mirror of
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2025-04-10 21:41:14 +08:00
itypes.adb (Create_Itype): Use new name Access_Subprogram_Kind
2008-03-26 Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> * itypes.adb (Create_Itype): Use new name Access_Subprogram_Kind * sem_ch13.adb (Validate_Unchecked_Conversion): Give warning for unchecked conversion for different conventions only for subprogram pointers or on VMS. From-SVN: r133570
This commit is contained in:
parent
f88ecba0bc
commit
0503c53a3f
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ package body Itypes is
|
||||
Set_Is_Frozen (Typ);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
if Ekind in Access_Subprogram_Type_Kind then
|
||||
if Ekind in Access_Subprogram_Kind then
|
||||
Set_Can_Use_Internal_Rep (Typ, not Always_Compatible_Rep_On_Target);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
|
||||
-- --
|
||||
-- B o d y --
|
||||
-- --
|
||||
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2007, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
||||
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
||||
-- --
|
||||
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
||||
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
||||
@ -180,17 +180,16 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
and then Attribute_Name (N) = Name_Address
|
||||
then
|
||||
declare
|
||||
Nam : Node_Id := Prefix (N);
|
||||
P : Node_Id;
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
while False
|
||||
or else Nkind (Nam) = N_Selected_Component
|
||||
or else Nkind (Nam) = N_Indexed_Component
|
||||
loop
|
||||
Nam := Prefix (Nam);
|
||||
P := Prefix (N);
|
||||
while Nkind_In (P, N_Selected_Component, N_Indexed_Component) loop
|
||||
P := Prefix (P);
|
||||
end loop;
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Entity_Name (Nam) then
|
||||
return Entity (Nam);
|
||||
if Is_Entity_Name (P) then
|
||||
return Entity (P);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
@ -1392,6 +1391,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
Set_Has_Small_Clause (U_Ent);
|
||||
Set_Has_Small_Clause (Implicit_Base);
|
||||
Set_Has_Non_Standard_Rep (Implicit_Base);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Recompute RM_Size, but shouldn't this be done in Freeze???
|
||||
|
||||
Set_Discrete_RM_Size (U_Ent);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end Small;
|
||||
@ -1749,10 +1751,10 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
while Present (Decl) loop
|
||||
DeclO := Original_Node (Decl);
|
||||
if Comes_From_Source (DeclO)
|
||||
and then Nkind (DeclO) /= N_Pragma
|
||||
and then Nkind (DeclO) /= N_Use_Package_Clause
|
||||
and then Nkind (DeclO) /= N_Use_Type_Clause
|
||||
and then Nkind (DeclO) /= N_Implicit_Label_Declaration
|
||||
and not Nkind_In (DeclO, N_Pragma,
|
||||
N_Use_Package_Clause,
|
||||
N_Use_Type_Clause,
|
||||
N_Implicit_Label_Declaration)
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_N
|
||||
("this declaration not allowed in machine code subprogram",
|
||||
@ -1769,9 +1771,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
while Present (Stmt) loop
|
||||
StmtO := Original_Node (Stmt);
|
||||
if Comes_From_Source (StmtO)
|
||||
and then Nkind (StmtO) /= N_Pragma
|
||||
and then Nkind (StmtO) /= N_Label
|
||||
and then Nkind (StmtO) /= N_Code_Statement
|
||||
and then not Nkind_In (StmtO, N_Pragma,
|
||||
N_Label,
|
||||
N_Code_Statement)
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_N
|
||||
("this statement is not allowed in machine code subprogram",
|
||||
@ -2284,7 +2286,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
-- The only pragma of interest is Complete_Representation
|
||||
|
||||
if Chars (CC) = Name_Complete_Representation then
|
||||
if Pragma_Name (CC) = Name_Complete_Representation then
|
||||
CR_Pragma := CC;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2346,13 +2348,12 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
elsif Present (Component_Clause (Comp)) then
|
||||
|
||||
-- Diagose duplicate rep clause, or check consistency
|
||||
-- if this is inherited component. In a double fault,
|
||||
-- if this is an inherited component. In a double fault,
|
||||
-- there may be a duplicate inconsistent clause for an
|
||||
-- inherited component.
