration
|
|
|
|
This is exactly the same as the {{SECT:Set up the consumer slapd}} section. It
|
|
can either setup in normal {{SECT:syncrepl replication}} mode, or in
|
|
{{SECT:delta-syncrepl replication}} mode.
|
|
|
|
H3: MirrorMode Summary
|
|
|
|
Hopefully you will now have a directory architecture that provides all of the
|
|
consistency guarantees of single-master replication, whilst also providing the
|
|
high availability of multi-master replication.
|
|
|
|
|