mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:10:25 +08:00
977cee7ffd
Add TLS.sdf (needs to be written) Reorder chapter
543 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
543 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
# Copyright 1999-2000, The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved.
|
|
# COPYING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, see COPYRIGHT.
|
|
|
|
H1: Using SASL
|
|
|
|
OpenLDAP clients and servers are capable of authenticating via the
|
|
{{TERM[expand]SASL}} ({{TERM:SASL}}) framework, which is detailed
|
|
in {{REF:RFC2222}}. This chapter describes how to make use of
|
|
SASL in OpenLDAP.
|
|
|
|
There are several industry standard authentication mechanisms that
|
|
can be used with SASL, including Kerberos V4, GSSAPI, and some of
|
|
the Digest mechanisms. The standard client tools provided with
|
|
OpenLDAP, such as {{ldapsearch}}(1) and {{ldapmodify}}(1), will by
|
|
default attempt to authenticate the user to the {{slapd}}(8) server
|
|
using SASL. Basic authentication service can be set up by the LDAP
|
|
administrator with a few steps, allowing users to be authenticated
|
|
to the slapd server as their LDAP entry. With a few extra steps,
|
|
some users and services can be allowed to exploit SASL's authorization
|
|
feature, allowing them to authenticate themselves and then switch
|
|
their identity to that of another user or service.
|
|
|
|
This chapter assumes you have read {{Cyrus SASL for System
|
|
Administrators}}, provided with the {{PRD:Cyrus}} {{PRD:SASL}}
|
|
package (in {{FILE:doc/sysadmin.html}}).
|
|
|
|
Note that in the following text the term {{user}} is used to describe
|
|
a person or application entity who is connecting to the LDAP server
|
|
via an LDAP client, such as {{ldapsearch}}(1). That is, the term
|
|
{{user}} not ony applies to both an individual using an LDAP client,
|
|
but to an application entity which issues LDAP client operations
|
|
without direct user control. For example, an e-mail server which
|
|
uses LDAP operations to access information held in an LDAP server
|
|
is an application entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2: SASL Security Considerations
|
|
|
|
SASL offers many different authentication mechanisms. This section
|
|
briefly outlines security considerations.
|
|
|
|
Some mechanisms, such as PLAIN and LOGIN, offer no greater security over
|
|
LDAP "simple" authentication. Like "simple" authentication, such
|
|
mechanisms should not be used unless you have adequate security
|
|
protections in place. It is recommended that these mechanism be
|
|
used only in conjunction with {{TERM[expand]TLS}} (TLS). Use of
|
|
PLAIN and LOGIN are not discussed further in this document.
|
|
|
|
The DIGEST-MD5 mechanism is the mandatory-to-implement authentication
|
|
mechanism for LDAPv3. Though DIGEST-MD5 is not a strong authentication
|
|
mechanism in comparison with trusted third party authentication
|
|
systems (such as Kerberos or public key systems), yet it does offer
|
|
significant protections against a number of attacks. Unlike the
|
|
CRAM-MD5 mechanism, it prevents chosen plaintext attacks. DIGEST-MD5
|
|
is favored over the weaker and even more dangerous use of plaintext
|
|
password mechanisms. The CRAM-MD5 mechanism is deprecated in favor
|
|
of DIGEST-MD5. Use of {{SECT:DIGEST-MD5}} is discussed below.
|
|
|
|
The KERBEROS_V4 mechanism utilizes Kerberos IV to provide secure
|
|
authentication services. There are also GSSAPI based mechanisms
|
|
which is generally used in conjunction with Kerberos V. Kerberos
|
|
is viewed as a secure, distributed authentication system suitable
|
|
for both small and large enterprises. Use of {{SECT:KERBEROS_V4}}
|
|
and {{SECT:GSSAPI}} are discussed below.
|
|
|
|
The EXTERNAL mechanism utilizes authentication services provided
|
|
by lower level network services such as {{TERM:TLS}} (TLS). When
|
|
used in conjunction with TLS X.509-based public key technology,
|
|
EXTERNAL offers strong authentication. Use of EXTERNAL is discussed
|
|
in the {{SECT:Using TLS}} chapter.
|
|
|
|
There are other strong authentication mechanisms to choose from,
|
|
including OTP (one time passwords) and SRP (secure remote passwords).
