mirror/openldap
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git synced 2024-12-21 03:10:25 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5a96aa5304
openldap/doc/drafts/draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-xx.txt
Kurt Zeilenga a77427bd01 updates
2006-01-25 04:13:59 +00:00

1180 lines
39 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

INTERNET-DRAFT Kurt D. Zeilenga
Intended Category: BCP OpenLDAP Foundation
Expires in six months 23 January 2006
Obsoletes: RFC 3383
IANA Considerations for LDAP
<draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt>
Status of Memo
This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as a Best Current Practice
document. This document is intended to replace RFC 3383.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this
document will take place on the IETF LDAP Revision Working Group
(LDAPBIS) mailing list <ietf-ldapbis@openldap.org>. Please send
editorial comments directly to the document editor
<Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>.
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). All Rights Reserved.
Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document
for more information.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
Abstract
This document provides procedures for registering extensible elements
of Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The document also
provides guidelines to Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
describing conditions under which new values can be assigned.
1. Introduction
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol [Roadmap] (LDAP) is an
extensible protocol. LDAP supports:
- addition of new operations,
- extension of existing operations, and
- extensible schema.
This document details procedures for registering values of used to
unambiguously identify extensible elements of the protocol including:
- LDAP message types;
- LDAP extended operations and controls;
- LDAP result codes;
- LDAP authentication methods;
- LDAP attribute description options; and
- Object Identifier descriptors.
These registries are maintained by the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority (IANA).
In addition, this document provides guidelines to IANA describing the
conditions under which new values can be assigned.
This document replaces RFC 3383.
2. Terminology and Conventions
This section details terms and conventions used in this document.
2.1. Policy Terminology
The terms "IESG Approval", "Standards Action", "IETF Consensus",
"Specification Required", "First Come First Served", "Expert Review",
and "Private Use" are used as defined in BCP 26 [RFC2434].
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
2.2. Requirement Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119]. In
this case, "the specification" as used by BCP 14 refers to the
processing of protocols being submitted to the IETF standards
process.
2.3. Common ABNF Productions
A number of syntaxes in this document are described using ABNF
[ABNF]. These syntaxes rely on the following common productions:
ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; "A"-"Z" / "a"-"z"
LDIGIT = %x31-39 ; "1"-"9"
DIGIT = %x30 / LDIGIT ; "0"-"9"
HYPHEN = %x2D ; "-"
DOT = %x2E ; "."
number = DIGIT / ( LDIGIT 1*DIGIT )
keychar = ALPHA / DIGIT / HYPHEN
leadkeychar = ALPHA
keystring = leadkeychar *keychar
A keyword is a case-insensitive string of UTF-8 [RFC3629] encoded
Unicode [Unicode] restricted to the <keystring> production.
3. IANA Considerations for LDAP
This section details each kind of protocol value which can be
registered and provides IANA guidelines on how to assign new values.
IANA may reject obviously bogus registrations.
LDAP values specified in RFCs MUST be registered. Other LDAP values,
except those in private-use name spaces, SHOULD be registered. RFCs
SHOULD NOT reference, use, or otherwise recognize unregistered LDAP
values.
3.1. Object Identifiers
Numerous LDAP schema and protocol elements are identified by Object
Identifiers (OIDs) [X.680]. Specifications which assign OIDs to
elements SHOULD state who delegated the OIDs for its use.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
For IETF developed elements, specifications SHOULD use OIDs under
"Internet Directory Numbers" (1.3.6.1.1.x). For elements developed
by others, any properly delegated OID can be used, including those
under "Internet Directory Numbers" (1.3.6.1.1.x) or "Internet Private
Enterprise Numbers" (1.3.6.1.4.1.x).
Internet Directory Numbers (1.3.6.1.1.x) will be assigned upon Expert
Review with Specification Required. Only one OID per specification
will be assigned. The specification MAY then assign any number of
OIDs within this arc without further coordination with IANA.
