re PR libgcj/5696 (natClass.cc run through superclasses of target if they exist while comparing variable types.)

Fix for PR libgcj/5696:
	* verify.cc (is_assignable_from_slow): Never call
	_Jv_IsAssignableFrom.
	(verify_instructions_0): Added new debug statement.
	(state::print): Print information about whether local has
	changed.
	(state::merge): Don't call note_variable when merging locals.
	(state::set_exception): Removed old FIXME comment.

From-SVN: r49886
This commit is contained in:
Tom Tromey 2002-02-20 03:16:30 +00:00 committed by Tom Tromey
parent c964d90e21
commit e4e35417f9
2 changed files with 23 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
2002-02-19 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Fix for PR libgcj/5696:
* verify.cc (is_assignable_from_slow): Never call
_Jv_IsAssignableFrom.
(verify_instructions_0): Added new debug statement.
(state::print): Print information about whether local has
changed.
(state::merge): Don't call note_variable when merging locals.
(state::set_exception): Removed old FIXME comment.
2002-02-18 Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
* java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc (bind): Call setsockopt to

View File

@ -231,9 +231,6 @@ private:
if (target->isPrimitive () || source->isPrimitive ())
return false;
// Check array case first because we can have an array whose
// component type is not prepared; _Jv_IsAssignableFrom
// doesn't handle this correctly.
if (target->isArray ())
{
if (! source->isArray ())
@ -241,11 +238,6 @@ private:
target = target->getComponentType ();
source = source->getComponentType ();
}
// _Jv_IsAssignableFrom can handle a target which is an
// interface even if it hasn't been prepared.
else if ((target->state > JV_STATE_LINKED || target->isInterface ())
&& source->state > JV_STATE_LINKED)
return _Jv_IsAssignableFrom (target, source);
else if (target->isInterface ())
{
for (int i = 0; i < source->interface_count; ++i)
@ -912,8 +904,6 @@ private:
stack[0] = t;
for (int i = stacktop; i < max_stack; ++i)
stack[i] = unsuitable_type;
// FIXME: subroutine handling?
}
// Modify this state to reflect entry into a subroutine.
@ -982,8 +972,14 @@ private:
{
if (locals[i].merge (state_old->locals[i], true, verifier))
{
// Note that we don't call `note_variable' here.
// This change doesn't represent a real change to a
// local, but rather a merge artifact. If we're in
// a subroutine which is called with two
// incompatible types in a slot that is unused by
// the subroutine, then we don't want to mark that
// variable as having been modified.
changed = true;
note_variable (i);
}
}
@ -1072,7 +1068,10 @@ private:
debug_print (".");
debug_print (" [local] ");
for (i = 0; i < max_locals; ++i)
locals[i].print ();
{
locals[i].print ();
debug_print (local_changed[i] ? "+" : " ");
}
if (subroutine == 0)
debug_print (" | None");
else
@ -2055,6 +2054,7 @@ private:
verify_fail ("can't happen: saw state::INVALID");
if (PC == state::NO_NEXT)
break;
debug_print ("== State pop from pending list\n");
// Set up the current state.
current_state->copy (states[PC], current_method->max_stack,
current_method->max_locals);