2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
|
|
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC ''
|
|
|
|
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
|
|
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc4510 PUBLIC ''
|
|
|
|
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4510.xml'>
|
|
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc4511 PUBLIC ''
|
|
|
|
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4511.xml'>
|
2008-11-05 09:27:23 +08:00
|
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc4512 PUBLIC ''
|
|
|
|
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4512.xml'>
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc4526 PUBLIC ''
|
|
|
|
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4526.xml'>
|
|
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc4529 PUBLIC ''
|
|
|
|
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4529.xml'>
|
|
|
|
]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- $OpenLDAP$ -->
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-19 21:11:57 +08:00
|
|
|
<rfc category="std" ipr="full3978" docName="draft-masarati-ldap-whatfailed-00.txt">
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
|
|
|
|
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
|
|
|
|
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
|
|
|
|
<?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>
|
|
|
|
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<front>
|
|
|
|
<title abbrev='LDAP WHATFAILED'>LDAP "What Failed?" Control</title>
|
|
|
|
<author initials='P.' surname="Masarati" fullname='Pierangelo Masarati'>
|
|
|
|
<organization abbrev='Politecnico di Milano'>
|
|
|
|
Politecnico di Milano
|
|
|
|
</organization>
|
|
|
|
<address>
|
|
|
|
<postal>
|
|
|
|
<street>Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale</street>
|
|
|
|
<street>via La Masa 34</street>
|
|
|
|
<city>Milano</city>
|
|
|
|
<code>20156</code>
|
|
|
|
<country>IT</country>
|
|
|
|
</postal>
|
|
|
|
<phone>+39 02 2399 8309</phone>
|
|
|
|
<facsimile>+39 02 2399 8334</facsimile>
|
|
|
|
<email>ando@OpenLDAP.org</email>
|
|
|
|
<uri>http://www.aero.polimi.it/masarati/</uri>
|
|
|
|
</address>
|
|
|
|
</author>
|
2008-11-19 21:11:57 +08:00
|
|
|
<date/>
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
<abstract>
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
This document describes the LDAP "What Failed?" control.
|
|
|
|
This control allows DUAs to request, in response to a failed operation
|
|
|
|
request, the object identifier of those extensions that caused
|
|
|
|
the operation to fail.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
</abstract>
|
|
|
|
</front>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<middle>
|
|
|
|
<section title="Background and Intended Use">
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
The LDAP Protocol <xref target="RFC4510" /> is extensible.
|
|
|
|
Extensions include controls, extended requests and extensions related
|
|
|
|
to other aspects of the protocol, for example those described in
|
|
|
|
<xref target="RFC4526" />, <xref target="RFC4529" /> and more.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
Operations may fail for different reasons.
|
|
|
|
The resultCode may help in determining the reason of a failure.
|
|
|
|
The (optional) diagnosticsMessage fields of a LDAPResponse
|
|
|
|
could also be of help.
|
|
|
|
However, according to <xref target="RFC4511" />,
|
|
|
|
implementations MUST NOT rely on the returned values,
|
|
|
|
which are simply intended to be presented as are to human users.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
In case of failure related to the inability to process a control
|
|
|
|
marked as critical in a request, the specific resultCode
|
|
|
|
unavailableCriticalExtension is returned.
|
|
|
|
In case of failure related to an unrecognized extendedReq, the generic
|
|
|
|
resultCode protocolError is returned.
|
|
|
|
Failures related to handling other extensions may result
|
|
|
|
in other generic resultCode values.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
As a consequence, DUAs may be unable to exactly determine
|
|
|
|
what extension, if any, caused a failure.
|
|
|
|
The "What Failed?" control represents a means for the DSA to inform
|
|
|
|
DUAs about what specific extensions, if any, caused an error notified
|
|
|
|
by the DSA.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
|
|
|
|
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
|
|
|
|
and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
|
|
|
|
described in <xref target="RFC2119" />.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section title='LDAP "What Failed?" Control'>
|
|
|
|
<section title="Control Semantics">
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
The presence of the "What Failed?" LDAP control in a LDAP request
|
|
|
|
indicates that the DUA, in case of error, wishes to receive detailed
|
|
|
|
information about what extension, if any, caused the error.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
The criticality of the control in the request SHOULD be FALSE.
|
|
|
|
According to the semantics of the criticality field as indicated
|
|
|
|
in <xref target="RFC4511" />, this ensures that in case the control
|
|
|
|
is not recognized by the DSA, it does not cause itself an error.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
The presence of this control in a request does not guarantee that the DSA
|
|
|
|
will return detailed information about what extensions caused an error.