Internet Private Enterprise Numbers (1.3.6.1.4.1.x) are assigned by
IANA <http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/enterprise.pl>. Practices for IANA
assignment of Internet Private Enterprise Numbers is detailed in RFC
2578 [RFC2578].
To avoid interoperability problems between early implementations of a
"work in progress" and implementations of the published specification
(e.g., the RFC), experimental OIDs SHOULD be used in "works in
progress" and early implementations. OIDs under the Internet
Experimental OID arc (1.3.6.1.3.x) may be used for this purpose.
Practices for IANA assignment of these Internet Experimental numbers
is detailed in RFC 2578 [RFC2578]
3.2 Protocol Mechanisms
LDAP provides a number of Root DSE attributes for discovery of
protocol mechanisms identified by OIDs, including the
supportedControl, supportedExtension, and supportedFeatures
attributes [Models],
A registry of OIDs used for discover of protocol mechanisms is
provided to allow implementors and others to locate the technical
specification for these protocol mechanisms. Future specifications
of additional Root DSE attributes holding values identifying protocol
mechanisms MAY extend this registry for their values.
Protocol Mechanisms are registered on a First Come First Served
basis.
3.3 LDAP Syntaxes
This registry provides a listing of LDAP syntaxes [Models]. Each
LDAP syntax is identified by an object identifier (OID). This
registry is provided to allow implementors and others to locate the
technical specification describing a particular LDAP Syntax.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
LDAP Syntaxes are registered on a First Come First Served with
Specification Required basis.
Note: unlike object classes, attribute types and various other kinds
of schema elements, descriptors are not used in LDAP to identify LDAP
Syntaxes.
3.4. Object Identifier Descriptors
LDAP allows short descriptive names (or descriptors) to be used
instead of a numeric Object Identifier to identify select protocol
extensions [Protocol], schema elements [Models], LDAP URL [LDAPURL]
extensions, and other objects.
While the protocol allows the same descriptor to refer to different
object identifiers in certain cases and the registry supports
multiple registrations of the same descriptor (each indicating a
different kind of schema element and different object identifier),
multiple registrations of the same descriptor are to be avoided. All
such multiple registration requests require Expert Review.
Descriptors are restricted to strings of UTF-8 encoded Unicode
characters restricted by the following ABNF:
name = keystring
Descriptors are case-insensitive.
Multiple names may be assigned to a given OID. For purposes of
registration, an OID is to be represented in numeric OID form (e.g.,
1.1.0.23.40) conforming to the ABNF:
numericoid = number 1*( DOT number )
While the protocol places no maximum length restriction upon
descriptors, they should be short. Descriptors longer than 48
characters may be viewed as too long to register.
A value ending with a hyphen ("-") reserves all descriptors which
start with that value. For example, the registration of the option
"descrFamily-" reserves all options which start with "descrFamily-"
for some related purpose.
Descriptors beginning with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be
registered.
Descriptors beginning with "e-" are reserved for experiments and will
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
be registered on a First Come First Served basis.
All other descriptors require Expert Review to be registered.
The registrant need not "own" the OID being named.
The OID name space is managed by The ISO/IEC Joint Technical
Committee 1 - Subcommittee 6.
3.5. AttributeDescription Options
An AttributeDescription [Models] can contain zero or more options
specifying additional semantics. An option SHALL be restricted to a
string UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters limited by the following
ABNF:
option = keystring
Options are case-insensitive.
While the protocol places no maximum length restriction upon option
strings, they should be short. Options longer than 24 characters may
be viewed as too long to register.
Values ending with a hyphen ("-") reserve all option names which
start with the name. For example, the registration of the option
"optionFamily-" reserves all options which start with "optionFamily-"
for some related purpose.
Options beginning with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be
registered.
Options beginning with "e-" are reserved for experiments and will be
registered on a First Come First Served basis.
All other options require Standards Action or Expert Review with
Specification Required to be registered.
