fix ITS#3406 - normalize attributes according to MR syntax in MRA filters

This commit is contained in:
Pierangelo Masarati 2005-01-26 21:48:36 +00:00
parent 3dd2f4150b
commit 1b268479c3
2 changed files with 137 additions and 40 deletions

View File

@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
* one attribute, and SEARCH permissions can be checked
* directly.
*/
if( !access_allowed( op, e,
if ( !access_allowed( op, e,
mra->ma_desc, &mra->ma_value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) )
{
return LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS;
@ -191,18 +191,20 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE;
}
for(a = attrs_find( e->e_attrs, mra->ma_desc );
for ( a = attrs_find( e->e_attrs, mra->ma_desc );
a != NULL;
a = attrs_find( a->a_next, mra->ma_desc ) )
{
struct berval *bv;
int normalize_attribute = 0;
#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH
/* Component Matching */
if( mra->ma_cf && mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT ) {
if ( mra->ma_cf && mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT ) {
num_attr_vals = 0;
if ( !a->a_comp_data ) {
for ( ;
a->a_vals[num_attr_vals].bv_val != NULL;
!BER_BVISNULL( &a->a_vals[num_attr_vals] );
num_attr_vals++ )
{
/* empty */;
@ -231,22 +233,25 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
/* If ma_rule is not the same as the attribute's
* normal rule, then we can't use the a_nvals.
*/
if (mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality) {
if ( mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality ) {
bv = a->a_nvals;
} else {
bv = a->a_vals;
normalize_attribute = 1;
}
#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH
i = 0;
#endif
for ( ; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++ ) {
for ( ; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) {
int ret;
int rc;
const char *text;
#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH
if( mra->ma_cf &&
mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT ) {
if ( mra->ma_cf &&
mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT )
{
/* Check if decoded component trees are already linked */
if ( num_attr_vals ) {
a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i] = attr_converter(
@ -262,11 +267,53 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
} else
#endif
{
rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, 0,
bv, &mra->ma_value, &text );
struct berval nbv = BER_BVNULL;
if ( normalize_attribute && mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize ) {
/*
Document: draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol
4.5.1. Search Request
...
If the type field is present and the matchingRule is present,
the matchValue is compared against entry attributes of the
specified type. In this case, the matchingRule MUST be one
suitable for use with the specified type (see [Syntaxes]),
otherwise the filter item is Undefined.
In this case, since the matchingRule requires the assertion
value to be normalized, we normalize the attribute value
according to the syntax of the matchingRule.
This should likely be done inside value_match(), by passing
the appropriate flags, but this is not done at present.
See ITS#3406.
*/
if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize(
SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX,
mra->ma_rule->smr_syntax,
mra->ma_rule,
bv, &nbv, memctx ) != LDAP_SUCCESS )
{
/* FIXME: stop processing? */
continue;
}
if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc;
} else {
nbv = *bv;
}
rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, 0,
&nbv, &mra->ma_value, &text );
if ( nbv.bv_val != bv->bv_val ) {
memfree( nbv.bv_val, memctx );
}
}
if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc;
if ( ret == 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE;
}
}
@ -279,9 +326,10 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
struct berval *bv, value;
const char *text = NULL;
int rc;
int normalize_attribute = 0;
/* check if matching is appropriate */
if ( !mr_usable_with_at( mra->ma_rule, a->a_desc->ad_type )) {
if ( !mr_usable_with_at( mra->ma_rule, a->a_desc->ad_type ) ) {
continue;
}
@ -293,20 +341,21 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
/* check search access */
if ( !access_allowed( op, e,
a->a_desc, &value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) {
a->a_desc, &value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) )
{
memfree( value.bv_val, memctx );
continue;
}
#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH
/* Component Matching */
if( mra->ma_cf &&
mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT)
if ( mra->ma_cf &&
mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT )
{
int ret;
rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, 0,
(struct berval*)a, (void*)mra, &text );
if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) break;
if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) break;
if ( ret == 0 ) {
rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE;
@ -317,19 +366,42 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
#endif
/* check match */
if (mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality) {
if ( mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality ) {
bv = a->a_nvals;
} else {
bv = a->a_vals;
normalize_attribute = 1;
}
for ( ; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++ ) {
for ( ; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) {
int ret;
struct berval nbv = BER_BVNULL;
if ( normalize_attribute && mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize ) {
/* see comment above */
if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize(
SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX,
mra->ma_rule->smr_syntax,
mra->ma_rule,
bv, &nbv, memctx ) != LDAP_SUCCESS )
{
/* FIXME: stop processing? */
continue;
}
} else {
nbv = *bv;
}
rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, 0,
bv, &value, &text );
&nbv, &value, &text );
if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) break;
if ( nbv.bv_val != bv->bv_val ) {
memfree( nbv.bv_val, memctx );
}
if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) break;
if ( ret == 0 ) {
rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE;
@ -378,7 +450,7 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
const char *text = NULL;
/* check if matching is appropriate */
if ( !mr_usable_with_at( mra->ma_rule, ad->ad_type )) {
if ( !mr_usable_with_at( mra->ma_rule, ad->ad_type ) ) {
continue;
}
@ -407,7 +479,7 @@ static int test_mra_filter(
if ( rc == LDAP_SUCCESS && ret == 0 ) rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE;
if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) {
if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) {
ldap_dnfree_x( dn, memctx );
return rc;
}
@ -532,7 +604,7 @@ test_ava_filter(
continue;
}
for ( bv = a->a_nvals; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++ ) {
for ( bv = a->a_nvals; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) {
int ret, match;
const char *text;
@ -721,7 +793,7 @@ test_substrings_filter(
continue;
}
for ( bv = a->a_nvals; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++ ) {
for ( bv = a->a_nvals; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) {
int ret, match;
const char *text;

