semantics.c (finish_stmt_expr): Fix typo in comment.

* semantics.c (finish_stmt_expr): Fix typo in comment.
	* tree.c (search_tree): Handle EXIT_EXPR, LOOP_EXPR.
	(mapcar): Likewise.
	* init.c (build_vec_delete_1): Make the children of a permanent
	BIND_EXPR permanent.
	* pt.c (register_specialization): Don't register a specialization
	more than once.

From-SVN: r28781

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+1999-08-20  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* semantics.c (finish_stmt_expr): Fix typo in comment.
+	* tree.c (search_tree): Handle EXIT_EXPR, LOOP_EXPR.
+	(mapcar): Likewise.
+	* init.c (build_vec_delete_1): Make the children of a permanent
+	BIND_EXPR permanent.
+	* pt.c (register_specialization): Don't register a specialization
+	more than once.
+	
 1999-08-18  Andrew Haley  <aph@cygnus.com>
 
 	* method.c (process_overload_item): Call build_mangled_C9x_name ()

gcc/cp/init.c

@@ -2673,6 +2673,15 @@ build_vec_delete_1 (base, maxindex, type, auto_delete_vec, auto_delete,
 
   if (controller)
     {
+      /* The CONTROLLER is a BIND_EXPR.  Such things are always
+	 allocated on at least the saveable obstack.  Since we may
+	 need to copy this expression to the permanent obstack, we
+	 must make sure that the operand is on the same obstack as the
+	 BIND_EXPR.  Otherwise, copy_to_permanent will not copy the
+	 operand, since it will assume that anything under a permanent
+	 node is permanent.  */
+      if (TREE_PERMANENT (controller))
+	body = copy_to_permanent (body);
       TREE_OPERAND (controller, 1) = body;
       return controller;
     }

gcc/cp/pt.c

@@ -842,59 +842,68 @@ register_specialization (spec, tmpl, args)
   for (s = DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS (tmpl);
        s != NULL_TREE;
        s = TREE_CHAIN (s))
-    if (comp_template_args (TREE_PURPOSE (s), args))
-      {
-	tree fn = TREE_VALUE (s);
+    {
+      tree fn = TREE_VALUE (s);
 
-	if (DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (spec))
-	  {
-	    if (DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (fn))
-	      {
-		if (TREE_USED (fn) 
-		    || DECL_EXPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (fn))
-		  {
-		    cp_error ("specialization of %D after instantiation",
-			      fn);
-		    return spec;
-		  }
-		else
-		  {
-		    /* This situation should occur only if the first
-		       specialization is an implicit instantiation,
-		       the second is an explicit specialization, and
-		       the implicit instantiation has not yet been
-		       used.  That situation can occur if we have
-		       implicitly instantiated a member function and
-		       then specialized it later.
+      /* We can sometimes try to re-register a specialization that we've
+	 already got.  In particular, regenerate_decl_from_template
+	 calls duplicate_decls which will update the specialization
+	 list.  But, we'll still get called again here anyhow.  It's
+	 more convenient to simply allow this than to try to prevent it.  */
+      if (fn == spec)
+	return spec;
+      else if (comp_template_args (TREE_PURPOSE (s), args))
+	{
+	  if (DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (spec))
+	    {
+	      if (DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (fn))
+		{
+		  if (TREE_USED (fn) 
+		      || DECL_EXPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (fn))
+		    {
+		      cp_error ("specialization of %D after instantiation",
+				fn);
+		      return spec;
+		    }
+		  else
+		    {
+		      /* This situation should occur only if the first
+			 specialization is an implicit instantiation,
+			 the second is an explicit specialization, and
+			 the implicit instantiation has not yet been
+			 used.  That situation can occur if we have
+			 implicitly instantiated a member function and
+			 then specialized it later.
 
-		       We can also wind up here if a friend
-		       declaration that looked like an instantiation
-		       turns out to be a specialization:
+			 We can also wind up here if a friend
+			 declaration that looked like an instantiation
+			 turns out to be a specialization:
 
-		         template <class T> void foo(T);
-			 class S { friend void foo<>(int) };
-			 template <> void foo(int);  
+			   template <class T> void foo(T);
+			   class S { friend void foo<>(int) };
+			   template <> void foo(int);  
 
-		       We transform the existing DECL in place so that
-		       any pointers to it become pointers to the
-		       updated declaration.  
+			 We transform the existing DECL in place so that
+			 any pointers to it become pointers to the
+			 updated declaration.  
 
-		       If there was a definition for the template, but
-		       not for the specialization, we want this to
-		       look as if there is no definition, and vice
-		       versa.  */
-		    DECL_INITIAL (fn) = NULL_TREE;
-		    duplicate_decls (spec, fn);
+			 If there was a definition for the template, but
+			 not for the specialization, we want this to
+			 look as if there is no definition, and vice
+			 versa.  */
+		      DECL_INITIAL (fn) = NULL_TREE;
+		      duplicate_decls (spec, fn);
 
-		    return fn;
-		  }
-	      }
-	    else if (DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (fn))
-	      {
-		duplicate_decls (spec, fn);
-		return fn;
-	      }
-	  }
+		      return fn;
+		    }
+		}
+	      else if (DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (fn))
+		{
+		  duplicate_decls (spec, fn);
+		  return fn;
+		}
+	    }
+	}
       }
 
   DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS (tmpl)

gcc/cp/semantics.c

@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ finish_stmt_expr (rtl_expr, expr)
 
   if (TREE_CODE (expr) == BLOCK)
     {
-      /* Make a CP_BIND_EXPR for the BLOCK already made.  */
+      /* Make a BIND_EXPR for the BLOCK already made.  */
       if (building_stmt_tree ())
 	{
 	  result = build_min (STMT_EXPR, last_expr_type, last_tree);

gcc/cp/tree.c

@@ -1668,6 +1668,8 @@ search_tree (t, func)
     case CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR:
     case LOOKUP_EXPR:
     case THROW_EXPR:
+    case EXIT_EXPR:
+    case LOOP_EXPR:
       TRY (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
       break;
 
@@ -2001,6 +2003,8 @@ mapcar (t, func)
       return t;
 
     case LOOKUP_EXPR:
+    case EXIT_EXPR:
+    case LOOP_EXPR:
       t = copy_node (t);
       TREE_OPERAND (t, 0) = mapcar (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0), func);
       return t;

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash49.C

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// Build don't link:
+// Origin: Loring Holden <lsh@cs.brown.edu> 
+
+template <class T>
+class REFptr {
+   public:
+      virtual ~REFptr();
+      REFptr<T> &operator =  (const REFptr<T>& p);
+};
+
+class STR { };
+class str_ptr : public REFptr<STR> { };
+
+template <class T>
+class ARRAY {
+ protected:
+   T      *_array; 
+   int     _num;   
+   int     _max;  
+ public:
+   virtual void realloc(int new_max) {
+       _max = new_max;
+       T *tmp = new T [_max];
+       if (tmp == 0) return;
+       for (int i=0; i<_num; i++) {
+          tmp[i] = _array[i];
+       }
+       delete [] _array;
+       _array = tmp;
+   }
+};
+
+int
+main()
+{
+   ARRAY<str_ptr> tags;
+}