2002-06-13 11:59:10 +08:00
|
|
|
.TH SLAPD-SQL 5 "RELEASEDATE" "OpenLDAP LDVERSION"
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.\" $OpenLDAP$
|
|
|
|
.SH NAME
|
|
|
|
slapd-sql \- SQL backend to slapd
|
|
|
|
.SH SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
ETCDIR/slapd.conf
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH DESCRIPTION
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
The primary purpose of this backend (8) to
|
|
|
|
.BR slapd (8)
|
|
|
|
is to PRESENT information stored in some RDBMS as an LDAP subtree
|
|
|
|
without any programming (some SQL and maybe stored procedures can't be
|
|
|
|
considered programming, anyway ;).
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
That is, for example, when you (some ISP) have account information you
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
use in an RDBMS, and want to use modern solutions that expect such
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
information in LDAP (to authenticate users, make email lookups etc.).
|
|
|
|
Or you want to synchronize or distribute information between different
|
|
|
|
sites/applications that use RDBMSes and/or LDAP.
|
|
|
|
Or whatever else...
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
It is NOT designed as a general-purpose backend that uses RDBMS instead
|
|
|
|
of BerkeleyDB (as the standard BDB backend does), though it can be
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
used as such with several limitations.
|
|
|
|
You can take a look at
|
|
|
|
.B http://www.openldap.org/faq/index.cgi?file=378
|
|
|
|
(OpenLDAP FAQ-O-Matic/General LDAP FAQ/Directories vs. conventional
|
|
|
|
databases) to find out more on this point.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
The idea (detailed below) is to use some metainformation to translate
|
|
|
|
LDAP queries to SQL queries, leaving relational schema untouched, so
|
|
|
|
that old applications can continue using it without any
|
|
|
|
modifications.
|
|
|
|
This allows SQL and LDAP applications to inter-operate without
|
|
|
|
replication, and exchange data as needed.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
The SQL backend is designed to be tunable to virtually any relational
|
|
|
|
schema without having to change source (through that metainformation
|
|
|
|
mentioned).
|
|
|
|
Also, it uses ODBC to connect to RDBMSes, and is highly configurable
|
|
|
|
for SQL dialects RDBMSes may use, so it may be used for integration
|
|
|
|
and distribution of data on different RDBMSes, OSes, hosts etc., in
|
|
|
|
other words, in highly heterogeneous environment.
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH CONFIGURATION
|
|
|
|
These
|
|
|
|
.B slapd.conf
|
|
|
|
options apply to the SQL backend database.
|
|
|
|
That is, they must follow a "database sql" line and come before any
|
|
|
|
subsequent "backend" or "database" lines.
|
|
|
|
Other database options are described in the
|
|
|
|
.BR slapd.conf (5)
|
|
|
|
manual page.
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B dbname <datasource name>
|
|
|
|
The name of the ODBC datasource to use.
|
2002-05-03 00:35:16 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
.B dbhost <hostname>
|
2002-05-03 00:35:16 +08:00
|
|
|
.br
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
.B dbuser <username>
|
2002-05-03 00:35:16 +08:00
|
|
|
.br
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
.B dbpasswd <password>
|
2002-05-03 00:35:16 +08:00
|
|
|
.RS
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
These three options are generally unneeded, because this information is already
|
|
|
|
taken from the datasource.
|
|
|
|
Use them if you need to override datasource settings.
|
|
|
|
Also, several RDBMS' drivers tend to require explicit passing of user/password,
|
|
|
|
even if those are given in datasource.
|
2002-05-03 00:35:16 +08:00
|
|
|
.RE
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B subtree_cond <SQL expression>
|
|
|
|
Specifies a where-clause template used to form a subtree search condition.
|
|
|
|
It may differ from one SQL dialect to another (see samples).
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B oc_query <SQL expression>
|
|
|
|
The default is
|
|
|
|
.B "SELECT id, name, keytbl, keycol, create_proc, delete_proc, expect_return FROM ldap_oc_mappings"
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B at_query <SQL expression>
|
|
|
|
The default is
|
|
|
|
.B "SELECT name, sel_expr, from_tbls, join_where, add_proc, delete_proc, param_order, expect_return FROM ldap_attr_mappings WHERE oc_map_id=?"