3.6. LDAP Message Types
Each protocol message is encapsulated in an LDAPMessage envelope
[Protocol]. The protocolOp CHOICE indicates the type of message
encapsulated. Each message type consists of an ASN.1 identifier in
the form of a keyword and a non-negative choice number. The choice
number is combined with the class (APPLICATION) and data type
(CONSTRUCTED or PRIMITIVE) to construct the BER tag in the message's
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
encoding. The choice numbers for existing protocol messages are
implicit in the protocol's ASN.1 defined in [Protocol].
New values will be registered upon Standards Action.
Note: LDAP provides extensible messages which reduces, but does not
eliminate, the need to add new message types.
3.7. LDAP Authentication Method
The LDAP Bind operation supports multiple authentication methods
[Protocol]. Each authentication choice consists of an ASN.1
identifier in the form of a keyword and a non-negative integer.
The registrant SHALL classify the authentication method usage using
one of the following terms:
COMMON - method is appropriate for common use on the
Internet,
LIMITED USE - method is appropriate for limited use,
OBSOLETE - method has been deprecated or otherwise found to
be inappropriate for any use.
Methods without publicly available specifications SHALL NOT be
classified as COMMON. New registrations of class OBSOLETE cannot be
registered.
New authentication method integers in the range 0-1023 require
Standards Action to be registered. New authentication method
integers in the range 1024-4095 require Expert Review with
Specification Required. New authentication method integers in the
range 4096-16383 will be registered on a First Come First Served
basis. Keywords associated with integers in the range 0-4095 SHALL
NOT start with "e-" or "x-". Keywords associated with integers in
the range 4096-16383 SHALL start with "e-". Values greater than or
equal to 16384 and keywords starting with "x-" are for Private Use
and cannot be registered.
Note: LDAP supports Simple Authentication and Security Layers [SASL]
as an authentication choice. SASL is an extensible
authentication framework.
3.8. LDAP Result Codes
LDAP result messages carry an resultCode enumerated value to indicate
the outcome of the operation [Protocol]. Each result code consists
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
of a ASN.1 identifier in the form of a keyword and a non-negative
integer.
New resultCodes integers in the range 0-1023 require Standards Action
to be registered. New resultCode integers in the range 1024-4095
require Expert Review with Specification Required. New resultCode
integers in the range 4096-16383 will be registered on a First Come
First Served basis. Keywords associated with integers in the range
0-4095 SHALL NOT start with "e-" or "x-". Keywords associated with
integers in the range 4096-16383 SHALL start with "e-". Values
greater than or equal to 16384 and keywords starting with "x-" are
for Private Use and cannot be registered.
3.9. LDAP Search Scope
LDAP SearchRequest messages carry a scope enumerated value to
indicate the extend of search within the DIT [Protocol] Each search
value consists of a ASN.1 identifier in the form of a keyword and a
non-negative integer.
New scope integers in the range 0-1023 require Standards Action to be
registered. New scope integers in the range 1024-4095 require Expert
Review with Specification Required. New scope integers in the range
4096-16383 will be registered on a First Come First Served basis.
Keywords associated with integers in the range 0-4095 SHALL NOT start
with "e-" or "x-". Keywords associated with integers in the range
4096-16383 SHALL start with "e-". Values greater than or equal to
16384 and keywords starting with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot
be registered.
3.10. LDAP Filter Choice
LDAP filters are used in making assertions against an object
represented in the directory [Protocol]. The Filter CHOICE indicates
a type of assertion. Each Filter CHOICE consists of an ASN.1
identifier in the form of a keyword and a non-negative choice number.
The choice number is combined with the class (APPLICATION) and data
type (CONSTRUCTED or PRIMITIVE) to construct the BER tag in the
message's encoding.
Note: LDAP provides the extensibleMatching choice which reduces, but
does not eliminate, the need to add new filter choices.
3.11. LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Type
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
The LDAP ModifyRequest carries a sequence of modification operations
[Protocol]. Each kind (e.g., add, delete, replace) of operation is
consists of a ASN.1 identifier in the form of a keyword and a
non-negative integer.