|
||||
|
||||
if
|
||||
Scope (Original_Record_Component (Comp)) = Rectype
|
||||
or else Parent (Component_Clause (Comp)) = N
|
||||
if Scope (Original_Record_Component (Comp)) = Rectype
|
||||
or else Parent (Component_Clause (Comp)) = N
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Component_Clause (Comp));
|
||||
Error_Msg_N ("component clause previously given#", CC);
|
||||
@ -2360,7 +2361,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
else
|
||||
declare
|
||||
Rep1 : constant Node_Id := Component_Clause (Comp);
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
if Intval (Position (Rep1)) /=
|
||||
Intval (Position (CC))
|
||||
@ -2371,7 +2371,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_N ("component clause inconsistent "
|
||||
& "with representation of ancestor", CC);
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs then
|
||||
Error_Msg_N ("?redundant component clause "
|
||||
& "for inherited component!", CC);
|
||||
@ -2467,30 +2466,30 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end loop;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Now that we have processed all the component clauses, check for
|
||||
-- overlap. We have to leave this till last, since the components
|
||||
-- can appear in any arbitrary order in the representation clause.
|
||||
-- overlap. We have to leave this till last, since the components can
|
||||
-- appear in any arbitrary order in the representation clause.
|
||||
|
||||
-- We do not need this check if all specified ranges were monotonic,
|
||||
-- as recorded by Overlap_Check_Required being False at this stage.
|
||||
|
||||
-- This first section checks if there are any overlapping entries
|
||||
-- at all. It does this by sorting all entries and then seeing if
|
||||
-- there are any overlaps. If there are none, then that is decisive,
|
||||
-- but if there are overlaps, they may still be OK (they may result
|
||||
-- from fields in different variants).
|
||||
-- This first section checks if there are any overlapping entries at
|
||||
-- all. It does this by sorting all entries and then seeing if there are
|
||||
-- any overlaps. If there are none, then that is decisive, but if there
|
||||
-- are overlaps, they may still be OK (they may result from fields in
|
||||
-- different variants).
|
||||
|
||||
if Overlap_Check_Required then
|
||||
Overlap_Check1 : declare
|
||||
|
||||
OC_Fbit : array (0 .. Ccount) of Uint;
|
||||
-- First-bit values for component clauses, the value is the
|
||||
-- offset of the first bit of the field from start of record.
|
||||
-- The zero entry is for use in sorting.
|
||||
-- First-bit values for component clauses, the value is the offset
|
||||
-- of the first bit of the field from start of record. The zero
|
||||
-- entry is for use in sorting.
|
||||
|
||||
OC_Lbit : array (0 .. Ccount) of Uint;
|
||||
-- Last-bit values for component clauses, the value is the
|
||||
-- offset of the last bit of the field from start of record.
|
||||
-- The zero entry is for use in sorting.
|
||||
-- Last-bit values for component clauses, the value is the offset
|
||||
-- of the last bit of the field from start of record. The zero
|
||||
-- entry is for use in sorting.
|
||||
|
||||
OC_Count : Natural := 0;
|
||||
-- Count of entries in OC_Fbit and OC_Lbit
|
||||
@ -2548,10 +2547,10 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end Overlap_Check1;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- If Overlap_Check_Required is still True, then we have to do
|
||||
-- the full scale overlap check, since we have at least two fields
|
||||
-- that do overlap, and we need to know if that is OK since they
|
||||
-- are in the same variant, or whether we have a definite problem
|
||||
-- If Overlap_Check_Required is still True, then we have to do the full
|
||||
-- scale overlap check, since we have at least two fields that do
|
||||
-- overlap, and we need to know if that is OK since they are in
|
||||
-- different variant, or whether we have a definite problem.
