mirror of
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git
synced 2025-02-23 14:09:39 +08:00
RFC 3909: LDAP Cancel Operation
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ad0485ea5
commit
275ee6f13d
@ -1,395 +0,0 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT Kurt D. Zeilenga
|
||||
Intended Category: Standard Track OpenLDAP Foundation
|
||||
Expires in six months 25 October 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
LDAP Cancel Operation
|
||||
<draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10.txt>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Status of this Memo
|
||||
|
||||
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all
|
||||
provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
|
||||
|
||||
This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
|
||||
revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as a Standard Track document.
|
||||
Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this
|
||||
document will take place on the IETF LDAP Extensions mailing list
|
||||
<ldapext@ietf.org>. Please send editorial comments directly to the
|
||||
author <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>.
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
|
||||
Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
|
||||
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
|
||||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
||||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
||||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
|
||||
material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''
|
||||
|
||||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||||
<http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt>. The list of
|
||||
Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||||
<http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html>.
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
|
||||
|
||||
Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document
|
||||
for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
This specification describes a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
||||
(LDAP) extended operation to cancel (or abandon) an outstanding
|
||||
operation. Unlike the LDAP Abandon operation but like the X.511
|
||||
Directory Access Protocol (DAP) Abandon operation, this operation has
|
||||
a response which provides an indication of its outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 1]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10 25 Octeboer 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Terminology
|
||||
|
||||
Protocol elements are described using ASN.1 [X.680] with implicit
|
||||
tags. The term "BER-encoded" means the element is to be encoded using
|
||||
the Basic Encoding Rules [X.690] under the restrictions detailed in
|
||||
Section 5.1 of [RFC2251].
|
||||
|
||||
DSA stands for Directory System Agent (or server).
|
||||
DSE stands for DSA-specific Entry.
|
||||
|
||||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||||
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Background and Intent of Use
|
||||
|
||||
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC3377] provides an
|
||||
Abandon operation [RFC2251] which clients may use to cancel other
|
||||
operations. The Abandon operation does not have a response and calls
|
||||
for there to be no response of the abandoned operation. These
|
||||
semantics provide the client with no clear indication of the outcome
|
||||
of the Abandon operation.
|
||||
|
||||
X.511 Directory Access Protocol (DAP) [X.511] provides an Abandon
|
||||
operation which does have a response and also requires the abandoned
|
||||
operation to return a response indicating it was canceled. The LDAP
|
||||
Cancel operation is modeled after the DAP Abandon operation.
|
||||
|
||||
The LDAP Cancel operation SHOULD be used instead of the LDAP Abandon
|
||||
operation when the client needs an indication of the outcome. This
|
||||
operation may be used to cancel both interrogation and update
|
||||
operations.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. Cancel Operation
|
||||
|
||||
The Cancel operation is defined as a LDAP Extended Operation [RFC2251,
|
||||
Section 4.12] identified by the IANA-ASSIGNED-OID. This section
|
||||
details the syntax of the Cancel request and response messages and
|
||||
defines additional LDAP resultCodes.
|
||||
|
||||
cancelRequestValue ::= SEQUENCE {
|
||||
cancelID MessageID
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2.1. Cancel Request
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 2]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10 25 Octeboer 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Cancel request is an ExtendedRequest with the requestName field
|
||||
containing the IANA-ASSIGNED-OID and a requestValue field which
|
||||
contains a BER-encoded cancelRequestValue value. The cancelID field
|
||||
contains the message id associated with the operation to be canceled.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2.2. Cancel Response
|
||||
|
||||
A Cancel response is an ExtendedResponse where the responseName and
|
||||
response fields are absent.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2.3. Additional Result Codes
|
||||
|
||||
Implementations of this specification SHALL recognize the following
|
||||
additional resultCode values:
|
||||
|
||||
canceled (IANA-ASSIGNED-1)
|
||||
noSuchOperation (IANA-ASSIGNED-2)
|
||||
tooLate (IANA-ASSIGNED-3)
|
||||
cannotCancel (IANA-ASSIGNED-4)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3. Operational Semantics
|
||||
|
||||
The function of the Cancel Operation is to request that the server
|
||||
cancel an outstanding operation issued within the same session.
