The implicit operand size override code didn't set the operand size
prefix, which confused the size calculation code for the range check.
The BITS 64 operand size calculation is still off, but "fixing" it by
making it 32-bit unless REX.W is set breaks PUSH and maybe others.
reloc_value returns 64bit numbers but we strip it down
to 'int' which causes problems if the former value is
big enough to overflow 'int'. Fix it.
[ BR3104312 ]
Reported-by: Christian Masloch
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
In case if relocations number exceed 16bit values
we have to hande such case by a special way, as described
in COFF specification.
"IMAGE_SCN_LNK_NRELOC_OVFL indicates that the count of
relocations for the section exceeds the 16 bits that are
reserved for it in the section header. If the bit is set
and the NumberOfRelocations field in the section header
is 0xffff, the actual relocation count is stored in the
32-bit VirtualAddress field of the first relocation. It
is an error if IMAGE_SCN_LNK_NRELOC_OVFL is set and
there are fewer than 0xffff relocations in the section."
[ BR3092924 ]
Reported-by: Robert Yates
Investigated-by: nasm64developer
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Actually it's temporary action. We have to support more
relocations then that but it requires some more code rework.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Michael proposed to run
| sed -i -e '/^.PHONY: all/s/$/ test/' Makefile.in
since we have test/ directory. Good idea.
Reported-by: Michael Sterrett
Patch-by: Michael Sterrett
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
This is a backport of commits
8dcbbd7af0d6d07b455de0b6460dca6db6113553
575d4289c9b1fb47774cb79764a24899a69a8d52
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
As being pointed by "matching braces" topic on
[ http://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=905.0 ]
we don't issue warning on missed match for "{"
brace opened.
Strictly speaking we should issue error instead and
force user to fix asm source code but since it's
here for a long time already -- lets be "admissive".
Reported-by: Klod
CC: Frank Kotler <fbkotler@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
We could have accessed malloc'ed data on external symbols
in obj and ieee output formats. Fix it by using nasm_zalloc.
Reported-by: Jiri Malak
Patch-by: Jiri Malak
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
If we're to print inside %rep block we should find
out which %macro it belongs.
Reported-by: Rob Neff
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
As being pointed by "matching braces" topic on
[ http://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=905.0 ]
we don't issue warning on missed match for "{"
brace opened.
Strictly speaking we should issue error instead and
force user to fix asm source code but since it's
here for a long time already -- lets be "admissive".
Reported-by: Klod
CC: Frank Kotler <fbkotler@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
In mmacro params head TOK_NUM should be concat'ed with
tail TOK_NUM only, otherwise the weird construction like
%define id1 1
%define idid1 2
%define TOK_NUM 1
%define TOK_ID id
%macro m 2
mov eax, 1%1id%2 ; this expands to 1idid1
; where idid1 expands to 2
; and then to 12
%endmacro
m TOK_ID, TOK_NUM
issue error.
N.B. I've checked nasm-0.98.39 and it compiles this macro
perfectly well, for the record.
Reported-by: nasm64developer@users.sf.net
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
We could have accessed malloc'ed data on external symbols
in obj and ieee output formats. Fix it by using nasm_zalloc.
Reported-by: Jiri Malak
Patch-by: Jiri Malak
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
During nasm-2.06 development we broke the rules for
concatenation of preprocessor tokens (d784a083a3f1).
The former candidates for concatenation were (in terms of RE)
expand_smacro
[(TOK_ID|TOK_PREPROC_ID)][(TOK_ID|TOK_PREPROC_ID|TOK_NUMBER)]
expand_mmac_params
[(TOK_ID|TOK_NUMBER|TOK_FLOAT)][(TOK_ID|TOK_NUMBER|TOK_FLOAT|TOK_OTHER)]
[ nb: review commits ec88c1beac00 , 20a94ad7fe41 and 984279b1dde9 if
you going to change this one ]
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
If we're to print inside %rep block we should find
out which %macro it belongs.
Reported-by: Rob Neff
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
read_input() shouldn't be part of the phash.ph module; instead it
should go into the sample usage file phash.pl.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
It seems to be a bit long story for the reason if this bug. But
lets be verbose and describe all byte-to-byte. And it is all about
preprocessor code, in particular paste_tokens and expand_mmac_params.
Initially the problem (not the same but similar) was noticed and
fixed in commit ec88c1be. The problem reveals itself with code snippets
like
| %macro m 1
| %push
| %define %$arg %1
| %%top_%$arg:
| resb ($ - %%top_%$arg)
| %pop
| %endmacro
So with commits ec88c1be, 51fd86e0, 1f6741fc, 985d880c we did expand
local single macro before processing tokens pasting unconditionally.
But then it being found that such approach breaks %assign directive.
The snippets like below didn't work
| %macro m 1
| %push
| %assign %$arg %1
| %assign %$arg %1+%$arg
| %pop
| %endmacro
So all these commits were reverted and we just stop pasting tokens
in paste_tokens() after TOK_PREPROC_ID (commit 20a94ad7). Unfortunately
this breaks %assign with compound preproc id
| %macro m3 1
| %push
| %assign %$_uses 0
| %rep 4
| %assign %$_ur%$_uses %$_uses
| mov ecx, %$_ur%$_uses
| %assign %$_uses %$_uses+1
| %endrep
| %pop
| %endmacro
To fix this bug we have to combine two approaches at once,
we should continue pasting after TOK_PREPROC_ID and expand
sequential TOK_PREPROC_IDs except first one.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
