mirror of
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2024-12-31 00:25:49 +08:00
except.c (current_function_has_exception_handlers): New.
* except.c (current_function_has_exception_handlers): New. * except.h: Declare it. * sibcall.c (optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_call): Use it. Combine tests that disable all sibcalls for the function. From-SVN: r51054
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed4fbfa016
commit
93f82d6080
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
||||
2002-03-19 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* except.c (current_function_has_exception_handlers): New.
|
||||
* except.h: Declare it.
|
||||
* sibcall.c (optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_call): Use it.
|
||||
Combine tests that disable all sibcalls for the function.
|
||||
|
||||
2002-03-19 Olivier Hainque <hainque@act-europe.fr>
|
||||
|
||||
* varasm.c (output_constant_def): Don't call ENCODE_SECTION_INFO
|
||||
|
17
gcc/except.c
17
gcc/except.c
@ -1401,6 +1401,23 @@ find_exception_handler_labels ()
|
||||
exception_handler_labels = list;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
current_function_has_exception_handlers ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = cfun->eh->last_region_number; i > 0; --i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct eh_region *region = cfun->eh->region_array[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (! region || region->region_number != i)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (region->type != ERT_THROW)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct eh_region *
|
||||
duplicate_eh_region_1 (o, map)
|
||||
|
@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ extern void maybe_remove_eh_handler PARAMS ((rtx));
|
||||
extern void convert_from_eh_region_ranges PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
extern void convert_to_eh_region_ranges PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
extern void find_exception_handler_labels PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
extern bool current_function_has_exception_handlers PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
extern void output_function_exception_table PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
|
||||
extern void expand_builtin_unwind_init PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
|
@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_calls ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
rtx insn, insns;
|
||||
basic_block alternate_exit = EXIT_BLOCK_PTR;
|
||||
int current_function_uses_addressof;
|
||||
bool no_sibcalls_this_function = false;
|
||||
int successful_sibling_call = 0;
|
||||
int replaced_call_placeholder = 0;
|
||||
edge e;
|
||||
@ -595,6 +595,12 @@ optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_calls ()
|
||||
if (n_basic_blocks == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we are using sjlj exceptions, we may need to add a call to
|
||||
_Unwind_SjLj_Unregister at exit of the function. Which means
|
||||
that we cannot do any sibcall transformations. */
|
||||
if (USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS && current_function_has_exception_handlers ())
|
||||
no_sibcalls_this_function = true;
|
||||
|
||||
return_value_pseudo = NULL_RTX;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Find the exit block.
|
||||
@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_calls ()
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the function uses ADDRESSOF, we can't (easily) determine
|
||||
at this point if the value will end up on the stack. */
|
||||
current_function_uses_addressof = sequence_uses_addressof (insns);
|
||||
no_sibcalls_this_function |= sequence_uses_addressof (insns);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Walk the insn chain and find any CALL_PLACEHOLDER insns. We need to
|
||||
select one of the insn sequences attached to each CALL_PLACEHOLDER.
|
||||
@ -685,11 +691,10 @@ optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_calls ()
|
||||
|
||||
/* See if there are any reasons we can't perform either sibling or
|
||||
tail call optimizations. We must be careful with stack slots
|
||||
which are live at potential optimization sites. ??? The first
|
||||
test is overly conservative and should be replaced. */
|
||||
if (frame_offset
|
||||
/* Can't take address of local var if used by recursive call. */
|
||||
|| current_function_uses_addressof
|
||||
which are live at potential optimization sites. */
|
||||
if (no_sibcalls_this_function
|
||||
/* ??? Overly conservative. */
|
||||
|| frame_offset
|
||||
/* Any function that calls setjmp might have longjmp called from
|
||||
any called function. ??? We really should represent this
|
||||
properly in the CFG so that this needn't be special cased. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user