Use lutil_passwd_string64 instead of pw_string64

This commit is contained in:
Howard Chu 2011-02-07 00:49:55 +00:00
parent 4f8c0eddd2
commit ffc1d68035

View File

@ -32,63 +32,6 @@ static const unsigned char apr64[] =
#define APR_SALT_SIZE 8
/* copied from liblutil/passwd.c */
static int pw_string64(
const struct berval *sc,
const struct berval *hash,
struct berval *b64,
const struct berval *salt )
{
int rc;
struct berval string;
size_t b64len;
if( salt ) {
/* need to base64 combined string */
string.bv_len = hash->bv_len + salt->bv_len;
string.bv_val = ber_memalloc( string.bv_len + 1 );
if( string.bv_val == NULL ) {
return LUTIL_PASSWD_ERR;
}
AC_MEMCPY( string.bv_val, hash->bv_val,
hash->bv_len );
AC_MEMCPY( &string.bv_val[hash->bv_len], salt->bv_val,
salt->bv_len );
string.bv_val[string.bv_len] = '\0';
} else {
string = *hash;
}
b64len = LUTIL_BASE64_ENCODE_LEN( string.bv_len ) + 1;
b64->bv_len = b64len + sc->bv_len;
b64->bv_val = ber_memalloc( b64->bv_len + 1 );
if( b64->bv_val == NULL ) {
if( salt ) ber_memfree( string.bv_val );
return LUTIL_PASSWD_ERR;
}
AC_MEMCPY(b64->bv_val, sc->bv_val, sc->bv_len);
rc = lutil_b64_ntop(
(unsigned char *) string.bv_val, string.bv_len,
&b64->bv_val[sc->bv_len], b64len );
if( salt ) ber_memfree( string.bv_val );
if( rc < 0 ) {
return LUTIL_PASSWD_ERR;
}
/* recompute length */
b64->bv_len = sc->bv_len + rc;
assert( strlen(b64->bv_val) == b64->bv_len );
return LUTIL_PASSWD_OK;
}
/* The algorithm implemented in this function was created by Poul-Henning
* Kamp and released under the following license:
* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@ -231,9 +174,9 @@ static int hash_apr1(
if (text)
*text = NULL;
return pw_string64(scheme, &digest, hash, &salt);
return lutil_passwd_string64(scheme, &digest, hash, &salt);
}
int init_module(int argc, char *argv[]) {
return lutil_passwd_add((struct berval *) &scheme, chk_apr1, hash_apr1);
}
}