gcc/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/abi.txt

358 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

===========================
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-07/msg00054.html for why this
document exists, why it's incomplete, and what needs to be done still.
===========================
2002-07-30 Benjamin Kosnik
Description of the libstdc++ ABI.
I. What is an ABI? What's covered? What's not?
- scope of document, of use to system integrators.
- What's the deal with C++? Why can't different compiler's object
files link with each other? Bug? Feature?
- compilation includes and linked library binary must match up..
- shared library only, static is immutable.
- What's an ABI?
- library ABI, compiler ABI different issues, (but related)
- GNU C++ does not have a compiler command line option to switch
between various different C++ ABIs. For instance, there is no way to
switch between the gcc-3.0.x ABI, gcc-3.1.x ABI, and the gcc-3.2.x
ABI during compilation. Other C++ compilers do allow this, and some
g++ command line options may change the ABI (-fno-exceptions, see
the complete list), but there is no version switch. Sorry.
To use a specific C++ABI, one must use the corresponding GNU C++
toolchain.
- How can this complexity be managed? What does C++ versioning mean?
Because library and compiler changes often make binaries compiled
with one version of the GNU tools incompatible with binaries
compiled with other (either newer or older) versions of the same GNU
tools, specific techniques are used to make managing this complexity
easier.
The following techniques are used:
- Release versioning on the libgcc_s.so binary.
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.0.1: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.0.2: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.0.3: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.0.4: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.1.0: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.1.1: libgcc_s.so.1
gcc-3.2.0: libgcc_s.so.1
- Release versioning on the libstdc++.so binary.
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: libstdc++.so.3.0.0
gcc-3.0.1: libstdc++.so.3.0.1
gcc-3.0.2: libstdc++.so.3.0.2
gcc-3.0.3: libstdc++.so.3.0.2 (Error, should be libstdc++.so.3.0.3)
gcc-3.0.4: libstdc++.so.3.0.4
gcc-3.1.0: libstdc++.so.4.0.0
gcc-3.1.1: libstdc++.so.4.0.1
gcc-3.2.0: libstdc++.so.5.0.0
- Symbol versioning on the libgcc_s.so binary.
file: gcc/libgcc-std.ver
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.0.1: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.0.2: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.0.3: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.0.4: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.1.0: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.1.1: GCC_3.0
gcc-3.2.0: GCC_3.0
- Symbol versioning on the libstdc++.so binary.
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: (Error, unversioned)
gcc-3.0.1: (Error, unversioned)
gcc-3.0.2: (Error, unversioned)
gcc-3.0.3: (Error, unversioned)
gcc-3.0.4: (Error, unversioned)
gcc-3.1.0: GLIBCPP_3.1, CXXABI_1
gcc-3.1.1: GLIBCPP_3.1, CXXABI_1
gcc-3.2.0: GLIBCPP_3.2, CXXABI_1.2
file: libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu
- Incremental bumping of a compiler pre-defined macro,
__GXX_ABI_VERSION. This macro is defined as the version of the
compiler v3 ABI, with g++ 3.0.x being version 100. This macro will
be automatically defined whenever g++ is used (the curious can
test this by invoking g++ with the '-v' flag.)
This macro is defined in the file "lang-specs.h" in the gcc/cp directory.
Later versions define it in "c-common.c" in the gcc directory.
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.x: 100
gcc-3.1.x: 100 (Error, should be 101)
gcc-3.2.x: 102
- Incremental bumping of a library pre-defined macro,
__GLIBCPP__. This macro is defined as the date the library was
released, in compressed ISO date format, as an unsigned long.
This macro is defined in the file "c++config" in the
"libstdc++-v3/include/bits" directory and is changed every night
by an automated script.
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: 20010615
gcc-3.0.1: 20010819
gcc-3.0.2: 20011023
gcc-3.0.3: 20011220
gcc-3.0.4: 20020220
gcc-3.1.0: 20020514
gcc-3.1.1: 20020725
gcc-3.2.0: (20020731)
- Incremental bumping of a library pre-defined macro,
_GLIBCPP_VERSION. This macro is defined as the released version of
the library, as a string literal. This is only implemented in
gcc-3.1.0 releases and higher.
This macro is defined in the file "c++config" in the
"libstdc++-v3/include/bits" directory and is generated
automatically by autoconf as part of the configure-time generation
of config.h.
It is versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: "3.0.0"
gcc-3.0.1: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.1")
gcc-3.0.2: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.2")
gcc-3.0.3: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.3")
gcc-3.0.4: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.4")
gcc-3.1.0: "3.1.0"
gcc-3.1.1: "3.1.1"
gcc-3.2.0: ("3.2.0")
- Matching each specific C++ compiler release to a specific set of
C++ include files. This is only implemented in gcc-3.1.1 releases
and higher.
All C++ includes are installed in include/c++, then nest in a
directory hierarchy corresponding to the C++ compiler's released
version. This version corresponds to the variable "gcc_version" in
"libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4," and more details can be found in that
file's macro GLIBCPP_CONFIGURE.
