gcc/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/TODO
Phil Edwards b00378457a Makefile.am (doxygen-maint): The script isn't executable in CVS.
2001-11-23  Phil Edwards  <pme@gcc.gnu.org>

	* Makefile.am (doxygen-maint):  The script isn't executable in CVS.
	* Makefile.in:  Regenerated.
	* docs/doxygen/TODO:  New file listing doxygen work to be done.
	* docs/doxygen/run_doxygen:  Fix up man pages.
	* docs/doxygen/user.cfg.in:  Insert maint-only toggles.
	* docs/doxygen/maint.cfg.in:  Copy from user.cfg and turn toggles on.
	* include/bits/stl_construct.h:  Use new hooks for internal functions.

	* docs/html/17_intro/TODO:  Small updates.
	* docs/html/faq/index.html:  Likewise.
	* docs/html/faq/index.txt:  Regenerated.

	* include/bits/stl_alloc.h:  Doxygenate, reindent comments, remove
	SGI-isms and wrappers.
	(simple_alloc, debug_alloc):  Uglify class names.
	(__default_alloc_template):  Uglify "threads" template parameter and
	update corresponding macros.
	* include/backward/alloc.h:  Bring up to date.

From-SVN: r47296
2001-11-24 03:28:27 +00:00

53 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext

The approach I've been using for a given header is to recursively do each
of the "bits" headers which make up the standard header. So, e.g., while
there are five headers making up <algorithm>, three of them were already
documented in the course of doing other headers.
"Untouched" means I've deliberately skipped it for various reasons, or
haven't gotten to it yet. It /will/ be done (by somebody, eventually.)
Area Still needs to be doxygen-documented
-----------------------------------------------------------
c17 FINISHED (Nothing in Clause 17 "exists" in terms of code.)
c18 <limits>, Note A
c19 Note A
c20 std_memory.h[20.4], rel_ops (should they be doc'd?), Note A
c21 Untouched, Note B
c22 Untouched
c23 See doxygroups.cc and Note B.
stl_alloc.h, stl_uninitialized.h remain from the common files.
c24 Untouched
c25 stl_tempbuf.h (small), stl_algo.h (big)
c26 <complex>, <valarray>, stl_numeric.h[26.4], Note A
c27 Untouched
backward/ Not scanned by doxygen. Should it be?
ext/ Untouched
__gnu_cxx Extensions such as verbose_terminate_handler are documented
but do not appear in output, since the __gnu_cxx namespace is
itself undocumented. Should it be? Eeeeeeehhh...
[1.3.5] "implementation-defined behavior: behavior ... that depends
on the implementation *and that each implementation shall
document*." [my emphasis] Not all implementation choices
have been thus described; doxygen is not necessarily the
appropriate place for such descriptions, either.
-----------------------------------------------------------
NOTES:
A) So far I have not tried to document any of the <c*> headers. So entities
such as atexit() are undocumented throughout the library.
B) Huge chunks of containers and strings are described in common "Tables"
in the standard. How to reproduce this information?
vim:ts=4:et: