mirror of
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2025-03-07 13:29:16 +08:00
verify.cc (type::compatible): Check initialization status first.
* verify.cc (type::compatible): Check initialization status first. * interpret.cc (run) [insn_invokespecial, invokespecial_resolved]: Don't use NULLCHECK. From-SVN: r59494
This commit is contained in:
parent
32f0ffb380
commit
b0fbe966b1
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
||||
2002-11-25 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* verify.cc (type::compatible): Check initialization status
|
||||
first.
|
||||
* interpret.cc (run) [insn_invokespecial, invokespecial_resolved]:
|
||||
Don't use NULLCHECK.
|
||||
|
||||
2002-11-23 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* javax/naming/AuthenticationException.java: Update copyright header.
|
||||
|
@ -2795,7 +2795,10 @@ _Jv_InterpMethod::run (void *retp, ffi_raw *args)
|
||||
|
||||
sp -= rmeth->stack_item_count;
|
||||
|
||||
NULLCHECK (sp[0].o);
|
||||
// We don't use NULLCHECK here because we can't rely on that
|
||||
// working for <init>. So instead we do an explicit test.
|
||||
if (! sp[0].o)
|
||||
throw new java::lang::NullPointerException;
|
||||
|
||||
fun = (void (*)()) rmeth->method->ncode;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2813,7 +2816,10 @@ _Jv_InterpMethod::run (void *retp, ffi_raw *args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rmeth = (_Jv_ResolvedMethod *) AVAL ();
|
||||
sp -= rmeth->stack_item_count;
|
||||
NULLCHECK (sp[0].o);
|
||||
// We don't use NULLCHECK here because we can't rely on that
|
||||
// working for <init>. So instead we do an explicit test.
|
||||
if (! sp[0].o)
|
||||
throw new java::lang::NullPointerException;
|
||||
fun = (void (*)()) rmeth->method->ncode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
goto perform_invoke;
|
||||
|
@ -458,8 +458,12 @@ private:
|
||||
if (key < reference_type || k.key < reference_type)
|
||||
return key == k.key;
|
||||
|
||||
// An initialized type and an uninitialized type are not
|
||||
// compatible.
|
||||
if (isinitialized () != k.isinitialized ())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// The `null' type is convertible to any reference type.
|
||||
// FIXME: is this correct for THIS?
|
||||
if (key == null_type || k.key == null_type)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -469,11 +473,6 @@ private:
|
||||
&& data.klass == &java::lang::Object::class$)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// An initialized type and an uninitialized type are not
|
||||
// compatible.
|
||||
if (isinitialized () != k.isinitialized ())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Two uninitialized objects are compatible if either:
|
||||
// * The PCs are identical, or
|
||||
// * One PC is UNINIT.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user