|
||||
|
||||
if Overlap_Check_Required then
|
||||
Overlap_Check2 : declare
|
||||
@ -2569,7 +2568,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
-- Loop through all components in record. For each component check
|
||||
-- for overlap with any of the preceding elements on the component
|
||||
-- list containing the component, and also, if the component is in
|
||||
-- list containing the component and also, if the component is in
|
||||
-- a variant, check against components outside the case structure.
|
||||
-- This latter test is repeated recursively up the variant tree.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2597,7 +2596,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
Component_List_Loop : loop
|
||||
|
||||
-- If derived type definition, go to full declaration
|
||||
-- If at outer level, check discriminants if there are any
|
||||
-- If at outer level, check discriminants if there are any.
|
||||
|
||||
if Nkind (Clist) = N_Derived_Type_Definition then
|
||||
Clist := Parent (Clist);
|
||||
@ -2605,8 +2604,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
-- Outer level of record definition, check discriminants
|
||||
|
||||
if Nkind (Clist) = N_Full_Type_Declaration
|
||||
or else Nkind (Clist) = N_Private_Type_Declaration
|
||||
if Nkind_In (Clist, N_Full_Type_Declaration,
|
||||
N_Private_Type_Declaration)
|
||||
then
|
||||
if Has_Discriminants (Defining_Identifier (Clist)) then
|
||||
C2_Ent :=
|
||||
@ -2644,23 +2643,22 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
-- be a variant, in which case its parent is a variant part,
|
||||
-- and the parent of the variant part is a component list
|
||||
-- whose components must all be checked against the current
|
||||
-- component for overlap.
|
||||
-- component for overlap).
|
||||
|
||||
if Nkind (Parent (Clist)) = N_Variant then
|
||||
Clist := Parent (Parent (Parent (Clist)));
|
||||
|
||||
-- Check for possible discriminant part in record, this is
|
||||
-- treated essentially as another level in the recursion.
|
||||
-- For this case we have the parent of the component list
|
||||
-- is the record definition, and its parent is the full
|
||||
-- type declaration which contains the discriminant
|
||||
-- specifications.
|
||||
-- For this case the parent of the component list is the
|
||||
-- record definition, and its parent is the full type
|
||||
-- declaration containing the discriminant specifications.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Nkind (Parent (Clist)) = N_Record_Definition then
|
||||
Clist := Parent (Parent ((Clist)));
|
||||
|
||||
-- If neither of these two cases, we are at the top of
|
||||
-- the tree
|
||||
-- the tree.
|
||||
|
||||
else
|
||||
exit Component_List_Loop;
|
||||
@ -2674,24 +2672,23 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end Overlap_Check2;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- For records that have component clauses for all components, and
|
||||
-- whose size is less than or equal to 32, we need to know the size
|
||||
-- in the front end to activate possible packed array processing
|
||||
-- where the component type is a record.
|
||||
-- For records that have component clauses for all components, and whose
|
||||
-- size is less than or equal to 32, we need to know the size in the
|
||||
-- front end to activate possible packed array processing where the
|
||||
-- component type is a record.
|
||||
|
||||
-- At this stage Hbit + 1 represents the first unused bit from all
|
||||
-- the component clauses processed, so if the component clauses are
|
||||
-- At this stage Hbit + 1 represents the first unused bit from all the
|
||||
-- component clauses processed, so if the component clauses are
|
||||
-- complete, then this is the length of the record.
|
||||
|
||||
-- For records longer than System.Storage_Unit, and for those where
|
||||
-- not all components have component clauses, the back end determines
|
||||
-- the length (it may for example be appopriate to round up the size
|
||||
-- to some convenient boundary, based on alignment considerations etc).
|
||||
-- For records longer than System.Storage_Unit, and for those where not
|
||||
-- all components have component clauses, the back end determines the
|
||||
-- length (it may for example be appopriate to round up the size
|
||||
-- to some convenient boundary, based on alignment considerations, etc).
