mirror of
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2024-12-12 09:20:33 +08:00
c++: Fix up maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated calls [PR114580]
When looking at maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated for the trivial infinite loops patch, I've noticed that it can emit weird diagnostics for if constexpr in templates, first warn that std::is_constant_evaluted() always evaluates to false (because the function template is not constexpr) and then during instantiation warn that std::is_constant_evaluted() always evaluates to true (because it is used in if constexpr condition). Now, only the latter is actually true, even when the if constexpr is in a non-constexpr function, it will still always evaluate to true. So, the following patch fixes it to call maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated always with IF_STMT_CONSTEXPR_P (if_stmt) as the second argument rather than true if it is if constexpr with non-dependent condition etc. 2024-04-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/114580 * semantics.cc (finish_if_stmt_cond): Call maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated with IF_STMT_CONSTEXPR_P (if_stmt) as the second argument, rather than true/false depending on if it is if constexpr with non-dependent constant expression with bool type. * g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated15.C: New test.
This commit is contained in:
parent
64aa48ced0
commit
cfed80b9e4
@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ tree
|
|||||||
finish_if_stmt_cond (tree orig_cond, tree if_stmt)
|
finish_if_stmt_cond (tree orig_cond, tree if_stmt)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
tree cond = maybe_convert_cond (orig_cond);
|
tree cond = maybe_convert_cond (orig_cond);
|
||||||
|
maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated (cond, IF_STMT_CONSTEXPR_P (if_stmt));
|
||||||
if (IF_STMT_CONSTEXPR_P (if_stmt)
|
if (IF_STMT_CONSTEXPR_P (if_stmt)
|
||||||
&& !type_dependent_expression_p (cond)
|
&& !type_dependent_expression_p (cond)
|
||||||
&& require_constant_expression (cond)
|
&& require_constant_expression (cond)
|
||||||
@ -1134,16 +1135,11 @@ finish_if_stmt_cond (tree orig_cond, tree if_stmt)
|
|||||||
converted to bool. */
|
converted to bool. */
|
||||||
&& TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (cond)) == boolean_type_node)
|
&& TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (cond)) == boolean_type_node)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated (cond, /*constexpr_if=*/true);
|
|
||||||
cond = instantiate_non_dependent_expr (cond);
|
cond = instantiate_non_dependent_expr (cond);
|
||||||
cond = cxx_constant_value (cond);
|
cond = cxx_constant_value (cond);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else
|
else if (processing_template_decl)
|
||||||
{
|
cond = orig_cond;
|
||||||
maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated (cond, /*constexpr_if=*/false);
|
|
||||||
if (processing_template_decl)
|
|
||||||
cond = orig_cond;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
finish_cond (&IF_COND (if_stmt), cond);
|
finish_cond (&IF_COND (if_stmt), cond);
|
||||||
add_stmt (if_stmt);
|
add_stmt (if_stmt);
|
||||||
THEN_CLAUSE (if_stmt) = push_stmt_list ();
|
THEN_CLAUSE (if_stmt) = push_stmt_list ();
|
||||||
|
28
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated15.C
Normal file
28
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated15.C
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|||||||
|
// PR c++/114580
|
||||||
|
// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
|
||||||
|
// { dg-options "-Wtautological-compare" }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
namespace std {
|
||||||
|
constexpr inline bool
|
||||||
|
is_constant_evaluated () noexcept
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
#if __cpp_if_consteval >= 202106L
|
||||||
|
if consteval { return true; } else { return false; }
|
||||||
|
#else
|
||||||
|
return __builtin_is_constant_evaluated ();
|
||||||
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
template <typename T>
|
||||||
|
void foo ()
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
if constexpr ((T) std::is_constant_evaluated ()) // { dg-warning "'std::is_constant_evaluated' always evaluates to true in 'if constexpr'" }
|
||||||
|
; // { dg-bogus "'std::is_constant_evaluated' always evaluates to false in a non-'constexpr' function" }
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
void
|
||||||
|
bar ()
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
foo <bool> ();
|
||||||
|
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user