Removed obsolete comment.

From-SVN: r30488
This commit is contained in:
Joern Rennecke 1999-11-11 14:36:30 +00:00
parent 665853dc7a
commit 7467c975b3

View File

@ -4699,14 +4699,6 @@ find_reloads_address (mode, memrefloc, ad, loc, opnum, type, ind_levels, insn)
that the index needs a reload and find_reloads_address_1 will take care
of it.
There is still a case when we might generate an extra reload,
however. In certain cases eliminate_regs will return a MEM for a REG
(see the code there for details). In those cases, memory_address_p
applied to our address will return 0 so we will think that our offset
must be too large. But it might indeed be valid and the only problem
is that a MEM is present where a REG should be. This case should be
very rare and there doesn't seem to be any way to avoid it.
If we decide to do something here, it must be that
`double_reg_address_ok' is true and that this address rtl was made by
eliminate_regs. We generate a reload of the fp/sp/ap + constant and