bitString fixes from Julius Enarusai (ITS#1441)

This commit is contained in:
Kurt Zeilenga 2001-11-16 18:10:37 +00:00
parent d51dc13a0b
commit 383939f18f

View File

@ -71,6 +71,8 @@
/* recycled indexing/filtering routines */
#define dnIndexer caseExactIgnoreIndexer
#define dnFilter caseExactIgnoreFilter
#define bitStringFilter octetStringFilter
#define bitStringIndexer octetStringIndexer
#define telephoneNumberIndexer caseIgnoreIA5Indexer
#define telephoneNumberFilter caseIgnoreIA5Filter
@ -437,14 +439,21 @@ bitStringValidate(
return LDAP_INVALID_SYNTAX;
}
if( in->bv_val[0] != 'B' ||
in->bv_val[1] != '\'' ||
in->bv_val[in->bv_len-1] != '\'' )
/*
* rfc 2252 section 6.3 Bit String
* bitstring = "'" *binary-digit "'"
* binary-digit = "0" / "1"
* example: '0101111101'B
*/
if( in->bv_val[0] != '\'' ||
in->bv_val[in->bv_len-2] != '\'' ||
in->bv_val[in->bv_len-1] != 'B' )
{
return LDAP_INVALID_SYNTAX;
}
for( i=in->bv_len-2; i>1; i-- ) {
for( i=in->bv_len-3; i>0; i-- ) {
if( in->bv_val[i] != '0' && in->bv_val[i] != '1' ) {
return LDAP_INVALID_SYNTAX;
}
@ -453,6 +462,51 @@ bitStringValidate(
return LDAP_SUCCESS;
}
static int
bitStringNormalize(
Syntax *syntax,
struct berval *val,
struct berval **normalized )
{
/*
* A normalized bitString is has no extaneous (leading) zero bits.
* That is, '00010'B is normalized to '10'B
* However, as a special case, '0'B requires no normalization.
*/
struct berval *newval;
char *p;
/* start at the first bit */
p = &val->bv_val[1];
/* Find the first non-zero bit */
while ( *p == '0' ) p++;
newval = (struct berval *) ch_malloc( sizeof(struct berval) );
if( *p == '\'' ) {
/* no non-zero bits */
newval->bv_val = ch_strdup("\'0\'B");
newval->bv_len = sizeof("\'0\'B") - 1;
goto done;
}
newval->bv_val = ch_malloc( val->bv_len + 1 );
newval->bv_val[0] = '\'';
newval->bv_len = 1;
for( ; *p != '\0'; p++ ) {
newval->bv_val[newval->bv_len++] = *p;
}
newval->bv_val[newval->bv_len] = '\0';
done:
*normalized = newval;
return LDAP_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Handling boolean syntax and matching is quite rigid.
* A more flexible approach would be to allow a variety
@ -4217,7 +4271,7 @@ struct syntax_defs_rec syntax_defs[] = {
{"( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.5 DESC 'Binary' " X_NOT_H_R ")",
SLAP_SYNTAX_BER, berValidate, NULL, NULL},
{"( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6 DESC 'Bit String' )",
0, bitStringValidate, NULL, NULL },
0, bitStringValidate, bitStringNormalize, NULL },
{"( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 DESC 'Boolean' )",
0, booleanValidate, NULL, NULL},
{"( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 DESC 'Certificate' "
@ -4519,7 +4573,7 @@ struct mrule_defs_rec mrule_defs[] = {
"SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6 )",
SLAP_MR_EQUALITY | SLAP_MR_EXT,
NULL, NULL,
bitStringMatch, NULL, NULL,
bitStringMatch, bitStringIndexer, bitStringFilter,
NULL},
{"( 2.5.13.17 NAME 'octetStringMatch' "