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B insentry_query <SQL expression>
|
|
|
|
The default is
|
|
|
|
.B "INSERT INTO ldap_entries (dn, oc_map_id, parent, keyval) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)"
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B delentry_query <SQL expression>
|
|
|
|
The default is
|
|
|
|
.B "DELETE FROM ldap_entries WHERE id=?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These four options specify SQL query templates for loading schema mapping
|
|
|
|
metainformation,
|
|
|
|
adding and deleting entries to ldap_entries, etc.
|
|
|
|
All these and subtree_cond should have the given default values.
|
|
|
|
For the current value it is recommended to look at the sources,
|
|
|
|
or in the log output when slapd starts with "-d 5" or greater.
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
.B upper_func <SQL function name>
|
|
|
|
Specifies the name of a function that converts a given value to uppercase.
|
|
|
|
This is used for CIS matching when the RDBMS is case sensitive.
|
|
|
|
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH METAINFORMATION USED
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Almost everything mentioned later is illustrated in examples located
|
|
|
|
in the
|
|
|
|
.B slapd/back-sql/rdbms_depend/
|
|
|
|
directory in the OpenLDAP source tree, and contains scripts for
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
generating sample database for Oracle, MS SQL Server and mySQL.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The first thing that one must arrange is what set of LDAP
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
object classes can present your RDBMS information.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
The easiest way is to create an objectclass for each entity you had in
|
|
|
|
ER-diagram when designing your relational schema.
|
|
|
|
Any relational schema, no matter how normalized it is, was designed
|
|
|
|
after some model of your application's domain (for instance, accounts,
|
|
|
|
services etc. in ISP), and is used in terms of its entities, not just
|
|
|
|
tables of normalized schema.
|
|
|
|
It means that for every attribute of every such instance there is an
|
|
|
|
effective SQL query that loads its values.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
Also you might want your object classes to conform to some of the standard
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
schemas like inetOrgPerson etc.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless, when you think it out, we must define a way to translate
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
LDAP operation requests to (a series of) SQL queries.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Let us deal with the SEARCH operation.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
Let's suppose that we store information about persons working in our
|
|
|
|
organization in two tables:
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
2002-05-03 00:35:16 +08:00
|
|
|
PERSONS PHONES
|
|
|
|
---------- -------------
|
|
|
|
id integer id integer
|
|
|
|
first_name varchar pers_id integer references persons(id)
|
|
|
|
last_name varchar phone
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
middle_name varchar
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
(PHONES contains telephone numbers associated with persons).
|
|
|
|
A person can have several numbers, then PHONES contains several
|
|
|
|
records with corresponding pers_id, or no numbers (and no records in
|
|
|
|
PHONES with such pers_id).
|
|
|
|
An LDAP objectclass to present such information could look like this:
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
person
|
|
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
MUST cn
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
MAY telephoneNumber $ firstName $ lastName
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
To fetch all values for cn attribute given person ID, we construct the
|
|
|
|
query:
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
SELECT CONCAT(persons.first_name,' ',persons.last_name)
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
AS cn FROM persons WHERE persons.id=?
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
for telephoneNumber we can use:
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
SELECT phones.phone AS telephoneNumber FROM persons,phones
|
|
|
|
WHERE persons.id=phones.pers.id AND persons.id=?
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
If we wanted to service LDAP requests with filters like
|
|
|
|
(telephoneNumber=123*), we would construct something like:
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
SELECT ... FROM persons,phones
|
|
|
|
WHERE persons.id=phones.pers.id
|
|
|
|
AND persons.id=?
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
AND phones.phone like '123%'
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
So, if we had information about what tables contain values for each
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
attribute, how to join these tables and arrange these values, we could
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
try to automatically generate such statements, and translate search
|
|
|
|
filters to SQL WHERE clauses.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
To store such information, we add three more tables to our schema
|
|
|
|
and fill it with data (see samples):
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
ldap_oc_mappings (some columns are not listed for clarity)
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
id=1
|
|
|
|
name="person"
|
|
|
|
keytbl="persons"
|
|
|
|
keycol="id"
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
This table defines a mapping between objectclass (its name held in the
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
"name" column), and a table that holds the primary key for corresponding
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
entities.
|
|
|
|
For instance, in our example, the person entity, which we are trying
|
|
|
|
to present as "person" objectclass, resides in two tables (persons and
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
phones), and is identified by the persons.id column (that we will call
|
|
|
|
the primary key for this entity).