|
||||
|
||||
The client requests the cancelation of an outstanding operation by
|
||||
issuing a Cancel Response with a cancelID set to the message id of the
|
||||
outstanding operation. The Cancel Request itself has a distinct
|
||||
message id. Clients SHOULD NOT request cancelation of an operation
|
||||
multiple times.
|
||||
|
||||
If the server is willing and able to cancel the outstanding operation
|
||||
identified by the cancelId, the server SHALL return a Cancel Response
|
||||
with a success resultCode and the canceled operation SHALL fail with
|
||||
canceled resultCode. Otherwise the Cancel Response SHALL have a
|
||||
non-success resultCode and SHALL NOT have impact upon the outstanding
|
||||
operation (if it exists).
|
||||
|
||||
The protocolError resultCode is returned if the server is unable to
|
||||
parse the requestValue or the requestValue is absent,
|
||||
|
||||
The noSuchOperation resultCode is returned if the server has no
|
||||
knowledge of the operation requested to be canceled.
|
||||
|
||||
The cannotCancel resultCode is returned if the identified operation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 3]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10 25 Octeboer 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
does not support cancelation or the cancel operation could not be
|
||||
performed. The following classes of operations are not cancelable:
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which have no response,
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which create, alter, or destroy authentication and/or
|
||||
authorization associations,
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which establish, alter, or tear-down security services,
|
||||
and
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which abandon or cancel other operations.
|
||||
|
||||
Specifically, the Abandon, Bind, Start TLS [RFC2830], Unbind and
|
||||
Cancel operations are not cancelable.
|
||||
|
||||
The tooLate resultCode is returned to indicate that it is too late to
|
||||
cancel the outstanding operation. For example, the server may return
|
||||
tooLate for a request to cancel an outstanding modify operation which
|
||||
as already committed updates to the underlying data store.
|
||||
|
||||
Servers SHOULD indicate their support for this extended operation by
|
||||
providing IANA-ASSIGNED-OID as a value of the 'supportedExtension'
|
||||
attribute type in their root DSE. A server MAY choose to advertise
|
||||
this extension only when the client is authorized to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4. Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
This operation is intended to allow user to cancel operations they
|
||||
previously issued during the current LDAP association. In certain
|
||||
cases, such as when the Proxy Authorization Control is in use,
|
||||
different outstanding operations may be processed under different LDAP
|
||||
associations. Servers MUST NOT allow a user to cancel an operation
|
||||
belonging to another user.
|
||||
|
||||
Some operations should not be cancelable for security reasons. This
|
||||
specification disallows cancelation of Bind operation and Start TLS
|
||||
extended operation so as to avoid adding complexity to authentication,
|
||||
authorization, and security layer semantics. Designers of future
|
||||
extended operations and/or controls should disallow abandonment and
|
||||
cancelation when appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5. IANA Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
Registration of the following values [RFC3383] is requested.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 4]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10 25 Octeboer 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5.1. Object Identifier
|
||||
|
||||
It is requested that IANA register upon Standards Action an LDAP
|
||||
Object Identifier to identify the LDAP Cancel Operation as defined in
|
||||
this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: Request for LDAP Object Identifier Registration
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments:
|
||||
Identifies the LDAP Cancel Operation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
It is requested that IANA register upon Standards Action the LDAP
|
||||
Protocol Mechanism described in this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
|
||||
Object Identifier: IANA-ASSIGNED-OID
|
||||
Description: LDAP Cancel Operation
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
||||
Usage: Extended Operation
|
||||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments: none
|
||||
in 2
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5.3. LDAP Result Codes
|
||||
|
||||
It is requested that IANA register upon Standards Action the LDAP
|
||||
Result Codes described in this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: LDAP Result Code Registration
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
Result Code Name: canceled
|
||||
Result Code Name: noSuchOperation
|
||||
Result Code Name: tooLate
|
||||
Result Code Name: cannotCancel
|
||||
Specification: RFC XXXX
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments: request four consecutive result codes be assigned
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10 25 Octeboer 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6. Acknowledgment
|
||||
|
||||
The LDAP Cancel operation is modeled after the X.511 DAP Abandon
|
||||
operation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
7. Normative References
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
||||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2251] Wahl, M., T. Howes and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory
|
||||
Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2830] Hodges, J., R. Morgan, and M. Wahl, "Lightweight
|
||||
Directory Access Protocol (v3): Extension for Transport
|
||||
Layer Security", RFC 2830, May 2000.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC3377] Hodges, J. and R. Morgan, "Lightweight Directory Access
|
||||
Protocol (v3): Technical Specification", RFC 3377,
|
||||
September 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
[X.680] International Telecommunication Union -
|
||||
Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract
|
||||
Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic
|
||||
Notation", X.680(1997) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:1998).
