nasm/include
H. Peter Anvin 75f2c1e131 Put in a comment that nasm_delete isn't side effect safe
I have not figured out a way to make nasm_delete() side effect safe
without using compiler-specific hacks, which would defeat the whole
purpose.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2017-01-24 12:42:37 -08:00
..
compiler.h If we have new features introduced by C11, use them 2016-12-20 02:29:58 -08:00
disp8.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
hashtbl.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
iflag.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
insns.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
labels.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
md5.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
nasm.h Allow relative references to external symbols in data 2016-10-31 08:44:25 -07:00
nasmint.h nasmint.h: change header guards to NASM_NASMINT_H 2016-10-04 18:11:57 -07:00
nasmlib.h Put in a comment that nasm_delete isn't side effect safe 2017-01-24 12:42:37 -08:00
opflags.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
raa.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
rbtree.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
rdoff.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
saa.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00
strlist.h Factor out common string list handling code 2016-10-04 01:12:28 -07:00
tables.h Handle multiple standard macro sets sanely 2016-07-13 14:23:48 -07:00
ver.h Reorganize the source code into subdirectories 2016-05-25 12:06:29 -07:00