The input file is provided by nasm_error(), we should not include it
in the printf list (compiler warning + wrong message.)
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
External symbols are defined via deflabel(), but deflabel() is not
called until pass0 == 1. Until that happens, segbase has no way to
know what the proper segment base of the segment actually is.
Thus, testing for pass0 == 0 will always fail for a forward reference;
correct the test to test for pass0 < 2, i.e. the assert should fail
only for the final code-generation pass.
Reported-by: <stsp@list.ru>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
When we are running regression tests we compare binary
forms and the strings better to be the constants to not
trigger false positives.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
If no output filename is specified, then a default filename is used
based on the input filename. If that ends up the *same* as the input
filename, change the output filename to "nasm.out".
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
readnum returns 64bit number which may become
a negative integer upon conversion which in
turn lead to out of bound array access.
Fix it by explicit conversion with bounds check
| POC6:2: error: parameter count `2222222222' is out of bounds [0; 2147483647]
https://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392528
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
* nasm-2.14.xx:
preproc: command-line preproc directive after system-generated
gorcunov@: Had to fix include_path StrList conversion,
it is a bit ugly by now, will rework.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
* commit '9a1216a1efa0ccb48e5df97acc763ea3de71e0ce':
NASM 2.14
nasmdoc.src: fix compound word
doc: Add a description for a useful case of mangling symbols
preproc: Don't access out of bound data on malformed input
rdstrnum: Make sure we dont shift out of bound
preproc: Fix out of bound access on malformed input
doc: Clarify %include search directory semantics
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
BR 3392527: make sure that all command-line specified preprocessing
directives are processed after the system-generated ones. In
particular __OUTPUT_FORMAT__ was generated after command line pass 2,
at which point -p, -d, -u, --pragma and --before had already been
processed.
There is no reason to split up defined_macros() anymore: the right
place to execute it is simply between command line passes 1 and 2. We
can also set dfmt here, which lets us define a __DEBUG_FORMAT__ macro
as well.
Finally move some options that have no business being processed in
pass 2 to pass 1.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>