|
||||
|
||||
[X.690] International Telecommunication Union -
|
||||
Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Specification
|
||||
of ASN.1 encoding rules: Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
|
||||
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER), and Distinguished
|
||||
Encoding Rules (DER)", X.690(1997) (also ISO/IEC
|
||||
8825-1:1998).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
8. Informative References
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC3383] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP", BCP 64
|
||||
(also RFC 3383), September 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
[X.511] International Telecommunication Union -
|
||||
Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
|
||||
Directory: Abstract Service Definition", X.511(1993).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
9. Author's Address
|
||||
|
||||
Kurt D. Zeilenga
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-cancel-10 25 Octeboer 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
OpenLDAP Foundation
|
||||
<Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Intellectual Property Rights
|
||||
|
||||
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
||||
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain
|
||||
to the implementation or use of the technology described in this
|
||||
document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or
|
||||
might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any
|
||||
effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's
|
||||
procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
|
||||
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
|
||||
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
|
||||
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
|
||||
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary
|
||||
rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained
|
||||
from the IETF Secretariat.
|
||||
|
||||
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
||||
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
||||
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
|
||||
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
|
||||
Director.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Full Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
|
||||
|
||||
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
|
||||
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
|
||||
or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and
|
||||
distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,
|
||||
provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
|
||||
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
|
||||
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
|
||||
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
|
||||
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
|
||||
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
|
||||
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed,
|
||||
or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga LDAP Cancel [Page 7]
|
||||
|
@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ rfc3771.txt LDAP: Intermediate Response Message (PS)
|
||||
rfc3829.txt LDAP Authorization Identity Controls (I)
|
||||
rfc3866.txt Language Tag and Ranges in LDAP (PS)
|
||||
rfc3876.txt Returning Matched Values with LDAP (PS)
|
||||
rfc3909.txt LDAP Cancel Operation (PS)
|
||||
|
||||
Legend:
|
||||
STD Standard
|
||||
|
395
doc/rfc/rfc3909.txt
Normal file
395
doc/rfc/rfc3909.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Network Working Group K. Zeilenga
|
||||
Request for Comments: 3909 OpenLDAP Foundation
|
||||
Category: Standards Track October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
|
||||
Cancel Operation
|
||||
|
||||
Status of this Memo
|
||||
|
||||
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
|
||||
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
|
||||
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
|
||||
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
|
||||
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright Notice
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
This specification describes a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
||||
(LDAP) extended operation to cancel (or abandon) an outstanding
|
||||
operation. Unlike the LDAP Abandon operation, but like the X.511
|
||||
Directory Access Protocol (DAP) Abandon operation, this operation has
|
||||
a response which provides an indication of its outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Background and Intent of Use
|
||||
|
||||
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC3377] provides
|
||||
an Abandon operation [RFC2251] which clients may use to cancel other
|
||||
operations. The Abandon operation does not have a response and
|
||||
requires no response from the abandoned operation. These semantics
|
||||
provide the client with no clear indication of the outcome of the
|
||||
Abandon operation.
|
||||
|
||||
The X.511 Directory Access Protocol (DAP) [X.511] provides an Abandon
|
||||
operation which has a response and also requires the abandoned
|
||||
operation to return a response indicating it was canceled. The LDAP
|
||||
Cancel operation is modeled after the DAP Abandon operation.
|
||||
|
||||
The LDAP Cancel operation SHOULD be used instead of the LDAP Abandon
|
||||
operation when the client needs an indication of the outcome. This
|
||||
operation may be used to cancel both interrogation and update
|
||||
operations.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 1]
|
||||
|
||||
RFC 3909 LDAP Cancel Operation October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Protocol elements are described using ASN.1 [X.680] with implicit
|
||||
tags. The term "BER-encoded" means the element is to be encoded
|
||||
using the Basic Encoding Rules [X.690] under the restrictions
|
||||
detailed in Section 5.1 of [RFC2251].
