re PR tree-optimization/17533 (cc1plus crashes on libmudflap test case, verify_dominators())

2004-09-23  Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/17533
	* dominance.c (verify_dominators): Tolerate even more incorrect
	dominance data during error message printing.
	* tree-mudflap.c (mf_build_check_statement_for): Build basic blocks
	and edges more correctly.

From-SVN: r87954
This commit is contained in:
Frank Ch. Eigler 2004-09-23 15:47:59 +00:00 committed by Frank Ch. Eigler
parent 7ccf35ed17
commit df485d8007
3 changed files with 35 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
2004-09-23 Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/17533
* dominance.c (verify_dominators): Tolerate even more incorrect
dominance data during error message printing.
* tree-mudflap.c (mf_build_check_statement_for): Build basic blocks
and edges more correctly.
2004-09-23 Dorit Naishlos <dorit@il.ibm.com>
* tree.def (ALIGN_INDIRECT_REF, MISALIGNED_INDIRECT_REF):

View File

@ -829,16 +829,17 @@ verify_dominators (enum cdi_direction dir)
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
{
basic_block dom_bb;
basic_block imm_bb;
dom_bb = recount_dominator (dir, bb);
if (dom_bb != get_immediate_dominator (dir, bb))
imm_bb = get_immediate_dominator (dir, bb);
if (dom_bb != imm_bb)
{
if (dom_bb == NULL)
error ("dominator of %d should be (unknown), not %d",
bb->index, get_immediate_dominator(dir, bb)->index);
if ((dom_bb == NULL) || (imm_bb == NULL))
error ("dominator of %d status unknown", bb->index);
else
error ("dominator of %d should be %d, not %d",
bb->index, dom_bb->index, get_immediate_dominator(dir, bb)->index);
bb->index, dom_bb->index, imm_bb->index);
err = 1;
}
}

View File

@ -508,25 +508,42 @@ mf_build_check_statement_for (tree addr, tree size,
bsi_prev (&bsi);
if (! bsi_end_p (bsi))
{
/* We're processing a statement in the middle of the block, so
we need to split the block. This creates a new block and a new
fallthrough edge. */
e = split_block (cond_bb, bsi_stmt (bsi));
cond_bb = e->src;
join_bb = e->dest;
}
else
{
/* We're processing the first statement in the block, so we need
to split the incoming edge. This also creates a new block
and a new fallthrough edge. */
join_bb = cond_bb;
cond_bb = create_empty_bb (join_bb->prev_bb);
e = make_edge (cond_bb, join_bb, 0);
cond_bb = split_edge (find_edge (join_bb->prev_bb, join_bb));
}
e->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
/* A recap at this point: join_bb is the basic block at whose head
is the gimple statement for which this check expression is being
built. cond_bb is the new synthetic basic block which will
contain the cache-lookup code, and a conditional that jumps to
the cache-miss code or, much more likely, over to join_bb. */
/* Create the bb that contains the cache-miss fallback block (mf_check). */
then_bb = create_empty_bb (cond_bb);
make_edge (cond_bb, then_bb, EDGE_TRUE_VALUE);
make_edge (then_bb, join_bb, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
make_single_succ_edge (then_bb, join_bb, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
/* We expect that the conditional jump we will construct will not
be taken very often as it basically is an exception condition. */
predict_edge_def (then_bb->pred, PRED_MUDFLAP, NOT_TAKEN);
/* Mark the pseudo-fallthrough edge from cond_bb to join_bb. */
e = find_edge (cond_bb, join_bb);
e->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
predict_edge_def (e, PRED_MUDFLAP, TAKEN);
/* Update dominance info. Note that bb_join's data was
updated by split_block. */
if (dom_computed[CDI_DOMINATORS] >= DOM_CONS_OK)