|
|
These mechanisms are not discussed in this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2: SASL Authentication
|
|
|
|
Getting basic SASL authentication running involves a few steps.
|
|
The first step configures your slapd server environment so
|
|
that it can communicate with client programs using the security
|
|
system in place at your site. This usually involves setting up a
|
|
service key, a public key, or other form of secret. The second step
|
|
concerns mapping authentication identities to LDAP DN's, which
|
|
depends on how entries are laid out in your directory. An explanation
|
|
of the first step will be given in the next section using Kerberos
|
|
V4 as an example mechanism. The steps necessary for your site's
|
|
authentication mechanism will be similar, but a guide to every
|
|
mechanism available under SASL is beyond the scope of this chapter.
|
|
The next section after that describes the second step of mapping
|
|
authentication identities to DN's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: GSSAPI
|
|
|
|
This section describes the use of the SASL GSSAPI mechanism and
|
|
Kerberos V with OpenLDAP. It will be assumed that you have Kerberos
|
|
V deployed, you are familiar with the operation of the system, and that
|
|
your users are trained its use. This section also assumes you have
|
|
familiarized yourself with the use of the GSSAPI mechanism by reading
|
|
{{Configuring GSSAPI and Cyrus SASL}} (provided with Cyrus SASL in
|
|
the {{FILE:doc/gssapi}} file) and successfully experimented with
|
|
the Cyrus provided sample_server and sample_client applications.
|
|
General information about Kerberos is available at
|
|
{{URL:http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/}}.
|
|
|
|
To use the GSSAPI mechanism with {{slapd}}(8) one must create a service
|
|
key with a principal for {{ldap}} service within the realm for the host
|
|
on which the service runs. For example, if your run {{slapd}} on
|
|
{{EX:directory.example.com}} and your realm is {{EX:EXAMPLE.COM}},
|
|
you need to create a service key with the principal:
|
|
|
|
> ldap/directory.example.com@EXAMPLE.COM
|
|
|
|
When {{slapd}}(8) runs, it must have access to this key. This is
|
|
generally done by placing the key into a keytab, such as
|
|
{{FILE:/etc/krb5.keytab}}.
|
|
|
|
To use the GSSAPI mechanism to authenticate to the directory, the
|
|
user obtains a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) prior to running the
|
|
LDAP client. When using OpenLDAP client tools, the user may mandate
|
|
use of the GSSAPI mechanism by specifying {{EX:-Y GSSAPI}} as a
|
|
command option.
|
|
|
|
For the purposes of authentication and authorization, {{slapd}}(8)
|
|
associates a non-mapped authentication DN of the form:
|
|
|
|
> uid=principal,cn=GSSAPI,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
If the user principal is within the same realm, the realm is
|
|
trimmed from the principal. Continuting our example, a user
|
|
with the Kerberos principal {{EX:kurt@EXAMPLE.COM}} would have
|
|
the associated DN:
|
|
|
|
> uid=kurt,cn=GSSAPI,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
and the principal {{EX:ursula@@FORIEGN.REALM}} would have the
|
|
associated DN:
|
|
|
|
> uid=ursula@FOREIGN-REALM,cn=GSSAPI,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: KERBEROS_V4
|
|
|
|
This section describes the use of the SASL KERBEROS_V4 mechanism
|
|
with OpenLDAP. It will be assumed that you are familiar with the
|
|
workings of Kerberos IV security system, and that your site has
|
|
Kerberos IV deployed. Your users should be familiar with
|
|
authentication policy, are aware of how to receive credentials in
|
|
a Kerberos ticket cache, and how to refresh expired credentials.
|
|
|
|
Client programs will need to be able to obtain a session key for
|
|
use when connecting to your LDAP server. This allows the LDAP server
|
|
to know the identity of the user, and allows the client to know it
|
|
is connecting to a legitimate server. If encryption layers are to
|
|
be used, the session key can also be used to help negotiate that
|
|
option.
