docs: Windows DLLs and headers.

* doc/libtool.texi (Platform quirks): Add new subsection
'Windows DLLs'.

Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Rosin 2010-11-01 10:10:36 +01:00
parent a1f6254415
commit 7a6ca6e694
2 changed files with 199 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
2010-11-01 Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>
docs: Windows DLLs and headers.
* doc/libtool.texi (Platform quirks): Add new subsection
'Windows DLLs'.
* doc/libtool.texi (Platform quirks): Fix typo.
2010-10-30 Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>

View File

@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ Platform quirks
* Archivers:: Programs that create static archives.
* Cross compiling:: Issues that arise when cross compiling.
* File name conversion:: Converting file names between platforms.
* Windows DLLs:: Windows header defines.
@end detailmenu
@end menu
@ -5775,6 +5776,7 @@ write your own.
* Archivers:: Programs that create static archives.
* Cross compiling:: Issues that arise when cross compiling.
* File name conversion:: Converting file names between platforms.
* Windows DLLs:: Windows header defines.
@end menu
@node References
@ -6328,6 +6330,199 @@ the source or build directory trees, and all @option{-M*} options to
This is quite a fragile setup, but it has been in historical use, and so is
documented here.
@node Windows DLLs
@subsection Windows DLLs
@cindex Windows DLLs
This topic describes a couple of ways to portably create Windows Dynamic
Link Libraries (DLLs). Libtool knows how to create DLLs using GNU tools
and using Microsoft tools.
A typical library has a ``hidden'' implementation with an interface
described in a header file. On just about every system, the interface
could be something like this:
Example @file{foo.h}:
@example
#ifndef FOO_H
#define FOO_H
int one (void);
int two (void);
extern int three;
#endif /* FOO_H */
@end example
@noindent
And the implementation could be something like this:
Example @file{foo.c}:
@example
#include "foo.h"
int one (void)
@{
return 1;
@}
int two (void)
@{
return three - one ();
@}
int three = 3;
@end example
When using contemporary GNU tools to create the Windows DLL, the above
code will work there too, thanks to its auto-import/auto-export
features. But that is not the case when using older GNU tools or perhaps
more interestingly when using proprietary tools. In those cases the code
will need additional decorations on the interface symbols with
@code{__declspec(dllimport)} and @code{__declspec(dllexport)} depending
on whether the library is built or it's consumed and how it's built and
consumed. However, it should be noted that it would have worked also
with Microsoft tools, if only the variable @code{three} hadn't been
there, due to the fact the Microsoft tools will automatically import
functions (but sadly not variables) and Libtool will automatically export
non-static symbols as described next.
With Microsoft tools, Libtool digs through the object files that make up
the library, looking for non-static symbols to automatically export.
I.e., Libtool with Microsoft tools tries to mimic the auto-export feature
of contemporary GNU tools. It should be noted that the GNU auto-export
feature is turned off when an explicit @code{__declspec(dllexport)} is
seen. The GNU tools do this to not make more symbols visible for projects
that have already taken the trouble to decorate symbols. There is no
similar way to limit which symbols are visible in the code when Libtool
is using Microsoft tools. In order to limit symbol visibility in that
case you need to use one of the options @option{-export-symbols} or
@option{-export-symbols-regex}.
No matching help with auto-import is provided by Libtool, which is why
variables must be decorated to import them from a DLL for everything but
contemporary GNU tools. As stated above, functions are automatically
imported by both contemporary GNU tools and Microsoft tools, but for
other proprietary tools the auto-import status of functions is unknown.
When the objects that form the library are built, there are generally
two copies built for each object. One copy is used when linking the DLL
and one copy is used for the static library. On Windows systems, a pair
of defines are commonly used to discriminate how the interface symbols
should be decorated. The first define is @samp{-DDLL_EXPORT} which is
automatically provided by Libtool when @command{libtool} builds the copy
of the object that is destined for the DLL. The second define is
@samp{-DLIBFOO_BUILD} (or similar) which is often added by the package
providing the library and is used when building the library, but not
when consuming the library.
However, the matching double compile is not performed when consuming
libraries. It is therefore not possible to reliably distinguish if the
consumer is importing from a DLL or if it is going to use a static
library.
With contemporary GNU tools, auto-import often saves the day, but see
the GNU ld documentation and its @option{--enable-auto-import} option
for some corner cases when it does not
(@pxref{Options, @option{--enable-auto-import}, Options specific to
i386 PE targets, ld, Using ld@comma{} the GNU linker}).
With Microsoft tools you typically get away with always compiling the
code such that variables are expected to be imported from a DLL and
functions are expected to be found in a static library. The tools will
then automatically import the function from a DLL if that is where they
are found. If the variables are not imported from a DLL as expected, but
are found in a static library that is otherwise pulled in by some
function, the linker will issue a warning (LNK4217) that a locally
defined symbol is imported, but it still works. In other words, this
scheme will not work to only consume variables from a library. There is
also a price connected to this liberal use of imports in that an extra
indirection is introduced when you are consuming the static version of
the library. That extra indirection is unavoidable when the DLL is
consumed, but it is not needed when consuming the static library.
For older GNU tools and other proprietary tools there is no generic way
to make it possible to consume either of the DLL or the static library
without user intervention, the tools need to be told what is intended.
One common assumption is that if a DLL is being built (@samp{DLL_EXPORT}
is defined) then that DLL is going to consume any dependent libraries as
DLLs. If that assumption is made everywhere, it is possible to select
how an end-user application is consuming libraries by adding a single
flag @samp{-DDLL_EXPORT} when a DLL build is required. This is of course
an all or nothing deal, either everything as DLLs or everything as static
libraries.
To sum up the above, the header file of the foo library needs to be
changed into something like this:
Modified @file{foo.h}:
@example
#ifndef FOO_H
#define FOO_H
#if defined _WIN32 && !defined __GNUC__
# ifdef LIBFOO_BUILD
# ifdef DLL_EXPORT
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE __declspec (dllexport)
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR extern __declspec (dllexport)
# endif
# elif defined _MSC_VER
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR extern __declspec (dllimport)
# elif defined DLL_EXPORT
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE __declspec (dllimport)
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR extern __declspec (dllimport)
# endif
#endif
#ifndef LIBFOO_SCOPE
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR extern
#endif
LIBFOO_SCOPE int one (void);
LIBFOO_SCOPE int two (void);
LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR int three;
#endif /* FOO_H */
@end example
When the targets are limited to contemporary GNU tools and Microsoft
tools, the above can be simplified to the following:
Simplified @file{foo.h}:
@example
#ifndef FOO_H
#define FOO_H
#if defined _WIN32 && !defined __GNUC__ && !defined LIBFOO_BUILD
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR extern __declspec (dllimport)
#else
# define LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR extern
#endif
int one (void);
int two (void);
LIBFOO_SCOPE_VAR int three;
#endif /* FOO_H */
@end example
This last simplified version can of course only work when Libtool is
used to build the DLL, as no symbols would be exported otherwise (i.e.,
when using Microsoft tools).
It should be noted that there are various projects that attempt to relax
these requirements by various low level tricks, but they are not
discussed here.
Examples are
@uref{http://alain.frisch.fr/@/flexdll.html, FlexDLL} and
@uref{http://edll.sourceforge.net/, edll}.
@node libtool script contents
@section @code{libtool} script contents
@cindex implementation of libtool