From 11a6bfd046706988ac50624c932d7945a4b5b1f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 20:28:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Removing one unnecessary comment.  It should be in the
 previous i960.h patch.

From-SVN: r30512
---
 gcc/config/i960/i960.h | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i960/i960.h b/gcc/config/i960/i960.h
index 5f293366425a..dcb4f09cabce 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i960/i960.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i960/i960.h
@@ -612,10 +612,6 @@ extern int hard_regno_mode_ok ();
 /* ??? It isn't clear to me why this is here.  Perhaps because of a bug (since
    fixed) in the definition of INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET which would have
    caused this to fail.  */
-/* ??? Must check current_function_has_nonlocal_goto, otherwise frame pointer
-   elimination messes up nonlocal goto sequences.  I think this works for other
-   targets because they use indirect jumps for the return which disables fp
-   elimination.  */
 #define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED (! leaf_function_p ())
 
 /* Definitions for register eliminations.