mirror of
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2024-12-19 18:19:53 +08:00
loop.c (loop_insn_first_p, [...]): New functions.
* loop.c (loop_insn_first_p, biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset): New functions. (maybe_eliminate_biv_1): Use biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset. From-SVN: r25167
This commit is contained in:
J"orn Rennecke
Joern Rennecke
parent
354a5b0721
commit
a6207a2b7e
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
||||
Fri Feb 12 18:29:11 1999 J"orn Rennecke <amylaar@cygnus.co.uk>
|
||||
|
||||
* loop.c (loop_insn_first_p, biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset):
|
||||
New functions.
|
||||
(maybe_eliminate_biv_1): Use biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset.
|
||||
|
||||
Fri Feb 12 16:56:10 1999 J"orn Rennecke <amylaar@cygnus.co.uk>
|
||||
|
||||
* loop.c (load_mems): Don't guess how to do a load / store, use
|
||||
|
||||
120
gcc/loop.c
120
gcc/loop.c
@ -375,7 +375,12 @@ static void instrument_loop_bct PROTO((rtx, rtx, rtx));
|
||||
int indirect_jump_in_function = 0;
|
||||
static int indirect_jump_in_function_p PROTO((rtx));
|
||||
|
||||
static int compute_luids PROTO ((rtx, rtx, int));
|
||||
static int compute_luids PROTO((rtx, rtx, int));
|
||||
|
||||
static int loop_insn_first_p PROTO((rtx, rtx));
|
||||
|
||||
static int biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset PROTO((struct induction *,
|
||||
struct induction *, rtx));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Relative gain of eliminating various kinds of operations. */
|
||||
static int add_cost;
|
||||
@ -8078,6 +8083,59 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv (bl, loop_start, end, eliminate_p, threshold, insn_count)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* INSN and REFERENCE are instructions in the same insn chain.
|
||||
Return non-zero if INSN is first.
|
||||
This is like insn_first_p, except that we use the luid information if
|
||||
available. */
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
loop_insn_first_p (insn, reference)
|
||||
rtx insn, reference;
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ((INSN_UID (insn) < max_uid_for_loop
|
||||
&& INSN_UID (reference) < max_uid_for_loop)
|
||||
? INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (reference)
|
||||
: insn_first_p (insn, reference));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We are trying to eliminate BIV in INSN using GIV. Return non-zero if
|
||||
the offset that we have to take into account due to auto-increment /
|
||||
div derivation is zero. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (biv, giv, insn)
|
||||
struct induction *biv, *giv;
|
||||
rtx insn;
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we'd have to adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to make this possible. */
|
||||
if (giv->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((loop_insn_first_p (giv->insn, insn)
|
||||
&& loop_insn_first_p (insn, biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (loop_insn_first_p (biv->insn, insn)
|
||||
&& loop_insn_first_p (insn, giv->insn))))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the giv V was derived from another giv, and INSN does
|
||||
not occur between the giv insn and the biv insn, then we'd
|
||||
have to adjust the value used here. This is rare, so we don't
|
||||
bother to make this possible. */
|
||||
if (giv->derived_from
|
||||
&& ! (giv->always_executed
|
||||
&& loop_insn_first_p (giv->insn, insn)
|
||||
&& loop_insn_first_p (insn, biv->insn)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (giv->same
|
||||
&& giv->same->derived_from
|
||||
&& ! (giv->same->always_executed
|
||||
&& loop_insn_first_p (giv->same->insn, insn)
|
||||
&& loop_insn_first_p (insn, biv->insn)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If BL appears in X (part of the pattern of INSN), see if we can
|
||||
eliminate its use. If so, return 1. If not, return 0.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -8143,15 +8201,7 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv_1 (x, insn, bl, eliminate_p, where)
|
||||
&& v->mode == mode
|
||||
&& 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we must adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to do so. */
|
||||
if (v->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((INSN_LUID (v->insn) < INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (INSN_LUID (v->insn) > INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) > INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))))
|
||||
if (! biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (bl->biv, v, insn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (! eliminate_p)
|
||||
@ -8186,15 +8236,7 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv_1 (x, insn, bl, eliminate_p, where)
|
||||
|| (GET_CODE (v->add_val) == REG
|
||||
&& REGNO_POINTER_FLAG (REGNO (v->add_val)))))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we must adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to do so. */
|
||||
if (v->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((INSN_LUID (v->insn) < INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (INSN_LUID (v->insn) > INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) > INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))))
|
||||
if (! biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (bl->biv, v, insn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (! eliminate_p)
|
||||
@ -8259,15 +8301,7 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv_1 (x, insn, bl, eliminate_p, where)
|
||||
&& ! v->ignore && ! v->maybe_dead && v->always_computable
|
||||
&& v->mode == mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we must adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to do so. */
|
||||
if (v->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((INSN_LUID (v->insn) < INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (INSN_LUID (v->insn) > INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) > INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))))
|
||||
if (! biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (bl->biv, v, insn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (! eliminate_p)
|
||||
@ -8310,15 +8344,7 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv_1 (x, insn, bl, eliminate_p, where)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rtx tem;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we must adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to do so. */
|
||||
if (v->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((INSN_LUID (v->insn) < INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (INSN_LUID (v->insn) > INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) > INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))))
|
||||
if (! biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (bl->biv, v, insn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (! eliminate_p)
|
||||
@ -8354,15 +8380,7 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv_1 (x, insn, bl, eliminate_p, where)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rtx tem;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we must adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to do so. */
|
||||
if (v->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((INSN_LUID (v->insn) < INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (INSN_LUID (v->insn) > INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) > INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))))
|
||||
if (! biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (bl->biv, v, insn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (! eliminate_p)
|
||||
@ -8416,15 +8434,7 @@ maybe_eliminate_biv_1 (x, insn, bl, eliminate_p, where)
|
||||
&& rtx_equal_p (tv->add_val, v->add_val)
|
||||
&& tv->mode == mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If the giv V had the auto-inc address optimization applied
|
||||
to it, and INSN occurs between the giv insn and the biv
|
||||
insn, then we must adjust the value used here.
|
||||
This is rare, so we don't bother to do so. */
|
||||
if (v->auto_inc_opt
|
||||
&& ((INSN_LUID (v->insn) < INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) < INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))
|
||||
|| (INSN_LUID (v->insn) > INSN_LUID (insn)
|
||||
&& INSN_LUID (insn) > INSN_LUID (bl->biv->insn))))
|
||||
if (! biv_elimination_giv_has_0_offset (bl->biv, v, insn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (! eliminate_p)
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user