|
||||
|
||||
if Unknown_RM_Size (Rectype)
|
||||
and then Hbit + 1 <= 32
|
||||
then
|
||||
-- Nothing to do if at least one component with no component clause
|
||||
if Unknown_RM_Size (Rectype) and then Hbit + 1 <= 32 then
|
||||
|
||||
-- Nothing to do if at least one component has no component clause
|
||||
|
||||
Comp := First_Component_Or_Discriminant (Rectype);
|
||||
while Present (Comp) loop
|
||||
@ -2722,9 +2719,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
-- If no Complete_Representation pragma, warn if missing components
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Warn_On_Unrepped_Components
|
||||
and then not Warnings_Off (Rectype)
|
||||
then
|
||||
elsif Warn_On_Unrepped_Components then
|
||||
declare
|
||||
Num_Repped_Components : Nat := 0;
|
||||
Num_Unrepped_Components : Nat := 0;
|
||||
@ -2736,7 +2731,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
while Present (Comp) loop
|
||||
if Present (Component_Clause (Comp)) then
|
||||
Num_Repped_Components := Num_Repped_Components + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
else
|
||||
Num_Unrepped_Components := Num_Unrepped_Components + 1;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
@ -2763,6 +2757,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
and then (Is_Scalar_Type (Underlying_Type (Etype (Comp)))
|
||||
or else Size_Known_At_Compile_Time
|
||||
(Underlying_Type (Etype (Comp))))
|
||||
and then not Has_Warnings_Off (Rectype)
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Comp);
|
||||
Error_Msg_NE
|
||||
@ -2786,9 +2781,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
if Present (Component_Clause (C1_Ent))
|
||||
and then Present (Component_Clause (C2_Ent))
|
||||
then
|
||||
-- Exclude odd case where we have two tag fields in the same
|
||||
-- record, both at location zero. This seems a bit strange,
|
||||
-- but it seems to happen in some circumstances ???
|
||||
-- Exclude odd case where we have two tag fields in the same record,
|
||||
-- both at location zero. This seems a bit strange, but it seems to
|
||||
-- happen in some circumstances ???
|
||||
|
||||
if Chars (C1_Ent) = Name_uTag
|
||||
and then Chars (C2_Ent) = Name_uTag
|
||||
@ -2830,14 +2825,14 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
U_Ent : Entity_Id)
|
||||
is
|
||||
procedure Check_At_Constant_Address (Nod : Node_Id);
|
||||
-- Checks that the given node N represents a name whose 'Address
|
||||
-- is constant (in the same sense as OK_Constant_Address_Clause,
|
||||
-- i.e. the address value is the same at the point of declaration
|
||||
-- of U_Ent and at the time of elaboration of the address clause.
|
||||
-- Checks that the given node N represents a name whose 'Address is
|
||||
-- constant (in the same sense as OK_Constant_Address_Clause, i.e. the
|
||||
-- address value is the same at the point of declaration of U_Ent and at
|
||||
-- the time of elaboration of the address clause.
|
||||
|
||||
procedure Check_Expr_Constants (Nod : Node_Id);
|
||||
-- Checks that Nod meets the requirements for a constant address
|
||||
-- clause in the sense of the enclosing procedure.
|
||||
-- Checks that Nod meets the requirements for a constant address clause
|
||||
-- in the sense of the enclosing procedure.
|
||||
|
||||
procedure Check_List_Constants (Lst : List_Id);
|
||||
-- Check that all elements of list Lst meet the requirements for a
|
||||
@ -2937,11 +2932,11 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
-- If the node is an object declaration without initial
|
||||
-- value, some code has been expanded, and the expression
|
||||
-- is not constant, even if the constituents might be
|
||||
-- acceptable, as in A'Address + offset.
|
||||
-- acceptable, as in A'Address + offset.