View File

@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ test_ava_vrFilter(
if( mr == NULL ) continue;
bv = a->a_nvals;
for ( j=0; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++, j++ ) {
for ( j=0; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++, j++ ) {
int rc, match;
const char *text;
@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ test_presence_vrFilter(
if ( !is_ad_subtype( a->a_desc, desc ) ) continue;
for ( bv = a->a_vals, j=0; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++, j++ );
for ( bv = a->a_vals, j = 0; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++, j++ );
memset( (*e_flags)[i], 1, j);
}
@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ test_substrings_vrFilter(
if( mr == NULL ) continue;
bv = a->a_nvals;
for ( j = 0; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++, j++ ) {
for ( j = 0; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++, j++ ) {
int rc, match;
const char *text;
@ -272,8 +272,9 @@ test_mra_vrFilter(
{
int i, j;
for ( i=0; a != NULL; a = a->a_next, i++ ) {
for ( i = 0; a != NULL; a = a->a_next, i++ ) {
struct berval *bv, assertedValue;
int normalize_attribute = 0;
if ( mra->ma_desc ) {
if ( !is_ad_subtype( a->a_desc, mra->ma_desc ) ) {
@ -294,23 +295,47 @@ test_mra_vrFilter(
SLAP_MR_EXT|SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ASSERTION_SYNTAX,
&mra->ma_value, &assertedValue, &text, op->o_tmpmemctx );
if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) continue;
if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) continue;
}
/* check match */
if (mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality) {
if ( mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality ) {
bv = a->a_nvals;
} else {
bv = a->a_vals;
normalize_attribute = 1;
}
for ( j = 0; bv->bv_val != NULL; bv++, j++ ) {
for ( j = 0; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++, j++ ) {
int rc, match;
const char *text;
struct berval nbv = BER_BVNULL;
if ( normalize_attribute && mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize ) {
/* see comment in filterentry.c */
if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize(
SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX,
mra->ma_rule->smr_syntax,
mra->ma_rule,
bv, &nbv, op->o_tmpmemctx ) != LDAP_SUCCESS )
{
/* FIXME: stop processing? */
continue;
}
} else {
nbv = *bv;
}
rc = value_match( &match, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, 0,
bv, &assertedValue, &text );
if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc;
&nbv, &assertedValue, &text );
if ( nbv.bv_val != bv->bv_val ) {
op->o_tmpfree( nbv.bv_val, op->o_tmpmemctx );
}
if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc;
if ( match == 0 ) {
(*e_flags)[i][j] = 1;