|
|
|
|
Considering the requirement on the criticality of the control,
|
|
|
|
the DSA MAY simply choose to ignore the control.
|
|
|
|
The DSA MAY hide information about failure in handling an extension
|
|
|
|
to prevent disclosure of other information.
|
|
|
|
The DSA MAY choose to notify an error as soon as it is detected,
|
|
|
|
instead of proceed checking its ability to handle any other extension
|
|
|
|
present in a request.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
Implementations may choose to check the validity of extensions,
|
|
|
|
including controls, as soon as they are parsed.
|
|
|
|
As a consequence, a critical control might result in an error
|
|
|
|
before thw "What Failed?" control request is parsed.
|
|
|
|
Implementations SHOULD check anyway the presence of this control,
|
|
|
|
unless they detect that the remaining part of the request
|
|
|
|
is malformed.
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD NOT rely on any specific ordering of controls handling
|
|
|
|
when requesting the "What Failed?" control.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
2008-11-05 09:27:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
Servers implementing this technical specification SHOULD publish
|
|
|
|
the object identifier whatFailed-oid (IANA assigned;
|
|
|
|
see <xref target="iana_considerations" />) as a value
|
|
|
|
of the 'supportedControl' attribute <xref target="RFC4512" />
|
|
|
|
in their root DSE.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section title="Control Request">
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
2008-11-05 09:27:23 +08:00
|
|
|
The controlType is whatFailed-oid (IANA assigned;
|
|
|
|
see <xref target="iana_considerations" />);
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
the controlValue MUST be absent;
|
|
|
|
the criticality SHOULD be FALSE.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section title="Control Response">
|
|
|
|
<figure>
|
|
|
|
<preamble>
|
2008-11-05 09:27:23 +08:00
|
|
|
The controlType is whatFailed-oid (IANA assigned;
|
|
|
|
see <xref target="iana_considerations" />);
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
the controlValue is:
|
|
|
|
</preamble>
|
|
|
|
<artwork>
|
|
|
|
controlValue ::= SET OF oid LDAPOID
|
|
|
|
</artwork>
|
|
|
|
<postamble>
|
|
|
|
If the set of extension OID is empty, the control is omitted
|
|
|
|
from the response.
|
2008-11-03 18:41:05 +08:00
|
|
|
The criticality MUST be FALSE.
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
</postamble>
|
|
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section title="Implementation Notes">
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
The "What Failed?" LDAP Control is implemented in OpenLDAP software
|
|
|
|
using the temporary OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.17 under OpenLDAP's
|
|
|
|
experimental OID arc.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section title="Security Considerations">
|
|
|
|
<t>
|
|
|
|
Implementations MUST take measures to prevent the disclosure
|
|
|
|
of sensible information whenever this may result from disclosing
|
|
|
|
what extension caused an error.
|
|
|
|
This can consist in excluding the OID of specific extensions from
|
|
|
|
the controlValue in the response, or in entirely omitting the control
|
|
|
|
in the response.
|
|
|
|
</t>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-05 09:27:23 +08:00
|
|
|
<section anchor="iana_considerations" title="IANA Considerations">
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
<section title="Object Identifier Registration">
|
|
|
|
<figure>
|
|
|
|
<preamble>
|
|
|
|
It is requested that IANA register upon Standards Action an LDAP
|
|
|
|
Object Identifier for use in this technical specification.
|
|
|
|
</preamble>
|
|
|
|
<artwork>
|
|
|
|
Subject: Request for LDAP OID Registration
|
|
|
|
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
|
|
|
Pierangelo Masarati <ando@OpenLDAP.org>
|
|
|
|
Specification: (I-D)
|
|
|
|
Author/Change Controller: IESG
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
Identifies the LDAP "What Failed?" Control request
|
|
|
|
and response
|
|
|
|
</artwork>
|
|
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section title="Acknowledgments">
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
</middle>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<back>
|
|
|
|
<references title='Normative References'>
|
|
|
|
&rfc2119;
|
|
|
|
&rfc4510;
|
|
|
|
&rfc4511;
|
2008-11-05 09:27:23 +08:00
|
|
|
&rfc4512;
|
2008-11-02 01:20:38 +08:00
|
|
|
</references>
|
|
|
|
<references title='Informative References'>
|
2008-11-01 22:42:39 +08:00
|
|
|
&rfc4526;
|
|
|
|
&rfc4529;
|
|
|
|
</references>
|
|
|
|
</back>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</rfc>
|