|
||||
|
||||
if Ekind (Ent) = E_Variable
|
||||
and then Nkind (Declaration_Node (Ent))
|
||||
= N_Object_Declaration
|
||||
and then
|
||||
Nkind (Declaration_Node (Ent)) = N_Object_Declaration
|
||||
and then
|
||||
No (Expression (Declaration_Node (Ent)))
|
||||
then
|
||||
@ -2981,16 +2976,16 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
or else
|
||||
Ekind (Ent) = E_In_Parameter
|
||||
then
|
||||
-- This is the case where we must have Ent defined
|
||||
-- before U_Ent. Clearly if they are in different
|
||||
-- units this requirement is met since the unit
|
||||
-- containing Ent is already processed.
|
||||
-- This is the case where we must have Ent defined before
|
||||
-- U_Ent. Clearly if they are in different units this
|
||||
-- requirement is met since the unit containing Ent is
|
||||
-- already processed.
|
||||
|
||||
if not In_Same_Source_Unit (Ent, U_Ent) then
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Otherwise location of Ent must be before the
|
||||
-- location of U_Ent, that's what prior defined means.
|
||||
-- Otherwise location of Ent must be before the location
|
||||
-- of U_Ent, that's what prior defined means.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Sloc (Ent) < Loc_U_Ent then
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -3107,15 +3102,15 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
when N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion =>
|
||||
Check_Expr_Constants (Expression (Nod));
|
||||
|
||||
-- If this is a rewritten unchecked conversion, subtypes
|
||||
-- in this node are those created within the instance.
|
||||
-- To avoid order of elaboration issues, replace them
|
||||
-- with their base types. Note that address clauses can
|
||||
-- cause order of elaboration problems because they are
|
||||
-- elaborated by the back-end at the point of definition,
|
||||
-- and may mention entities declared in between (as long
|
||||
-- as everything is static). It is user-friendly to allow
|
||||
-- unchecked conversions in this context.
|
||||
-- If this is a rewritten unchecked conversion, subtypes in
|
||||
-- this node are those created within the instance. To avoid
|
||||
-- order of elaboration issues, replace them with their base
|
||||
-- types. Note that address clauses can cause order of
|
||||
-- elaboration problems because they are elaborated by the
|
||||
-- back-end at the point of definition, and may mention
|
||||
-- entities declared in between (as long as everything is
|
||||
-- static). It is user-friendly to allow unchecked conversions
|
||||
-- in this context.
|
||||
|
||||
if Nkind (Original_Node (Nod)) = N_Function_Call then
|
||||
Set_Etype (Expression (Nod),
|
||||
@ -3275,7 +3270,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
if Siz < M then
|
||||
|
||||
-- Size is less than minimum size, but one possibility remains
|
||||
-- that we can manage with the new size if we bias the type
|
||||
-- that we can manage with the new size if we bias the type.
|
||||
|
||||
M := UI_From_Int (Minimum_Size (UT, Biased => True));
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3347,9 +3342,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
else
|
||||
declare
|
||||
Id : constant Attribute_Id := Get_Attribute_Id (Chars (N));
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
return Id = Attribute_Input
|
||||
return Id = Attribute_Input
|
||||
or else Id = Attribute_Output
|
||||
or else Id = Attribute_Read
|
||||
or else Id = Attribute_Write
|
||||
@ -3397,7 +3391,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
-- we have short and long addresses, and it is possible for an access
|
||||
-- type to have a short address size (and thus be less than the size
|
||||
-- of System.Address itself). We simply skip the check for VMS, and
|
||||
-- leave the back end to do the check.
|
||||
-- leave it to the back end to do the check.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Is_Access_Type (T) then
|
||||
if OpenVMS_On_Target then
|
||||
@ -3415,9 +3409,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Is_Discrete_Type (T) then
|
||||
|
||||
-- The following loop is looking for the nearest compile time
|
||||
-- known bounds following the ancestor subtype chain. The idea
|
||||
-- is to find the most restrictive known bounds information.
|
||||
-- The following loop is looking for the nearest compile time known
|
||||
-- bounds following the ancestor subtype chain. The idea is to find
|
||||
-- the most restrictive known bounds information.