|
|
|
|
The slapd server runs the service called "{{ldap}}", and the server
|
|
will require a srvtab file with a service key. SASL aware client
|
|
programs will be obtaining an "ldap" service ticket with the user's
|
|
ticket granting ticket (TGT), with the instance of the ticket
|
|
matching the hostname of the OpenLDAP server. For example, if your
|
|
realm is named {{EX:EXAMPLE.COM}} and the slapd server is running
|
|
on the host named {{EX:directory.example.com}}, the {{FILE:/etc/srvtab}}
|
|
file on the server will have a service key
|
|
|
|
> ldap.directory@EXAMPLE.COM
|
|
|
|
When an LDAP client is authenticating a user to the directory using
|
|
the KERBEROS_IV mechanism, it will request a session key for that
|
|
same principal, either from the ticket cache or by obtaining a new
|
|
one from the Kerberos server. This will require the TGT to be
|
|
available and valid in the cache as well. If it is not present or
|
|
has expired, SASL will print out the message
|
|
|
|
> ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Local error
|
|
|
|
When the service ticket is obtained, it will be passed to the LDAP
|
|
server as proof of the user's identity. The server will extract
|
|
the identity and realm out of the service ticket using SASL
|
|
library calls, and convert them into an {{authentication request
|
|
DN}} of the form
|
|
|
|
> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
So in our above example, if the user's name were "adamson", the
|
|
authentication request DN would be:
|
|
|
|
> uid=ADAMSON,cn=EXAMPLE.COM,cn=KERBEROS_V4,cn=AUTH
|
|
|
|
This authentication request DN by itself could be placed into ACL's
|
|
and {{EX:groupOfNames}} "member" attributes, since it is of legitimate
|
|
LDAP DN format. The next section, however, tells how to map that
|
|
DN into the DN of a person's own LDAP entry.
|
|
|
|
Also note that this example, being for Kerberos, shows the <realm>
|
|
portion of the DN being filled in with the Kerberos realm of the
|
|
company. Several other authentication mechanisms do not emply the
|
|
concept of a realm, so the ",cn=<realm>" portion of the authentication
|
|
request DN would not appear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Mapping Authentication identities to LDAP entries
|
|
|
|
The authentication mechanism in the slapd server will use SASL
|
|
library calls to obtain the authenticated user's "username", based
|
|
on whatever underlying authentication mechanism was used. This
|
|
username is in the namespace of the authentication mechanism, and
|
|
not in the LDAP namespace. As stated in the section above, that
|
|
username is reformatted into an authentication request DN of the
|
|
form
|
|
|
|
> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
> uid=<username>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
depending on whether or not <mechanism> employs the concept of
|
|
"realms".
|
|
|
|
It is not intended that you should add LDAP entries of the above
|
|
form to your LDAP database. Chances are you have an LDAP entry for
|
|
each of the people that will be authenticating to LDAP, laid out
|
|
in your directory tree, and the tree does not start at cn=auth.
|
|
But if your site has a clear mapping between the "username" and an
|
|
LDAP entry for the person, you will be able to configure your LDAP
|
|
server to automatically map a user's authentication username to
|
|
their {{authentication DN}}.
|
|
|
|
The LDAP administrator will need to tell the slapd server how to
|
|
map an authentication request DN to a user's authentication DN.
|
|
This is done by adding one or more {{EX:saslRegexp}} directives to
|
|
the {{slapd.conf}}(5) file. This directive takes two arguments:
|
|
|
|
> saslRegexp <search pattern> <replacement pattern>
|
|
|
|
The authentication request DN is compared to the search pattern
|
|
using the regular expression functions {{regcomp}}() and {{regexec}}(),
|
|
and if it matches, it is rewritten as the replacement pattern. If
|
|
there are multiple {{EX:saslRegexp}} directives, only the first
|
|
whose search pattern matches the authentication identity is used.
|
|
The string that is output from the replacement pattern should be
|
|
the authentication DN of the user, in a legitimate LDAP DN format.
|
|
It can also be an LDAP URL, which is discussed below.
|
|
|
|
The search pattern can contain any of the regular expression
|
|
characters listed in {{regexec}}(3C). The main characters of note
|
|
are dot ".", asterisk "*", and the open and close parenthesis "("
|
|
and ")". Essentially, the dot matches any character, the asterisk
|
|
matches one or more characters, and terms in parenthesis are
|
|
remembered for the replacement pattern.
|
|
|
|
The replacement pattern will produce the final authentication DN
|
|
of the user. Anything from the authentication request DN that
|
|
matched a string in parenthesis in the search pattern is stored in
|
|
the variable "$1". That variable "$1" can appear in the replacement
|
|
pattern, and will be replaced by the string from the authentication
|
|
request DN. If there were multiple sets of parenthesis in the search
|
|
pattern, the variables $2, $3, etc are used.