|
||||
|
||||
DSA stands for Directory System Agent (or server).
|
||||
DSE stands for DSA-specific Entry.
|
||||
|
||||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||||
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].
|
||||
|
||||
2. Cancel Operation
|
||||
|
||||
The Cancel operation is defined as an LDAP Extended Operation
|
||||
[RFC2251, Section 4.12] identified by the object identifier
|
||||
1.3.6.1.1.8. This section details the syntax of the Cancel request
|
||||
and response messages and defines additional LDAP resultCodes.
|
||||
|
||||
2.1. Cancel Request
|
||||
|
||||
The Cancel request is an ExtendedRequest with the requestName field
|
||||
containing 1.3.6.1.1.8 and a requestValue field which contains a
|
||||
BER-encoded cancelRequestValue value.
|
||||
|
||||
cancelRequestValue ::= SEQUENCE {
|
||||
cancelID MessageID
|
||||
-- MessageID is as defined in [RFC2251]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
The cancelID field contains the message ID associated with the
|
||||
operation to be canceled.
|
||||
|
||||
2.2. Cancel Response
|
||||
|
||||
A Cancel response is an ExtendedResponse where the responseName and
|
||||
response fields are absent.
|
||||
|
||||
2.3. Additional Result Codes
|
||||
|
||||
Implementations of this specification SHALL recognize the following
|
||||
additional resultCode values:
|
||||
|
||||
canceled (118)
|
||||
noSuchOperation (119)
|
||||
tooLate (120)
|
||||
cannotCancel (121)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 2]
|
||||
|
||||
RFC 3909 LDAP Cancel Operation October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3. Operational Semantics
|
||||
|
||||
The function of the Cancel Operation is to request that the server
|
||||
cancel an outstanding operation issued within the same session.
|
||||
|
||||
The client requests the cancelation of an outstanding operation by
|
||||
issuing a Cancel Response with a cancelID set to the message ID of
|
||||
the outstanding operation. The Cancel Request itself has a distinct
|
||||
message ID. Clients SHOULD NOT request the cancelation of an
|
||||
operation multiple times.
|
||||
|
||||
If the server is willing and able to cancel the outstanding operation
|
||||
identified by the cancelId, the server SHALL return a Cancel Response
|
||||
with a success resultCode, and the canceled operation SHALL fail with
|
||||
canceled resultCode. Otherwise the Cancel Response SHALL have a
|
||||
non-success resultCode and SHALL NOT have an impact upon the
|
||||
outstanding operation (if it exists).
|
||||
|
||||
The protocolError resultCode is returned if the server is unable to
|
||||
parse the requestValue or the requestValue is absent,
|
||||
|
||||
The noSuchOperation resultCode is returned if the server has no
|
||||
knowledge of the operation requested for cancelation.
|
||||
|
||||
The cannotCancel resultCode is returned if the identified operation
|
||||
does not support cancelation or the cancel operation could not be
|
||||
performed. The following classes of operations are not cancelable:
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which have no response,
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which create, alter, or destroy authentication and/or
|
||||
authorization associations,
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which establish, alter, or tear-down security services,
|
||||
and
|
||||
|
||||
- operations which abandon or cancel other operations.
|
||||
|
||||
Specifically, the Abandon, Bind, Start TLS [RFC2830], Unbind, and
|
||||
Cancel operations are not cancelable.
|
||||
|
||||
The Cancel operation cannot be abandoned.
|
||||
|
||||
The tooLate resultCode is returned to indicate that it is too late to
|
||||
cancel the outstanding operation. For example, the server may return
|
||||
tooLate for a request to cancel an outstanding modify operation which
|
||||
has already committed updates to the underlying data store.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 3]
|
||||
|
||||
RFC 3909 LDAP Cancel Operation October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Servers SHOULD indicate their support for this extended operation by
|
||||
providing 1.3.6.1.1.8 as a value of the 'supportedExtension'
|
||||
attribute type in their root DSE. A server MAY choose to advertise
|
||||
this extension only when the client is authorized to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
This operation is intended to allow a user to cancel operations they
|
||||
previously issued during the current LDAP association. In certain
|
||||
cases, such as when the Proxy Authorization Control is in use,
|
||||
different outstanding operations may be processed under different
|
||||
LDAP associations. Servers MUST NOT allow a user to cancel an
|
||||
operation belonging to another user.
