openldap/doc/drafts/draft-rharrison-ldap-extpartresp-xx.txt
Kurt Zeilenga 2c9b803866 rev 01
2000-06-16 06:48:09 +00:00

160 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

Individual Submission to LDAPExt Working Group R. Harrison
Internet Draft Novell, Inc.
Document: draft-rharrison-ldap-extpartresp-01.txt June, 2000
Category: Proposed Standard
Extended Partial Response
Protocol Enhancement to LDAP v3
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [1].
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of
six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts
as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
1. Abstract
This document describes the ExtendedPartialResponse, an element of
LDAP v3 protocol which allows multiple responses to LDAP v3 extended
requests. Extended partial responses are backward compatible with
the existing LDAP v3 Extended Operation defined in [LDAPv3].
2. Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. Motivation for the Extended Partial Response
The Extended Operation ([LDAPv3] Section 4.12) was defined in LDAP
v3 to allow additional operations to be defined as part of the
protocol without requiring a new revision of the protocol.
The LDAP v3 Extended Operation allows for a single extended response
to each extended request, but this paradigm may not be sufficient
for some directory operations. For instance, the LDAP search
operation is a directory operation that is much more efficient when
multiple partial responses are used to service a single request. The
LDAP v3 Extended Partial Response June, 2000
extended partial response generalizes the current extended operation
definition to give LDAP server implementers the ability to make use
of a single-request-multiple-response paradigm for extended LDAP
operations that require it or that would benefit from it.
4. Element of Protocol
The ExtendedPartialResponse is defined as
ExtendedPartialResponse ::= [APPLICATION 25] SEQUENCE {
responseName [0] LDAPOID OPTIONAL,
response [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
An LDAP server responds to an LDAP v3 ExtendedRequest with zero or
more ExtendedPartialResponses followed by one ExtendedResponse. This
ensures backward compatibility with existing LDAP extensions which
do not make use of the ExtendedPartialResponse. As with all LDAP
extensions, LDAP extensions that make use of the
ExtendedPartialResponse have predefined syntax and semantics that
are defined in RFCs or are private to a particular implementation.
5. Security Considerations
This draft describes an enhancement to the LDAP v3 protocol
[LDAPv3]. All security considerations of [LDAPv3] apply to this
draft, however it does not introduce any new security considerations
to the LDAP v3 protocol.
6. References
[LDAPv3]
Wahl, M., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997.
[ReqsKeywords]
Scott Bradner. "Key Words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels". RFC 2119.
7. Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge the readers of the LDAP
Extensions working group mail list who responded to the suggestion
that a multiple-response paradigm might be useful for LDAP extended
requests. Special thanks go to two individuals: David Wilbur who
first introduced the idea on the working group list, and Thomas
Salter, who succinctly summarized the discussion and suggested the
name ExtendedPartialResponse in his summary.
8. Author's Addresses
Roger Harrison
Novell, Inc.
LDAP v3 Extended Partial Response June, 2000
1800 S. Novell Place
Provo, UT 84606
+1 801 861 2642
roger_harrison@novell.com
Appendix A - Document Revision History
A.1 draft-rharrison-ldap-extPartResp-00.doc
Initial revision of draft.
A.2 draft-rharrison-ldap-extPartResp-01.doc
Changed responseName to be optional to align with [LDAPv3]
definition of ExtendedResponse.
Full Copyright Statement
"Copyright (C) The Internet Society (date). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.