RISC-V: Add detailed comments on processing implied extensions. [NFC]

In some cases, we don't need to handle implied extensions. Add detailed
comments to help developers understand what implied ISAs should be
considered.

libgcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/riscv/feature_bits.c (__init_riscv_features_bits_linux):
	Add detailed comments on processing implied extensions.

Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <chenyangyu@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
This commit is contained in:
Yangyu Chen 2024-10-14 18:31:06 +08:00 committed by Kito Cheng
parent accb85345e
commit 1c507a02f2

View File

@ -290,9 +290,12 @@ static void __init_riscv_features_bits_linux ()
}
const struct riscv_hwprobe hwprobe_ima_ext = hwprobes[4];
/* Every time we add new extensions, we should check if previous extensions
imply the new extension and set the corresponding bit. */
imply the new extension and set the corresponding bit.
We don't need to handle cases where:
1. The new extension implies a previous extension (e.g., Zve32f -> F).
2. The extensions imply some other extensions appear in the same release
version of Linux Kernel (e.g., Zbc - > Zbkc). */
if (hwprobe_ima_ext.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD)
{
@ -397,7 +400,7 @@ __init_riscv_feature_bits ()
#ifdef __linux
__init_riscv_features_bits_linux ();
#else
/* Unsupported, just initlizaed that into all zeros. */
/* Unsupported, just initialize that into all zeros. */
__riscv_feature_bits.length = 0;
__riscv_vendor_feature_bits.length = 0;
__riscv_cpu_model.mvendorid = 0;