|
|
|
|
For example, suppose the user's authentication identity is written
|
|
as the DN string
|
|
|
|
> uid=ADAMSON,cn=EXAMPLE.COM,cn=KERBEROS_V4,cn=AUTH
|
|
|
|
and the user's actual LDAP entry is
|
|
|
|
> uid=ADAMSON,ou=PERSON,dc=EXAMPLE,dc=COM
|
|
|
|
The {{EX:saslRegexp}} directive in {{slapd.conf}}(5) could be
|
|
written
|
|
|
|
> saslRegexp
|
|
> uid=(.*),cn=example.com,cn=kerberos_v4,cn=auth
|
|
> uid=$1,ou=person,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
|
|
An even more lenient rule could be written as
|
|
|
|
> saslRegexp
|
|
> uid=(.*),.*cn=auth
|
|
> uid=$1,ou=person,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
|
|
Be careful about setting the search pattern too leniently, however,
|
|
since it may mistakenly allow people to become authenticated as a
|
|
DN to which they should not have access. It is better to write
|
|
several strict directives than one lenient directive which has
|
|
security holes. If there is only one authentication mechanism in
|
|
place at your site, and zero or one realms in use, you might be
|
|
able to map between authentication identities and LDAP DN's with
|
|
a single {{EX:saslRegexp}} directive.
|
|
|
|
Some sites may have people's DN's spread to multiple areas of the
|
|
LDAP tree, such as if there were an ou=accounting tree and an
|
|
ou=engineering tree, with people interspersed between them. Or
|
|
there may not be enough information in the authentication identity
|
|
to isolate the DN, such as if the above person's LDAP entry looked
|
|
like
|
|
|
|
> dn: cn=mark adamson,ou=person,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
> objectclass: Person
|
|
> cn: mark adamson
|
|
> uid: adamson
|
|
|
|
In this case, the information in the authentication identity can
|
|
only be used to search for the user's DN, not derive it directly.
|
|
For both of these situations, and others, the replacement pattern
|
|
in the {{EX:saslRegexp}} directives will need to produce an LDAP
|
|
URL, described in the next section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Performing searches for a person's DN
|
|
|
|
When there is not enough information in the authentication identity
|
|
to derive a person's authentication DN directly, the {{EX:saslRegexp}}
|
|
directives in the {{slapd.conf}}(5) file will need to produce an
|
|
LDAP URL. This URL will then be used to perform an internal search
|
|
of the LDAP database to find the person's authentication DN.
|
|
|
|
An LDAP URL, similar to other URL's, is of the form
|
|
|
|
> ldap://<host>/<base>?<attrs>?<scope>?<filter>
|
|
|
|
This contains all of the elements necessary to perform an LDAP
|
|
search: the name of the server <host>, the LDAP DN search base
|
|
<base>, the LDAP attributes to retrieve <attrs>, the search scope
|
|
<scope> which is one of the three options "base", "one", or "sub",
|
|
and lastly an LDAP search filter <filter>. Since the search is for
|
|
an LDAP DN on the local machine, the <host> portion is ignored. By
|
|
the same token the <attrs> field is also ignored since only the DN
|
|
is of concern. These two elements are left in the format of the
|
|
URL to maintain the clarity of what information goes where in the
|
|
string.
|
|
|
|
Suppose that the person in the example from above did in fact have
|
|
an authentication username of "adamson" and that information was
|
|
kept in the attribute "uid" in their LDAP entry. The {{EX:saslRegexp}}
|
|
directive might be written as
|
|
|
|
> saslRegexp
|
|
> uid=(.*),cn=example.com,cn=kerberos_v4,cn=auth
|
|
> ldap://localhost/ou=person,dc=example,dc=com??sub?uid=$1
|
|
|
|
This will initiate an internal search of the LDAP database inside
|
|
the slapd server. If the search returns exactly one entry, it is
|
|
accepted as being the DN of the user. If there are more than one
|
|
entries returned, or if there are zero entries returned, the
|
|
authentication fails and the user's connection is left bound as
|
|
the authentication request DN.
|
|
|
|
Note that if the search scope <scope> in the URL is "base", then
|
|
the only LDAP entry that will be returned is the searchbase DN
|
|
<base>, so the actual search of the database is skipped. This is
|
|
equivalent to setting the replacement pattern in the directive to
|
|
a DN directly, as in the section above.