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Keytbl and keycol thus contain "persons" (name of the table), and "id"
|
|
|
|
(name of the column).
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
ldap_attr_mappings (some columns are not listed for clarity)
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
id=1
|
|
|
|
oc_id=1
|
|
|
|
name="cn"
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
sel_expr="CONCAT(persons.first_name,' ',persons.last_name)"
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
from_tbls="persons"
|
|
|
|
join_where=NULL
|
|
|
|
************
|
|
|
|
id=<n>
|
|
|
|
oc_map_id=1
|
|
|
|
name="telephoneNumber"
|
|
|
|
sel_expr="phones.phone"
|
|
|
|
from_tbls="persons,phones"
|
|
|
|
join_where="phones.pers_id=persons.id"
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
This table defines mappings between LDAP attributes and SQL queries
|
|
|
|
that load their values.
|
|
|
|
Note that, unlike LDAP schema, these are not
|
|
|
|
.B attribute types
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
- the attribute "cn" for "person" objectclass can
|
|
|
|
have its values in different tables than "cn" for some other objectclass,
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
so attribute mappings depend on objectclass mappings (unlike attribute
|
|
|
|
types in LDAP schema, which are indifferent to objectclasses).
|
|
|
|
Thus, we have oc_map_id column with link to oc_mappings table.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
Now we cut the SQL query that loads values for a given attribute into 3 parts.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
First goes into sel_expr column - this is the expression we had
|
|
|
|
between SELECT and FROM keywords, which defines WHAT to load.
|
|
|
|
Next is table list - text between FROM and WHERE keywords.
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
It may contain aliases for convenience (see examples).
|
|
|
|
The last is part of the where clause, which (if it exists at all) expresses the
|
|
|
|
condition for joining the table containing values with the table
|
|
|
|
containing the primary key (foreign key equality and such).
|
|
|
|
If values are in the same table as the primary key, then this column is
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
left NULL (as for cn attribute above).
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Having this information in parts, we are able to not only construct
|
|
|
|
queries that load attribute values by id of entry (for this we could
|
|
|
|
store SQL query as a whole), but to construct queries that load id's
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
of objects that correspond to a given search filter (or at least part of
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
it).
|
|
|
|
See below for examples.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
ldap_entries
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
id=1
|
|
|
|
dn=<dn you choose>
|
|
|
|
oc_map_id=...
|
|
|
|
parent=<parent record id>
|
|
|
|
keyval=<value of primary key>
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
This table defines mappings between DNs of entries in your LDAP tree,
|
|
|
|
and values of primary keys for corresponding relational data.
|
|
|
|
It has recursive structure (parent column references id column of the
|
|
|
|
same table), which allows you to add any tree structure(s) to your
|
|
|
|
flat relational data.
|
|
|
|
Having id of objectclass mapping, we can determine table and column
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
for primary key, and keyval stores value of it, thus defining the exact
|
|
|
|
tuple corresponding to the LDAP entry with this DN.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Note that such design (see exact SQL table creation query) implies one
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
important constraint - the key must be an integer.
|
|
|
|
But all that I know about well-designed schemas makes me think that it's
|
|
|
|
not very narrow ;) If anyone needs support for different types for
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
keys - he may want to write a patch, and submit it to OpenLDAP ITS,
|
|
|
|
then I'll include it.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Also, several people complained that they don't really need very
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
structured trees, and they don't want to update one more table every
|
|
|
|
time they add or delete an instance in the relational schema.
|
|
|
|
Those people can use a view instead of a real table for ldap_entries, something
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
like this (by Robin Elfrink):
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
CREATE VIEW ldap_entries (id, dn, oc_map_id, parent, keyval)
|
|
|
|
AS SELECT (1000000000+userid),
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
UPPER(CONCAT(CONCAT('cn=',gecos),',o=MyCompany,c=NL')),
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
1, 0, userid FROM unixusers UNION
|
|
|
|
SELECT (2000000000+groupnummer),
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
UPPER(CONCAT(CONCAT('cn=',groupnaam),',o=MyCompany,c=NL')),
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
2, 0, groupnummer FROM groups;
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH Typical SQL backend operation
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Having metainformation loaded, the SQL backend uses these tables to
|
|
|
|
determine a set of primary keys of candidates (depending on search
|
|
|
|
scope and filter).