|
||||
|
||||
Ancest := T;
|
||||
loop
|
||||
@ -3453,17 +3447,17 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end loop;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Fixed-point types. We can't simply use Expr_Value to get the
|
||||
-- Corresponding_Integer_Value values of the bounds, since these
|
||||
-- do not get set till the type is frozen, and this routine can
|
||||
-- be called before the type is frozen. Similarly the test for
|
||||
-- bounds being static needs to include the case where we have
|
||||
-- unanalyzed real literals for the same reason.
|
||||
-- Corresponding_Integer_Value values of the bounds, since these do not
|
||||
-- get set till the type is frozen, and this routine can be called
|
||||
-- before the type is frozen. Similarly the test for bounds being static
|
||||
-- needs to include the case where we have unanalyzed real literals for
|
||||
-- the same reason.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Is_Fixed_Point_Type (T) then
|
||||
|
||||
-- The following loop is looking for the nearest compile time
|
||||
-- known bounds following the ancestor subtype chain. The idea
|
||||
-- is to find the most restrictive known bounds information.
|
||||
-- The following loop is looking for the nearest compile time known
|
||||
-- bounds following the ancestor subtype chain. The idea is to find
|
||||
-- the most restrictive known bounds information.
|
||||
|
||||
Ancest := T;
|
||||
loop
|
||||
@ -3532,8 +3526,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Signed case. Note that we consider types like range 1 .. -1 to be
|
||||
-- signed for the purpose of computing the size, since the bounds
|
||||
-- have to be accomodated in the base type.
|
||||
-- signed for the purpose of computing the size, since the bounds have
|
||||
-- to be accomodated in the base type.
|
||||
|
||||
if Lo < 0 or else Hi < 0 then
|
||||
S := 1;
|
||||
@ -3725,7 +3719,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
return True;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Otherwise check for incompleted type
|
||||
-- Otherwise check for incomplete type
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Incomplete_Or_Private_Type (T)
|
||||
and then No (Underlying_Type (T))
|
||||
@ -3827,23 +3821,22 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Overloadable (T)
|
||||
and then Nkind (N) = N_Pragma
|
||||
and then (Chars (N) = Name_Convention
|
||||
or else
|
||||
Chars (N) = Name_Import
|
||||
or else
|
||||
Chars (N) = Name_Export
|
||||
or else
|
||||
Chars (N) = Name_External
|
||||
or else
|
||||
Chars (N) = Name_Interface)
|
||||
then
|
||||
null;
|
||||
else
|
||||
Record_Rep_Item (T, N);
|
||||
declare
|
||||
Pname : constant Name_Id := Pragma_Name (N);
|
||||
begin
|
||||
if Pname = Name_Convention or else
|
||||
Pname = Name_Import or else
|
||||
Pname = Name_Export or else
|
||||
Pname = Name_External or else
|
||||
Pname = Name_Interface
|
||||
then
|
||||
return False;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Rep item was OK, not too late
|
||||
|
||||
Record_Rep_Item (T, N);
|
||||
return False;
|
||||
end Rep_Item_Too_Late;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3919,8 +3912,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
return not Has_Non_Standard_Rep (T2);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Here the two types both have non-standard representation, and we
|
||||
-- need to determine if they have the same non-standard representation
|
||||
-- Here the two types both have non-standard representation, and we need
|
||||
-- to determine if they have the same non-standard representation.
|
||||
|
||||
-- For arrays, we simply need to test if the component sizes are the
|
||||
-- same. Pragma Pack is reflected in modified component sizes, so this
|
||||
@ -4240,8 +4233,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
|
||||
Target := Ancestor_Subtype (Etype (Act_Unit));
|
||||
|
||||
-- If either type is generic, the instantiation happens within a
|
||||
-- generic unit, and there is nothing to check. The proper check
|
||||
-- If either type is generic, the instantiation happens within a generic
|
||||
-- unit, and there is nothing to check. The proper check
|
||||
-- will happen when the enclosing generic is instantiated.
