mirror of
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2024-12-21 08:03:41 +08:00
861bb6c1b0
From-SVN: r14764
145 lines
6.1 KiB
Plaintext
145 lines
6.1 KiB
Plaintext
The purpose of GCC pretesting is to verify that the new GCC
|
||
distribution, about to be released, works properly on your system *with
|
||
no change whatever*, when installed following the precise
|
||
recommendations that come with the distribution.
|
||
|
||
Here are some guidelines on how to do pretesting so as to make it
|
||
helpful. All of them follow from common sense together with the
|
||
nature of the purpose and the situation.
|
||
|
||
* It is absolutely vital that you mention even the smallest change or
|
||
departure from the standard sources and installation procedure.
|
||
|
||
Otherwise, you are not testing the same program that I wrote. Testing
|
||
a different program is usually of no use whatever. It can even cause
|
||
trouble if you fail to tell me that you tested some other program
|
||
instead of what I know as GCC. I might think that GCC works, when in
|
||
fact it has not been properly tried, and might have a glaring fault.
|
||
|
||
* Even changing the compilation options counts as a change in the
|
||
program. The GCC sources specify which compilation options to use.
|
||
Some of them are specified in makefiles, and some in machine-specific
|
||
configuration files.
|
||
|
||
You have ways to override this--but if you do, then you are not
|
||
testing what ordinary users will do. Therefore, when pretesting, it
|
||
is vital to test with the default compilation options.
|
||
|
||
(It is okay to test with nonstandard options as well as testing with
|
||
the standard ones.)
|
||
|
||
* The machine and system configuration files of GCC are parts of
|
||
GCC. So when you test GCC, you need to do it with the
|
||
configuration files that come with GCC.
|
||
|
||
If GCC does not come with configuration files for a certain machine,
|
||
and you test it with configuration files that don't come with GCC,
|
||
this is effectively changing GCC. Because the crucial fact about
|
||
the planned release is that, without changes, it doesn't work on that
|
||
machine.
|
||
|
||
To make GCC work on that machine, I would need to install new
|
||
configuration files. That is not out of the question, since it is
|
||
safe--it certainly won't break any other machines that already work.
|
||
But you will have to rush me the legal papers to give the FSF
|
||
permission to use a large piece of text.
|
||
|
||
* Look for recommendations for your system.
|
||
|
||
You can find these recommendations in the Installation node of the
|
||
manual, and in the file INSTALL. (These two files have the same text.)
|
||
|
||
These files say which configuration name to use for your machine, so
|
||
use the ones that are recommended. If you guess, you might guess
|
||
wrong and encounter spurious difficulties. What's more, if you don't
|
||
follow the recommendations then you aren't helping to test that its
|
||
recommendations are valid.
|
||
|
||
These files may describe other things that you need to do to make GCC
|
||
work on your machine. If so, you should follow these recommendations
|
||
also, for the same reason.
|
||
|
||
Also look at the Trouble chapter of the manual for items that
|
||
pertain to your machine.
|
||
|
||
* Don't delay sending information.
|
||
|
||
When you find a problem, please double check it if you can do so
|
||
quickly. But don't spend a long time double-checking. A good rule is
|
||
always to tell me about every problem on the same day you encounter
|
||
it, even if that means you can't find a solution before you report the
|
||
problem.
|
||
|
||
I'd much rather hear about a problem today and a solution tomorrow
|
||
than get both of them tomorrow at the same time.
|
||
|
||
* Make each bug report self-contained.
|
||
|
||
If you refer back to another message, whether from you or from someone
|
||
else, then it will be necessary for anyone who wants to investigate
|
||
the bug to find the other message. This may be difficult, it is
|
||
probably time-consuming.
|
||
|
||
To help me save time, simply copy the relevant parts of any previous
|
||
messages into your own bug report.
|
||
|
||
In particular, if I ask you for more information because a bug report
|
||
was incomplete, it is best to send me the *entire* collection of
|
||
relevant information, all together. If you send just the additional
|
||
information, that makes me do extra work. There is even a risk that
|
||
I won't remember what question you are sending me the answer to.
|
||
|
||
* Always be precise when talking about changes you have made. Show
|
||
things rather than describing them. Use exact filenames (relative to
|
||
the main directory of the distribution), not partial ones. For
|
||
example, say "I changed Makefile" rather than "I changed the
|
||
makefile". Instead of saying "I defined the MUMBLE macro", send a
|
||
diff that shows your change.
|
||
|
||
* Always use `diff -c' to make diffs. If you don't include context,
|
||
it may be hard for me to figure out where you propose to make the
|
||
changes. I might have to ignore your patch because I can't tell what
|
||
it means.
|
||
|
||
* When you write a fix, keep in mind that I can't install a change
|
||
that would break other systems.
|
||
|
||
People often suggest fixing a problem by changing machine-independent
|
||
files such as toplev.c to do something special that a particular
|
||
system needs. Sometimes it is totally obvious that such changes would
|
||
break GCC for almost all users. I can't possibly make a change like
|
||
that. All I can do is send it back to you and ask you to find a fix
|
||
that is safe to install.
|
||
|
||
Sometimes people send fixes that *might* be an improvement in
|
||
general--but it is hard to be sure of this. I can install such
|
||
changes some of the time, but not during pretest, when I am trying to
|
||
get a new version to work reliably as quickly as possible.
|
||
|
||
The safest changes for me to install are changes to the configuration
|
||
files for a particular machine. At least I know those can't create
|
||
bugs on other machines.
|
||
|
||
* Don't try changing GCC unless it fails to work if you don't change it.
|
||
|
||
* Don't even suggest changes that would only make GCC cleaner.
|
||
Every change I install could introduce a bug, so I won't install
|
||
a change unless I see it is necessary.
|
||
|
||
* If you would like to suggest changes for purposes other than fixing
|
||
serious bugs, don't wait till pretest time. Instead, send them just
|
||
after I make a release. That's the best time for me to install them.
|
||
|
||
* In some cases, if you don't follow these guidelines, your
|
||
information might still be useful, but I might have to do more work to
|
||
make use of it. Unfortunately, I am so far behind in my work that I
|
||
just can't get the job done unless you help me to do it efficiently.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Thank you
|
||
rms
|
||
|
||
Local Variables:
|
||
mode: text
|
||
End:
|