H. Peter Anvin (Intel) 9df075595e Restore the ability to have ? in identifiers, except ? itself ... ? in identifiers turns out to be used in the field even in non-TASM mode. Resolve this by allowing it in an identifier still, but treat '?' by itself the same as we would a keyword, meaning that it needs to be separated from other identifier characters. In other words: a ? b : c ; conditional expression a?b:c ; seg:off expression seg = a?b, off = c Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>		2018-12-14 00:57:05 -08:00
..
alloc.c	Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/nasm-2.14.xx'	2018-12-13 16:43:43 -08:00
alloc.h
asprintf.c	strlist: can be unique or not, add printf functions	2018-12-13 22:48:14 -08:00
badenum.c
bsi.c
crc64.c
errfile.c	Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/nasm-2.14.xx'	2018-12-13 16:43:43 -08:00
file.c
file.h
filename.c
hashtbl.c	hashtbl: fix errors in hash_iterate() and hash_free()	2018-12-14 00:10:15 -08:00
ilog2.c
md5c.c
mmap.c
nctype.c	Restore the ability to have ? in identifiers, except ? itself	2018-12-14 00:57:05 -08:00
path.c
perfhash.c
perfhash.pl
raa.c
rbtree.c
readnum.c	warnings: define warning classes at point of use	2018-12-13 21:53:31 -08:00
realpath.c
saa.c
string.c
strlist.c	Define and use offsetin() instead of offsetof()	2018-12-14 00:27:59 -08:00
ver.c
zerobuf.c