c++: NRV in lambda in template [PR91217]

tsubst_lambda_expr was producing a function with two blocks that claimed to
be the outermost block in the function body, one from the call to
start_lambda_function in tsubst_lambda_expr, and one from tsubsting the
block added by start_lambda_function when we first parsed the lambda.  This
messed with the named return value optimization, which only works for
variables in the outermost block.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/91217
	* pt.c (tsubst_lambda_expr): Skip the body block from
	DECL_SAVED_TREE.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/91217
	* g++.dg/opt/nrv20.C: New test.

gcc/cp/pt.c

@@ -19433,8 +19433,13 @@ tsubst_lambda_expr (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, tree in_decl)
 	 the purposes of template argument deduction. */
       complain = tf_warning_or_error;
 
-      tsubst_expr (DECL_SAVED_TREE (oldfn), args, complain, r,
-		   /*constexpr*/false);
+      tree saved = DECL_SAVED_TREE (oldfn);
+      if (TREE_CODE (saved) == BIND_EXPR && BIND_EXPR_BODY_BLOCK (saved))
+	/* We already have a body block from start_lambda_function, we don't
+	   need another to confuse NRV (91217).  */
+	saved = BIND_EXPR_BODY (saved);
+
+      tsubst_expr (saved, args, complain, r, /*constexpr*/false);
 
       finish_lambda_function (body);
 

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv20.C

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// PR c++/91217
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options -fdump-tree-gimple }
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "<retval> = a" "gimple" } }
+
+struct A
+{
+  int ar[42];
+};
+
+template <class T>
+A f()
+{
+  return [] { A a; return a; }();
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+  f<int>();
+}