mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:10:25 +08:00
166 lines
6.4 KiB
Plaintext
166 lines
6.4 KiB
Plaintext
INTERNET-DRAFT Michael P. Armijo
|
|
<draft-ietf-ldapext-locate-01.txt> Levon Esibov
|
|
January, 2000 Paul Leach
|
|
Expires: July, 2000 Microsoft Corporation
|
|
|
|
Discovering LDAP Services with DNS
|
|
|
|
Status of this Memo
|
|
|
|
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
|
|
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
|
|
|
|
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
|
|
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
|
|
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
|
|
Drafts.
|
|
|
|
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
|
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
|
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
|
|
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
|
|
|
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
|
|
|
|
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
|
|
|
|
Distribution of this memo is unlimited. It is filed as <draft-
|
|
ietf-ldapext-locate-01.txt>, and expires on July 4, 2000.
|
|
Please send comments to the authors.
|
|
|
|
1. Abstract
|
|
|
|
This draft defines a way that native Internet LDAP servers can make
|
|
use of the DNS's knowledge base to provide clients a method to
|
|
resolve LDAP services for a given domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Introduction
|
|
|
|
The LDAPv3 protocol [1] is designed to be a lightweight access
|
|
protocol for directory services supporting X.500 models. This may
|
|
be the X.500 directory itself, but the LDAP specification
|
|
explicitly allows it to be a different directory. Let us define
|
|
a "native LDAP server" to be one that is not a front end to the
|
|
X.500 directory service. Let us further define an "Internet based
|
|
organization" as one that has a domain name, and an "Internet LDAP
|
|
server" to be one containing a directory entries for such an
|
|
organization.
|
|
|
|
This draft defines a way that native Internet LDAP servers can make
|
|
use of the DNS's knowledge base to perform the same function, while
|
|
still supporting integration with the X.500 directory.
|
|
|
|
This draft builds on RFC 2247[2] to define a mechanism by which
|
|
collections of native Internet LDAP servers can be integrated to
|
|
create a directory service. That work supports this cause by
|
|
defining a mapping from an LDAP DN to a DNS name that can be
|
|
resolved to the address of a server holding the entry corresponding
|
|
to the DN. For example, the DN "CN=Fred,OU=Eng,DC=example,DC=net"
|
|
maps to the DNS name "example.net".
|
|
|
|
In an Internet context, many of the names about which users seek
|
|
information are DNS names, or include DNS names. A native LDAP based
|
|
directory service for the Internet should make it convenient to
|
|
process such names -- there is a huge social investment spanning two
|
|
decades to get to the point where names like
|
|
"john.doe@somewhere.example" and "http://www.example.net" can
|
|
appear in newspaper articles, TV commercials, and on billboards
|
|
and millions of people understand what to do with them. As a result,
|
|
we assume that Internet based organizations wish to preserve this
|
|
investment, yet also want to deploy directory services.
|
|
|
|
Widespread use of, and dependence on, LDAP services will require that
|
|
they are robust and scalable. Both of these features are typically
|
|
supported by replicated servers. Use of SRV records to locate LDAP
|
|
servers supports clients' use of replicated servers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Locating LDAP servers through DNS
|
|
|
|
LDAP server location information is to be stored using DNS Service
|
|
Location Record (SRV)[6]. The data in a SRV record contains the DNS
|
|
name of the server that provides the LDAP service, corresponding Port
|
|
number, and parameters that enable the client to choose an
|
|
appropriate server from multiple servers according to the algorithm
|
|
described in the SRV protocol[6]. The name of this record always has
|
|
the following format:
|
|
|
|
_<Service>._<Proto>.<Domain>
|
|
|
|
where <Service> is always "ldap", <Proto> is a protocol that can
|
|
be either "udp" or "tcp", and <Domain> is the domain hosted by the
|
|
LDAP Server. Note that "ldap" is the symbolic name for the LDAP
|
|
service in Assigned Numbers [7], as required by the SRV Protocol[6].
|
|
|
|
Presence of such records enables clients to find the LDAP servers
|
|
using standard DNS query [3]. As an example, a client that searches
|
|
for an LDAP server in the example.net domain that supports TCP protocol
|
|
will submit a DNS query for a set of SRV records with owner name:
|
|
|
|
_ldap._tcp.example.net.
|
|
|
|
The client will receive the list of SRV records published in DNS
|
|
that satisfy the requested criteria. The following is an example
|
|
of such record:
|
|
|
|
_ldap._tcp.example.net. IN SRV 0 0 389 phoenix.example.net.
|
|
|
|
The set of returned records may contain multiple records in the
|
|
case where multiple LDAP servers serve the same domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Security Considerations
|
|
|
|
This document describes a method that uses DNS SRV records to
|
|
discover LDAP servers. All security considerations related to DNS
|
|
SRV records are inherited by this document. See the security
|
|
considerations section in [6] for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. References
|
|
|
|
[1] M. Wahl, T. Howes, S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access
|
|
Protocol(v3)". RFC 2251, December 1997.
|
|
|
|
[2] S. Kille, M. Wahl, "Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished
|
|
Names". RFC 2247, January 1998.
|
|
|
|
[3] P. Mockapetris, RFC 1034, DOMAIN NAMES - CONCEPTS AND FACILITIES,
|
|
November, 1987.
|
|
|
|
[4] P. Mockapetris, RFC 1035, DOMAIN NAMES - IMPLEMENTATION AND
|
|
SPECIFICATION, November, 1987.
|
|
|
|
[5] T. Howes, M. Smith, "The LDAP URL Format". RFC 2255 December 1997.
|
|
|
|
[6] A. Gulbrandsen, P. Vixie, L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for specifying the
|
|
location of services (DNS SRV)".
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-
|
|
dnsind-rfc2052bis-05.txt, November 1999.
|
|
|
|
[7] J. Reynolds, J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, October 1994
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Authors' Addresses
|
|
|
|
Michael P. Armijo
|
|
One Microsoft Way
|
|
Redmond, WA 98052
|
|
micharm@microsoft.com
|
|
|
|
Paul Leach
|
|
One Microsoft Way
|
|
Redmond, WA 98052
|
|
paulle@microsoft.com
|
|
|
|
Levon Esibov
|
|
One Microsoft Way
|
|
Redmond, WA 98052
|
|
levone@microsoft.com
|
|
|
|
Expires July, 2000
|
|
|