From 8a815198bf935092191c4150dd65749af2b5db89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:02:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] (__sigwait): The return value semantics for sigtimedwait is different. Rework the return value handling and don't pass in an siginfo variable. --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigwait.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigwait.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigwait.c index 522359e1da..39cc3e9750 100644 --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigwait.c +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigwait.c @@ -36,15 +36,20 @@ __sigwait (set, sig) const sigset_t *set; int *sig; { - siginfo_t info; int ret; /* XXX The size argument hopefully will have to be changed to the real size of the user-level sigset_t. */ + /* XXX INLINE_SYSCALL_NOERROR candiate. */ ret = INLINE_SYSCALL (rt_sigtimedwait, 4, CHECK_SIGSET (set), - CHECK_1 (&info), NULL, _NSIG / 8); - if (ret == 0) - *sig = info.si_signo; + NULL, NULL, _NSIG / 8); + if (ret != -1) + { + *sig = ret; + ret = 0; + } + else + ret = errno; return ret; }