mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2025-04-06 15:00:40 +08:00
Add noop-06
This commit is contained in:
parent
725423ef4f
commit
59e8ac437b
340
doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-xx.txt
Normal file
340
doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-xx.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT Kurt D. Zeilenga
|
||||
Intended Category: Standard Track OpenLDAP Foundation
|
||||
Expires in six months 10 February 2005
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The LDAP No-Op Control
|
||||
<draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-06.txt>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Status of this Memo
|
||||
|
||||
This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
|
||||
revision, submitted to the IESG for consideration as a Standard Track
|
||||
document. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical
|
||||
discussion of this document will take place on the IETF LDAP
|
||||
Extensions mailing list <ldapext@ietf.org>. Please send editorial
|
||||
comments directly to the author <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>.
|
||||
|
||||
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section
|
||||
4 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any
|
||||
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been
|
||||
disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will
|
||||
be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668.
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
|
||||
Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
|
||||
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
||||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
||||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
|
||||
or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
||||
|
||||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
|
||||
|
||||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). All Rights Reserved.
|
||||
|
||||
Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document
|
||||
for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP No-Op Control [Page 1]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-06 10 February 2005
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
|
||||
No-Op control which can be used to disable the normal effect of an
|
||||
operation. The control can be used to discover how a server might
|
||||
react to a particular update request without updating the directory.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Overview
|
||||
|
||||
It is often desirable to be able to determine if a directory operation
|
||||
[Protocol] would successful complete or not without having the normal
|
||||
effect of the operation take place. For example, an administrative
|
||||
client might want to verify that new user could update their entry
|
||||
(and not other entries) without the directory actually being updated.
|
||||
The mechanism could be used to build more sophisticated security
|
||||
auditing tools.
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
|
||||
[Roadmap] No-Op control extension. The presence of the No-Op control
|
||||
in an operation request message disables its normal effect upon the
|
||||
directory which operation would otherwise have. Instead of updating
|
||||
the directory and return the normal indication of success, the server
|
||||
does not update the directory and indicates so by returning the
|
||||
noOperation resultCode (introduced below).
|
||||
|
||||
For example, when the No-Op control is present in a LDAP modify
|
||||
operation [Protocol], the server is do all processing necessary to
|
||||
perform the operation without actually updating the directory. If it
|
||||
detects an error during this processing, it returns a non-success
|
||||
(other than noOperation) resultCode as it normally would. Otherwise,
|
||||
it returns the noOperation. In either case, the directory is left
|
||||
unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
This No-Op control is not intended to be to an "effective access"
|
||||
mechanism [RFC2820, U12].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1.1. Terminology
|
||||
|
||||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||||
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].
|
||||
|
||||
DN stands for Distinguished Name.
|
||||
DSA stands for Directory System Agent.
|
||||
DSE stands for DSA-specific entry.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP No-Op Control [Page 2]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-06 10 February 2005
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. No-Op Control
|
||||
|
||||
The No-Op control is an LDAP Control [Protocol] whose controlType is
|
||||
IANA-ASSIGNED-OID and controlValue is absent. Clients MUST provide a
|
||||
criticality value of TRUE to prevent unintended modification of the
|
||||
directory.
|
||||
|
||||
The control is appropriate for request messages of LDAP Add, Delete,
|
||||
Modify and ModifyDN operations [Protocol]. The control is also
|
||||
appropriate for requests of extended operations which update the
|
||||
directory (or other data stores), such as Password Modify Extended
|
||||
Operation [RFC3062]. There is no corresponding response control.
|
||||
|
||||
When the control is attached to an LDAP request, the server does all
|
||||
normal processing possible for the operation without modification of
|
||||
the directory. That is, when the control is attached to an LDAP
|
||||
request, the directory SHALL NOT be updated and the response SHALL NOT
|
||||
have a resultCode of success (0).
