Tom de Vries 1554556312 [libatomic] Add nvptx support ... Add nvptx support to libatomic. Given that atomic_test_and_set is not implemented for nvptx (PR96964), the compiler translates __atomic_test_and_set falling back onto the "Failing all else, assume a single threaded environment and simply perform the operation" case in expand_atomic_test_and_set, so it doesn't map onto an actual atomic operation. Still, that counts as supported for the configure test of libatomic, so we end up with HAVE_ATOMIC_TAS_1/2/4/8/16 == 1, and the corresponding __atomic_test_and_set_1/2/4/8/16 in libatomic all using that non-atomic implementation. Fix this by adding an atomic_test_and_set expansion for nvptx, that uses libatomics __atomic_test_and_set_1. This again makes the configure tests for HAVE_ATOMIC_TAS_1/2/4/8/16 fail, so instead we use this case in tas_n.c: ... /* If this type is smaller than word-sized, fall back to a word-sized compare-and-swap loop. */ bool SIZE(libat_test_and_set) (UTYPE *mptr, int smodel) ... which for __atomic_test_and_set_8 uses INVERT_MASK_8. Add INVERT_MASK_8 in libatomic_i.h, as well as MASK_8. Tested libatomic testsuite on nvptx. gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/96964 * config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_expand "atomic_test_and_set"): New expansion. libatomic/ChangeLog: PR target/96898 * configure.tgt: Add nvptx. * libatomic_i.h (MASK_8, INVERT_MASK_8): New macro definition. * config/nvptx/host-config.h: New file. * config/nvptx/lock.c: New file.		2020-09-11 12:06:15 +02:00
..
host-config.h
lock.c