|
|
|
|
It tries to do it for each objectclass registered in ldap_objclasses.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
for our query with filter (telephoneNumber=123*) we would get the following
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
query generated (which loads candidate IDs)
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
SELECT ldap_entries.id,persons.id, 'person' AS objectClass,
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
ldap_entries.dn AS dn
|
|
|
|
FROM ldap_entries,persons,phones
|
|
|
|
WHERE persons.id=ldap_entries.keyval
|
|
|
|
AND ldap_entries.objclass=?
|
|
|
|
AND ldap_entries.parent=?
|
|
|
|
AND phones.pers_id=persons.id
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
AND (phones.phone LIKE '123%')
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
(for ONELEVEL search)
|
|
|
|
or "... AND dn=?" (for BASE search)
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
or "... AND dn LIKE '%?'" (for SUBTREE)
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
Then, for each candidate, we load the requested attributes using
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
per-attribute queries like
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
|
|
SELECT phones.phone AS telephoneNumber
|
|
|
|
FROM persons,phones
|
|
|
|
WHERE persons.id=? AND phones.pers_id=persons.id
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
Then, we use test_filter() from the frontend API to test the entry for a full
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
LDAP search filter match (since we cannot effectively make sense of
|
|
|
|
SYNTAX of corresponding LDAP schema attribute, we translate the filter
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
into the most relaxed SQL condition to filter candidates), and send it to
|
|
|
|
the user.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
ADD, DELETE, MODIFY operations are also performed on per-attribute
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
metainformation (add_proc etc.).
|
|
|
|
In those fields one can specify an SQL statement or stored procedure
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
call which can add, or delete given values of a given attribute, using
|
|
|
|
the given entry keyval (see examples -- mostly ORACLE and MSSQL - since
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
there're no stored procs in mySQL).
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
We just add more columns to oc_mappings and attr_mappings, holding
|
|
|
|
statements to execute (like create_proc, add_proc, del_proc etc.), and
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
flags governing the order of parameters passed to those statements.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Please see samples to find out what are the parameters passed, and other
|
|
|
|
information on this matter - they are self-explanatory for those familiar
|
|
|
|
with concept expressed above.
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH common techniques (referrals, multiclassing etc.)
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
First of all, lets remember that among other major differences to the
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
complete LDAP data model, the concept above does not directly support
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
such things as multiple objectclasses per entry, and referrals.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Fortunately, they are easy to adopt in this scheme.
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The SQL backend suggests two more tables being added to the schema -
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
ldap_entry_objectclasses(entry_id,oc_name), and
|
|
|
|
ldap_referrals(entry_id,url).
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The first contains any number of objectclass names that corresponding
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
entries will be found by, in addition to that mentioned in
|
|
|
|
mapping.
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The SQL backend automatically adds attribute mapping for the "objectclass"
|
|
|
|
attribute to each objectclass mapping that loads values from this table.
|
|
|
|
So, you may, for instance, have a mapping for inetOrgPerson, and use it
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
for queries for "person" objectclass...
|
|
|
|
.LP
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The second table contains any number of referrals associated with a given entry.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
The SQL backend automatically adds attribute mapping for "ref" attribute
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
to each objectclass mapping that loads values from this table.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
So, if you add objectclass "referral" to this entry, and make one or
|
|
|
|
more tuples in ldap_referrals for this entry (they will be seen as
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
values of "ref" attribute), you will have slapd return a referral, as
|
|
|
|
described in the Administrators Guide.
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.LP
|
|
|
|
.SH EXAMPLES
|
|
|
|
There are example SQL modules in the slapd/back-sql/rdbms_depend/
|
2002-05-02 04:24:56 +08:00
|
|
|
directory in the OpenLDAP source tree.
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH FILES
|
2002-05-09 10:07:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.TP
|
2002-05-02 00:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
ETCDIR/slapd.conf
|
2002-05-09 10:07:41 +08:00
|
|
|
default slapd configuration file
|
2002-04-30 04:24:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.SH SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
.BR slapd.conf (5),
|
|
|
|
.BR slapd (8).
|