|
|
|
|
The attributes that are used in the search filter <filter> in the
|
|
URL should be indexed to allow faster searching. If they are not,
|
|
the authentication step alone can take uncomfortably long periods,
|
|
and users may assume the server is down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2: SASL Authorization
|
|
|
|
The SASL offers a feature known as {{authorization}}, which allows
|
|
an authenticated user to request that they act on the behalf of
|
|
another user. This step occurs after the user has obtained an
|
|
authentication DN, and involves sending an authorization identity
|
|
to the server. The server will then make a decision on whether or
|
|
not to allow the authorization to occur. If it is allowed, the
|
|
user's LDAP connection is switched to have a binding DN derived
|
|
from the authorization identity, and the LDAP session proceeds with
|
|
the access of the new authorization DN.
|
|
|
|
The decision to allow an authorization to proceed depends on the
|
|
rules and policies of the site where LDAP is running, and thus
|
|
cannot be made by SASL alone. The SASL library leaves it up to the
|
|
server to make the decision. The LDAP administrator sets the
|
|
guidelines of who can authorize to what identity by adding information
|
|
into the LDAP database entries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Uses of Authorization
|
|
|
|
This sort of service is useful when one entity needs to act on the
|
|
behalf of many other users. For example, users may be directed to
|
|
a web page to make changes to their personal information in their
|
|
LDAP entry. The users authenticate to the web server to establish
|
|
their identity, but the web server CGI cannot authenticate to the
|
|
LDAP server as that user to make changes for them. Instead, the
|
|
web server authenticates itself to the LDAP server as a service
|
|
identity, say,
|
|
|
|
> cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
|
|
and then it will SASL authorize to the DN of the user. Once so
|
|
authorized, the CGI makes changes to the LDAP entry of the user,
|
|
and as far as the slapd server can tell for its ACLs, it is the
|
|
user themself on the other end of the connection. The user could
|
|
have connected to the LDAP server directly and authenticated as
|
|
themself, but that would require the user to have more knowledge
|
|
of LDAP clients, knowledge which the web page provides in an easier
|
|
format.
|
|
|
|
Authorization can also be used to limit access to an account that
|
|
has greater access to the database. Such an account, perhaps even
|
|
the root DN specified in {{slapd.conf}}(5), can have a strict list
|
|
of people who can authorize to that DN. Changes to the LDAP database
|
|
could then be only allowed by that DN, and in order to become that
|
|
DN, users must first authenticate as one of the persons on the
|
|
list. This allows for better auditing of who made changes to the
|
|
LDAP database. If people were allowed to authenticate directly to
|
|
the priviliged account, possibly through the {{EX:rootpw}}
|
|
{{slapd.conf}}(5) directive or through a {{EX:userPassword}}
|
|
attribute, then auditing becomes more difficult.
|
|
|
|
Note that after a successful authorization, the original authentication
|
|
DN in the LDAP connection is overwritten by the new DN from the
|
|
authorization request. If a service program is able to authenticate
|
|
itself as its own authentication DN and then authorize to other
|
|
DN's, and it is planning on switching to several different identities
|
|
during one LDAP session, it will need to authenticate itself each
|
|
time before authorizing to another DN. The slapd server does not
|
|
keep record of the service program's ability to switch to other
|
|
DN's. On authentication mechanisms like Kerberos this will not
|
|
require multiple connections being made to the Kerberos server,
|
|
since the user's TGT and "ldap" session key are valid for multiple
|
|
uses for the several hours of the ticket lifetime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Authorization Identities
|
|
|
|
The authorization identity is sent to the slapd server via the -X
|
|
switch for {{ldapsearch}}(1) and other tools, or in the *authzid
|
|
parameter to the {{lutil_sasl_defaults}}() call. The identity can
|
|
be in one of two forms, either
|
|
|
|
> u:<username>
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
> dn:<dn>
|
|
|
|
In the first form, the <username> is from the same namespace as
|
|
the authentication identities above. It is the user's username as
|
|
it is refered to by the underlying authentication mechanism.