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Generic_Type (Source) or else Is_Generic_Type (Target) then
|
||||
@ -4271,8 +4264,17 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
and then Convention (Target) /= Convention (Source)
|
||||
and then Warn_On_Unchecked_Conversion
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_N
|
||||
("?conversion between pointers with different conventions!", N);
|
||||
-- Give warnings for subprogram pointers only on most targets. The
|
||||
-- exception is VMS, where data pointers can have different lengths
|
||||
-- depending on the pointer convention.
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Access_Subprogram_Type (Target)
|
||||
or else Is_Access_Subprogram_Type (Source)
|
||||
or else OpenVMS_On_Target
|
||||
then
|
||||
Error_Msg_N
|
||||
("?conversion between pointers with different conventions!", N);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Warn if one of the operands is Ada.Calendar.Time. Do not emit a
|
||||
@ -4305,10 +4307,10 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Make entry in unchecked conversion table for later processing
|
||||
-- by Validate_Unchecked_Conversions, which will check sizes and
|
||||
-- alignments (using values set by the back-end where possible).
|
||||
-- This is only done if the appropriate warning is active
|
||||
-- Make entry in unchecked conversion table for later processing by
|
||||
-- Validate_Unchecked_Conversions, which will check sizes and alignments
|
||||
-- (using values set by the back-end where possible). This is only done
|
||||
-- if the appropriate warning is active.
|
||||
|
||||
if Warn_On_Unchecked_Conversion then
|
||||
Unchecked_Conversions.Append
|
||||
@ -4330,10 +4332,10 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- If unchecked conversion to access type, and access type is
|
||||
-- declared in the same unit as the unchecked conversion, then
|
||||
-- set the No_Strict_Aliasing flag (no strict aliasing is
|
||||
-- implicit in this situation).
|
||||
-- If unchecked conversion to access type, and access type is declared
|
||||
-- in the same unit as the unchecked conversion, then set the
|
||||
-- No_Strict_Aliasing flag (no strict aliasing is implicit in this
|
||||
-- situation).
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Access_Type (Target) and then
|
||||
In_Same_Source_Unit (Target, N)
|
||||
@ -4344,7 +4346,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
-- Generate N_Validate_Unchecked_Conversion node for back end in
|
||||
-- case the back end needs to perform special validation checks.
|
||||
|
||||
-- Shouldn't this be in exp_ch13, since the check only gets done
|
||||
-- Shouldn't this be in Exp_Ch13, since the check only gets done
|
||||
-- if we have full expansion and the back end is called ???
|
||||
|
||||
Vnode :=
|
||||
@ -4352,8 +4354,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
Set_Source_Type (Vnode, Source);
|
||||
Set_Target_Type (Vnode, Target);
|
||||
|
||||
-- If the unchecked conversion node is in a list, just insert before
|
||||
-- it. If not we have some strange case, not worth bothering about.
|
||||
-- If the unchecked conversion node is in a list, just insert before it.
|
||||
-- If not we have some strange case, not worth bothering about.
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_List_Member (N) then
|
||||
Insert_After (N, Vnode);
|
||||
@ -4378,11 +4380,11 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
|
||||
Target_Siz : Uint;
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
-- This validation check, which warns if we have unequal sizes
|
||||
-- for unchecked conversion, and thus potentially implementation
|
||||
-- This validation check, which warns if we have unequal sizes for
|
||||
-- unchecked conversion, and thus potentially implementation
|
||||
-- dependent semantics, is one of the few occasions on which we
|
||||
-- use the official RM size instead of Esize. See description
|
||||
-- in Einfo "Handling of Type'Size Values" for details.
|
||||
-- use the official RM size instead of Esize. See description in
|
||||
-- Einfo "Handling of Type'Size Values" for details.
|
||||
|
||||
if Serious_Errors_Detected = 0
|
||||
and then Known_Static_RM_Size (Source)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user