New operation type integers in the range 0-1023 require Standards
Action to be registered. New operation type integers in the range
1024-4095 require Expert Review with Specification Required. New
operation type integers in the range 4096-16383 will be registered on
a First Come First Served basis. Keywords associated with integers
in the range 0-4095 SHALL NOT start with "e-" or "x-". Keywords
associated with integers in the range 4096-16383 SHALL start with
"e-". Values greater than or equal to 16384 and keywords starting
with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be registered.
3.12. LDAP authzId Prefixes
Authorization Identities in LDAP are strings conforming to the
<authzId> production [AuthMeth]. This production is extensible.
Each new specific authorization form is identified by a prefix string
conforming to the following ABNF:
prefix = keystring COLON
COLON = %x3A ; COLON (":" U+003A)
Prefixes are case-insensitive.
While the protocol places no maximum length restriction upon prefix
strings, they should be short. Prefixes longer than 12 characters
may be viewed as too long to register.
Prefixes beginning with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be
registered.
Prefixes beginning with "e-" are reserved for experiments and will be
registered on a First Come First Served basis.
All other prefixes require Standards Action or Expert Review with
Specification Required to be registered.
3.13. Directory Systems Names
The IANA-maintained "Directory Systems Names" registry [IANADSN] of
valid keywords for well known attributes was used in the LDAPv2
string representation of a distinguished name [RFC1779]. LDAPv2 is
now Historic [RFC3494].
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
Directory systems names are not known to be used in any other
context. LDAPv3 [LDAPDN] uses Object Identifier Descriptors [Section
3.2] (which have a different syntax than directory system names).
New Directory System Names will no longer be accepted. For
historical purposes, the current list of registered names should
remain publicly available.
4. Registration Procedure
The procedure given here MUST be used by anyone who wishes to use a
new value of a type described in Section 3 of this document.
The first step is for the requester to fill out the appropriate form.
Templates are provided in Appendix A.
If the policy is Standards Action, the completed form SHOULD be
provided to the IESG with the request for Standards Action. Upon
approval of the Standards Action, the IESG SHALL forward the request
(possibly revised) to IANA. The IESG SHALL be viewed as the owner of
all values requiring Standards Action.
If the policy is Expert Review, the requester SHALL post the
completed form to the <directory@apps.ietf.org> mailing list for
public review. The review period is two (2) weeks. If a revised
form is later submitted, the review period is restarted. Anyone may
subscribe to this list by sending a request to
<directory-request@apps.ietf.org>. During the review, objections may
be raised by anyone (including the Expert) on the list. After
completion of the review, the Expert, based upon public comments,
SHALL either approve the request and forward it to the IANA OR deny
the request. In either case, the Expert SHALL promptly notify the
requester of the action. Actions of the Expert may be appealed
[RFC2026]. The Expert is appointed by Applications Area Director(s).
The requester is viewed as the owner of values registered under
Expert Review.
If the policy is First Come First Served, the requester SHALL submit
the completed form directly to the IANA: <iana@iana.org>. The
requester is viewed as the owner of values registered under First
Come First Served.
Neither the Expert nor IANA will take position on the claims of
copyright or trademarks issues regarding completed forms.
Prior to submission of the Internet Draft (I-D) to the RFC Editor but
after IESG review and tentative approval, the document editor SHOULD
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
revise the I-D to use registered values.
5. Registration Maintenance
This section discusses maintenance of registrations.
5.1. Lists of Registered Values
IANA makes lists of registered values readily available to the
Internet community on their web site: <http://www.iana.org/>.
5.2. Change Control
The registration owner MAY update the registration subject to the
same constraints and review as with new registrations. In cases
where the owner is not unable or unwilling to make necessary updates,
the IESG MAY assume ownership in order to update the registration.