|
|
Authorization identities of this form are converted into a DN format
|
|
by the same function that the authentication process used, producing
|
|
an {{authorization request DN}} of the form
|
|
|
|
> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=auth
|
|
|
|
That authorization request DN is then run through the same
|
|
{{EX:saslRegexp}} process to convert it into a legitimate authorization
|
|
DN from the database. If it cannot be converted due to a failed
|
|
search from an LDAP URL, the authorization request fails with
|
|
"inappropriate access". Otherwise, the DN string is now a legitimate
|
|
authorization DN ready to undergo approval.
|
|
|
|
If the authorization identity was provided in the second form, with
|
|
a {EX:"dn:"}} prefix, the string after the prefix is already in
|
|
authorization DN form, ready to undergo approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3: Authorization rules
|
|
|
|
Once slapd has the authorization DN, the actual approval process
|
|
begins. There are two attributes that the LDAP administrator can
|
|
put into LDAP entries to allow authorization:
|
|
|
|
> saslAuthzTo
|
|
> saslAuthzFrom
|
|
|
|
Both can be multivalued. The first is called a source rule, and it
|
|
is placed into a person's authentication DN entry to tell what
|
|
other authorization DN's the person is allowed to change to. The
|
|
second form is called a destination rule, and it is placed into an
|
|
authorization DN's entry to tell what authenticated DN a person
|
|
must be coming from in order to switch to that authorization DN.
|
|
The choice of which form to use is up to the administrator. Source
|
|
rules are checked first in the person's authentication DN entry,
|
|
and if none of the {{EX:saslAuthzTo}} rules specify the authorization
|
|
is permitted, the {{EX:saslAuthzFrom}} rules in the authorization
|
|
DN entry are then checked. If neither case specifies that the
|
|
request be honored, the request is denied with an "inappropriate
|
|
access" message. Since the default behaviour is to deny authorization
|
|
requests, rules only specify that a request be allowed; there are
|
|
no negative rules telling what authorizations to deny.
|
|
|
|
The value(s) in the two attributes are of the same form as the
|
|
output of the replacement pattern of a {{EX:saslRegexp}} directive:
|
|
either a DN or an LDAP URL. For example, if a saslAuthzTo value is
|
|
a DN, that DN is one the authenticated user can authorize to. On
|
|
the other hand, if the {{EX:saslAuthzTo}} value is an LDAP URL,
|
|
the URL is used as an internal search of the LDAP database, and
|
|
the authenticated user can become ANY DN returned by the search.
|
|
If an LDAP entry looked like:
|
|
|
|
> dn: cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
> saslAuthzTo: ldap://host/dc=example,dc=com??sub?objectclass=Person
|
|
|
|
then any user who authenticated as cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
could authorize to any other LDAP entry under the search base
|
|
"dc=example,dc=com" which has an objectClass of "Person".
|
|
|
|
|
|
H4: Notes on Authorization rules
|
|
|
|
An LDAP URL in a {{EX:saslAuthzTo}} or {{EX:saslAuthzFrom}} attribute
|
|
will return a set of DNs. Each DN returned will be checked.
|
|
Searches which return a large set can cause the authorization
|
|
process to take an uncomfortably long time. Also, searches should
|
|
be performed on attributes that have been indexed by slapd.
|
|
|
|
To help produce more sweeping rules for {{EX:saslAuthzFrom}} and
|
|
{{EX:saslAuthzTo}}, the values of these attributes are allowed to
|
|
be DNs with regular expression characters in them. This means a
|
|
source rule like
|
|
|
|
> saslAuthzTo: uid=.*,dc=example,dc=com
|
|
|
|
would allow that authenticated user to authorize to any DN that
|
|
matches the regular expression pattern given. This regular expression
|
|
comparison can be evaluated much faster than an LDAP search for
|
|
"uid=*".
|
|
|
|
Also note that the values in an authorization rule must be one of
|
|
the two forms: an LDAP URL or a DN (with or without regular expression
|
|
characters). Anything that does not begin with "ldap://" is taken
|
|
as a DN. It is not permissable to enter another authorization
|
|
identity of the form "u:<username>" as an authorization rule.
|
|
|
|
The decision of which type of rules to use, saslAuthzFrom or
|
|
saslAuthzTo, will depend on the site's situation. For example, if
|
|
the set of people who may become a given identity can easily be
|
|
written as a search filter, then a single destination rule could
|
|
be written. If the set of people is not easily defined by a search
|
|
filter, and the set of people is small, it may be better to write
|
|
a source rule in the entries of each of those people who should be
|
|
allowed to perform the authorization.
|
|
|