C++ includes are versioned as follows:
gcc-3.0.0: include/g++-v3
gcc-3.0.1: include/g++-v3
gcc-3.0.2: include/g++-v3
gcc-3.0.3: include/g++-v3
gcc-3.0.4: include/g++-v3
gcc-3.1.0: include/g++-v3
gcc-3.1.1: include/c++/3.1.1
gcc-3.2.0: include/c++/3.2
Taken together, these techniques can accurately specify interface
and implementation changes in the GNU C++ tools themselves. Used
properly, they allow both the GNU C++ tools implementation, and
programs using them, an evolving yet controlled development that
maintains backward compatibility.
- Minimum environment that supports a versioned ABI: what's needed? A
supported dynamic linker, a GNU linker of sufficient vintage to
understand demangled C++ name globbing (ld), a shared executable
compiled with g++, and shared libraries (libgcc_s, libstdc++-v3)
compiled by a compiler (g++) with a compatible ABI. Phew.
On top of all that, an additional constraint: libstdc++ did not
attempt to version symbols (or age gracefully, really) until version
3.1.0.
Most modern Linux and BSD versions, particularly ones using
gcc-3.1.x tools, will meet the requirements above.
- What configure options impact symbol versioning?
There is only one: --enable-symvers. For more information see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/configopts.html
In particular, libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 has a macro called
GLIBCPP_ENABLE_SYMVERS that defaults to yes (or the argument passed
in via --enable-symvers=foo). At that point, the macro attempts to
make sure that all the requirement for symbol versioning are in
place. For more information, please consult acinclude.m4.
- How can I tell if symbol versioning is, indeed, active?
When the GNU C++ library is being built with symbol versioning on,
you should see the following at configure time for libstdc++-v3:
checking versioning on shared library symbols... gnu
If you don't see this line in the configure output, or if this line
appears but the last word is 'no', then you are out of luck.
If the compiler is pre-installed, a quick way to test is to compile
the following (or any) simple C++ file:
#include <iostream>
int main()
{ std::cout << "hello" << std::endl; return 0; }
%g++ hello.cc -o hello.out
%nm hello.out
If you see symbols in the resulting output with "GLIBCPP_3.x" as part
of the name, then the executable is versioned. Here's an example:
U _ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev@@GLIBCPP_3.1
II. Library ABI changes
The following will cause the library major version number to
increase, say from "libstdc++.so.3.0.4" to "libstdc++.so.4.0.0".
- any g++ compiler ABI changes
- (anything) changing size of an exported symbol
- (anything) changing alignment of an exported symbol
- (anything) changing the layout of an exported symbol
- (anything) changing mangling on an exported symbol
- (anything) deleting an exported symbol
Note: adding an exported symbol, if it's in a new linker map name, is ok.
The following will cause the library revision version number to
increase, say from "libstdc++.so.5.0.0" to "libstdc++.so.5.0.1".
- any release of the gcc toolchain.
III. Versioning
- include files
- versioning headers with version, why necessary
(need to control member/non-member functions, add delete files)
- shared library binaries
- release versions
- libtool versions
- when does so version get a bump? what are the options?
- how is the link map used?
- in an non-abi breaking minor release, how are symbols added?
removed?
- in an abi-breaking major release, what happens? symbol fall back
IV. Testing ABI changes
Currently, there is no formal testing for changes in the libstdc++
ABI. It would be in the best interest of GNU C++ users everywhere to
have such a test, and work to develop this test is ongoing.
There is a formal method for checking the compiler parts of the C++
ABI, donated by Intel. More information can be obtained
<a href="http://developer.intel.com/software/products/opensource/">here.</a>
To test the library, the following two ideas have been suggested:
One.
(Brendan Kehoe, Jeff Law suggestion to run 'make check-c++' two ways,
one with a new compiler and an old library, and the other with an old
compiler and a new library, and look for testsuite regressions)
Two.
Have the libstdc++ testsuite proactive check the library ABI. Probably
a couple of items would be covered, although perhaps not all would
need to be done at once for this to be useful. Compute the list of
names exported in the shared version of libstdc++ binary. Then, save
this list of names. Have this list of names re-computed for each new
binary of the same version. Next, use sizeof, alignof, and offset to
compute offsets for each structure and type in the standard library,
saving to another datafile. Then, compute this for new binaries, and
look for differences.
An example of a way to compute the list of names exported by the
shared libstdc++ binary is:
nm --extern-only --portability libstdc++.so.5.0.0 | awk '{ print $1 $2}'
The thought is to choose one or both of these approaches, and to use a
Makefile hook, perhaps 'make check-abi', to add this capability to the
libstdc++ testsuite.
Perhaps there are other Library ABI checkers. If so, please notify us.
V. Issues not directly addressed, and possible suggestions
- what to do about multi-ABI systems (nathan scenario)?
- compatibility libs
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
- Alexandre Oliva proposal to have extended name attributes, modify ld
- directory-level versioning
- wrapping C++ API's in "C" to use the C ABI.
V. References
ABIcheck, a vague idea of checking ABI compatibility
http://abicheck.sourceforge.net/
C++ ABI reference
http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/
Intel ABI documentation
"Intel<65> Compilers for Linux* -Compatibility with the GNU Compilers"
(included in icc 6.0)
Sun Solaris 2.9 docs
Linker and Libraries Guide (document 816-1386)
C++ Migration Guide (document 816-2459)
http://docs.sun.com/db/prod/solaris.9
http://docs.sun.com/?p=/doc/816-1386&a=load
Ulrich Drepper, "ELF Symbol Versioning"
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/symbol-versioning