5.3. Comments
For cases where others (anyone other than the owner) have significant
objections to the claims in a registration and the owner does not
agree to change the registration, comments MAY be attached to a
registration upon Expert Review. For registrations owned by the
IESG, the objections SHOULD be addressed by initiating a request for
Expert Review.
The form to these requests is ad hoc, but MUST include the specific
objections to be reviewed and SHOULD contain (directly or by
reference) materials supporting the objections.
6. Security Considerations
The security considerations detailed in BCP 26 [RFC2434] are
generally applicable to this document. Additional security
considerations specific to each name space are discussed in Section 3
where appropriate.
Security considerations for LDAP are discussed in documents
comprising the technical specification [Roadmap].
7. Acknowledgment
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
This document is a product of the IETF LDAP Revision (LDAPBIS)
Working Group (WG). This document is a revision of RFC 3383, also a
product of the LDAPBIS WG.
This document includes text borrowed from "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs" [RFC2434] by Thomas Narten and
Harald Alvestrand.
8. Author's Address
Kurt D. Zeilenga
OpenLDAP Foundation
Email: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
9. References
[[Note to the RFC Editor: please replace the citation tags used in
referencing Internet-Drafts with tags of the form RFCnnnn where
possible.]]
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", BCP 9 (also RFC 2026), October 1996.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997.
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26 (also RFC
2434), October 1998.
[RFC2578] K. McCloghrie, D. Perkins, J. Schoenwaelder, "Structure
of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", RFC 2578
(STD: 58), April 1999.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", RFC 3629 (also STD 63), November 2003.
[ABNF] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
[Roadmap] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification
Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in
progress.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
[AuthMeth] Harrison, R. (editor), "LDAP: Authentication Methods and
Connection Level Security Mechanisms",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-authmeth-xx.txt, a work in progress.
[Models] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Directory Information
Models", draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in
progress.
[Protocol] Sermersheim, J. (editor), "LDAP: The Protocol",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress.
[LDAPURL] Smith, M. (editor), "LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-xx.txt, a work in progress.
[Unicode] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version
3.2.0" is defined by "The Unicode Standard, Version 3.0"
(Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5),
as amended by the "Unicode Standard Annex #27: Unicode
3.1" (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27/) and by the
"Unicode Standard Annex #28: Unicode 3.2"
(http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28/).
[X.680] International Telecommunication Union -
Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract
Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic
Notation", X.680(2002) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002).
9.2. Informative References
[RFC1779] Kille, S., "A String Representation of Distinguished
Names", RFC 1779, March 1995.
[RFC3494] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
version 2 (LDAPv2) to Historic Status", RFC 3494, March
2003.
[Syntaxes] Legg, S. (editor), "LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-xx.txt, a work in progress.
[LDAPDN] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: String Representation of
Distinguished Names", draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-xx.txt, a
work in progress.
[SASL] Melnikov, A. (Editor), "Simple Authentication and
Security Layer (SASL)",
draft-ietf-sasl-rfc2222bis-xx.txt, a work in progress.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
[IANADSN] IANA, "Directory Systems Names",
http://www.iana.org/assignments/directory-system-names.
Appendix A. Registration Templates
This appendix provides registration templates for registering new
LDAP values. Note that more than one value may be requested by
extending the template by listing multiple values, or through use of
tables.
A.1. LDAP Object Identifier Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP OID Registration
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (I-D)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
Object Identifier:
Description:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Usage: (One of Control or Extension or Feature or other)
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
A.3. LDAP Syntax Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Syntax Registration
Object Identifier:
Description:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.4. LDAP Descriptor Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration
Descriptor (short name):
Object Identifier:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Usage: (One of administrative role, attribute type, matching rule,
name form, object class, URL extension, or other)
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.5. LDAP Attribute Description Option Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Attribute Description Option Registration
Option Name:
Family of Options: (YES or NO)
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.6. LDAP Message Type Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Message Type Registration
LDAP Message Name:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (Approved I-D)
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.7. LDAP Authentication Method Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Authentication Method Registration
Authentication Method Name:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Intended Usage: (One of COMMON, LIMITED-USE, OBSOLETE)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.8. LDAP Result Code Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Result Code Registration
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
Result Code Name:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.8. LDAP Search Scope Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Search Scope Registration
Search Scope Name:
Filter Scope String:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
A.9. LDAP Filter Choice Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP Filter Choice Registration
Filter Choice Name:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
A.10. LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Registration Template
Subject: Request for LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Registration
ModifyRequest Operation Name:
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
Author/Change Controller:
Comments:
(Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
Appendix B. Changes since RFC 3383
This informative appendix provides a summary of changes made since RFC
3383.