|
||||
|
||||
Some operations should not be cancelable for security reasons. This
|
||||
specification disallows the cancelation of the Bind operation and
|
||||
Start TLS extended operation so as to avoid adding complexity to
|
||||
authentication, authorization, and security layer semantics.
|
||||
Designers of future extended operations and/or controls should
|
||||
disallow abandonment and cancelation when appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
5. IANA Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The following values [RFC3383] have been registered by the IANA.
|
||||
|
||||
5.1. Object Identifier
|
||||
|
||||
The IANA has registered upon Standards Action the LDAP Object
|
||||
Identifier 1.3.6.1.1.8 to identify the LDAP Cancel Operation as
|
||||
defined in this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: Request for LDAP Object Identifier Registration
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
Specification: RFC 3909
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments:
|
||||
Identifies the LDAP Cancel Operation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 4]
|
||||
|
||||
RFC 3909 LDAP Cancel Operation October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
The IANA has registered upon Standards Action the LDAP Protocol
|
||||
Mechanism described in this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
|
||||
Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.1.8
|
||||
Description: LDAP Cancel Operation
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
||||
Usage: Extended Operation
|
||||
Specification: RFC 3909
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
Comments: none
|
||||
|
||||
5.3. LDAP Result Codes
|
||||
|
||||
The IANA has registered upon Standards Action the LDAP Result Codes
|
||||
described in this document.
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: LDAP Result Code Registration
|
||||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||||
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
||||
Result Code Name: canceled (118)
|
||||
Result Code Name: noSuchOperation (119)
|
||||
Result Code Name: tooLate (120)
|
||||
Result Code Name: cannotCancel (121)
|
||||
Specification: RFC 3909
|
||||
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
||||
|
||||
6. Acknowledgment
|
||||
|
||||
The LDAP Cancel operation is modeled after the X.511 DAP Abandon
|
||||
operation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
RFC 3909 LDAP Cancel Operation October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
7. References
|
||||
|
||||
7.1. Normative References
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
||||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2251] Wahl, M., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory
|
||||
Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2830] Hodges, J., Morgan, R., and M. Wahl, "Lightweight
|
||||
Directory Access Protocol (v3): Extension for Transport
|
||||
Layer Security", RFC 2830, May 2000.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC3377] Hodges, J. and R. Morgan, "Lightweight Directory Access
|
||||
Protocol (v3): Technical Specification", RFC 3377,
|
||||
September 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
[X.680] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication
|
||||
Standardization Sector, "Abstract Syntax Notation One
|
||||
(ASN.1) - Specification of Basic Notation", X.680(1997)
|
||||
(also ISO/IEC 8824-1:1998).
|
||||
|
||||
[X.690] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication
|
||||
Standardization Sector, "Specification of ASN.1 encoding
|
||||
rules: Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding
|
||||
Rules (CER), and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)",
|
||||
X.690(1997) (also ISO/IEC 8825-1:1998).
|
||||
|
||||
7.2. Informative References
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC3383] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
|
||||
Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access
|
||||
Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 3383, September 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
[X.511] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication
|
||||
Standardization Sector, "The Directory: Abstract Service
|
||||
Definition", X.511(1993).
|
||||
|
||||
8. Author's Address
|
||||
|
||||
Kurt D. Zeilenga
|
||||
OpenLDAP Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
RFC 3909 LDAP Cancel Operation October 2004
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
9. Full Copyright Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
|
||||
|
||||
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
|
||||
contained in BCP 78, and at www.rfc-editor.org, and except as set
|
||||
forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
|
||||
|
||||
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
|
||||
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
|
||||
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
|
||||
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
|
||||
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
|
||||
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
|
||||
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
||||
|
||||
Intellectual Property
|
||||
|
||||
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
||||
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
|
||||
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
|
||||
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
|
||||
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
|
||||
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
|
||||
on the ISOC's procedures with respect to rights in ISOC Documents can
|
||||
be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
|
||||
|
||||
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
|
||||
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
|
||||
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
|
||||
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
|
||||
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
|
||||
|
||||
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
||||
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
||||
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
|
||||
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
|
||||
ipr@ietf.org.
|
||||
|
||||
Acknowledgement
|
||||
|
||||
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
|
||||
Internet Society.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 7]
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user