|
||||
|
||||
A result code other than noOperation (IANA-ASSIGNED-CODE) means that
|
||||
the server is unable or unwilling to complete the processing for the
|
||||
reason indicated by the result code. A result code of noOperation
|
||||
(IANA-ASSIGNED-CODE) indicates that the server discovered no reason
|
||||
why the operation would fail if submitted without the No-Op control.
|
||||
|
||||
Servers SHOULD indicate their support for this control by providing
|
||||
IANA-ASSIGNED-OID as a value of the 'supportedControl' attribute type
|
||||
[Models] in their root DSE entry. A server MAY choose to advertise
|
||||
this extension only when the client is authorized to use this
|
||||
operation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3. Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The No-Op control mechanism allows directory administrators and users
|
||||
to verify that access control and other administrative policy controls
|
||||
are properly configured. The mechanism may also lead to the
|
||||
development (and deployment) of more effective security auditing
|
||||
tools.
|
||||
|
||||
Implementors of this LDAP extension should be familiar with security
|
||||
considerations applicable to the LDAP operations [Protocol] extended
|
||||
by this control, as well as general LDAP security considerations
|
||||
[Roadmap].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4. IANA Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP No-Op Control [Page 3]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-06 10 February 2005
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4.1. Object Identifier
|
||||
|
||||
It is requested that IANA assign an LDAP Object Identifier [BCP64bis]
|
||||
to identify the LDAP No-Op Control defined in this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: Request for LDAP Object Identifier Registration
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments:
|
||||
Identifies the LDAP No-Op Control
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4.2 LDAP Protocol Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
Registration of this protocol mechanism is requested [RFC3383].
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
|
||||
Object Identifier: IANA-ASSIGNED-OID
|
||||
Description: No-Op Control
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
||||
Usage: Control
|
||||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments: none
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4.3 LDAP Result Code
|
||||
|
||||
Assignment of an LDAP Result Code called 'noOperation' is requested.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: LDAP Result Code Registration
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
Result Code Name: noOperation
|
||||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments: none
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5. Author's Address
|
||||
|
||||
Kurt D. Zeilenga
|
||||
OpenLDAP Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
Email: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP No-Op Control [Page 4]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-06 10 February 2005
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6. References
|
||||
|
||||
[[Note to the RFC Editor: please replace the citation tags used in
|
||||
referencing Internet-Drafts with tags of the form RFCnnnn where
|
||||
possible.]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6.1. Normative References
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
||||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997.
|
||||
|
||||
[Protocol] Sermersheim, J. (editor), "LDAP: The Protocol",
|
||||
draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress.
|
||||
|
||||
[Roadmap] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification
|
||||
Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in
|
||||
progress.
|
||||
|
||||
[Models] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Directory Information
|
||||
Models", draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in
|
||||
progress.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6.2. Informative References
|
||||
|
||||
[X.500] International Telecommunication Union -
|
||||
Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory
|
||||
-- Overview of concepts, models and services,"
|
||||
X.500(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994).
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2820] Stokes, E., et. al., "Access Control Requirements for
|
||||
LDAP", RFC 2820, May 2000.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC3062] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP Password Modify Extended Operation",
|
||||
RFC 3062, February 2000.
|
||||
|
||||
[BCP64bis] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP",
|
||||
draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-xx.txt, a work in progress.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Intellectual Property Rights
|
||||
|
||||
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
||||
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
|
||||
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
|
||||
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP No-Op Control [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-06 10 February 2005
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
|
||||
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
|
||||
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found
|
||||
in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
|
||||
|
||||
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
|
||||
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
|
||||
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
|
||||
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification
|
||||
can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
|
||||
|
||||
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
||||
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
||||
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
|
||||
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
|
||||
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Full Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
|
||||
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
|
||||
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
|
||||
|
||||
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
|
||||
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
|
||||
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
|
||||
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
|
||||
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
|
||||
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
|
||||
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP No-Op Control [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user