- Object Identifier Descriptors practices were updated to require
all descriptors defined in RFCs to be registered and
recommending all other descriptors (excepting those in
private-use name space) be registered. Additionally, all
requests for multiple registrations of the same descriptor are
now subject to Expert Review.
- Protocol Mechanisms practices were updated to include values of
the 'supportedFeatures' attribute type.
- LDAP Syntax, Search Scope, Filter Choice, ModifyRequest
operation, and authzId prefixes registries were added.
[[Initial values provided in Appendix C. This Appendix is to be
removed by the RFC Editor before publication as an RFC.]]
- References to RFCs comprising the LDAP technical specifications
have been updated to latest revisions.
- References to ISO 10646 have been replaced with [Unicode].
- The "Assigned Values" appendix providing initial registry values
was removed.
- Numerous editorial changes were made.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
Appendix C. Initial Values for new registries
This appendix provides initial values for new registries.
C.1. LDAP Syntaxes
Object Identifier Syntax Owner Reference
----------------------------- -------------------------- ----- ---
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.3 Attribute Type Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6 Bit String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 Boolean IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.11 Country String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 DN IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.14 Delivery Method IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 Directory String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.16 DIT Content Rule Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.17 DIT Structure Rule Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.21 Enhanced Guide IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.22 Facsimile Telephone Number IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.23 Fax IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 Generalized Time IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.25 Guide IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 IA5 String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 Integer IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.28 JPEG IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.30 Matching Rule Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.31 Matching Rule Use Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.34 Name And Optional UID IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.35 Name Form Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36 Numeric String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.37 Object Class Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38 OID IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.39 Other Mailbox IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40 Octet String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41 Postal Address IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.44 Printable String IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 Telephone Number IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.51 Teletex Terminal Identifier IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.52 Telex Number IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.53 UTC Time IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.54 LDAP Syntax Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 Substring Assertion IESG [Syntaxes]
C.2. LDAP Search Scopes
Name URLString Value Owner Reference
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
---------------- --------- ----- ----- -------------------
baseObject base 0 IESG [Protocol][LDAPURL]
singleLevel one 1 IESG [Protocol][LDAPURL]
wholeSubtree sub 2 IESG [Protocol][LDAPURL]
C.3. LDAP Filter Choices
Name Value Owner Reference
---------------- ----- ----- ---------
and 0 IESG [Protocol]
or 1 IESG [Protocol]
not 2 IESG [Protocol]
equalityMatch 3 IESG [Protocol]
substrings 4 IESG [Protocol]
greaterOrEqual 5 IESG [Protocol]
lessOrEqual 6 IESG [Protocol]
present 7 IESG [Protocol]
approxMatch 8 IESG [Protocol]
extensibleMatch 9 IESG [Protocol]
C.4. LDAP ModifyRequest Operations
Name Value Owner Reference
---------------- ----- ----- ---------
add 0 IESG [Protocol]
delete 1 IESG [Protocol]
replace 2 IESG [Protocol]
C.5. LDAP authzId prefixes
Name Prefix Owner Reference
---------------- ------ ----- ---------
dnAuthzId dn: IESG [AuthMeth]
uAuthzId u: IESG [AuthMeth]
Full Copyright
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 20]
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-06.txt 23 January 2006
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property Rights
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found
in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification
can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 21]
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink